ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Educ.
Sec. Digital Education
Digital applications inject new vitality into art education ——Path analysis based on data of art teachers in basic education in China
Provisionally accepted
- Huanghe University of Science and Technology, Zhengzhou, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract: This study analyzes the current situation of art education in China from the perspective of teacher resources and education funding allocation. The article analyzes the educational background composition, geographical distribution, and professional classification of art teachers in the basic art education stage, and finds that there are currently problems such as a low proportion of highly educated teachers, uneven distribution of professional disciplines, teacher resources, and teacher education levels; In the analysis of education funding, it was found that the per capita funding in some provinces does not reach the national average level, which may be due to uneven economic development and differences in the number of students in basic education. In order to change the "teacher gap" and promote educational equality, we will use the digital education full coverage model to improve the quality of education and promote educational equality. This study comprehensively utilized methods such as literature review, policy analysis, interpretation of education statistical reports, survey method, Delphi method, and analytic hierarchy process to analyze the current situation and advantages of digitize in basic art education. Through the CIPP evaluation model, a hierarchical analysis was conducted on the four dimensions of teaching resource allocation, teaching environment foundation, teaching process implementation, and teaching effectiveness evaluation. The expert authority coefficient Cr=0.632 (with 3 decimal places), the expert weighting evaluation index system Y=0.35X1+0.15X2+0.22X3+0.28X4, and the overall Y of the survey subjects=2.726 (with 3 decimal places) were obtained. In the analysis of the differences between traditional and digital schools, digital demonstration school A has a Y score of 2.721, which is equivalent to 82.5 points on a percentage scale; B school Y average=2.715, converted to 78.25 points on a percentage scale. This indicates that digitalize has a certain promoting effect on the development and advancement of basic art education. Propose some rational suggestions based on research results and the current foundation of educational development.
Keywords: Digital Basic Education, Basic education, art education, teacher resources, educational equity
Received: 07 Jun 2025; Accepted: 07 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Shi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Jiawei Shi, 83667710@qq.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.