- School of Psychology, Whitelands College, University of Roehampton, London, United Kingdom
School-based dietary interventions are implemented to improve health outcomes in children and adolescents, yet their impact on mental health and wellbeing remains underexplored. This mini-review synthesized findings from seventeen interventions assessing behavioral functioning and mental health symptoms in children (6–12 years) or adolescents (13–18 years). Most studies were conducted across multiple sites, enabling recruitment of large, diverse populations. More studies were conducted in children compared to adolescents. Behavioral outcomes such as hyperactivity, inattention, and oppositional behavior were commonly assessed in younger children via parent or teacher reports, while adolescent studies more frequently measured mental health symptoms, including depression and anxiety, through self-report. Supplementation, particularly in the context of nutrient deficiencies, was associated with modest improvements in behavioral functioning in children and mental health symptoms in adolescents. However, outcomes varied by the assessor (parent or teacher), and some studies showed placebo effects. In contrast, food reformulation interventions showed no significant impact on mental health outcomes. Despite the use of validated tools, methodological limitations, and variation in participants’ nutritional status limit interpretation. Overall, school-based dietary interventions show potential to improve mental health by reaching large, diverse populations. Further research is needed using standardized, age-appropriate measures and incorporating assessment of nutritional status to understand how diet can support and improve mental health in children and adolescents.
Introduction
Poor mental health among children and adolescents is an increasingly urgent global concern: mental disorders are among the leading causes of disability in young people worldwide, with onset typically peaking at about age 14 (Kieling et al., 2024). Growing evidence suggests rising trends in anxiety, depression and psychological distress among school-aged children (Baranne and Falissard, 2018). In the UK, happiness among 10–15-year-olds has declined since 2013 (Collet et al., 2024), and globally mental health in children further declined because of the Covid-19 pandemic (Racine et al., 2021). In 2022, the UK had the highest proportion (25%) of 15-year-olds reporting low life satisfaction among 27 European countries (Collet et al., 2024). These challenges not only compromise individual wellbeing but also affect academic achievement, social relationships, productivity, and long-term health outcomes (Zhang et al., 2025).
Diet and nutrition play a vital role in the physical growth and cognitive development of children and adolescents (Moore Heslin and McNulty, 2023; Norris et al., 2022). Recent research has also highlighted the importance of diet for mental health (Khalid et al., 2016; O’Neil et al., 2014). A high-quality diet, characterized by the consumption of nutrient-dense foods such as fresh fruits and vegetables, whole grains, legumes, and lean sources of protein, has been associated with lower levels of depression, anxiety, and stress (Jiménez-López et al., 2024; Sinclair et al., 2016). In contrast, a low-quality diet, characterized by a high intake of highly processed, energy-dense foods, has been associated with poor mental health outcomes (Mesas et al., 2022). In fact, adherence to healthy Mediterranean-style dietary patterns appears to have a protective effect, with studies showing associations with reduced symptoms of inattention, hyperactivity, depression, and anxiety (Camprodon-Boadas et al., 2025).
Similarly, deficiencies in key micronutrients may impact mental health outcomes (Kris-Etherton et al., 2021). In children and adolescents, for instance, inadequate levels of omega-3 fatty acids and Vitamin D have been linked to increased risk of depression (Föcker et al., 2017; Saji Parel et al., 2022). Low iron status is associated with internalizing symptoms among adolescents (Fiani et al., 2024), while zinc deficiency has been implicated in both child and maternal mental health (DiGirolamo and Ramirez-Zea, 2009). Furthermore, deficiencies in iron and zinc have been associated with higher severity of inattention and hyperactive symptoms in children with Attention Deficient Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) (Granero et al., 2021).
These issues are compounded by poor dietary behaviors which are observed in children and adolescents. These include a high intake of confectionery, high-sugar beverages, fats, processed meats, refined grains, and ready meals (Moore Heslin and McNulty, 2023). Recent evidence has demonstrated dose–response relationships between diet and common mental health symptoms, where individuals who reported healthier dietary behaviors, such as high consumption of fruit and vegetables and low consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages, alongside other positive lifestyle habits, reported lower levels of mental health symptoms (Smout et al., 2023). Furthermore, low consumption of fruits and vegetables has been consistently associated with depressive symptoms in low-middle income countries (Liu et al., 2020), while unhealthy dietary patterns have been found more commonly among adolescents reporting psychological distress (Shawon et al., 2023). Poor mental health can also influence eating behaviors, where female adolescents experiencing depression or anxiety were found to be more likely to consume higher amounts of sweet and fatty foods (Aparicio et al., 2017). Taken together, these findings highlight the importance of targeting diet, nutrition, and eating behaviors as key strategies for improving mental health outcomes in children and adolescents.
Schools play a vital role in shaping children’s health and offer an ideal setting for delivering nutrition interventions to diverse student populations. As key platforms for health promotion, they can scale interventions to improve diet quality and reduce health inequalities (Woodside et al., 2024, 2021). Evidence indicates that school-based interventions can yield physical and psychosocial benefits, especially for disadvantaged groups (Kristjansson et al., 2015) and may generate long-term cost savings for health and education systems (Wellander et al., 2016). This approach aligns with global strategies outlined by the World Health and Organization (2021).
School-based dietary interventions are diverse and widely implemented. Interventions include the provision of universal school meals (Cohen et al., 2021; Kristjansson et al., 2015), or school breakfast programs (Adolphus et al., 2017; Cueto, 2001), micronutrient supplementation (Kedir et al., 2024; Samson et al., 2022) food fortification (De-Regil et al., 2017), and nutrition education (Medeiros et al., 2022; Peralta et al., 2021). Collectively, these studies show that school-based dietary interventions can improve physical health, cognitive function, and academic performance, particularly among disadvantaged children and adolescents.
Despite the breadth of these interventions, the focus has been on understanding how dietary interventions can impact cognitive and/or academic outcomes. While these outcomes are important, there is a growing recognition of the mental health challenges faced by school-aged children, including anxiety, stress and depression (Fu et al., 2024; Sood et al., 2024). Poor nutrition may also affect cognitive health, behavioral outcomes, and social functioning, which can influence overall school performance and long-term wellbeing (Bellisle, 2004; Benton, 2008; Taras, 2005).
There is a growing recognition of the link between nutrition and mental health, yet current research rarely includes validated assessments of mental health. Therefore, it is unclear how these interventions may influence emotional and behavioral wellbeing of children and adolescents. This mini-review aims to address this gap by synthesizing evidence from school-based dietary interventions that have assessed cognitive, emotional, behavioral, or psychological outcomes. This literature review evaluates what has been measured, how studies have been designed and implemented, and what findings have emerged. It is guided by the following research questions:
(1) What types of mental health-related cognitive, emotional, behavioral, and psychological outcomes have been assessed in school-based dietary interventions, and how have these outcomes been measured across different study designs, populations, and intervention types?
(2) What findings have been reported, and what limitations or methodological issues have been identified?
(3) What gaps exist in the current evidence base, and how can these inform the development of future school-based nutrition interventions that aim to support mental health and wellbeing in children and adolescents?
Methods
The present review followed the PRISMA-ScR framework (Tricco et al., 2018) and employed a systematic search across five electronic databases: PsycINFO, CINAHL, PsycARTICLES, Academic Search Complete (via EBSCOhost), and PubMed. The search was limited to peer-reviewed articles published from 2000 to 2025.
The search was completed on 8th March 2025. Titles and abstracts were screened using Rayyan (Ouzzani et al., 2016). Screening followed predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Articles were included if they met the following criteria:
• Population: School-aged children or adolescents (6–18 years)
• Exposure: Dietary or nutritional interventions, including but not limited to diet, nutrition, food intake, dietary patterns, school meals, eating habits, micronutrient supplementation, sugar intake, fortified or functional foods, meal/diet reformulation, overall dietary quality, and or school food policy or nutrition programs changes
• Outcome: Mental health outcomes, including but not limited to internalizing symptoms (e.g., anxiety, depression, stress) emotional wellbeing, and behavioral functioning (e.g., hyperactivity, inattention, oppositional behavior)
• Context: Intervention delivered in a school-based or educational settings
Studies were excluded if they
• Focused on clinical, early-childhood (<6 years) or adult populations
• Were conducted outside of school environments or focused on non-dietary interventions or broader lifestyle interventions without a dietary component
• Did not assess mental health outcomes
• Were not intervention studies (e.g., observational or cross-sectional studies, or were reviews, editorials, dissertations, or non-peer-reviewed materials
A PRISMA flow diagram summarizes the screening process (Figure 1). Initial screening yielded 2,499 records; after duplicate removal and full-text review, 17 intervention studies were retained for analysis. Risk of bias was not formally assessed, consistent with scoping review methodology (Tricco et al., 2018). For this review, outcomes were grouped into two categories: behavioral outcomes and mental health symptoms. Behavioral outcomes refer to observable behaviors and emotional functioning, such as hyperactivity, inattention, impulsivity, emotional lability, and oppositional behavior, typically assessed through teacher or parent ratings using tools like the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) or Conners Comprehensive Behaviour Rating Scales (CBRS). Mental health symptoms refer specifically to internalising symptoms such as depression, anxiety, and stress, assessed using validated scales such as the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) or adapted anxiety and stress inventories. A narrative synthesis was then conducted and structured into two thematic categories: (1) Dietary intervention types and outcomes assessed, (2) patterns and trends across intervention, outcomes, and study contexts. Table 1 presents key study characteristics, including author and date, country and setting, study design, population characteristics (including sample size and gender), intervention type, outcomes assessed (cognitive, physiological, academic, and mental health), and the tools used to assess mental health outcomes. Table 2 summarizes findings by author, population group (children/adolescents), geographic region and country income level, intervention type, outcomes assessed, main findings and interpretative notes.

Figure 1. PRISMA-ScR flow diagram illustrating the screening and selection process for school-based dietary intervention studies assessing mental health symptoms in children and adolescents.

Table 1. Study design, country and setting, population, intervention type, outcomes assessed, and measurement tools related to mental health of reviewed studies.

Table 2. Population characteristics, region, country and income level, intervention type, outcomes assessed, main findings and interpretative notes of reviewed studies.
Results
Study characteristics: intervention types, study designs and outcomes assessed
The studies included in this review investigated school-based nutrition interventions for children and adolescents across a wide range of countries and regions (see Table 1). Many studies were conducted across multiple sites, and there was a noticeable trend toward targeting rural areas or low-income areas. For instance, Mhurchu et al. (2013) and Murphy et al. (2011) targeted schools in low-income regions, while Neumann et al. (2007), Sigman et al. (2005), Satyanarayana et al. (2024), and Zhang et al. (2013) targeted schools in rural settings. This enabled recruitment from diverse populations, particularly in settings where diet quality is likely to be poor and where interventions may yield the greatest potential benefits (Pradeilles et al., 2019). Eleven studies focused on children aged 6–12 years and typically recruited larger sample sizes ranging from around 100 to over 2000 participants. In contrast, studies involving adolescents were fewer (n = 6) and generally smaller in scale, with sample size of approximately 20–200 participants. This pattern may reflect a broader preference for targeting younger populations, who may be more vulnerable to nutritional deficiencies and more responsive to early dietary interventions (Ares et al., 2024).
Interventions included micronutrient supplementation, food reformulation, and school meal provision, each targeting a specific nutrition concern. Supplementation was used to address nutritional deficiencies, such as iron (Zhang et al., 2013), vitamin D (Satyanarayana et al., 2024), or zinc (DiGirolamo et al., 2010; Üçkardeş et al., 2009), or examine the effects of specific nutrients such as omega-3 fatty acids (Al-Ghannami et al., 2019; Kirby et al., 2010; Parletta et al., 2013; Richardson et al., 2012; Tammam et al., 2016). Food reformulation studies aimed to improve dietary intake through varied approaches, such as aligning meals with national dietary guidelines (Healthy New Nordic Diet; Sørensen et al., 2015), modifying the type of grain provided at breakfast (Kim et al., 2021), offering mixed grain diets (Chung et al., 2012), or enriching a local vegetable stew with either meat, milk or vegetable oil (Neumann et al., 2007; Sigman et al., 2005). School meal programs focused on improved nutrition, improved school attendance and addressing consequences of food insecurity (Mhurchu et al., 2013; Murphy et al., 2011).
Of the 17 studies, supplementation was the most common intervention (n = 10) with a preference for double-blind, placebo Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) design (n = 6). In contrast, food reformulation (n = 5) and school meal interventions (n = 2) were less common and typically used cluster RCT designs (see Table 1). The emphasis on supplementation and RCT study designs reflects its alignment with nutrition research, where RCTs offer the strongest method for establishing cause-and-effect relationships (Weaver and Miller, 2017).
Across studies, mental health outcomes were assessed using standardized measures, although the approach varied by age group. In children, behavioral outcomes, such as hyperactivity, attention, and conduct, were commonly assessed via parent and teacher reports using tools such as the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) (Mhurchu et al., 2013; Murphy et al., 2011), Conners Rating Scales (Richardson et al., 2012; Tammam et al., 2016; Üçkardeş et al., 2009), and the SNAP-IV for ADHD and oppositional symptoms (Kirby et al., 2010). In contrast, adolescent studies focused on internalizing symptoms, such as anxiety and depression, relying on self-report questionnaires such as the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) (Bin Sayeed et al., 2014), an adapted stress scale (Kim et al., 2021), and an adapted General Anxiety Test (Zhang et al., 2013) (see Table 1). Only one study employed clinician-administered interviews (Satyanarayana et al., 2024). This trend may reflect developmental differences in assessment practices, where younger children may be less able to self-report reliably (Johnston and Murray, 2003).
Overall, the studies reflect a strong emphasis on early intervention in younger, at-risk populations, particularly using supplementation strategies. This may indicate a preference for targeted and controlled nutritional intervention approaches. More broadly, these patterns also reflect evidence that schools are a critical setting for addressing nutritional concerns and promoting healthy eating behaviors in children and adolescents, enabling access to large, diverse populations (O’Brien et al., 2021).
Patterns and trends in findings
Across the studies, findings varied depending on outcome type and participant age group. Below, an overview of the findings are presented by outcome type; a summary is included in Table 2.
Behavioral outcomes
Improvements in behavioral and emotional functioning were reported following supplementation and food reformulation interventions. In supplementation studies, parents reported improvements in symptoms such as hyperactivity, emotional lability, oppositional behavior, and impulsivity following supplementation with omega-3 (Kirby et al., 2010; Richardson et al., 2012), or zinc (Üçkardeş et al., 2009). Following omega-3 supplementation, teachers’ reported reductions in disruptive behavior (Tammam et al., 2016), enhanced attention and reduced hyperactivity (Al-Ghannami et al., 2019). However, discrepancies between parent and teacher reports were common, and several studies demonstrated placebo effects. For example, the improvements reported by parents following omega-3 supplementation in studies by Kirby et al. (2010) and Richardson et al. (2012) were not corroborated by teacher assessments, and some improvements were also evident in the control groups, indicating potential placebo effects. A similar pattern was observed for zinc supplementation, where parents reported reductions in symptoms of inattention and hyperactivity; however, these improvements were not confirmed in teacher ratings (Üçkardeş et al., 2009). These patterns highlight the challenges of relying on subjective behavioral assessments and potential influence of expectations and contextual factors (Lapalme et al., 2020).
Behavioral improvements were also observed in food reformulation studies conducted in low-income countries, where children showed improvements in activity levels, leadership, and initiative behaviors (Neumann et al., 2007; Sigman et al., 2005). These populations had high rates of stunting and underweight, suggesting that the intervention may have addressed moderate to severe nutritional deficiencies, which likely contributed to the observed improvements. In contrast, no measurable behavioral improvements were reported after one year of school breakfast programs in high-income countries, despite targeting low-socioeconomic regions (Mhurchu et al., 2013; Murphy et al., 2011). These patterns indicate that interventions may have greater impact in settings where undernutrition and poor diet quality are more prevalent.
Mental health symptoms
In studies assessing mental health symptoms, improvements were reported for symptoms of depression and anxiety following supplementation. Satyanarayana et al. (2024) reported significant reductions in depressive symptoms among adolescents following daily Vitamin D3 supplementation (2,000 IU) over 2 months. Similarly, Zhang et al. (2013) found reduced self-reported anxiety in children following supplementation with a multinutrient formulation containing 5 mg iron as ferrous sulfate. However, findings were not consistent across all studies. DiGirolamo et al. (2010) found no group-level differences in mental health symptoms between zinc-supplemented and control groups, although increased serum zinc was linked to improved parent-rated symptoms. Bin Sayeed et al. (2014) observed within-group improvements in mood and trait anxiety following supplementation with Nigella Sativa, but no differences between treatment and control groups, suggesting possible placebo effects or time-related changes. Importantly, supplementation appeared to address nutritional deficiencies reported in several studies (Vitamin D deficiency, anemia), suggesting that improvements in mental health symptoms may be more likely when interventions are targeting underlying deficiencies.
Food reformulation studies did not report improvements in mental health symptoms. However, this finding is based on two studies, one with a small sample size (Chung et al., 2012), and the other comparing multiple breakfast types rather than testing against a true control condition (no intervention) (Kim et al., 2021). This limits the strength of the conclusion that can be drawn.
Overall, findings suggest that supplementation may offer modest benefits for behavioral and mental health outcomes, particularly in populations with nutritional deficiencies. However, inconsistencies across studies and methodological limitations highlight the need for more rigorous and context-sensitive research to clarify the impact of dietary interventions on mental health.
Research gaps and future directions
School-based dietary interventions show promise in supporting the mental health and wellbeing of children and adolescents. This review highlights the unique role schools can play in recruiting large, diverse populations and targeting at-risk groups. It also demonstrates that rigorous research designs, including RCTs, can be successfully implemented in school settings across varying contexts. However, several important gaps remain.
The evidence is weighted toward studies in children, with adolescents underrepresented overall. This leaves a gap in understanding how school-based dietary interventions may impact adolescent mental health and wellbeing, especially as adolescents may be vulnerable to poor dietary habits and the mental health consequences of inadequate nutrition (Chaudhary et al., 2020; Devine et al., 2023; Samad et al., 2024). Furthermore, relatively few studies assessed mental health symptoms such as depression, anxiety, and stress, and inconsistencies in outcome measurement limit comparability across trials. Given the rising prevalence of these conditions, future research should prioritize the assessment of mental health outcomes in child and adolescent populations using validated, standardized, and age-appropriate measures (Deighton et al., 2014).
Overall, fewer studies included routine assessment of dietary intake or biomarkers of nutritional status, limiting conclusions about whether interventions effectively addressed nutrient deficiencies or the pathways through which nutrition may influence mental health (Gillies et al., 2025; Young et al., 2020). Notably, positive outcomes were more common in studies involving participants with baseline nutritional deficiencies or in those using broad-spectrum formulations (DiGirolamo et al., 2010; Satyanarayana et al., 2024; Zhang et al., 2013). Evidence also suggests that multinutrient approaches may be more effective than single-nutrient supplementation, suggesting that strategies aimed at improving overall nutritional adequacy hold greater potential (Rucklidge et al., 2021).
Despite the popularity of supplementation, few studies investigated whole-diet approaches, even though these have become a major focus in broader nutrition research (Bamber et al., 2007; Chopra et al., 2021; Staudacher et al., 2025). Furthermore, fewer studies employed longitudinal designs or included follow-up data, limiting understanding of the long-term impact of these interventions (Langford et al., 2014). Whole-diet interventions may be more closely aligned with the principles of health-promoting schools, as they are better positioned to address the complex social and contextual factors shaping dietary intake (Woodside et al., 2024, 2021). These approaches may offer more sustainable and meaningful improvements in mental health and wellbeing.
In conclusion, research is needed to evaluate the impact of school-based dietary interventions on mental health across both child and adolescent populations (Zhao et al., 2025). Future work should prioritize whole-diet strategies within school settings, incorporate measures of nutritional status, and include long-term follow-up to capture their sustained potential for improving mental health and wellbeing.
Author contributions
CC: Conceptualization, Resources, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Project administration, Visualization, Supervision, Methodology, Validation, Data curation, Investigation, Software. EG: Supervision, Methodology, Conceptualization, Software, Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Formal analysis, Visualization, Project administration, Validation, Data curation, Resources.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The authors declare that Generative AI was used for the creation of this Manuscript. Generative AI (ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot based on OpenAI’s GPT-4 architecture) was used to assist in editing the manuscript to meet the word count requirements of the review. All content was reviewed by the authors for accuracy and originality.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Adolphus, K., Bellissimo, N., Lawton, C. L., Ford, N. A., Rains, T. M., and Totosy, et al. (2017). Methodological challenges in studies examining the effects of breakfast on cognitive performance and appetite in children and adolescents. Adv. Nutr. 8, 184S–196S. doi: 10.3945/an.116.012831
Al-Ghannami, S. S., Al-Adawi, S., Ghebremeskel, K., Hussein, I. S., Min, Y., Jeyaseelan, L., et al. (2019). Randomized open-label trial of docosahexaenoic acid–enriched fish oil and fish meal on cognitive and behavioral functioning in Omani children. Nutrition 57, 167–172. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2018.04.008
Aparicio, E., Canals, J., Voltas, N., Valenzano, A., and Arija, V. (2017). Emotional symptoms and dietary patterns in early adolescence: A school-based follow-up study. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 49, 405–414.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2017.01.015
Ares, G., De Rosso, S., Mueller, C., Philippe, K., Pickard, A., Nicklaus, S., et al. (2024). Development of food literacy in children and adolescents: Implications for the design of strategies to promote healthier and more sustainable diets. Nutr. Rev. 82, 536–552. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuad072
Bamber, D. J., Stokes, C. S., and Stephen, A. M. (2007). The role of diet in the prevention and management of adolescent depression. Nutr. Bull. 32, 90–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-3010.2007.00608.x
Baranne, M. L., and Falissard, B. (2018). Global burden of mental disorders among cildren aged 5–14 years. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry Ment. Health 12:19. doi: 10.1186/s13034-018-0225-4
Bellisle, F. (2004). Effects of diet on behaviour and cognition in children. Br. J. Nutr. 92, S227–S232. doi: 10.1079/BJN20041171
Benton, D. (2008). The influence of children’s diet on their cognition and behavior. Eur. J. Nutr. 47, 25–37. doi: 10.1007/s00394-008-3003-x
Bin Sayeed, M. S., Shams, T., Fahim Hossain, S., Rahman, R., Mostofa, A. G. M., Fahim Kadir, M., et al. (2014). Nigella sativa L. seeds modulate mood, anxiety and cognition in healthy adolescent males. J. Ethnopharmacol. 152, 156–162. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2013.12.050
Camprodon-Boadas, P., Gil-Dominguez, A., De la Serna, E., Sugranyes, G., Lázaro, I., and Baeza, I. (2025). Mediterranean diet and mental health in children and adolescents: A systematic review. Nutr. Rev. 83, e343–e355. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuae053
Chaudhary, A., Sudzina, F., and Mikkelsen, B. E. (2020). Promoting healthy eating among young people—A review of the evidence of the impact of school-based interventions. Nutrients 12:2894. doi: 10.3390/nu12092894
Chopra, C., Mandalika, S., and Kinger, N. (2021). Does diet play a role in the prevention and management of depression among adolescents? A narrative review. Nutr. Health 27, 243–263. doi: 10.1177/0260106020980532
Chung, Y.-C., Park, C.-H., Kwon, H.-K., Park, Y.-M., Kim, Y. S., Doo, J.-K., et al. (2012). Improved cognitive performance following supplementation with a mixed-grain diet in high school students: A randomized controlled trial. Nutrition 28, 165–172. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2011.05.017
Cohen, J. F. W., Hecht, A. A., McLoughlin, G. M., Turner, L., and Schwartz, M. B. (2021). Universal school meals and associations with student participation, attendance, academic performance, diet quality, food security, and body mass index: A systematic review. Nutrients 13:911. doi: 10.3390/nu13030911
Collet, D., Turner, A., Marquez, J., O’Neil, J., and Moore, L. (2024). The Good Childhood Report 2024. London: The Children’s Society.
Cueto, S. (2001). Breakfast and performance. Public Health Nutr. 4, 1429–1431. doi: 10.1079/PHN2001233
Deighton, J., Croudace, T., Fonagy, P., Brown, J., Patalay, P., and Wolpert, M. (2014). Measuring mental health and wellbeing outcomes for children and adolescents to inform practice and policy: A review of child self-report measures. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry Ment. Health 8:14. doi: 10.1186/1753-2000-8-14
De-Regil, L. M., Jefferds, M. E. D., and Peña-Rosas, J. P. (2017). Point-of-use fortification of foods with micronutrient powders containing iron in children of preschool and school-age. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 11:CD009666. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009666.pub2
Devine, L. D., Hill, A. J., and Gallagher, A. M. (2023). Improving adolescents’ dietary behaviours in the school-setting: Challenges and opportunities. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 82, 172–185. doi: 10.1017/S0029665123002197
DiGirolamo, A. M., and Ramirez-Zea, M. (2009). Role of zinc in maternal and child mental health. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 89, 940S–945S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.26692C
DiGirolamo, A. M., Ramirez-Zea, M., Wang, M., Flores-Ayala, R., Martorell, R., Neufeld, L. M., et al. (2010). Randomized trial of the effect of zinc supplementation on the mental health of school-age children in Guatemala. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 92, 1241–1250. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.29686
Fiani, D., Engler, S., Ni, Y., Fields, S., and Calarge, C. (2024). Iron deficiency and internalizing symptoms among adolescents in the national health and nutrition examination survey. Nutrients 16:3643. doi: 10.3390/nu16213643
Föcker, M., Antel, J., Ring, S., Hahn, D., Kanal, Ö,Öztürk, D., et al. (2017). Vitamin D and mental health in children and adolescents. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 26, 1043–1066. doi: 10.1007/s00787-017-0949-3
Fu, J. N., Yu, W. B., Li, S. Q., and Sun, W. Z. (2024). A bibliometric analysis of anxiety and depression among primary school students. Front. Psychiatry 15:1431215. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1431215
Gillies, N. A., Rapson, J. P., Lovell, A. L., Waldie, K. E., and Wall, C. R. (2025). Design and evaluation of the “Feel Good” feasibility study – A multi-component fruit and vegetable intervention in children measuring cognitive and mental health outcomes. Nutr. J. 24:80. doi: 10.1186/s12937-025-01137-1
Granero, R., Pardo-Garrido, A., Carpio-Toro, I. L., Ramírez-Coronel, A. A., Martínez-Suárez, P. C., and Reivan-Ortiz, G. G. (2021). The role of iron and zinc in the treatment of ADHD among children and adolescents: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Nutrients 13:4059. doi: 10.3390/nu13114059
Jiménez-López, E., Mesas, A. E., Visier-Alfonso, M. E., Pascual-Morena, C., Martínez-Vizcaíno, V., Herrera-Gutiérrez, E., et al. (2024). Adherence to the Mediterranean diet and depressive, anxiety, and stress symptoms in Spanish adolescents: Results from the EHDLA study. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 33, 2637–2646. doi: 10.1007/s00787-023-02351-0
Johnston, C., and Murray, C. (2003). Incremental validity in the psychological assessment of children and adolescents. Psychol. Assess. 15, 496–507. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.15.4.496
Kedir, S., Hassen Abate, K., Mohammed, B., and Ademe, B. W. (2024). Weekly iron-folic acid supplementation and its impact on children and adolescents iron status, mental health and school performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis in sub-Saharan Africa. BMJ Open 14:e084033. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084033
Khalid, S., Williams, C. M., and Reynolds, S. A. (2016). Is there an association between diet and depression in children and adolescents? A systematic review. Br. J. Nutr. 116, 2097–2108. doi: 10.1017/S0007114516004359
Kieling, C., Buchweitz, C., Caye, A., Silvani, J., Ameis, S. H., Brunoni, A. R., et al. (2024). Worldwide prevalence and disability from mental disorders across childhood and adolescence. JAMA Psychiatry 81:347. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.5051
Kim, H.-S., Jung, S.-J., Mun, E.-G., Kim, M.-S., Cho, S.-M., and Cha, Y.-S. (2021). Effects of a rice-based diet in Korean adolescents who habitually skip breakfast: A randomized, parallel group clinical trial. Nutrients 13:853. doi: 10.3390/nu13030853
Kirby, A., Woodward, A., Jackson, S., Wang, Y., and Crawford, M. A. (2010). A double-blind, placebo-controlled study investigating the effects of omega-3 supplementation in children aged 8–10 years from a mainstream school population. Res. Dev. Disabil. 31, 718–730. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.01.014
Kris-Etherton, P. M., Petersen, K. S., Hibbeln, J. R., Hurley, D., Kolick, V., Peoples, S., et al. (2021). Nutrition and behavioral health disorders: depression and anxiety. Nutr. Rev. 79, 247–260. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuaa025
Kristjansson, E., Francis, D. K., Liberato, S., Benkhalti Jandu, M., Welch, V., Batal, M., et al. (2015). Food supplementation for improving the physical and psychosocial health of socio-economically disadvantaged children aged three months to five years. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015:CD009924. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009924.pub2
Langford, R., Bonell, C. P., Jones, H. E., Pouliou, T., Murphy, S. M., Waters, E., et al. (2014). The WHO Health Promoting School framework for improving the health and well-being of students and their academic achievement. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014:CD008958. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008958.pub2
Lapalme, M., Bégin, V., Le Corff, Y., and Déry, M. (2020). Comparison of discriminant validity indices of parent, teacher, and multi-informant reports of behavioral problems in elementary schoolers. J. Psychopathol. Behav. Assess. 42, 58–68. doi: 10.1007/s10862-019-09782-7
Liu, M., Chen, Q., Towne, S. D., Zhang, J., Yu, H., Tang, R., et al. (2020). Fruit and vegetable intake in relation to depressive and anxiety symptoms among adolescents in 25 low- and middle-income countries. J. Affect. Disord. 261, 172–180. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.10.007
Medeiros, G. C., Azevedo, K. P. M., Garcia, D., Oliveira Segundo, V. H., Mata, ÁN. S., Fernandes, A. K. P., et al. (2022). Effect of school-based food and nutrition education interventions on the food consumption of adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19:10522. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710522
Mesas, A. E., González, A. D., de Andrade, S. M., Martínez-Vizcaíno, V., López-Gil, J. F., and Jiménez-López, E. (2022). Increased consumption of ultra-processed food is associated with poor mental health in a nationally representative sample of adolescent students in Brazil. Nutrients 14:5207. doi: 10.3390/nu14245207
Mhurchu, C. N., Gorton, D., Turley, M., Jiang, Y., Michie, J., Maddison, R., et al. (2013). Effects of a free school breakfast programme on children’s attendance, academic achievement and short-term hunger: Results from a stepped-wedge, cluster randomised controlled trial. J. Epidemiol. Community Health (1978) 67, 257–264. doi: 10.1136/jech-2012-201540
Moore Heslin, A., and McNulty, B. (2023). Adolescent nutrition and health: Characteristics, risk factors and opportunities of an overlooked life stage. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 82, 142–156. doi: 10.1017/S0029665123002689
Murphy, S., Moore, G. F., Tapper, K., Lynch, R., Clarke, R., Raisanen, L., et al. (2011). Free healthy breakfasts in primary schools: a cluster randomised controlled trial of a policy intervention in Wales, UK. Public Health Nutr. 14, 219–226. doi: 10.1017/S1368980010001886
Neumann, C. G., Murphy, S. P., Gewa, C., Grillenberger, M., and Bwibo, N. O. (2007). Meat supplementation improves growth, cognitive, and behavioral outcomes in Kenyan Children1. J. Nutr. 137, 1119–1123. doi: 10.1093/jn/137.4.1119
Norris, S. A., Frongillo, E. A., Black, M. M., Dong, Y., Fall, C., Lampl, M., et al. (2022). Nutrition in adolescent growth and development. Lancet 399, 172–184. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01590-7
O’Brien, K. M., Barnes, C., Yoong, S., Campbell, E., Wyse, R., Delaney, T., et al. (2021). School-based nutrition interventions in children aged 6 to 18 years: An umbrella review of systematic reviews. Nutrients 13:4113. doi: 10.3390/nu13114113
O’Neil, A., Quirk, S. E., Housden, S., Brennan, S. L., Williams, L. J., Pasco, J. A., et al. (2014). Relationship between diet and mental health in children and adolescents: A systematic review. Am. J. Public Health 104, e31–e42. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302110
Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., and Elmagarmid, A. (2016). Rayyan—A web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst. Rev. 5:210. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
Parletta, N., Cooper, P., Gent, D. N., Petkov, J., and O’Dea, K. (2013). Effects of fish oil supplementation on learning and behaviour of children from Australian Indigenous remote community schools: A randomised controlled trial. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids 89, 71–79. doi: 10.1016/j.plefa.2013.05.001
Peralta, L. R., Cotton, W. G., Dudley, D. A., Hardy, L. L., Yager, Z., and Prichard, I. (2021). Group-based physical activity interventions for postpartum women with children aged 0–5 years old: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. BMC Womens Health 21:435. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01581-1
Pradeilles, R., Baye, K., and Holdsworth, M. (2019). Addressing malnutrition in low- and middle-income countries with double-duty actions. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 78, 388–397. doi: 10.1017/S0029665118002616
Racine, N., McArthur, B. A., Cooke, J. E., Eirich, R., Zhu, J., and Madigan, S. (2021). Global prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms in children and adolescents during COVID-19: A meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 175, 1142–1150. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.2482
Richardson, A. J., Burton, J. R., Sewell, R. P., Spreckelsen, T. F., and Montgomery, P. (2012). Docosahexaenoic acid for reading, cognition and behavior in children aged 7–9 years: A randomized, controlled trial (The DOLAB study). PLoS One 7:e43909. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043909
Rucklidge, J. J., Johnstone, J. M., and Kaplan, B. J. (2021). Nutrition Provides the Essential Foundation for Optimizing Mental Health. Evid. Based Pract. Child Adolesc. Ment. Health 6, 131–154. doi: 10.1080/23794925.2021.1875342
Saji Parel, N., Krishna, P. V., Gupta, A., Kadari, M., Subhan, M., and Kasire, S. P. (2022). Depression and vitamin D: A peculiar relationship. Cureus 14:e24363. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24363
Samad, N., Bearne, L., Noor, F. M., Akter, F., and Parmar, D. (2024). School-based healthy eating interventions for adolescents aged 10–19 years: An umbrella review. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Activity 21:117. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01668-6
Samson, K. L. I., Fischer, J. A. J., and Roche, M. L. (2022). Iron status, anemia, and iron interventions and their associations with cognitive and academic performance in adolescents: A systematic review. Nutrients 14:224. doi: 10.3390/nu14010224
Satyanarayana, P. T., Suryanarayana, R., Yesupatham, S. T., Varadapuram Ramalingareddy, S. R., and Gopalli, N. A. (2024). Does vitamin D3 supplementation improve depression scores among rural adolescents? a randomized controlled trial. Nutrients 16:1828. doi: 10.3390/nu16121828
Shawon, M. S. R., Rouf, R. R., Jahan, E., Hossain, F. B., Mahmood, S., Gupta, R., et al. (2023). The burden of psychological distress and unhealthy dietary behaviours among 222,401 school-going adolescents from 61 countries. Sci. Rep. 13:21894. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49500-8
Sigman, M., Whaley, S. E., Neumann, C. G., Bwibo, N., Guthrie, D., Weiss, R. E., et al. (2005). Diet quality affects the playground activities of Kenyan children. Food Nutr. Bull. 26, S202–S212. doi: 10.1177/15648265050262S211
Sinclair, R., Millar, L., Allender, S., Snowdon, W., Waqa, G., Jacka, F., et al. (2016). The cross-sectional association between diet quality and depressive symptomology amongst Fijian adolescents. PLoS One 11:e0161709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161709
Smout, S., Gardner, L. A., Newton, N., and Champion, K. E. (2023). Dose–response associations between modifiable lifestyle behaviours and anxiety, depression and psychological distress symptoms in early adolescence. Aust. N. Z. J. Public Health 47:100010. doi: 10.1016/j.anzjph.2022.100010
Sood, A., Sharma, D., Sharma, M., and Dey, R. (2024). Prevalence and repercussions of stress and mental health issues on primary and middle school students: A bibliometric analysis. Front. Psychiatry 15:1369605. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1369605
Sørensen, L. B., Dyssegaard, C. B., Damsgaard, C. T., Petersen, R. A., Dalskov, S.-M., Hjorth, M. F., et al. (2015). The effects of Nordic school meals on concentration and school performance in 8- to 11-year-old children in the OPUS school meal study: A cluster-randomised, controlled, cross-over trial. Br. J. Nutr. 113, 1280–1291. doi: 10.1017/S0007114515000033
Staudacher, H. M., Teasdale, S., Cowan, C., Opie, R., Jacka, F. N., and Rocks, T. (2025). Diet interventions for depression: Review and recommendations for practice. Aust. N. Zealand J. Psychiatry 59, 115–127. doi: 10.1177/00048674241289010
Tammam, J. D., Steinsaltz, D., Bester, D. W., Semb-Andenaes, T., and Stein, J. F. (2016). A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial investigating the behavioural effects of vitamin, mineral and n -3 fatty acid supplementation in typically developing adolescent schoolchildren. Br. J. Nutr. 115, 361–373. doi: 10.1017/S0007114515004390
Taras, H. (2005). Nutrition and student performance at school. J. School Health 75, 199–213. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2005.tb06674.x
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., et al. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Ann. Intern. Med. 169, 467–473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850
Üçkardeş, Y., Özmert, E. N., Ünal, F., and Yurdakök, K. (2009). Effects of zinc supplementation on parent and teacher behaviour rating scores in low socioeconomic level Turkish primary school children. Acta Paediatr. 98, 731–736. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.01186.x
Weaver, C. M., and Miller, J. W. (2017). Challenges in conducting clinical nutrition research. Nutr. Rev. 75, 491–499. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nux026
Wellander, L., Wells, M. B., and Feldman, I. (2016). Does prevention pay? Costs and potential cost-savings of school interventions targeting children with mental health problems. J. Ment. Health Policy Econ. 19, 91–101.
Woodside, J. V., Adamson, A., Spence, S., Baker, T., and McKinley, M. C. (2021). Opportunities for intervention and innovation in school food within UK schools. Public Health Nutr. 24, 2313–2317. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020004668
Woodside, J. V., O’Kane, N., Pallan, M., Evans, C. E. L., Defeyter, G., Brownlee, I., et al. (2024). The generating excellent nutrition in UK schools (GENIUS) network: Working towards a more health-promoting food and nutrition system in UK schools. Proc. Nutr. Soc. doi: 10.1017/S0029665124007560 Online ahead of print.
World Health and Organization U. (2021). Making every school a health-promoting school: global standards and indicators. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Young, L. M., Gauci, S., Scholey, A., White, D. J., and Pipingas, A. (2020). Self-selection bias: An essential design consideration for nutrition trials in healthy populations. Front. Nutr. 7:587983. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2020.587983
Zhang, L., Kleiman-Weiner, M., Luo, R., Shi, Y., Martorell, R., Medina, A., et al. (2013). Multiple micronutrient supplementation reduces anemia and anxiety in rural China’s elementary school children. J. Nutr. 143, 640–647. doi: 10.3945/jn.112.171959
Zhang, Y., Li, Z., Feng, Q., Xu, Y., Yu, R., Chen, J., et al. (2025). Global, regional and national burdens of major depression disorders and its attributable risk factors in adolescents and young adults aged 10–24 years from 1990 to 2021. BMC Psychiatry 25:399. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06772-w
Keywords: diet, mental health, nutrition, depression, anxiety, schools, children
Citation: Coxon C and Gibson EL (2025) Diet and mental health in school-aged children: a mini review of school-based dietary intervention studies. Front. Educ. 10:1656924. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1656924
Received: 30 June 2025; Accepted: 15 September 2025;
Published: 30 September 2025.
Edited by:
Jonathan Glazzard, University of Hull, United KingdomReviewed by:
Omer Horovitz, Tel-Hai College, IsraelCopyright © 2025 Coxon and Gibson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Christle Coxon, Y2hyaXN0bGUuY294b25Acm9laGFtcHRvbi5hYy51aw==