Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Educ.

Sec. Leadership in Education

This article is part of the Research TopicStrengthening Equity in and through Research Collaborations in EducationView all 5 articles

How to make equity practical in primary schools? Lessons learned in collaborative action research in an Educational Research Lab

Provisionally accepted
Lisa  GaikhorstLisa Gaikhorst1Saskia  van CaemSaskia van Caem2Hester  EdzesHester Edzes2Marco  SnoekMarco Snoek3Monique  VolmanMonique Volman1*
  • 1University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • 2ASKO Scholen, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • 3Hogeschool van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: To bridge the gap between educational research and practice, grants have been made available in the Netherlands for partnerships of schools and universities to engage in practice-based research. This enabled the establishment of an Educational Research Lab Amsterdam (ERLA), for which its founders, also the authors of this paper, chose diversity and equity as a focus. We wanted to strengthen the agency of teachers and researchers to contribute to social justice, through collaboratively designing and evaluating educational approaches that address diversity and equity challenges in classrooms and schools. In this paper, we discuss 1) how our approach evolved; 2) how it promoted agency in relation to diversity and equity; 3) the challenges we encountered and the lessons we learned. Methods: We present our reflections as a case study of the ERLA, basing our analysis on 1) documents about our approach; 2) minutes of meetings; 3) reports for funding agencies; 4) notes and e-mails ; 5) teacher interviews and questionnaires from ERLA-projects; 5) research proposals, reports, publications. Data were thematically analysed, using the three research questions and Penuel et al.'s (2020) framework of principles for collaborative research approaches as lenses. Findings: The ERLA has developed a functioning structure with school-based learning teams and cross-school thematic teams, supported by researchers. The outputs are useful educational approaches to promote equity in schools, concrete tools, professional development for teachers and school leaders, strengthened school board policies, and scientific publications. Along the way, we gained valuable insights about teacher-researcher collaboration: collective agency is achieved when participants contribute from their area of expertise; it involves struggle and requires negotiation; working structures facilitate agency and should be regularly evaluated; a shared vision on approach and object of the collaboration must be actively maintained, e.g. to uphold principles, and with a view to transparency for external partners. Discussion: This study provides insights into teacher–researcher collaboration within ERLA, contributing a practice-based perspective to the existing Research Practice Partnerships (RPPs) literature and offering lessons for fostering successful partnerships, such as the importance of recognizing differences in expertise and of a shared vision that is actively maintained and revisited.

Keywords: Collaborative Research, Practice-based research, Social Justice, diversity, Equity

Received: 23 Jul 2025; Accepted: 24 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Gaikhorst, Caem, Edzes, Snoek and Volman. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Monique Volman, m.l.l.volman@uva.nl

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.