Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Educ.

Sec. Higher Education

This article is part of the Research TopicGlobal Perspectives in Oral Cancer Prevention and EducationView all articles

Integrating Clinical Psychology and Social Care in Oral Cancer Prevention & Early Detection: A Needs Assessment for Interprofessional Education

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Manipal College of Dental Sciences Mangalore, MAHE, Mangalore, India
  • 2Kasturba Medical College Mangalore, Mangaluru, India
  • 3National University of Science and Technology, Oman, Muscut, Oman
  • 4The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
  • 5School of Social Work Roshni Nilaya, Mangaluru, India

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract: Background: To address the challenges in the early diagnosis and prevention of oral cancer, it is essential to include clinical psychology and social care professionals in interprofessional healthcare teams. In this context, a needs assessment study was conducted to inform the development of an interprofessional education and collaborative practice (IPECP) course focused on oral cancer for students in clinical psychology and social care. The objectives of this study were to develop a tool for assessing the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAPs) related to oral cancer prevention and early detection among these students and to evaluate the current KAP levels within this student cohort. Additional objectives were to estimate the likelihood that students would demonstrate strong KAP scores related to oral cancer prevention and early detection and to assess their readiness for interprofessional learning and collaborative practice. Methods: Two questionnaires were employed in this study: 1) a custom-designed questionnaire was developed, validated, and administered to assess KAP related to the early detection and prevention of oral cancer and 2) the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS). For data analysis, both descriptive and inferential statistical methods were applied. These included the Mann–Whitney U test, ordered logistic regression, and probit analysis. A significance level of p < 0.05 was set for all the statistical tests. Results: A total of 220 clinical psychology students and 226 social care students were included in the study. The mean scores related to KAP were 11.04±1.782, 5.28±1.292, and 4.56±1.583, respectively, and the mean score for RIPLS was 82.23±10.961 among clinical psychology students. Among the social care students, the KAPs were 10.46±2.688, 5.36±1.626, and 5.86±1.806, respectively, and the mean RIPLS score was 46.58±9.705. Conclusion: The analysis revealed that both the clinical psychology and social care student cohorts presented low scores in knowledge and practices related to the prevention and early detection of oral cancer. However, the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) results indicated a more positive attitude toward interprofessional learning among clinical psychology students than among their social care counterparts.

Keywords: Interprofession education, oral cancer, Prevention and early detection, Social care professionals, Clinical psycho logy

Received: 31 Aug 2025; Accepted: 30 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Sujir, Ahmed, Ramakrishna, Ali Mohammed, Unnikrishnan, Gilbert, KG and Monteiro. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Junaid Ahmed, junaid.ahmed@manipal.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.