Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Educ.

Sec. Language, Culture and Diversity

Perceptions of Male vs Female English L2 Speaker Comprehensibility

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Osaka Jogakuin College, Osaka, Japan
  • 2Hiroshima Daigaku, Higashihiroshima, Japan

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Evaluation of English as an additional language (L2) speech comprehensibility in classroom and standardized test situations is important for students' academic and career success. While previous research has found phonetic differences between male and female speech, as well as disparities in language learning ability and academic achievement, little is known about how these gender-related factors affect listener evaluations of L2 speech. This study examined responses of 201 raters from 23 first language (L1) backgrounds to the question of whether or not there are differences in male and female English L2 speaker comprehensibility. The results indicated that 66.7% perceived no difference, 27.9% judged female speakers to be easier to understand, and only 5.5% judged male speakers to be easier to understand. Written comments were coded and frequencies of codes compared in terms of rater sex and teaching experience. While overall likelihood of perceiving gender effects did not differ, the reasons given did. Male raters and teachers tended to reject gender differences on philosophical grounds, whereas students more often reported never noticing them. Among those who perceived gender differences, lower male voice pitch was seen as hindering intelligibility, while females were thought to make greater efforts at clarity and correction. Greater familiarity with female L2 speech was also cited, highlighting potential gender bias in listener judgments of comprehensibility. Based on these findings, implications and recommendations for ensuring fairness in L2 assessment are presented.

Keywords: L2 speech comprehensibility1, gender2, bias3, L2 speech assessment4, Listener backgrounds5

Received: 16 Oct 2025; Accepted: 28 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Head and Yamane. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Philip Head

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.