CLINICAL TRIAL article

Front. Endocrinol.

Sec. Bone Research

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1445093

This article is part of the Research TopicMolecular Mechanisms and Treatment of Monogenic Skeletal DisordersView all 7 articles

Denosumab in Patients with Osteogenesis Imperfecta and A Historical Control Study with Alendronate

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Other, Shanghai, China
  • 2Department of Endocrinology, Punan Hospital of Pudong New District, Shanghai, China
  • 3Clinical Research Center, Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Optimal dosing of denosumab in osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) remains undefined. This prospective cohort study evaluated the 12-month efficacy and safety of denosumab in OI patients, with a historical control study with alendronate.Eight pediatric patients (1 mg/kg every 3 months; ≤60 mg/dose) and ten adults (60 mg every 6 months) received denosumab. Outcomes included lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover markers (BTMs), vertebral compression fractures (assessed via AI-assisted Genant grading [AI_OVF_SH system]), fracture incidence, height velocity and adverse events. Historical controls (n=25 alendronate-treated OI patients) were analyzed for comparative efficacy. Sensitivity analyses excluded female pediatric participants (n=4) and peri-/post-menopausal adults (n=4) to assess hormonal confounding.Results: Pediatric denosumab recipients exhibited significant LS-BMD (+30.3%, P<0.001) and FN-BMD gains (+38.7%, P=0.001) versus baseline, whereas adults showed non-significant increases (LS: +2.6%, P=0.10; FN: +4.4%, P=0.051).Sensitivity analyses revealed attenuated BTMs suppression in adults after excluding peri-/post-menopausal women (only ALP decreased by 27.9%, P=0.028). Rebound hypercalcemia occurred in 62.5% (5/8) of children, peaking at 2.93 mmol/L. Compared to alendronate, denosumab demonstrated comparable BMD improvements and fracture reduction (P>0.05) but superior pediatric height gain (+5.8% vs. +2.5%, P=0.004).Vertebral area loss decreased significantly with denosumab (-14.6%, P=0.029), unlike alendronate (-8.8%, P=0.296). Adverse events were more frequent with denosumab in children (hypercalcemia: 62.5% vs. 0%, P=0.002).Denosumab demonstrates non-inferior efficacy to alendronate for BMD improvement in OI, with heightened vertebral remodeling and pediatric height gains.However, its overshoot phenomenon in children (rebound hypercalcemia) and hormone-dependent efficacy in adults necessitate risk-stratified use. Age and menopausal status considerations are critical for optimizing denosumab therapy in OI.

Keywords: Osteogenesis Imperfecta, Denosumab, Alendronate, Hypercalcemia, bone mineral density

Received: 06 Jun 2024; Accepted: 09 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Mei, Cai, Jiang, Tian, Shen, Gu, Wang, Zhang and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Chun Wang, Other, Shanghai, China
ZhenLin Zhang, Other, Shanghai, China
Hao Zhang, Other, Shanghai, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.