Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Endocrinol.

Sec. Diabetes: Molecular Mechanisms

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1511561

Genetic variants in HLA-DQA1/DQB1 genes modulate the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in a southern Chinese population

Provisionally accepted
Lijie  NieLijie Nie1Yan  SunYan Sun1Ruiqi  LiRuiqi Li1Qiulian  LiangQiulian Liang1Guocun  DengGuocun Deng1Xinyu  HeXinyu He1Yifei  ZengYifei Zeng1Hui  ZhengHui Zheng1Xinhe  XiaoXinhe Xiao1Xiaodong  DingXiaodong Ding1Jian  HuangJian Huang2*Xiangyuan  YuXiangyuan Yu1,3*
  • 1School of Public Health, Guilin Medical University, Guilin 541000, China
  • 2Institute of Biomedical Research, School of Intelligent Medicine and Biotechnology, Guilin Medical University, Guilin 541000, China
  • 3Guangxi Key Laboratory of Diabetic Systems Medicine, Guilin 541000, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is an endocrine disorder that occurs easily in women during pregnancy. HLA-DQA1/DQB1 genes play a crucial role in the regulation of the human immune and endocrine systems, potentially influencing the pathogenesis of GDM.Objective: To explore the associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in HLA-DQA1/DQB1 genes and the risk of GDM.Methods: Seven functional SNPs of HLA-DQA1/DQB1 genes were selected and genotyped in 523 GDM patients and 638 normal pregnant women. The odds ratio (OR) and its corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were utilized to assess the association between candidate SNPs and the risk of GDM. And then, false positive report probability (FPRP), multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR) and haplotype analysis were employed to validate the statistically significant associations between studied SNPs and GDM risk.Results: Compared to those with 0-1 risk genotypes, individuals with 2-7 unfavorable genotypes presented an increased risk of GDM (adjusted OR = 1.54, 95% CI=1.04-2.28, P=0.033). A doseaccumulation effect was detected between the number of unfavorable genotypes and GDM risk (Ptrend=0.024). Furthermore, stratified analysis revealed that the increased GDM risk was more likely to occur in individuals with higher blood pressure and TG, and lower HDL-c levels (P<0.05). Multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR) analysis revealed that rs9274666 was the best single locus model, whereas the 7-loci model was the best multifactor interaction model for predicting GDM risk (χ²=134.28, P<0.0001). Finally, haplotype analysis revealed that the ACGAGTA and ACGGATA haplotypes were significantly associated with the increased GDM risk. HLA-DQA1/ DQB1 SNPs can significantly alter individuals' genetic susceptibility to GDM.The genetic variations in the HLA-DQA1 and HLA-DQB1 genes may collectively contribute to the susceptibility to gestational diabetes mellitus. These findings suggest that these genetic markers could be useful for early prediction of GDM, and further validation in larger cohorts is warranted.

Keywords: gestational diabetes mellitus, HLA-DQA1/DQB1, risk, variant, gene-gene interaction

Received: 15 Oct 2024; Accepted: 07 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Nie, Sun, Li, Liang, Deng, He, Zeng, Zheng, Xiao, Ding, Huang and Yu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Jian Huang, Institute of Biomedical Research, School of Intelligent Medicine and Biotechnology, Guilin Medical University, Guilin 541000, China
Xiangyuan Yu, School of Public Health, Guilin Medical University, Guilin 541000, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.