Abstract
Molten chloride mixtures such as MgCl2–KCl–NaCl are potential thermal energy storage (TES) materials and heat transfer fluids (HTFs) for next-generation concentrating solar power (CSP) systems due to their high operation temperatures (>700°C) and low costs. This ternary MgCl2–KCl–NaCl salt mixture with a low material cost (<0.35 $/kg) is a promising salt for high-temperature TES/HTF applications, for example, it could enable next-generation CSP plants to have significant power cycle efficiency and lower levelized cost of electricity (LCOE). In this study, the minimum melting temperature composition for the MgCl2–KCl–NaCl mixture was estimated by FactSage simulation, while the binary and ternary phase diagrams of the MgCl2–KCl–NaCl salt system, including their phase transitions, were studied. Five different eutectic compositions of the MgCl2–KCl–NaCl mixture from literature and simulations were selected to determine the minimum melting temperature composition by the differential scanning calorimetry technique. Results show agreement between experiments and simulations of the melting temperature and its composition. Hence, values of the exact and reliable minimum melting temperature and salt composition in mol% and wt% are given. Based on the determined melting temperature, the minimum operating temperature of MgCl2–KCl–NaCl is recommended according to the safety margin for CSP applications.
Introduction
Concentrating solar power (CSP) has been extensively investigated as a key technology for green electricity generation. A dispatchable form of CSP is the possibility to incorporate thermal energy storage (TES) using molten salts. In addition, for large-scale applications, this technology integrated with TES presents an economic advantage regarding manageability which implies lower demand-oriented levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) than volatile photovoltaic technology (). Molten nitrate salts, especially the so-called solar salt (NaNO3-KNO3 60–40 wt%), have been studied extensively for TES and heat transfer applications in the temperature range of 290–565°C (). However, their thermal stability is limited by the decomposition above 565°C. Thus, the research programs on next-generation CSP, for example, the SunShot Initiative of United States Department of Energy (DOE) focus on higher operation temperature for better power cycle efficiency and major cost reduction using chloride salt mixtures comprising CaCl2, KCl, MgCl2, NaCl, and ZnCl2 among others (; ; ).
Low-cost molten chloride salts are some of the most promising high-temperature TES and heat transfer fluid (HTF) materials in next-generation CSP plants and other energy applications (e.g., nuclear molten salt reactor) due to, for example, their high thermal stability (>800°C) and low prices (<0.35 $/kg) (; ; ; ). In next-generation CSP plants (see Figure 1), the MgCl2–KCl–NaCl mixture can achieve higher power cycle efficiencies by using, for example, sCO2 Brayton power cycle. In its potential high-temperature TES/HTF applications, this ternary salt presents different challenges which require a study from their initial composition and preparation to the final system integration.
FIGURE 1
The exact and reliable data of the salt properties, such as melting temperature, are vital and essential for the design, construction, and operation of a TES system based on molten salts. However, due to the corrosivity and volatility of molten alkali chlorides at high temperatures and forming of salt hydrates (e.g., MgCl2∙6H2O), the experimental determination of thermodynamic properties, particularly at high temperatures, is complex. Thermodynamic simulation provides a practical way to assist the study on the thermophysical properties of molten chlorides. The salt properties, as well as the corrosion control, of molten chloride salts have been intensively studied in these years for TES/HTF applications. Two recent review articles from our group (
Since about 2015, there has been a strong renewed interest in the ternary MgCl2–KCl–NaCl mixture as one of the most promising TES materials in next-generation CSP due to the abundance and low price of the single salts and relatively low melting temperature (
Melting temperature is a key parameter in the selection of a sensible TES or heat transfer fluid (HTF) since it determines the minimum operation temperature (partly the storage capacity) and system design to avoid salt freezing (
Materials and Experimental Methods
Molten Salt Preparation
Five kinds of mixed chlorides were prepared by mixing KCl, NaCl, and MgCl2 at different mixed ratios according to the literature and FactSage prediction. The purities of the chloride salts were >99.9% for NaCl purchased from VWR BDH Chemicals, the purities of KCl and anhydrous MgCl2 were both 99%, purchased from Acros Organics and Alfa Aesar, respectively. Since MgCl2 may absorb H2O from the moisture under air, all salt mixtures were prepared inside a glove box under argon atmosphere (argon 5.0, 99.999%, O2 < 0.5 ppm, H2O < 10 ppm). In addition, MgCl2 was held at 150°C for 18 h to remove the most hydrated water and avoid hydration. Subsequently, around 5.0 g of each salt mixture was prepared from stoichiometric weighing of each single chloride salt, followed by mixing and grinding for at least 20 min manually to ensure homogenization. For the DSC analysis, around 10–20 mg sample was transferred into aluminum crucibles, a pierced lid was placed on top of the crucible, and then hermetically sealed with a sealing press from Netzsch. Then, the samples were carefully transported in a desiccator from the glovebox to the DSC apparatus to avoid atmospheric exposure and salt hydration.
Differential Scanning Calorimetry Measurements
Thermal analysis was carried out with a differential scanning calorimeter DSC 404 from Netzsch using aluminum crucibles under argon atmosphere (Argon 5.0), which was temperature-calibrated using Netzsch standard materials (In, Bi, Zn) in a temperature range of 100–480°C. Three heating and cooling runs from room temperature up to 480°C were performed in total to avoid discrepancies in the melting temperature produced by the traces of hydrated MgCl2. The same heating and cooling rates (10°C/min) were applied for all samples to allow qualitative comparison of the melting point between the samples and using an empty pan as a reference. The first cycle was used for the removal of traces of absorbed water followed by pre-melting and homogenization of the mixture. For the phase diagrams, the onset of the melting peak during heating was extracted since it represents the melting temperature of the salt mixture.
Thermodynamic Simulation With FactSage
FactSage is a commercial thermochemical databank system running in a Windows environment with the modules of Information, Database, Calculation, and manipulation (https://www.factsage.com/). This study utilizes version 7.2 of this software. Calculation is the main module of FactSage, which is based on the minimum Gibbs-free energy and CalPhaD (calculation of phase diagrams) theory to predict the equilibrium conditions of a system (
Result and Discussion of Binary Systems: KCl–MgCl2, KCl–NaCl, MgCl2–NaCl
Literature Review
There have been numerous studies to investigate the binary KCl–MgCl2, KCl–NaCl, and MgCl2–NaCl mixtures and their compositions as candidate materials for thermal energy storage. The phase diagrams of the KCl–MgCl2 and MgCl2–NaCl binary systems were experimentally studied by Menge (1911) (
In the review of the literature published by Rowe et al. (
For the KCl–NaCl binary mixture, Kurnakow (
The MgCl2-NaCl system was experimentally studied by Menge (
FactSage Thermodynamic Simulation
The binary phase diagrams of KCl–MgCl2, KCl–NaCl, and MgCl2–NaCl have been estimated using the Phase Diagram module as well as the FTsalt database which contains data of the species Mg, K, and Na chloride, and the temperature range was chosen between 350–850°C. The binary phase diagrams of the KCl–MgCl2, KCl–NaCl, and MgCl2–NaCl estimated with FactSage are shown in Figure 2. The compositions mentioned here are all based on mole fractions.
FIGURE 2

Estimated phase diagrams for the binary (A) KCl–MgCl2, (B) KCl–NaCl, and (C) MgCl2–NaCl systems from the FTsalt database using FactSage 7.2 thermodynamic software (
According to FactSage 7.2, the KCl–MgCl2 system presents three eutectic temperatures at 472.72°C, 428.96 °C, and 422.68°C with the intermetallic KMgCl3, K3Mg2Cl7, and K2MgCl4 respectively, which are in good agreement with the literature data for E1 and E2 (
For the KCl–NaCl binary mixture, the formation of the solid solution can be confirmed with a minimum temperature of 656.35°C and a composition of 50.23 mol% NaCl which is good agreement with the previous reported data from Rowe and Kurnakow (
The MgCl2-NaCl system exhibits eutectic temperature at 459.14°C with a composition of 57 mol% NaCl followed by the formation of the compounds NaMgCl3 and Na2MgCl4 that leads to a peritectic transformation at 465 and 474°C, respectively.
Compared to the KCl–NaCl and MgCl2–NaCl phase diagrams, the KCl–MgCl2 has the lowest melting temperature of 422.68°C. These three binary phase diagrams are important as the starting point of the evaluation of the ternary phase diagram.
These results of the binary chloride salt simulation include different eutectic, peritectic, and solid-solution compositions. Those invariant points are summarized in Table 1 at 1 atm in the temperature range 350–850°C.
TABLE 1
| System KCl–MgCl2 | Phase transition | T (°C) | Composition (Xmole) |
|---|---|---|---|
| L<=> MgCl2+KMgCl3 | Eutectic (E1) | 472.72 | 0.4158 KCl–0.5842 MgCl2 |
| L + KMgCl3<=> K3Mg2Cl7 | Peritectic (P1) | 440.09 | 0.6253 KCl–0.3747 MgCl2 |
| L<=> K3Mg2Cl7+K2MgCl4 | Eutectic (E2) | 428.96 | 0.6541 KCl–0.3459 MgCl2 |
| L<=> K2MgCl4+KCl | Eutectic (E3) | 422.68 | 0.6987 KCl–0.3013 MgCl2 |
| System KCl–NaCl | Phase transition | T (°C) | Composition (Xmole) |
| L<=> NaCl + KCl (ss) | Solid solution (ss) | 656.35 | 0.4977 KCl–0.5023 NaCl |
| System MgCl2–NaCl | Phase transition | T (°C) | Composition (Xmole) |
| L + NaCl<=> Na2MgCl4 | Peritectic (P1) | 474.95 | 0.3662 MgCl2–0.6338 NaCl |
| L + MgCl2<=> NaMgCl3 | Peritectic (P2) | 465.67 | 0.4818 MgCl2–0.5182 NaCl |
| L<=> Na2MgCl4+NaMgCl3 | Eutectic (E1) | 459.14 | 0.4296 MgCl2–0.5704 NaCl |
Invariant reactions of KCl–MgCl2, KCl–NaCl, and MgCl2–NaCl using FactSage thermodynamic simulation (L: Salt liquid).
Result and Discussion of the Ternary System MgCl2–KCl–NaCl
Literature Review
In the first MgCl2–KCl–NaCl ternary diagram presented by Scholich in 1920 (
Further studies by Bradwell et al. (
As suggested by Fink et al. (
According to Fink and Neil (
FIGURE 3

KMgCl3/NaCl section in the ternary phase diagram adapted from the study by Chartrand et al. (
The salt compositions and minimum melting temperature data from literature are summarized for comparison in Table 2. The discrepancies of minimum melting temperature compositions are relatively high (standard deviation of about 2 mol% for each salt species), while the reported minimum melting temperatures are in the range of 385–400°C.
TABLE 2
| Work | Salt composition (mol%) | Reported minimum temperature (°C) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MgCl2 | KCl | NaCl | |||
| A | Scholich ( | 49.0 | 18.5 | 32.5 | 385 |
| B | Jänecke, Mohan, Nemecek ( | 45.4 | 21.6 | 33.0 | 385–387 |
| C | Podlesnyak ( | 46.5 | 22.2 | 31.3 | <400 |
| D | Vidal et al. ( | 44.7 | 25.8 | 29.4 | 385 |
| This work | Average ± Standard deviation | 46.4 ± 1.6 | 22.0 ± 2.6 | 31.6 ± 1.4 | 385 ≤ Tm< 400 |
Different compositions (in mol%) and minimum melting temperature data following the literature review with phase diagram measurements.
FactSage Thermodynamic Simulation
In this section, a thermodynamic simulation was performed using FactSage 7.2. The ternary phase diagram of MgCl2–KCl–NaCl have been estimated using the Phase Diagram module as well as the FTsalt database which contains data of the species Mg, K, and NaCl, and the temperature range was chosen between 350–850°C. This ternary phase diagram was estimated through the first melting temperature projection and, all compositions are referred on mole fractions.
According to FactSage simulation shown in Figure 4, the zone in which the minimum temperature is located corresponds to a composition of 30.2 mol% NaCl, 22.7 mol% KCl, and 47.1 mol% of MgCl2 with a minimum temperature of 385.4°C compared to the minimum temperature of 383°C for 32.96 mol% NaCl, 21.62 mol% KCl, and 45.42 mol% MgCl2 previously reported by Mohan et al. (
FIGURE 4

Ternary phase diagram of the MgCl2–KCl–NaCl obtained from FactSage 7.2 thermodynamic database in this work (lines: isothermal liquidus projections). The blue circle, which represents the average and standard deviation of the minimum melting temperature salt composition from Table 2, is also presented for comparison.
Differential Scanning Calorimetry Measurements
Since there are limited experimental measurements for the MgCl2–KCl–NaCl ternary system, more detailed discussion is useful in understanding the minimum melting temperature and composition of this mixture. The minimum melting temperature and related eutectic composition of the MgCl2–KCl–NaCl ternary system were validated by DSC experiments on the salt mixtures (Samples A–D) from the literature listed in Table 2 and the predicted salt mixture (Sample E) 30.2 mol% NaCl, 22.7 mol% KCl, and 47.1 mol% of MgCl2 in this work. The DSC heating and solidification curves of the five compositions are given in Figure 5.
FIGURE 5

DSC heating (A) and solidification (B) curves for the ternary MgCl2–KCl–NaCl mixtures with the minimum melting temperature composition reported and listed above.
Figure 5 (a) shows the melting temperature which is taken from the onset of the main endothermic peak at the heating cycle from the DSC curve, excluding the water losses in the first cycle. There is only one main melting peak at approximately 388.5°C in all curves, as would be expected for a congruent melting compound. Moreover, an overlapping melting peak (Sample B, C, and E) or a plateau (Sample D) can be observed which implies that the salt mixture is not completely eutectic. A similar phenomenon can be observed in the solidification curves. The onset temperature of the main endothermic peak in the heating curve is about 3°C higher than the predicted temperature value by FactSage. The end temperatures of phase transition during heating were between ∼405 and 425°C. The melting temperatures for the five salt compositions measured via DSC in this work are slightly higher than the melting temperatures reported in Table 2. The experimental results show that among these five salt compositions, the composition of Sample A (MgCl2–KCl–NaCl 49.0–18.5–32.5 mol%) is shown to be very close to the exact eutectic composition, as almost no secondary peak can be found in the heating and solidification curve. This also agrees with the fact that the composition of Sample A is closer to the theoretical exact eutectic composition.
Discussion
The melting temperature is a key parameter in the development of next-generation molten chloride salts, and it is represented by the onset of the DSC melting peak for a minimum melting temperature or eutectic mixture. From previous experience in our group with molten nitrate salts, the melting temperature of minimum melting temperature compositions can be successfully determined by differential scanning calorimetry—DSC (e.g., ASTM E794 (
The melting temperatures of the ternary MgCl2–KCl–NaCl system with different compositions, including this work, are listed in Table 3. All onset values are mostly around 388.40 ± 0.55°C. The variations of the DSC liquidus temperature for the five different ternary mixtures at 10 K/min are shown in Figure 6, in which the influence of each single chloride from the ternary mixture is notable. Both NaCl and MgCl2 contribute to a decrease in the liquidus temperature, whereas the KCl content increases the liquidus temperature. The results confirm the main conclusion in the last subsection that the composition of Sample A (MgCl2–KCl–NaCl 49.0–18.5–32.5 mol%), which has the highest MgCl2 content and lowest KCl content, is closer to the exact eutectic composition.
TABLE 3
| Salt composition (mol%) | Reported or predicted Temp. (°C) | Onset Temp. (°C) | End Temp. (°C) at 10 K/min | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MgCl2 | KCl | NaCl | ||||
| A ( | 49.0 | 18.5 | 32.5 | 385 | 388.20 ± 0.14 | 404.9 ± 0.14 |
| B ( | 45.4 | 21.6 | 33 | 385–387 | 388.33 ± 0.21 | 410.55 ± 0.78 |
| C ( | 46.5 | 22.2 | 31.3 | 400 | 388.47 ± 0.06 | 411.17 ± 2.57 |
| D ( | 44.7 | 25.8 | 29.4 | 385 | 388.45 ± 0.07 | 426.35 ± 0.92 |
| E (This work) | 47.1 | 22.7 | 30.2 | 385.4 | 388.55 ± 0.07 | 415.90 ± 0.14 |
Comparison of salt compositions and melting temperatures of the studied five MgCl2–KCl–NaCl ternary salt mixtures experimentally obtained by DSC at 10°C/min heating rate. The error of the measured temperatures is the standard deviation of three different measurements.
FIGURE 6

Determined onset and liquidus at 10 K/min depending on (A) NaCl, (B) MgCl2, and (C) KCl concentration of DSC measurements for five different ternary mixtures. (D) Detailed amplified triangle section.
Summary and Conclusions
This study investigated the binary and ternary phase diagrams of the MgCl2–KCl–NaCl system using literature data and FactSage simulation and own DSC measurements in order to determine the minimum melting temperature of the MgCl2–KCl–NaCl ternary salt. This mixture is relevant for high temperature TES for next-generation CSP systems.
In this study, five different compositions of the ternary MgCl2–KCl–NaCl salt mixture from literature and simulation of this study have been synthesized in an inert atmosphere (i.e., water impurity in the salt mixtures is neglectable) and tested according to the previous reported compositions, and their experimental melting temperatures were determined by the DSC technique.
After detailed analysis of literature, FactSage simulation and own DSC measurements, a minimum melting composition of MgCl2–KCl–NaCl 49.0–18.5–32.5 mol% or 58.7–17.4–23.9 wt% with the experimental melting temperature of 388.5°C is recommended. In addition, the phase transition that describes this eutectic composition is given by the composition KMgCl3 + NaMgCl3 (36–64 mol%). This implies that the theoretical exact eutectic composition of MgCl2–KCl–NaCl is 50–18–32 mol%, which agrees very well with the recommended composition. Based on these results, the minimum recommended operating temperature for high-temperature TES is 420°C (more than 30°C higher than the melting temperature). However, material cost aspects and larger safety margins may lead to other salt compositions (e.g., less MgCl2 and more NaCl in salt mixture) and operating temperatures higher than 420°C regarding the overall TES costs. Moreover, as the salt composition and melting temperature can be changed (i.e., shift of salt composition) by the by-reactions of the salt with impurities in salt or gas atmosphere during the use, monitoring of salt health is suggested in order to avoid inconveniences such as salt freezing.
Statements
Data availability statement
The simulation details have been added to the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
CV: conceptualization, investigation, writing–original draft, preparation, and visualization. WD: conceptualization, investigation, writing–original draft, preparation, visualization, review and editing, and revision. AB: Writing–review and editing. TB: Writing–review and editing and funding acquisition.
Funding
This research has been performed within the DLR-DAAD fellowship program (Grant number 91716495), which is funded by German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) and German Aerospace Center (DLR).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
BaekU.-H.LeeB.-D.LeeK.-W.YoonJ.-Y.HanG.-S.HanJ.-W. (2016). Removal of Ca from Magnesium Melt by Flux Refining. Mater. Trans.57, 1156–1164. 10.2320/matertrans.m2015426
2
BaleC. W.BélisleE.ChartrandP.DecterovS. A.ErikssonG.GheribiA. E.et al (2016). FactSage Thermochemical Software and Databases, 2010-2016. Calphad54, 35–53. 10.1016/j.calphad.2016.05.002
3
BonkA.SauS.UrangaN.HernaizM.BauerT. (2018). Advanced Heat Transfer Fluids for Direct Molten Salt Line-Focusing CSP Plants. Prog. Energ. Combustion Sci.67, 69–87. 10.1016/j.pecs.2018.02.002
4
BradwellD. J.KimH.SirkA. H. C.SadowayD. R. (2012). Magnesium-antimony Liquid Metal Battery for Stationary Energy Storage. J. Am. Chem. Soc.134, 1895–1897. 10.1021/ja209759s
5
ChartrandP.PeltonA. D. (2001). Thermodynamic Evaluation and Optimization of the LiCl-NaCl-KCl-RbCl-CsCl-MgCl2-CaCl2 System Using the Modified Quasi-Chemical Model. Metallurgical Mater. Trans. A32, 1361–1383. 10.1007/s11661-001-0227-2
6
DingW.BauerT. (2021). Progress in Research and Development of Molten Chloride Salt Technology for Next Generation Concentrated Solar Power Plants. Engineering7, 334–347. 10.1016/j.eng.2020.06.027
7
DingW.BonkA.BauerT. (2018). Corrosion Behavior of Metallic Alloys in Molten Chloride Salts for thermal Energy Storage in Concentrated Solar Power Plants: A Review. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng.12, 564–576. 10.1007/s11705-018-1720-0
8
DuL.DingJ.TianH.WangW.WeiX.SongM. (2017). Thermal Properties and thermal Stability of the Ternary Eutectic Salt NaCl-CaCl2-MgCl2 Used in High-Temperature thermal Energy Storage Process. Appl. Energ.204, 1225–1230. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.096
9
FinkH.SeifertH. J. (1984). Quaternary Compounds in the System KCl/NaCl/MgCl2?Thermochim. Acta72, 195–200. 10.1016/0040-6031(84)85073-x
10
FTsalt (2019). FACT Salt Phase Diagrams. FactSage.
11
JäneckeE. (1950). Über das Schmelz‐und Erstarrungsbild des doppelt‐ternären Systemes (K2· Na2· Mg)(Cl2· SO4). Z. für anorganische Chem.261, 213–225. 10.1002/zaac.19502610311
12
JanzG. J.TomkinsR. P. T.AllenC. B.DowneyJ. R.GarnerG. L.KrebsU.et al (1975). Molten Salts: Volume 4, Part 2, Chlorides and Mixtures-Electrical Conductance, Density, Viscosity, and Surface Tension Data. J. Phys. Chem. Reference Data4, 871–1178. 10.1063/1.555527
13
JanzG. J.TomkinsR. P. T. (1981). Physical Properties Data Compilations Relevant to Energy Storage. IV. Molten Salts: Data on Additional Single and Multi-Component Salt Systems. Troy, NY: National Bureau of Standards.
14
KurnakowN. S.ZhemchuzhnuiS. F. (1907). Isomorphism of Potassium and Sodium Compounds. Z. Anorg. Chem.52, 186–201. 10.1002/zaac.19070520118
15
LiY.XuX.WangX.LiP.HaoQ.XiaoB. (2017). Survey and Evaluation of Equations for Thermophysical Properties of Binary/ternary Eutectic Salts from NaCl, KCl, MgCl2, CaCl2, ZnCl2 for Heat Transfer and thermal Storage Fluids in CSP. Solar Energy152, 57–79. 10.1016/j.solener.2017.03.019
16
LiuM.Steven TayN. H.BellS.BeluskoM.JacobR.WillG.et al (2016). Review on Concentrating Solar Power Plants and New Developments in High Temperature thermal Energy Storage Technologies. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev.53, 1411–1432. 10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.026
17
MaksoudL.BauerT. (2015). Experimental Investigation of Chloride Molten Salts for Thermal Energy Storage Applications, 10th International Conference on Molten Salt Chemistry and Technology. China: Shenyang.
18
ManoharS. S.MatthiasA. E.PiyushS.PhilS. (2010). Engineering Database of Liquid Salt Thermophysical and Thermochemical Properties. United States.
19
MehosT. C. M.VidalJ.WagnerM.MaZ.HoC.KolbW.et al (2017). Concentrating Solar Power Gen3 Demonstration Roadmap. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
20
MengeO. (1911). Die binren Systeme von MgCl2 und CaCl2 mit den Chloriden der Metalle K, Na, Ag, Pb, Cu?, Zn, Sn? und Cd. Z. Anorg. Chem.72, 162–218. 10.1002/zaac.19110720113
21
MohanG.VenkataramanM. B.CoventryJ. (2019). Sensible Energy Storage Options for Concentrating Solar Power Plants Operating above 600 °C. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev.107, 319–337. 10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.062
22
MohanG.VenkataramanM.Gomez-VidalJ.CoventryJ. (2018). Assessment of a Novel Ternary Eutectic Chloride Salt for Next Generation High-Temperature Sensible Heat Storage. Energ. Convers. Manag.167, 156–164. 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.04.100
23
MohanG.VenkataramanM.Gomez-VidalJ.CoventryJ. (2018). Thermo-economic Analysis of High-Temperature Sensible thermal Storage with Different Ternary Eutectic Alkali and Alkaline Earth Metal Chlorides. Solar Energy176, 350–357. 10.1016/j.solener.2018.10.008
24
MurphyC.SunY.ColeW. J.MaclaurinG. J.MehosM. S.TurchiC. S. (2019). The Potential Role of Concentrating Solar Power within the Context of DOE's 2030 Solar Cost Targets. United States.
25
NeilD. E.ClarkH. M.WiswallR. H. (1965). Thermodynamic Properties of Molten Solutions of MgCl2-KCl, MgCl2-NaCl, and MgCl2-KCl-NaCl. J. Chem. Eng. Data10, 21–24. 10.1021/je60024a009
26
NemecekJ. J.SimmonsD. E.ChubbT. A. (1978). Demand Sensitive Energy Storage in Molten Salts. Solar Energy20, 213–217. 10.1016/0038-092x(78)90099-3
27
PodlesnyakN. P.OrekhovaA. I.DievaE. N., Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Tsvet. Metall (1987) 105–106.
28
PolimeniS.BinottiM.MorettiL.ManzoliniG. (2018). Comparison of Sodium and KCl-MgCl2 as Heat Transfer Fluids in CSP Solar tower with sCO2 Power Cycles. Solar Energy162, 510–524. 10.1016/j.solener.2018.01.046
29
RobbK. R.MulliganP. L.YoderG. L.SmithK.MassengaleJ. (2019). “Facility to Alleviate Salt Technology Risks (FASTR): Preliminary Design Report with Failure Modes and Effects Analysis,” in Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL) (Oak Ridge, TN (United States): Size), 63. 10.2172/1615802
30
RoweJ. J.MoreyG. W.ZenC. S. (1972). in The Quinary Reciprocal Salt System Na,K,Mg,Ca/Cl,SO4 - A Review of the Literature with New Data. Editor InteriorU. S. D. o. t. (Washington: United States Government Printing Offide).
31
ScholichK. (1920). Neues Jahrb. Mineral. Geol. Palaontol., Beil.43, 251–262.
32
TianY.ZhaoC. Y. (2013). A Review of Solar Collectors and thermal Energy Storage in Solar thermal Applications. Appl. Energ.104, 538–553. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.11.051
33
VidalJ. C.KlammerN. (2019). Molten Chloride Technology Pathway to Meet the U.S. DOE Sunshot Initiative with Gen3 CSP. AIP Conf. Proc.2126, 080006. 10.1063/1.5117601
34
VilladaC.DingW.BonkA.BauerT. (2021). Engineering Molten MgCl2-KCl-NaCl Salt for High-Temperature thermal Energy Storage: Review on Salt Properties and Corrosion Control Strategies. Solar Energ. Mater. Solar Cell232, 111344. 10.1016/j.solmat.2021.111344
35
VilladaC.DingW.BonkA.BauerT. (2019). Thermodynamic Simulation of Molten Chlorides for Next-Generation Concentrating Solar Power Applications, Eurotherm Seminar 112 Advances in Thermal Energy Storage. Spain: Lleida.
36
XuX.DehghaniG.NingJ.LiP. (2018). Basic Properties of Eutectic Chloride Salts NaCl-KCl-ZnCl2 and NaCl-KCl-MgCl2 as HTFs and thermal Storage media Measured Using Simultaneous DSC-TGA. Solar Energy162, 431–441. 10.1016/j.solener.2018.01.067
37
XuX.WangX.LiP.LiY.HaoQ.XiaoB.et al (2018). Experimental Test of Properties of KCl–MgCl2 Eutectic Molten Salt for Heat Transfer and Thermal Storage Fluid in Concentrated Solar Power Systems. J. Solar Energ. Eng.140, 40065. 10.1115/1.4040065
38
Yu-tingW. U.YingL. I.Yuan-weiL. U.WangH.-f.Chong-fangM. A. (2017). Novel Low Melting point Binary Nitrates for thermal Energy Storage Applications. Solar Energ. Mater. Solar Cell164, 114–121. 10.1615/tfec2017.htm.018500
Summary
Keywords
concentrating solar power, eutectic composition, heat transfer fluid, thermal energy storage, phase diagram
Citation
Villada C, Ding W, Bonk A and Bauer T (2022) Simulation-Assisted Determination of the Minimum Melting Temperature Composition of MgCl2–KCl–NaCl Salt Mixture for Next-Generation Molten Salt Thermal Energy Storage. Front. Energy Res. 10:809663. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2022.809663
Received
05 November 2021
Accepted
07 February 2022
Published
04 March 2022
Volume
10 - 2022
Edited by
Chuan Li, Beijing University of Technology, China
Reviewed by
Terry David Humphries, Curtin University, Australia
Haochun Zhang, Harbin Institute of Technology, China
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2022 Villada, Ding, Bonk and Bauer.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Wenjin Ding, wenjin.ding@dlr.de
This article was submitted to Process and Energy Systems Engineering, a section of the journal Frontiers in Energy Research
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.