MINI REVIEW article

Front. Immunol., 30 April 2025

Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1589243

This article is part of the Research TopicThe Role of Metabolic Reprogramming in Tumor TherapyView all 11 articles

Metabolic reprogramming and immune microenvironment characteristics in laryngeal carcinoma: advances in immunotherapy

Kexin Ma&#x;Kexin Ma1†Qingjie Mao&#x;Qingjie Mao2†Bing FeiBing Fei3Tingting NiTingting Ni4Zhenxin Zhang*Zhenxin Zhang2*Haosheng Ni*Haosheng Ni2*
  • 1Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, China
  • 2Department of Otolaryngology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, China
  • 3Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Affiliated Huai’an Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Huai’an, China
  • 4Department of Oncology, Nantong Tumor Hospital, Nantong, China

Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) is a prevalent malignancy with high mortality and recurrence rates, necessitating novel therapeutic strategies. Recent research highlights the pivotal role of metabolic reprogramming and immune microenvironment alterations in LSCC pathogenesis, providing promising avenues for targeted therapy. This review summarizes the metabolic characteristics of LSCC, including glycolysis, lipid metabolism, and amino acid biosynthesis, and their implications for tumor progression and therapeutic resistance. Additionally, this review further describes the tumor microenvironment’s immunosuppressive landscape, including immune checkpoint regulation, tumor-associated macrophages, and T-cell dysfunction. The integration of metabolic and immune-targeted strategies represents a promising frontier in LSCC treatment, warranting further investigation.

1 Introduction

Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) is a prevalent and aggressive malignancy, representing approximately one-third of head and neck cancers (1, 2). Recent research highlights the pivotal roles of metabolic reprogramming and the tumor immune microenvironment (TME) in cancer progression (36). Metabolic reprogramming, involving alterations in glucose, lipid, and amino acid metabolism, supports tumor growth, survival, and therapy resistance (712). Simultaneously, the TME, comprising immune cells, stromal components, and extracellular matrix elements, facilitates immune evasion and tumor progression (1315). Immunotherapy, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) like pembrolizumab and nivolumab, has transformed the treatment of recurrent or metastatic LSCC, improving survival and quality of life (16). However, variability in treatment response and resistance mechanisms necessitate a deeper understanding of the metabolic and immune landscape of LSCC to optimize therapeutic outcomes.

This review summarizes the metabolic characteristics of LSCC, including glycolysis, lipid metabolism, and amino acid biosynthesis, and their implications for tumor progression. We also examine the immunosuppressive features of the TME, such as immune checkpoint regulation and T-cell dysfunction, and their impact on immunotherapy. Finally, we provide the advances in immunotherapy and the potential of integrating metabolic and immune-targeted strategies to enhance precision medicine in LSCC management. By synthesizing current knowledge, this review aims to guide the development of more effective treatments for LSCC.

2 The tumor microenvironment in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma

2.1 Composition of the tumor microenvironment in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma

The tumor microenvironment is a complex ecosystem shaped by interactions among malignant cells, cancer stem cells (CSCs), and stromal components, including vascular-associated cells and extracellular matrix (ECM) elements, during tumorigenesis and progression (1720). This environment undergoes metabolic reprogramming, influencing gene expression, cellular differentiation, and tumor cell functionality. CSCs, a rare but critical subpopulation with self-renewal capacity (3, 7), play a key role in tumor recurrence and metastasis. The stromal compartment of the TME includes non-immune and immune cells. Non-immune stromal cells, such as fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and pericytes, provide structural and metabolic support. Immune cells, including lymphocytes and macrophages, facilitate immune evasion and promote immune tolerance (13). Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are particularly significant due to their role in ECM remodeling and supporting LSCC proliferation. Key immune subsets, such as dendritic cells, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), exert diverse immunomodulatory effects (16).

Non-cellular TME components include ECM proteins, cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, proteases, and non-coding RNAs (2129). ECM proteins regulate biomechanical properties, influencing cancer cell adhesion, survival, differentiation, and invasion. Secreted factors create a pro-angiogenic and immunosuppressive landscape, promoting tumor progression. Non-coding RNAs, implicated in LSCC radio-resistance (30), show potential as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, with their downregulation linked to reduced tumor proliferation and metastasis.

2.2 Tumor microenvironment and the development of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma

Cancer progression involves genetic alterations (31, 32), such as oncogene overexpression and tumor suppressor gene silencing, leading to epithelial cell changes and precancerous lesions (3335). TME promotes tissue invasion, metastasis, and immune evasion, facilitating malignant transformation (3640). Recent studies highlight key TME components in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) progression, identifying potential therapeutic targets (Table 1). Genomic analyses link LSCC risk to overexpression of SRY-box transcription factor 2 (SOX2), cortactin (CTTN), and focal adhesion kinase (FAK) (41, 42). SU (43) identified CD163+ TAMs and Ki-67 proliferation as dysplasia severity indicators, with Ki-67 facilitating spheroid formation, offering new predictors for LSCC risk stratification. LSCC invasion and metastasis involve complex mechanisms. KLOBUCAR (44) linked ladinin-1 to MIF-CD44-β1 integrin signaling, increasing LSCC cell motility. TOPF (45) demonstrated LSCC-derived factors in lymph nodes promote CD163+ TAMs, raising nodal metastasis risk. Immune evasion is critical in LSCC. Elevated Tregs in LSCC patients suppress CD4+ and CD25+ T cell proliferation (46). WEN (47) found IL-33 increases Foxp3+ GATA3+ Tregs and suppresses T cell proliferation via IL-10 and TGF-β1, with ST2 inhibition reversing this effect. PD-L1 overexpression in LSCC binds PD-1, inducing T cell anergy or apoptosis. Yu et al. (48) noted higher PD-L1 levels in LSCC, negatively correlating with CD8+ TILs and CD16+ M1 TAMs but positively with CD206+ M2 TAMs.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Key components of the LSCC tumor microenvironment and their functional roles.

These findings illustrate the multifaceted mechanisms by which LSCC invades surrounding tissues and metastasizes. Building upon this mechanistic understanding, recent studies have identified biomarkers that may assist in risk stratification and prognosis of LSCC. Prognostic biomarkers in LSCC include CD3, CD8, CD57, and S100, correlating with better outcomes, while CTLA-4 predicts poor prognosis (49). Tumor-stroma interactions, including stroma-rich tumors and fibroblastic patterns, indicate aggressive disease (50). Inflammatory factors regulate disease progression and significantly influence the efficacy of therapies (5156). Vassil et al. (57) found PD-L1 expression correlates with TIL density and survival, which was also observed in IL-12Rβ2+ TILs (58). Further, Schulter et al. (59) identified CD31-positive vasculature and VEGF as markers for recurrence risk.

3 Metabolic characteristics of the microenvironment in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma

The tumor microenvironment (TME) in cancer undergoes dynamic alterations in cellular and extracellular components, driving metabolic reprogramming—a hallmark of malignancy (6063). Metabolomics, utilizing mass spectrometry (MS) or nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, enables comprehensive profiling of metabolites in biological specimens, aiding in biomarker identification and elucidating disease mechanisms (64). NMR was used to analyze LSCC tissues, revealing elevated lactate, amino acids, choline compounds, creatine, taurine, and glutathione, alongside reduced triglycerides (64). Fei et al. (65) employed GC-TOF-MS and UPLC-TOF-MS to identify 41 differentially expressed metabolites in LSCC tissues, including upregulated TCA cycle intermediates, lactate, purine, and pyrimidine metabolites, and downregulated fatty acid derivatives. Urine metabolomics further distinguished LSCC patients from controls, highlighting pantothenic acid, palmitic acid, myristic acid, oleamide, sphingosine, and phytoglycine as potential diagnostic biomarkers (66). These findings underscore the role of lipid metabolism in bio-membrane biosynthesis and cancer cell proliferation. Current studies emphasize glycolysis, lipid metabolism, and amino acid biosynthesis as key metabolic features of LSCC, aligning with genomic and proteomic insights (67). These findings highlight the importance of metabolic reprogramming in LSCC pathogenesis and the potential of metabolomics for identifying therapeutic targets and biomarkers.

3.1 Glucose metabolism

The Warburg effect, as a hallmark of cancer metabolism, involves a preference for glycolysis over oxidative phosphorylation for ATP production, even under aerobic conditions (68). This metabolic shift promotes radiation resistance and malignant progression in cancers like LSCC. Glycolysis is initiated by glucose uptake via glucose transporter-1 (Glut-1) and phosphorylation by hexokinase-II (HK-II), with pyruvate converted to lactate by lactate-dehydrogenase (LDH) and exported via monocarboxylate transporter-4 (MCT-4) to prevent intracellular acidification (69). Glut-1, a key driver of the Warburg effect, was studied by WANG (70) in Hep-2 cells, revealing that aberrant WISP1 expression enhanced glucose uptake, lactate production, and cisplatin resistance by upregulating YAP1 and TEAD1. LU (71) demonstrated that CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of HIF-1 and Glut-1 impaired glucose uptake and LSCC progression. HU (72) linked PCK2 downregulation to suppressed LSCC progression and Glut-1 interaction.

HK-II, regulated by lncRNA loc285194 (73), miR-125a (74), and miR-125b-5p (75), is central to glycolysis. XU (76) found that lncRNA PCAT19 suppresses PDK4 via the miR-182/PDK4 axis, promoting glycolysis. LIU (77) showed that FOXJ1 knockdown attenuates glycolysis by inhibiting the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. MCT-4 facilitates lactate efflux, while MCT-1 mediates uptake, creating metabolic coupling (78). CURRY (79) observed high MCT-4 and low MCT-1 expression in tumor cells, promoting glycolysis. Targeting MCT-4 offers therapeutic potential. WANG (69) linked Glut-1, MCT-4, and CAIX expression to LSCC grade, with combined inhibition suppressing glycolysis. LIU (67) identified RASSF1, PGK1, CAII, and CAXII as key metabolic regulators in LSCC.

3.2 Lipid metabolism

Lipid-mediated signaling pathways are crucial in LSCC pathogenesis. Cancer cells upregulate fatty acid and phospholipid biosynthesis, producing metabolites that modify membrane components and act as signaling molecules. Fatty acid biosynthesis begins with citrate export from mitochondria, converted to acetyl-CoA by ATP citrate lyase. Acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC) then generates malonyl-CoA, which fatty acid synthase (FAS) converts to palmitic acid, a precursor for other fatty acids. FAS (80) and ACC (81) are overexpressed in LSCC, highlighting their role in fatty acid biosynthesis and potential as prognostic markers. Fatty acid desaturase 1 (FADS1), a key enzyme in polyunsaturated fatty acid biosynthesis, converts linoleic acid to arachidonic acid (AA). Zhao (82) found elevated FADS1 in LSCC tissues, with knockdown impairing cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, suggesting FADS1 promotes LSCC via AKT/mTOR signaling.

Lipid metabolism plays a crucial role in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) progression through its interplay with inflammation and oncogenic signaling pathways. Arachidonic acid (AA), released from membrane phospholipids by phospholipase A2 (PLA2), serves as a substrate for cyclooxygenase (COX) and lipoxygenase (LOX) to generate pro-inflammatory eicosanoids (83, 84). Studies have demonstrated elevated expression of PLCγ-2 and LOX-12 in LSCC, which correlates with advanced clinical stage, poor differentiation, and metastatic potential, while COX-2 overexpression has been associated with tumor recurrence (85). Early-stage LSCC exhibits increased levels of linoleic acid (LA), AA, and saturated fatty acids that enhance LOX and COX-2 activity, driving oxidative stress, inflammatory responses, angiogenesis, and immune evasion through upregulation of NF-κB and Bcl-2 (86, 87). Notably, reduced PTEN expression in LSCC tissues serves as a prognostic indicator, and DJ-1 silencing has been shown to restore PTEN expression, thereby inhibiting tumor cell proliferation and invasion (8890). These findings collectively identify FAS, ACC, LOX-12, COX-2, and PTEN as critical regulators in LSCC lipid metabolism, highlighting the therapeutic potential of targeting fatty acid biosynthesis, AA metabolism, and the PTEN/PI3K/AKT/mTOR axis in LSCC treatment (86).

3.3 Nitrogen metabolism

Nitrogen is essential for proteins, DNA, and RNA. In humans, it is primarily used for urea biosynthesis in the liver, with disruptions in the urea cycle common in tumors, leading to upregulated pyrimidine biosynthesis and amino acid metabolism (91). The lysyl oxidase (LOX) family stabilizes collagen and elastic fibers, regulating EMT and tumor progression (92). Elevated LOX expression correlates with poor prognosis and metastasis in LSCC (93). Tryptophan metabolism via indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) produces kynurenine, an immunosuppressive metabolite. ENGIN (94) found higher IDO activity in advanced LSCC, with elevated serum neopterin post-resection indicating poor outcomes. Adenosine, an extracellular signaling molecule, activates tumor cell receptors, promoting growth. WILKAT (95) showed A2B receptor inhibition reduces tumor growth and vascularization. Hypoxia and inflammation in the TME increase adenosine production, enhancing immunosuppression. CD39 and CD73, elevated in head and neck cancer, accelerate ATP hydrolysis, increasing adenosine and reinforcing immunosuppression (96).

Moreover, metabolic reprogramming shapes the immune microenvironment by modulating nutrient availability, altering metabolite composition, and producing immunosuppressive byproducts. For instance, lactate accumulation due to enhanced glycolysis impairs CD8+ T cell and NK cell cytotoxicity while promoting regulatory T cell (Treg) differentiation. Lipid accumulation in the TME compromises dendritic cell function and fosters M2-like macrophage polarization, promoting immune evasion. Elevated IDO activity in tryptophan metabolism generates kynurenine, suppressing T cell proliferation and driving Treg expansion. These alterations jointly contribute to immune dysfunction and resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors in LSCC (Table 2).

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Metabolic reprogramming In LSCC.

4 Advances in immunotherapy for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma

4.1 Cytotoxic agent

Cytotoxic agents such as cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu), and docetaxel play a central role in laryngeal preservation strategies, exerting antineoplastic effects through mechanisms involving DNA damage or inhibition of protein synthesis (97). Cisplatin, a cornerstone in the treatment of LSCC, demonstrates substantial efficacy but is limited by dose-dependent nephrotoxicity. Similarly, 5-Fu, a widely utilized chemotherapeutic for solid tumors, carries a cardiotoxicity risk ranging from 0% to 35% (98). Docetaxel, effective against various metastatic malignancies, is frequently associated with peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, and neutropenia—adverse effects that often necessitate dose modifications (99). Clinical studies have provided supportive evidence for laryngeal preservation. Urba et al. Urba et al. (100) reported a 3-year laryngeal preservation rate of 70% using induction chemotherapy, exceeding the 64% rate observed in the Veterans Affairs trial (101). The RTOG 91–11 trial and its follow-up corroborated these findings (102, 103). Notably, incorporation of docetaxel into the cisplatin and 5-Fu induction regimen—forming the TPF regimen—has demonstrated superior outcomes. The TPF regimen yielded improved laryngeal preservation rates at both 5 years (74% vs. 58%) and 10 years (70% vs. 47%) compared to PF alone (104), establishing TPF as a more effective induction strategy (105, 106).

However, concerns regarding patient selection and generalizability have emerged. Olsen (107) emphasized that participants in these trials were generally younger and presented with limited nodal disease, potentially limiting the applicability of findings to broader patient populations. Furthermore, conflicting evidence has challenged the universal adoption of laryngeal preservation protocols. For instance, Nocon (108) and Bates (109) reported improved survival with total laryngectomy. Dyckhoff (110) further noted that patients with T4-stage LSCC treated with chemoradiotherapy exhibited a twofold increase in mortality risk compared to those receiving total laryngectomy followed by adjuvant radiotherapy. Collectively, these findings underscore the importance of individualized treatment planning, as the heterogeneity in tumor staging, patient characteristics, and treatment response continues to constrain the universal implementation of induction chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy as a standard approach.

4.2 Epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies

Monoclonal antibodies targeting the EGFR, such as cetuximab and nimotuzumab, are the only clinically approved targeted therapies for head and HNSCC (111). EGFR is overexpressed in approximately 90% of HNSCC cases, and its aberrant activation in laryngeal carcinoma promotes uncontrolled proliferation, radiotherapy resistance, and poor prognosis (112, 113). Physiologically, EGFR regulates epidermal cell development, with expression limited to undifferentiated basal keratinocytes and diminishing as cells migrate to the epithelial surface. Activation by ligands like epidermal growth factor (EGF) and TGF-α triggers tyrosine kinase signaling, driving growth-associated transcription in normal and malignant cells. Cetuximab and nimotuzumab competitively inhibit EGFR activation, disrupting downstream signaling, reducing cellular survival, and enhancing tumor-targeting efficacy compared to conventional chemotherapy.

EGFR inhibition enhances radiosensitivity in laryngeal carcinoma, improving radiotherapy outcomes (114). Cetuximab combined with radiotherapy extended locoregional control to 24.4 months versus 14.9 months with radiotherapy alone, likely due to enhanced apoptosis without increased toxicity (115). Bonner et al. (116) reported a 3-year laryngeal preservation rate of 87.9% with cetuximab plus radiotherapy, compared to 76.8% with radiotherapy alone. Similarly, Noronha et al. (117) observed a 74.1% laryngeal preservation rate with nimotuzumab combined with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), supporting anti-EGFR antibodies’ role in organ preservation (118). However, the RTOG 10–16 trial found lower 5-year overall survival with cetuximab plus radiotherapy (77.9%) versus cisplatin plus radiotherapy (84.6%) in HPV-positive laryngeal carcinoma (119). While cetuximab is less effective than cisplatin in cisplatin-tolerant patients, it remains a viable alternative for cisplatin-resistant or intolerant individuals. Despite its clinical utility, cetuximab benefits only a subset of patients, underscoring the importance of patient selection in optimizing EGFR-targeted therapy.

4.3 Immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have significantly advanced the treatment of cancer (120123), particularly for recurrent or metastatic cases. In 2016, the FDA approved PD-1 inhibitors nivolumab and pembrolizumab for platinum-refractory recurrent/metastatic HNSCC (124). These inhibitors counteract tumor immune evasion by restoring T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity, targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis, a key regulator of T-cell activation. PD-1, expressed on immune cells, interacts with PD-L1 to suppress T-cell activity via the PI3K-AKT pathway, promoting immune tolerance (125, 126). Nivolumab and pembrolizumab block PD-1, preventing immune suppression and enhancing antitumor immunity.

Pembrolizumab’s efficacy was first shown in the KEYNOTE-012 trial (127), with the phase III KEYNOTE-048 trial (128) confirming its role as a first-line treatment. Recently, a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of the PD-1 monoclonal antibody finotonlimab (SCT-I10A) combined with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (C5F) as first-line treatment for recurrent HNSCC (NCT04146402). In the finotonlimab plus C5F group, the median OS was 14.1 months, compared with 10.5 months in the placebo plus C5F group. This study highlights the effectiveness of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in recurrent or metastatic head and HNSCC (129). Furthermore, clinical studies have shown that PD-L1-high HNSCC patients treated with a PD-L1 inhibitor combined with 5-azacytidine (5-aza) experienced a significant extension in overall survival (OS) (NCT03019003) (130). To date, numerous clinical trials are still underway, evaluating the efficacy and optimal dosage of immune checkpoint inhibitors, exploring other immune targets, and providing new therapeutic targets for the treatment of laryngeal cancer. In addition to PD-1, other immune checkpoints such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG-3) are being investigated (131, 132).

5 Conclusion

Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) is characterized by profound metabolic reprogramming and an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, both of which contribute to disease progression and therapeutic resistance. Immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has demonstrated substantial promise in treating recurrent or metastatic LSCC. However, limitations in response rates and the development of resistance necessitate combinatorial strategies.

Recent preclinical and early-phase clinical studies have highlighted the potential of combining metabolic inhibitors with ICIs to enhance antitumor immunity. For instance, co-administration of PD-1 inhibitors with glycolytic inhibitors such as 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) has been shown to restore CD8+ T cell function and reduce tumor burden in murine models of head and HNSCC, including LSCC. Similarly, targeting lipid metabolism using fatty acid oxidation (FAO) inhibitors like etomoxir in combination with PD-1 blockade has led to augmented T cell infiltration and enhanced antitumor efficacy in preclinical studies. In clinical contexts, a phase I trial combining pembrolizumab with the glutaminase inhibitor CB-839 (telaglenastat) in solid tumors demonstrated favorable safety and preliminary antitumor activity, supporting the translational relevance of metabolic-immune co-targeting strategies. These findings underscore the therapeutic potential of dual modulation of tumor metabolism and immune checkpoints, offering a promising avenue for overcoming immune resistance and improving clinical outcomes in LSCC. Future research should aim to delineate optimal combinations, identify predictive biomarkers, and validate efficacy through large-scale clinical trials. Integrating metabolic and immune-targeted therapies represents a rational and potentially transformative approach for precision medicine in LSCC treatment.

Author contributions

KM: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft. QM: Investigation, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft. BF: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Validation, Writing – original draft. TN: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft. ZZ: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Software, Writing – original draft. HN: Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Resources.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82371130), Basic Research Project of Huai’an (HAB2024015), Special Research Project of Nantong Municipal Health Commission (QN2024027), and Jiangsu Provincial Research Hospital (YJXYY202204-2-YSB02).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Patterson RH, Fischman VG, Wasserman I, Siu J, Shrime MG, Fagan JJ, et al. Global burden of head and neck cancer: economic consequences, health, and the role of surgery. Otolaryngology–Head Neck Surg. (2020) 162:296–303. doi: 10.1177/0194599819897265

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Piotrowski I, Zhu X, Saccon TD, Ashiqueali S, Schneider A, de Carvalho Nunes AD, et al. miRNAs as Biomarkers for Diagnosing and Predicting Survival of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients. Cancers (Basel). (2021) 13:3980. doi: 10.3390/cancers13163980

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Xia Z, Chen S, He M, Li B, Deng Y, Yi L, et al. Editorial: Targeting metabolism to activate T cells and enhance the efficacy of checkpoint blockade immunotherapy in solid tumors. Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1247178. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1247178

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Zhang P, Pei S, Wu L, Xia Z, Wang Q, Huang X, et al. Integrating multiple machine learning methods to construct glutamine metabolism-related signatures in lung adenocarcinoma. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2023) 14:1196372. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1196372

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Zhang X, Zhuge J, Liu J, Xia Z, Wang H, Gao Q, et al. : Prognostic signatures of sphingolipids: Understanding the immune landscape and predictive role in immunotherapy response and outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1153423. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1153423

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Liu J, Zhang P, Yang F, Jiang K, Sun S, Xia Z, et al. Integrating single-cell analysis and machine learning to create glycosylation-based gene signature for prognostic prediction of uveal melanoma. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2023) 14:1163046. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1163046

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Greco A, Rizzo MI, De Virgilio A, Gallo A, Fusconi M, Pagliuca G, et al. Cancer stem cells in laryngeal cancer: what we know. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. (2016) 273:3487–95. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3837-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Soltani M, Zhao Y, Xia Z, Ganjalikhani Hakemi M, Bazhin AV. The importance of cellular metabolic pathways in pathogenesis and selective treatments of hematological Malignancies. Front Oncol. (2021) 11:767026. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.767026

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Zhao S, Zhang X, Gao F, Chi H, Zhang J, Xia Z, et al. Identification of copper metabolism-related subtypes and establishment of the prognostic model in ovarian cancer. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2023) 14:1145797. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1145797

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Wang X, Zhao Y, Strohmer DF, Yang W, Xia Z, Yu C. The prognostic value of MicroRNAs associated with fatty acid metabolism in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Front Genet. (2022) 13:983672. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.983672

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Zuo D, Li C, Liu T, Yue M, Zhang J, Ning G. Construction and validation of a metabolic risk model predicting prognosis of colon cancer. Sci Rep. (2021) 11:6837. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86286-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Zhong Y, Zhang Y, Wei S, Chen J, Zhong C, Cai W, et al. Dissecting the effect of sphingolipid metabolism gene in progression and microenvironment of osteosarcoma to develop a prognostic signature. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2022) 13:1030655. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1030655

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. (2011) 144:646–74. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Xie H, Xi X, Lei T, Liu H, Xia Z. CD8(+) T cell exhaustion in the tumor microenvironment of breast cancer. Front Immunol. (2024) 15:1507283. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1507283

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Deng Y, Shi M, Yi L, Naveed Khan M, Xia Z, Li X. Eliminating a barrier: Aiming at VISTA, reversing MDSC-mediated T cell suppression in the tumor microenvironment. Heliyon. (2024) 10:e37060. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37060

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Bai S, Yang X, Zhang N, Zhang F, Shen Z, Yang N, et al. Function of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in solid tumors - a review. Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao. (2019) 35:2308–25. doi: 10.13345/j.cjb.190300

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Zhang C, Sun D, Li C, Liu Y, Zhou Y, Zhang J. Development of cancer-associated fibroblasts subtype and prognostic model in gastric cancer and the landscape of tumor microenvironment. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. (2022) 152:106309. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2022.106309

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Liu T, Li C, Zhang J, Hu H, Li C. Unveiling efferocytosis-related signatures through the integration of single-cell analysis and machine learning: a predictive framework for prognosis and immunotherapy response in hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1237350. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1237350

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Huang L, Sun F, Liu Z, Jin W, Zhang Y, Chen J, et al. Probing the potential of defense response-associated genes for predicting the progression, prognosis, and immune microenvironment of osteosarcoma. Cancers (Basel). (2023) 15:2405. doi: 10.3390/cancers15082405

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Liu G, Xiong D, Che Z, Chen H, Jin W. A novel inflammation-associated prognostic signature for clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Oncol Lett. (2022) 24:307. doi: 10.3892/ol.2022.13427

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Huang L, Jin W, Bao Y, Zeng X, Zhang Y, Zhou J, et al. Identification and validation of long noncoding RNA AC083900.1 and RP11-283C24.1 for prediction of progression of osteosarcoma. Mutat Res. (2023) 827:111828. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2023.111828

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Wang Z, Yan S, Liao S, Zhang Y, Wu S, Zhou M, et al. Dysregulated lncSNHG12 suppresses the invasion and migration of trophoblasts by regulating Dio2/Snail axis to involve in recurrent spontaneous abortion. Biochem Pharmacol. (2024) 229:116459. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2024.116459

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Zhao Y, Wei K, Chi H, Xia Z, Li X. IL-7: A promising adjuvant ensuring effective T cell responses and memory in combination with cancer vaccines? Front Immunol. (2022) 13:1022808. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1022808

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Gong X, Chi H, Strohmer DF, Teichmann AT, Xia Z, Wang Q. Exosomes: A potential tool for immunotherapy of ovarian cancer. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:1089410. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1089410

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Balkwill FR, Capasso M, Hagemann T. The tumor microenvironment at a glance. J Cell Sci. (2012) 125:5591–6. doi: 10.1242/jcs.116392

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Gong X, Chi H, Xia Z, Yang G, Tian G. Advances in HPV-associated tumor management: Therapeutic strategies and emerging insights. J Med Virol. (2023) 95:e28950. doi: 10.1002/jmv.28950

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Xiong J, Chi H, Yang G, Zhao S, Zhang J, Tran LJ, et al. Revolutionizing anti-tumor therapy: unleashing the potential of B cell-derived exosomes. Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1188760. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1188760

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Zhou W, Li S, Zhang X, Li C, Zhang J. miR-143-3p shuttled by M2 macrophage-derived extracellular vesicles induces progression of colorectal cancer through a ZC3H12A/C/EBPbeta axis-dependent mechanism. Int Immunopharmacol. (2023) 119:110137. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.110137

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Liu T, Yin L, Yan G, Li C, Wang L. A meta-analysis of microRNA-17 as a potential biomarker in diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). (2018) 64:86–93. doi: 10.14715/cmb/2018.64.6.15

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Wang K, Tang J, Liu X, Wang Y, Chen W, Zheng R. UBR5 regulates proliferation and radiosensitivity in human laryngeal carcinoma via the p38/MAPK signaling pathway. Oncol Rep. (2020) 44:685–97. doi: 10.3892/or.2020.7620

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Gu J, Wang Y, Zhang H, Gu H, Zhu H. SIGLEC1 has the potential to be an immune-related prognostic indicator in colon adenocarcinoma: a study based on transcriptomic data and Mendelian randomization analysis. Discov Oncol. (2025) 16:324. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-02093-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Liu Y, Cheng L, Song X, Li C, Zhang J, Wang L. A TP53-associated immune prognostic signature for the prediction of the overall survival and therapeutic responses in pancreatic cancer. Math Biosci Eng. (2022) 19:191–208. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Li Z, Zhou H, Xia Z, Xia T, Du G, Franziska SD, et al. HMGA1 augments palbociclib efficacy via PI3K/mTOR signaling in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Biomark Res. (2023) 11:33. doi: 10.1186/s40364-023-00473-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Zhai X, Xia Z, Du G, Zhang X, Xia T, Ma D, et al. LRP1B suppresses HCC progression through the NCSTN/PI3K/AKT signaling axis and affects doxorubicin resistance. Genes Dis. (2023) 10:2082–96. doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2022.10.021

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Zhang H, Zhai X, Liu Y, Xia Z, Xia T, Du G, et al. : NOP2-mediated m5C Modification of c-Myc in an EIF3A-Dependent Manner to Reprogram Glucose Metabolism and Promote Hepatocellular Carcinoma Progression. Res (Wash D C). (2023) 6:0184. doi: 10.34133/research.0184

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Chi H, Zhao S, Yang J, Gao X, Peng G, Zhang J, et al. : T-cell exhaustion signatures characterize the immune landscape and predict HCC prognosis via integrating single-cell RNA-seq and bulk RNA-sequencing. Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1137025. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1137025

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Chi H, Jiang P, Xu K, Zhao Y, Song B, Peng G, et al. A novel anoikis-related gene signature predicts prognosis in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and reveals immune infiltration. Front Genet. (2022) 13:984273. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.984273

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Zhu H, Zhao Y, Wang Y, Wei G, Liu J. Understanding the relationship between cuproptosis and the development of hepatocellular carcinoma: implications for targeted therapies. Front Immunol. (2025) 16:1557223. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1557223

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Jiang S, Yang X, Lin Y, Liu Y, Tran LJ, Zhang J, et al. Unveiling Anoikis-related genes: A breakthrough in the prognosis of bladder cancer. J Gene Med. (2024) 26:e3651. doi: 10.1002/jgm.v26.1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Yang H, Li Z, Zhu S, Wang W, Zhang J, Zhao D, et al. Molecular mechanisms of pancreatic cancer liver metastasis: the role of PAK2. Front Immunol. (2024) 15:1347683. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1347683

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Granda-Diaz R, Menendez ST, Pedregal Mallo D, Hermida-Prado F, Rodriguez R, Suarez-Fernandez L, et al. : the novel role of SOX2 as an early predictor of cancer risk in patients with laryngeal precancerous lesions. Cancers (Basel). (2019) 11:286. doi: 10.3390/cancers11030286

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Villaronga MA, Hermida-Prado F, Granda-Diaz R, Menendez ST, Alvarez-Teijeiro S, Quer M, et al. : immunohistochemical expression of cortactin and focal adhesion kinase predicts recurrence risk and laryngeal cancer risk beyond histologic grading. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. (2018) 27:805–13. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-1082

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Su C, Jia S, Liu H. Immunolocalization of CD163+ Tumor-associated macrophages and symmetric proliferation of ki-67 as biomarkers to differentiate new different grades of laryngeal dysplasia. Am J Clin Pathol. (2018) 149:8–16. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqx107

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Klobucar M, Sedic M, Gehrig P, Grossmann J, Bilic M, Kovac-Bilic L, et al. Basement membrane protein ladinin-1 and the MIF-CD44-beta1 integrin signaling axis are implicated in laryngeal cancer metastasis. Biochim Biophys Acta. (2016) 1862:1938–54. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2016.07.014

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Topf MC, Tuluc M, Harshyne LA, Luginbuhl A. Macrophage type 2 differentiation in a patient with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma and metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma to the cervical lymph nodes. J Immunother Cancer. (2017) 5:60. doi: 10.1186/s40425-017-0264-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Sun W, Li WJ, Fu QL, Wu CY, Lin JZ, Zhu XL, et al. Functionally distinct subsets of CD4(+) regulatory T cells in patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma are indicative of immune deregulation and disease progression. Oncol Rep. (2015) 33:354–62. doi: 10.3892/or.2014.3553

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Wen YH, Lin HQ, Li H, Zhao Y, Lui VWY, Chen L, et al. Stromal interleukin-33 promotes regulatory T cell-mediated immunosuppression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and correlates with poor prognosis. Cancer Immunol Immunother. (2019) 68:221–32. doi: 10.1007/s00262-018-2265-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Yu D, Cheng J, Xue K, Zhao X, Wen L, Xu C. Expression of programmed death-ligand 1 in laryngeal carcinoma and its effects on immune cell subgroup infiltration. Pathol Oncol Res. (2019) 25:1437–43. doi: 10.1007/s12253-018-0501-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Karpathiou G, Casteillo F, Giroult JB, Forest F, Fournel P, Monaya A, et al. Prognostic impact of immune microenvironment in laryngeal and pharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Immune cell subtypes, immuno-suppressive pathways and clinicopathologic characteristics. Oncotarget. (2017) 8:19310–22. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14242

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Karpathiou G, Vieville M, Gavid M, Camy F, Dumollard JM, Magne N, et al. Prognostic significance of tumor budding, tumor-stroma ratio, cell nests size, and stroma type in laryngeal and pharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas. Head Neck. (2019) 41:1918–27. doi: 10.1002/hed.25629

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Wang JF, Wang JS, Liu Y, Ji B, Ding BC, Wang YX, et al. Knockdown of integrin beta1 inhibits proliferation and promotes apoptosis in bladder cancer cells. Biofactors. (2025) 51:e2150. doi: 10.1002/biof.2150

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Zhai X, Zhang H, Xia Z, Liu M, Du G, Jiang Z, et al. : Oxytocin alleviates liver fibrosis via hepatic macrophages. JHEP Rep. (2024) 6:101032. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2024.101032

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Xiao J, Lin H, Liu B, Xia Z, Zhang J, Jin J. Decreased S1P and SPHK2 are involved in pancreatic acinar cell injury. Biomark Med. (2019) 13:627–37. doi: 10.2217/bmm-2018-0404

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Xiao J, Huang K, Lin H, Xia Z, Zhang J, Li D, et al. Mogroside II(E) inhibits digestive enzymes via suppression of interleukin 9/interleukin 9 receptor signalling in acute pancreatitis. Front Pharmacol. (2020) 11:859. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00859

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Zhang H, Xia T, Xia Z, Zhou H, Li Z, Wang W, et al. KIF18A inactivates hepatic stellate cells and alleviates liver fibrosis through the TTC3/Akt/mTOR pathway. Cell Mol Life Sci. (2024) 81:96. doi: 10.1007/s00018-024-05114-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Zhang H, Ni M, Wang H, Zhang J, Jin D, Busuttil RW, et al. Gsk3beta regulates the resolution of liver ischemia/reperfusion injury via MerTK. JCI Insight. (2023) 8:e151819. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.151819

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Vassilakopoulou M, Avgeris M, Velcheti V, Kotoula V, Rampias T, Chatzopoulos K, et al. : evaluation of PD-L1 expression and associated tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. (2016) 22:704–13. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1543

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Tao Y, Gross N, Liu Y, Zhang L, Li G, Huang Z, et al. A high ratio of IL-12Rbeta2-positive tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes indicates favorable prognosis in laryngeal cancer. Oncol. (2017) 74:148–56. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.10.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Schluter A, Weller P, Kanaan O, Nel I, Heusgen L, Hoing B, et al. l: CD31 and VEGF are prognostic biomarkers in early-stage, but not in late-stage, laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer. (2018) 18:272. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4180-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Wilkie MD, Lau AS, Vlatkovic N, Jones TM, Boyd MT. Metabolic signature of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Consequences of TP53 mutation and therapeutic perspectives. Oncol. (2018) 83:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.05.018

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Zhang J, Peng G, Chi H, Yang J, Xie X, Song G, et al. CD8 + T-cell marker genes reveal different immune subtypes of oral lichen planus by integrating single-cell RNA-seq and bulk RNA-sequencing. BMC Health. (2023) 23:464. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03138-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Zhang X, Zhang P, Cong A, Feng Y, Chi H, Xia Z, et al. Unraveling molecular networks in thymic epithelial tumors: deciphering the unique signatures. Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1264325. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1264325

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Wang Y, Wang J, Liu J, Zhu H. Immune-related diagnostic markers for benign prostatic hyperplasia and their potential as drug targets. Front Immunol. (2024) 15:1516362. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1516362

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Somashekar BS, Kamarajan P, Danciu T, Kapila YL, Chinnaiyan AM, Rajendiran TM, et al. Magic angle spinning NMR-based metabolic profiling of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma tissues. J Proteome Res. (2011) 10:5232–41. doi: 10.1021/pr200800w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Fei MJ, Xu YN, Wang JD. Preliminary findings for metabolite profiles of papillary thyroid carcinoma and laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. (2017) 31:1561–5. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2017.20.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Chen J, Hou H, Chen H, Luo Y, Zhang L, Zhang Y, et al. Urinary metabolomics for discovering metabolic biomarkers of laryngeal cancer using UPLC-QTOF/MS. J Pharm BioMed Anal. (2019) 167:83–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2019.01.035

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Liu F, Du J, Liu J, Wen B. Identification of key target genes and pathways in laryngeal carcinoma. Oncol Lett. (2016) 12:1279–86. doi: 10.3892/ol.2016.4750

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Tripathi P, Kamarajan P, Somashekar BS, MacKinnon N, Chinnaiyan AM, Kapila YL, et al. Delineating metabolic signatures of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: phospholipase A2, a potential therapeutic target. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. (2012) 44:1852–61. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2012.06.025

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Wang YB, Xu O, Zhang RJ, Shan CG. A preliminary study on the relationship between GLUT-1, MCT-4 and CA in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. (2017) 31:510–514;519. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2017.07.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Wang L, Sun J, Gao P, Su K, Wu H, Li J, et al. Wnt1-inducible signaling protein 1 regulates laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma glycolysis and chemoresistance via the YAP1/TEAD1/GLUT1 pathway. J Cell Physiol. (2019) 234:15941–50. doi: 10.1002/jcp.v234.9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Lu ZJ, Yu Q, Zhou SH, Fan J, Shen LF, Bao YY, et al. Construction of a GLUT-1 and HIF-1alpha gene knockout cell model in HEp-2 cells using the CRISPR/Cas9 technique. Cancer Manag Res. (2019) 11:2087–96. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S183859

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Hu Y, Deng K, Pan M, Liu S, Li W, Huang J, et al. Down-regulation of PCK2 inhibits the invasion and metastasis of laryngeal carcinoma cells. Am J Transl Res. (2020) 12:3842–57.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

73. Gao Y, Wang Z, Tong J, Zheng Y. LncRNA loc285194 inhibits tumor growth of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma cells by downregulating hexokinase 2. Exp Ther Med. (2019) 18:2378–84. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7761

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Sun Z, Zhang W, Li Q. miR-125a suppresses viability and glycolysis and induces apoptosis by targeting Hexokinase 2 in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Cell Biosci. (2017) 7:51. doi: 10.1186/s13578-017-0178-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Hui L, Zhang J, Guo X. MiR-125b-5p suppressed the glycolysis of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma by down-regulating hexokinase-2. BioMed Pharmacother. (2018) 103:1194–201. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.04.098

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Xu S, Guo J, Zhang W. lncRNA PCAT19 promotes the proliferation of laryngocarcinoma cells via modulation of the miR-182/PDK4 axis. J Cell Biochem. (2019) 120:12810–21. doi: 10.1002/jcb.v120.8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Liu L, Zhang P, Shao Y, Quan F, Li H. Knockdown of FOXJ1 inhibits the proliferation, migration, invasion, and glycolysis in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma cells. J Cell Biochem. (2019) 120:15874–82. doi: 10.1002/jcb.v120.9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Li F, Simon MC. Cancer cells don’t live alone: metabolic communication within tumor microenvironments. Dev Cell. (2020) 54:183–95. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.06.018

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Curry JM, Tuluc M, Whitaker-Menezes D, Ames JA, Anantharaman A, Butera A, et al. Cancer metabolism, stemness and tumor recurrence: MCT1 and MCT4 are functional biomarkers of metabolic symbiosis in head and neck cancer. Cell Cycle. (2013) 12:1371–84. doi: 10.4161/cc.24092

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Villaronga M, Hermida-Prado F, Granda-Díaz R, Menéndez ST, Álvarez-Teijeiro S, Quer M, et al. immunohistochemical expression of cortactin and focal adhesion kinase predicts recurrence risk and laryngeal cancer risk beyond histologic grading. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. (2018) 27:805–13. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-1082

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Li K, Zhang C, Chen L, Wang P, Fang Y, Zhu J, et al. The role of acetyl-coA carboxylase2 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. PeerJ. (2019) 7:e7037. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7037

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Zhao R, Tian L, Zhao B, Sun Y, Cao J, Chen K, et al. FADS1 promotes the progression of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma through activating AKT/mTOR signaling. Cell Death Dis. (2020) 11:272. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-2457-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Louw L, Claassen J. Rationale for adjuvant fatty acid therapy to prevent radiotherapy failure and tumor recurrence during early laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Prostaglandins Leukotrienes Essential Fatty Acids. (2008) 78:21–6. doi: 10.1016/j.plefa.2007.10.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Lin Q, Jin W, Shan D. Concerns regarding the AtTEnd trial in advanced endometrial carcinoma. Lancet Oncol. (2024) 25:e534. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00486-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Wang J, Li X, Xu O, Shan C. The role and clinical significance of 12-LOX passway in arachidonic acid metabolism induced by phospholipase Cgamma-2 in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. (2013) 27:1355–9.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

86. Kourelis K, Vandoros G, Kourelis T, Papadas T, Goumas P, Sotiropoulou-Bonikou G. Low COX2 in tumor and upregulation in stroma mark laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma progression. Laryngoscope. (2009) 119:1723–9. doi: 10.1002/lary.v119:9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Kourelis K, Sotiropoulou-Bonikou G, Vandoros G, Repanti M, Varakis I, Goumas P. Coordinated upregulation of COX-2 and NF-kappaB is a steady feature of laryngeal carcinogenesis. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. (2007) 69:181–9. doi: 10.1159/000099229

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Mastronikolis NS, Tsiambas E, Papadas TA, Karameris A, Ragos V, Peschos D, et al. Deregulation of PTEN expression in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma based on tissue microarray digital analysis. Anticancer Res. (2017) 37:5521–4. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.11983

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Sullu Y, Gun S, Atmaca S, Karagoz F, Kandemir B. Poor prognostic clinicopathologic features correlate with VEGF expression but not with PTEN expression in squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx. Diagn Pathol. (2010) 5:35. doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-5-35

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Zhu XL, Sun W, Lei WB, Zhuang HW, Hou WJ, Wen WP. DJ-1-induced phosphatase and tensin homologue downregulation is associated with proliferative and invasive activity of laryngeal cancer cells. Mol Med Rep. (2015) 12:2003–8. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2015.3617

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

91. Lee JS, Adler L, Karathia H, Carmel N, Rabinovich S, Auslander N, et al. : urea cycle dysregulation generates clinically relevant genomic and biochemical signatures. Cell. (2018) 174:1559–1570.e1522. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.019

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Cano A, Santamaría PG, Moreno-Bueno G. LOXL2 in epithelial cell plasticity and tumor progression. Future Oncol. (2012) 8:1095–108. doi: 10.2217/fon.12.105

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

93. Peinado H, Moreno-Bueno G, Hardisson D, Peírez-Goímez E, Santos V, Mendiola M, et al. : lysyl oxidase–like 2 as a new poor prognosis marker of squamous cell carcinomas. Cancer Res. (2008) 68:4541–50. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6345

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

94. Engin AB, Gunaydin RO, Kesikli SA, Fuchs D, Hosal AS. Serum neopterin concentrations and tryptophan degradation pattern in patients with late stage larynx carcinoma. Pteridines. (2017) 28:91–5. doi: 10.1515/pterid-2017-0004

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

95. Wilkat M, Bast H, Drees R, Dünser J, Mahr A, Azoitei N, et al. : Adenosine receptor 2B activity promotes autonomous growth, migration as well as vascularization of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells. Int J Cancer. (2020) 147:202–17. doi: 10.1002/ijc.v147.1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

96. Mandapathil M, Szczepanski MJ, Szajnik M, Ren J, Lenzner DE, Jackson EK, et al. Increased ectonucleotidase expression and activity in regulatory T cells of patients with head and neck cancer. Clin Cancer Res. (2009) 15:6348–57. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1143

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

97. Mesía R, Vázquez S, Grau JJ, García-Sáenz JA, Lozano A, García C, et al. : A phase 2 open label, single-arm trial to evaluate the combination of cetuximab plus taxotere, cisplatin, and 5-flurouracil as an induction regimen in patients with unresectabl e squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. (2016) 94:289–96. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.10.019

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

98. More LA, Lane S, Asnani A. 5-FU cardiotoxicity: vasospasm, myocarditis, and sudden death. Curr Cardiol Rep. (2021) 23:17. doi: 10.1007/s11886-021-01441-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

99. Amaya C, Smith ER, Xu XX. Low intensity ultrasound as an antidote to taxane/paclitaxel-induced cytotoxicity. J Cancer. (2022) 13:2362–73. doi: 10.7150/jca.71263

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

100. Urba S, Wolf G, Eisbruch A, Worden F, Lee J, Bradford C, et al. Single-cycle induction chemotherapy selects patients with advanced laryngeal cancer for combined chemoradiation: a new treatment paradigm. J Clin Oncol. (2006) 24:593–8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.2047

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

101. Ji Z, Wang X, Xin J, Ma L, Zuo D, Li H, et al. : Multiomics reveals tumor microenvironment remodeling in locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer following neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy. J Immunother Cancer. (2024) 12:e010041. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2024-010041

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

102. Forastiere AA, Zhang Q, Weber RS, Maor MH, Goepfert H, Pajak TF, et al. : Long-term results of RTOG 91-11: a comparison of three nonsurgical treatment strategies to preserve the larynx in patients with locally advanced larynx cancer. J Clin Oncol. (2013) 31:845–52. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.6097

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

103. Forastiere AA, Goepfert H, Maor M, Pajak TF, Weber R, Morrison W, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for organ preservation in advanced laryngeal cancer. N Engl J Med. (2003) 349:2091–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa031317

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

104. Janoray G, Pointreau Y, Garaud P, Chapet S, Alfonsi M, Sire C, et al. Long-term results of a multicenter randomized phase III trial of induction chemotherapy with cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, +/- docetaxel for larynx preservation. J Natl Cancer Inst. (2016) 108:djv368. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv368

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

105. Takácsi-Nagy Z, Hitre E, Remenár É, Oberna F, Polgár C, Major T, et al. Docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy alone in stage III-IV unresectabl e head and neck cancer: Results of a randomized phase II study. Strahlenther Onkol. (2015) 191:635–41. doi: 10.1007/s00066-015-0829-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

106. Lorch JH, Goloubeva O, Haddad RI, Cullen K, Sarlis N, Tishler R, et al. Induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and fluorouracil alone or in combination with docetaxel in locally advanced squamous-cell cancer of the head and neck: long-term results of the TAX 324 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. (2011) 12:153–9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70279-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

107. Olsen KD. Reexamining the treatment of advanced laryngeal cancer. Head Neck. (2010) 32:1–7. doi: 10.1002/hed.21294

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

108. Nocon CC, Yesensky J, Ajmani GS, Bhayani MK. Failed larynx preservation and survival in patients with advanced larynx cancer. Am J Otolaryngol. (2019) 40:542–6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2019.04.014

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

109. Bates JE, Amdur RJ, Morris CM, Hitchcock KE, Dziegielewski PT, Boyce BJ, et al. Curative-dose chemoradiotherapy versus total laryngectomy for stage T3-T4 squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx: an “Apples-to-apples” Analysis of the national cancer database. Am J Clin Oncol. (2019) 42:527–33. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000550

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

110. Dyckhoff G, Plinkert PK, Ramroth H. A change in the study evaluation paradigm reveals that larynx preservation compromises survival in T4 laryngeal cancer patients. BMC Cancer. (2017) 17:609. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3608-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

111. Taberna M, Oliva M, Mesia R. Cetuximab-containing combinations in locally advanced and recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Front Oncol. (2019) 9:383. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00383

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

112. Liang K, Ang KK, Milas L, Hunter N, Fan Z. The epidermal growth factor receptor mediates radioresistance. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. (2003) 57:246–54. doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00511-X

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

113. Kalyankrishna S, Grandis JR. Epidermal growth factor receptor biology in head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol. (2006) 24:2666–72. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.8306

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

114. Harari PM, Huang SM. Head and neck cancer as a clinical model for molecular targeting of therapy: combining EGFR blockade with radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. (2001) 49:427–33. doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(00)01488-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

115. Egloff AM, Lee JW, Langer CJ, Quon H, Vaezi A, Grandis JR, et al. : Phase II study of cetuximab in combination with cisplatin and radiation in unresectabl e, locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Eastern cooperative oncology group trial E3303. Clin Cancer Res. (2014) 20:5041–51. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0051

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

116. Bonner J, Giralt J, Harari P, Spencer S, Schulten J, Hossain A, et al. Cetuximab and radiotherapy in laryngeal preservation for cancers of the larynx and hypopharynx: A secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. (2016) 142:842–9. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.1228

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

117. Patil VM, Noronha V, Joshi A, Agarwal J, Ghosh-Laskar S, Budrukkar A, et al. A randomized phase 3 trial comparing nimotuzumab plus cisplatin chemoradiotherapy versus cisplatin chemoradiotherapy alone in locally advanced head and neck cancer. Cancer. (2019) 125:3184–97. doi: 10.1002/cncr.v125.18

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

118. Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J, Azarnia N, Shin DM, Cohen RB, et al. Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med. (2006) 354:567–78. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa053422

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

119. Gillison ML, Trotti AM, Harris J, Eisbruch A, Harari PM, Adelstein DJ, et al. Radiotherapy plus cetuximab or cisplatin in human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer (NRG Oncology RTOG 1016): a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. (2019) 393:40–50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32779-X

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

120. Chi H, Xie X, Yan Y, Peng G, Strohmer DF, Lai G, et al. Natural killer cell-related prognosis signature characterizes immune landscape and predicts prognosis of HNSCC. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:1018685. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1018685

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

121. Chi H, Yang J, Peng G, Zhang J, Song G, Xie X, et al. Circadian rhythm-related genes index: A predictor for HNSCC prognosis, immunotherapy efficacy, and chemosensitivity. Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1091218. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1091218

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

122. Ren Q, Zhang P, Lin H, Feng Y, Chi H, Zhang X, et al. A novel signature predicts prognosis and immunotherapy in lung adenocarcinoma based on cancer-associated fibroblasts. Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1201573. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1201573

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

123. Xue M, Jin W. Editorial: Immunological precision therapeutics: integrating multi-omics technologies and comprehensive approaches for personalized immune intervention. Front Immunol. (2025) 16:1581238. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1581238

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

124. Cohen EEW, Bell RB, Bifulco CB, Burtness B, Gillison ML, Harrington KJ, et al. The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer consensus statement on immunotherapy for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC). J Immunother Cancer. (2019) 7:184. doi: 10.1186/s40425-019-0662-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

125. Patsoukis N, Brown J, Petkova V, Liu F, Li L, Boussiotis VA. Selective effects of PD-1 on Akt and Ras pathways regulate molecular components of the cell cycle and inhibit T cell proliferation. Sci Signal. (2012) 5:ra46. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2002796

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

126. Jin W, Yang Q, Chi H, Wei K, Zhang P, Zhao G, et al. Ensemble deep learning enhanced with self-attention for predicting immunotherapeutic responses to cancers. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:1025330. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1025330

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

127. Okada T, Fushimi C, Matsuki T, Okamoto I, Sato H, Kondo T, et al. Comparison of dosage of nivolumab in efficacy and safety for recurrent metastatic squamous cell carcinoma. Anticancer Res. (2022) 42:1607–13. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.15635

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

128. Burtness B, Harrington KJ, Greil R, Soulières D, Tahara M, de Castro G Jr., et al. Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. (2019) 394:1915–28. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32591-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

129. Shi Y, Guo W, Wang W, Wu Y, Fang M, Huang X, et al. : Finotonlimab with chemotherapy in recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial. Nat Med. (2024) 30:2568–75. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03110-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

130. Qin T, Mattox AK, Campbell JS, Park JC, Shin KY, Li S, et al. Epigenetic therapy sensitizes anti-PD-1 refractory head and neck cancers to immunotherapy rechallenge. J Clin Invest. (2025) 135:e181671. doi: 10.1172/JCI181671.71

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

131. Bayrak AF, Eliyatkin NO, Islek A, Ozkul Y, Kilic HS, Aktas S. Association of immune response with overall and disease-free survival in laryngeal squamous cell carcinomas. Am J Otolaryngol. (2022) 43:103477. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103477

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

132. Li W, You J, Xue H, Liu Y, Chen J, Zheng X, et al. Unlocking the potential of HHLA2: identifying functional immune infiltrating cells in the tumor microenvironment and predicting clinical outcomes in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother. (2024) 73:207. doi: 10.1007/s00262-024-03791-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma, metabolic reprogramming, tumor microenvironment, immune checkpoint inhibitors, glycolysis, precision medicine, immunotherapy

Citation: Ma K, Mao Q, Fei B, Ni T, Zhang Z and Ni H (2025) Metabolic reprogramming and immune microenvironment characteristics in laryngeal carcinoma: advances in immunotherapy. Front. Immunol. 16:1589243. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1589243

Received: 07 March 2025; Accepted: 08 April 2025;
Published: 30 April 2025.

Edited by:

Lilong Zhang, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, China

Reviewed by:

Binggang Liu, The Central Hospital of Yongzhou, China

Copyright © 2025 Ma, Mao, Fei, Ni, Zhang and Ni. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Haosheng Ni, ZW50bmhzQG50dS5lZHUuY24=; Zhenxin Zhang, enp4emgzNjlAc2luYS5jb20=

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.