ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Immunol.
Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy
Efficacy and safety of adding immune checkpoint inhibitors to standard chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for advanced or recurrent cervical cancer: A meta-analysis
1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
2. Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseased of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China
3. Department of Oncology, Zizhong Zizhou Hospital & Neijiang cancer Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with standard chemotherapy (CT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) have shown promising results in recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for advanced or recurrent cervical cancer (CC). However, comprehensive evidence is needed to evaluate their efficacy and safety, particularly in the context of patient subgroups and immune response mechanisms. This meta-analysis aimed to synthesize data from RCTs and apply trial sequential analysis (TSA) to validate findings. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from database inception through 19 December 2025. Meta-analyses were performed to pool hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and risk ratios (RRs) for objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs). TSA was applied to control the risk of false-positive and false-negative findings for outcomes including PFS, OS, ORR, any grade and grade 3-5 AEs. AEs were graded based on the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) v.5.0. Results: 5 RCTs totaling 3302 patients with CC met the inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis revealed that compared with CT or CRT (with or without placebo) the addition of ICIs to CT or CRT significantly improved PFS and OS. TSA confirmed the robustness of these findings. While the pooled ORR showed a numerical increase, the 95% PI (0.888-1.404) suggested limited robustness. Subgroup analyses showed that the PFS and OS benefits were particularly pronounced in patients with a PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 1, while those with CPS <1 did not derive significant benefit. Safety analyses indicated that adding ICIs did not increase the risk of all-cause AEs of any grade, but was associated with a higher incidence of grade 3-5 AEs. Conclusion: Adding ICIs to CT or CRT significantly improves survival outcomes in advanced or recurrent CC, particularly in PD-L1-positive patients. However, the increased risk of grade 3-5 AEs underscores the need for vigilant toxicity monitoring and management. These findings highlight the potential of ICIs to enhance immune-mediated tumor control, offering a promising therapeutic option for selected patient populations.
Summary
Keywords
cervical cancer, Chemoradiotherapy, chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, overall survival, Progression-free survival
Received
04 January 2026
Accepted
19 February 2026
Copyright
© 2026 Zhou, Diao and Sun. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Chuntang Sun
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.