There was a mistake in Table 1 as published. The error consists of an incorrect assignment of the source of isolates Se4 and Se5 in the published Table: Se4 was incorrectly labeled as originating from catheter 6 – non-adhered, and Se5 from catheter 7—adhered, when in fact it is the opposite.
The corrected Table 1 appears below.
Table 1
| Name | Identification | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Ec1 | Escherichia coli | Catheter 2—Adhered |
| Ec2 | Escherichia coli | Catheter 2—Non-adhered |
| Ec3 | Escherichia coli | Catheter 2—Non-Adhered |
| Kp1 | Klebsiella pneumoniae | Catheter 8—Adhered |
| Kp2 | Klebsiella pneumoniae | Catheter 8—Adhered |
| Kp3 | Klebsiella pneumoniae | Catheter 8—Adhered |
| Kp4 | Klebsiella pneumoniae | Catheter 8—Adhered |
| Ef1 | Enterococcus faecalis | Catheter 2—Adhered |
| Ef2 | Enterococcus faecalis | Catheter 2—Adhered |
| Ef3 | Enterococcus faecalis | Catheter 2—Adhered |
| Ef4 | Enterococcus faecalis | Catheter 2—Non-adhered |
| Ef5 | Enterococcus faecalis | Catheter 3—Adhered |
| Ef6 | Enterococcus faecalis | Catheter 3—Adhered |
| Sa1 | Staphylococcus aureus | Catheter 1—Adhered |
| Se1 | Staphylococcus epidermidis | Catheter 4—Adhered |
| Se2 | Staphylococcus epidermidis | Catheter 5—Adhered |
| Se3 | Staphylococcus epidermidis | Catheter 6—Adhered |
| Se4 | Staphylococcus epidermidis | Catheter 7—Adhered |
| Se5 | Staphylococcus epidermidis | Catheter 6—Non-adhered |
| Se6 | Staphylococcus epidermidis | Catheter 7—Non-adhered |
| Bm1 | Bacillus megaterium | Catheter 4—Non-adhered |
| Bm2 | Bacillus megaterium | Catheter 8—Adhered |
| Bp1 | Bacillus pumilus | Catheter 3—Adhered |
| Bs1 | Bacillus subtilis | Catheter 6—Adhered |
| Bs2 | Bacillus subtilis | Catheter 7—Adhered |
| Bs3 | Bacillus subtilis | Catheter 7—Non-adhered |
| Bs4 | Bacillus subtilis | Catheter 6—Non-adhered |
Clinical isolates obtained from double-J catheters.
The original version of this article has been updated.
Statements
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Summary
Keywords
uropathogens, catheters, biofilm, virulence, bacterial interaction, antibiotic resistance
Citation
Farizano JV, Castagnaro E, Arroyo-Egea JT, Aparicio JD, Vallejos AC, Hebert EM, Saavedra L, Rapisarda VA, Villegas JM and Grillo-Puertas M (2025) Correction: Virulence traits and bacterial interactions within the complex microbial population in urinary double-J catheters. Front. Microbiol. 16:1674834. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1674834
Received
28 July 2025
Accepted
30 July 2025
Published
13 August 2025
Approved by
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland
Volume
16 - 2025
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Farizano, Castagnaro, Arroyo-Egea, Aparicio, Vallejos, Hebert, Saavedra, Rapisarda, Villegas and Grillo-Puertas.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Mariana Grillo-Puertas mariana.grillo@fbqf.unt.edu.ar
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.