ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Microbiol.
Sec. Food Microbiology
This article is part of the Research TopicBiofilm Control for Food Safety: From Processing to PackagingView all 6 articles
Efficacy of Chemical Sanitizers Against E. coli O157:H7 in Single-and Multi-Species Biofilms Under Wet and Dry Conditions
Provisionally accepted- 1University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
- 2Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Lethbridge, Canada
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Effective sanitation of food-contact surfaces is essential for controlling E. coli O157:H7 in beef processing environments. This study evaluated how environmental conditions (temperature, humidity, and biofilm age), surface materials (stainless steel [SS] and thermoplastic polyurethane [TPU]), mechanical action, and sanitizer type influence the survival of E. coli O157:H7 and spoilage bacteria within single-and mixed-species biofilms. Biofilms were formed on TPU and SS coupons at 10°C or 25°C, stored under wet (60–90% Relative humidity (RH) and dry (20–50% RH) conditions at 10 °C and 25 °C for up to 60 days, and then exposed to detergents, a group was scrubbed other was not, then exposed to sanitizers quaternary ammonium compounds (Quats), sodium hypochlorite (Shypo), sodium hydroxide (SHyd), hydrogen peroxide (Hyp), peroxyacetic acid (PeroA) or BioDestroy®. Results showed that sanitizer efficacy was strongly influenced by the interaction of biofilm age, scrubbing, and sanitizer type (P < 0.01). Across treatments, biocides achieved greater reductions on SS (up to 7 log) than on TPU (up to 5.6 log). BioDestroy®, specifically formulated to eradicate biofilms, was the most effective sanitizer. ATP bioluminescence testing revealed that scrubbing markedly reduced organic residues, lowering RLU values from >14,000 on non-scrubbed surfaces to ~100–180 on scrubbed surfaces. Mixed-species biofilms containing Carnobacterium and Lactobacillus, in combination with scrubbing, showed the greatest reduction of E. coli O157:H7. However, conditions such as mature or dry biofilms, lack of mechanical action, and treatment with hydrogen peroxide allowed E. coli O157:H7 survival, reflecting the structural resilience of biofilms and the pathogen's genetic tolerance to oxidative stress. Notably, E. coli O157:H7 was not detected on TPU or SS after 60 days of storage under either wet or dry conditions. Spoilage bacteria varied in resilience: This is a provisional file, not the final typeset article Comamonas and Raoultella were harder to control on TPU, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa was most resistant, especially in wet TPU biofilms at 10 °C.
Keywords: Biofilms, Sanitizers, Spoilage bacteria, Stainless Steel, STEC, thermoplasticpolyurethane
Received: 09 Aug 2025; Accepted: 03 Feb 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Koti, Macdonald, Rodas-Gonzalez, McAllister and Narvaez-Bravo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Claudia Narvaez-Bravo
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
