Abstract
Head and neck cancer (HNC) is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide, and is prone to tumor recurrence and metastasis. At present, surgery combined with radiotherapy and chemotherapy is still the conventional treatment modality for patients with HNC. However, for patients with relapse or metastasis of HNC, the treatment outcome is not ideal, and the prognosis is poor. Thus, it is crucial to deepen the understand of tumor mechanisms. Post-translational modifications (PTMs) refer to covalent binding of small chemical molecular groups to amino-acid side-chain of proteins. Post-translational modification is an important regulator of protein function, and as such, a current research hotspot of epigenetics. In recent years, it has been found that tumor occurrence is often accompanied by the abnormality of PTMs. Indeed, the abnormality play an important role in tumor development, and can be used as a target for tumor diagnosis and treatment. To date, several types of protein PTMs involved in the development of HNC have been reported. This paper reviews the relationship between HNC and several major protein PTMs, including acetylation, methylation, and glycosylation, in order to provide clues for the future application about PTMs in diagnosis and treatment of HNC.
Introduction
Head and neck cancer (HNC) represents the sixth most common cancer in the world (). It occurs in the regions of the head and neck, which have complex anatomical structure as well as abundant lymph circulation and blood supply. As HNC involves many organs and is prone to invasion and metastasis, most patients are not at an early stage at their first medical examination. Head and neck cancer can have a great impact on a patient’s appearance and basic physiological functions, such as swallowing, language, and breathing, which could seriously impair their quality of life. At present, there are nearly 700,000 new HNC cases and 380,000 deaths in the world every year (). In the early stage of HNC, patients without positive lymph node or distant metastases are usually treated by surgical resection combined with local radiotherapy; most of them can be cured. However, the prognosis of patients suffering from advanced HNC is still poor, even if treated with chemotherapy, and shows the five-year survival rate of less than 50% (). Taken together, it is necessary to actively explore new diagnosis and treatment methods for HNC.
Post-translational modifications (PTMs) are important regulators of protein function. Through covalent binding of small chemical molecular groups to the amino-acid side-chain of proteins, direct changes occur to proteins’ physical and chemical properties, conformation, binding capacity, and function, so as to regulate gene expression at the post-translational level. It is estimated that PTMs can occur in 50–90% of proteins in human body (). Different PTMs could occur in the same protein, and PTMs of different amino-acid residues on the same protein probably cause different effects. PTMs of various proteins greatly increase flexibility and diversity of functional regulation of proteins to participate in complex life activities. Thanks to the development of mass spectrometry in recent years, we can accurately determine the specific modification of specific proteins, allowing us to understand PTMs and their effects more profoundly. Previous studies have shown that the expression and function of tumor proteins and tumor suppressors are regulated by many kinds of PTMs (). As HNC is no exception to that, many new targeting possibilities emerge for tumor diagnosis and treatment. Currently, studies on PTMs in HNC are mainly focused on acetylation, methylation, and glycosylation. PTMs are involved in various aspects of HNC, such as proliferation, invasion and metastasis, drug resistance, radio-sensitivity, and anti-apoptosis.
Acetylation
Acetylation was first found on histones in 1964. It was thought to occur mainly on lysine residues of histones, regulated by histone acetyltransferase (HAT) and histone deacetylase (HDAC) () (Figure 1). However, advances in proteomics during the past decade have shown that non-histones proteins are also often acetylated, and that acetylation of non-histone proteins is widely involved in key cellular processes related to physiology and diseases, such as gene transcription, DNA damage repair, cell division, signal transduction, protein folding, autophagy, and metabolism (). During progression of many tumors, the balance between HAT and HDAC is broken, thereby changing the expression level of the acetylation. Through promotion of acetylation in histones and non-histone proteins, histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) can affect cell differentiation, cell cycle arrest, tumor immunity, and apoptosis of damaged cells, exhibiting overall an anti-cancer activity (). Histone deacetylase inhibitors can be combined with traditional anti-tumor drugs or new targeted drugs to increase the sensitivity of tumor cells to apoptosis and the drug (). At present, research on acetylation in HNC mainly focuses on HDACi.
FIGURE 1
Bai et al. (
However, a phase II clinical trial (
The findings above suggest that in the treatment of HNC, HDACi may be more useful when combined with other existing therapies. Almeida et al. (
In conclusion, HDACi can play a wide range of anti-tumor effects in HNC (Figure 2), such as inhibiting proliferation, promoting apoptosis, enhancing radio- and chemo-sensitization and so on, and also has high selectivity. However, EMT may be induced by HDACi in some epithelial tumors. Histone deacetylase inhibitors have been the first kind of epigenetic-related drug that can be used in cancer treatment. Although their clinical efficacy is still less than optimal, relevant researches still provide valuable epigenetic targets for future anti-cancer strategies. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out further research to explore the potential and possibility of HDACi in the treatment of HNC, espesically when combined with other therapies.
FIGURE 2

Effect of HDACi on HNC.
Methylation
Protein methylation usually occurs on arginine or lysine residues. The process is mediated by protein lysine methyltransferases (PKMTs) and protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs), which regulate the methylation level jointly with protein demethylases. Although protein methyltransferases (PMTs) regulate epigenetic and transcription mainly through histone methylation, studies have also revealed some non-histone substrates methylated at lysine or arginine residues. It was shown that 95% of the HNSCC patients have genetic or expressional changes of PMTs (
FIGURE 3

Effect of PKMTs on histone. The NSD family catalyzes the deposition of mono- and di-methyl groups on lysine 36 of histone H3. EHMT2 catalyzes mono- and di-methylation of H3K9. EZH2 catalyzes tri-methylation of H3K27.
The nuclear receptor binding SET domain protein (NSD) family catalyzes the deposition of mono- and di-methyl groups on lysine 36 of histone H3 (H3K36me1, H3K36me2)(
Euchromatic histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2 (EHMT2) can catalyze mono- and di-methylation of H3K9 and inhibit the transcription of the target gene (
EZH2 is a direct downstream target of tumor-suppressive microRNA miR-26a in NPC, which can catalyze tri-methylation of H3K27. MiR-26a can directly downregulate the translation of EZH2 in NPC, resulting in the decrease of NPC cells (C666-1, HNE-1) proliferation and G1 cell cycle arrest, while the overexpression of EZH2 could rescue the growth-suppressive effect of miR-26a (
Protein arginine methyltransferase 1 can mono- and asymmetrically di-methylate various histone and non-histone substrates. A study on the mechanism of cetuximab resistance suggested that the HNSCC cell lines (OECM-1, FaDu) resistant to cetuximab upregulated the transcription factor Snail and induced direct upregulation of lymphotoxin-β and PRMT1, leading to interaction of lymphotoxin-β and methylated EGFR, and thus activated the resistance to cetuximab (
In general, overexpression of methylation promotes the occurrence and development of HNC, while inhibiting methylation of related proteins can reserve the malignant phenotype of HNC. Therefore, more attention should be paid to the target role of PMTs and their related genes in tumor therapy. So far, there has not been PMTs related drug that can be applied in clinical, and more researches are needed to explore the possibility of its application in HNC treatment.
Glycosylation
Glycosylation of proteins is the process of glycosyltransferase-mediated transfer of glycosyl to protein and formation of glycosidic bond with amino-acid residues on the protein, which mainly occurs in endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi body. Glycosyltransferase and glycosidase play key roles in glycosylation. Glycosylation of proteins in mammals can be divided into two types: N-glycosylation and O-glycosylation. N-glycosylation involves formation of a covalent bond between N-sugar chain and free NH2 group of the aspartic acid of the protein, whereas O-glycosylation encompasses covalent bonding between the O-sugar chain and the free OH- group of serine or threonine of the protein. It has been shown that the change of glycosylation influences the progression and metastasis of tumors, and that abnormal glycosylation affects cell signal transduction, adhesion, and migration (
FIGURE 4

Representation of protein N- and O-glycosylation in healthy tissues and malignant cells. Protein glycosylation plays a key role in the definition of protein folding and physiological functioning. Glycans contribute to cell–cell and cell–extracellular matrix adhesion, immune cell recognition, among other key biologic processes. Glycosylation is a highly dynamic PTM resulting from the concerted and highly regulated action of several glycosyltransferases in secretory organelles that rapidly changes in response to physiological stimuli. Several N- (Asn residues) and O- (Ser/Thr residues) glycans may coexist in the same protein backbone, depending on available glycosites and conformational constrains. In comparison to healthy cells, malignant cells tend to present more complex and branched oversialylated and/or fucosylated N-glycans. N-glycans may also be more extended by LacNAc chains. Conversely, more malignant clones present less complex and immature O-glycans, namely the Tn, sTn, and T antigens that may be also found in oncofetal tissues. Some cancer cells may also express selectin ligands sLea/x as terminal structures of both N- and O-glycans. These structural alterations at the cell-surface favor more motile and plastic cell phenotypes, invasion, lymphatic and hematogenous dissemination, and immune evasion. By impairing normal functions of cell-surface receptors, cancer-associated glycans also interfere with normal intracellular signaling transduction pathways toward the activation of oncogenic features (
Glycosylation may play an anti-apoptosis role in HNC. A study (
Conclusion
Various lines of evidence have proven that protein PTMs play an important role in the development of HNC, and that they are involved in the regulation of HNC proliferation, invasion and metastasis, chemo-resistance, radio-sensitivity, anti-apoptosis and so on. According to their characteristics, different PTMs can be selectively inhibited or promoted to play anti-cancer effects. With advances in research, many regulatory factors of PTMs with target significance have been found, which have shown preliminary value for clinical treatment. Compared with chemotherapy and radiotherapy, PTMs-related drugs have the advantage of good targeting and high safety, but their therapeutic effects need verification in further clinical research. It is plausible that the combination therapy of PTM regulators and other existing therapies may present a feasible direction for their future clinical application. Except several major PTMs, the role of other PTMs in the development of HNC is poorly understood. With the discovery of an increasing number of PTMs and their specific sites (
Statements
Author contributions
HZ contributed to reviewing and classifying the literature, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. WH contributed to guidance and general oversight. Both authors contributed to the manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1.
KamangarFDoresGMAndersonWF.Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world.J Clin Oncol. (2006) 24:2137–50. 10.1200/jco.2005.05.2308
2.
CohenEEWBellRBBifulcoCBBurtnessBGillisonMLHarringtonKJet alThe Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer consensus statement on immunotherapy for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC).J Immunother Cancer. (2019) 7:184. 10.1186/s40425-019-0662-
3.
SiegelRMaJZouZJemalA.Cancer statistics, 2014.CA Cancer J Clin. (2014) 64:9–29. 10.3322/caac.21208
4.
DoyleHAMamulaMJ.Post-translational protein modifications in antigen recognition and autoimmunity.Trends Immunol. (2001) 22:443–9. 10.1016/S1471-4906(01)01976-7
5.
RayDCuneoKCRehemtullaALawrenceTSNyatiMK.Inducing oncoprotein degradation to improve targeted cancer therapy.Neoplasia. (2015) 17:697–703. 10.1016/j.neo.2015.08.008
6.
AllfreyVGFaulknerRMirskyAE.Acetylation and methylation of histones and their possible role in the regulation of RNA synthesis.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (1964) 51:786–94. 10.1073/pnas.51.5.786
7.
NaritaTWeinertBTChoudharyC.Functions and mechanisms of non-histone protein acetylation.Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. (2019) 20:156–74. 10.1038/s41580-018-0081-3
8.
LakshmaiahKCJacobLAAparnaSLokanathaDSaldanhaSC.Epigenetic therapy of cancer with histone deacetylase inhibitors.J Cancer Res Ther. (2014) 10:469–78. 10.4103/0973-1482.137937
9.
PeregoPZucoVGattiLZuninoF.Sensitization of tumor cells by targeting histone deacetylases.Biochem Pharmacol. (2012) 83:987–94. 10.1016/j.bcp.2011.11.010
10.
BaiLYChiuCFPanSLSargeantAMShiehTMWangYCet alAntitumor activity of a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor (S)-HDAC42 in oral squamous cell carcinoma.Oral Oncol. (2011) 47:1127–33. 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2011.07.031
11.
HehlgansSStorchKLangeICordesN.The novel HDAC inhibitor NDACI054 sensitizes human cancer cells to radiotherapy.Radiother Oncol. (2013) 109:126–32. 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.08.023
12.
ZaginCPistaràVOliveiraLACastilhoRMRomeoGChiacchioUet alSerendipitous discovery of potent human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma anti-cancer molecules: a fortunate failure of a rational molecular design.Eur J Med Chem. (2017) 141:188–96. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.09.075
13.
JangBYangIHChoNPJinBLeeWJungYCet alDown-regulation and nuclear localization of survivin by sodium butyrate induces caspase-dependent apoptosis in human oral mucoepidermoid carcinoma.Oral Oncol. (2019) 88:160–7. 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.11.032
14.
HaigentzMJr.KimMSartaCLinJKeresztesRSCullineyBet alPhase II trial of the histone deacetylase inhibitor romidepsin in patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer.Oral Oncol. (2012) 48:1281–8. 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.05.024
15.
GiudiceFSPintoDSJr.NörJESquarizeCHCastilhoRM.Inhibition of histone deacetylase impacts cancer stem cells and induces epithelial-mesenchyme transition of head and neck cancer.PLoS One. (2013) 8:e58672. 10.1371/journal.pone.0058672
16.
JiangGMWangHSZhangFZhangKSLiuZCFangRet alHistone deacetylase inhibitor induction of epithelial–mesenchymal transitions via up-regulation of Snail facilitates cancer progression.Biochim Biophys Acta. (2013) 1833:663–71. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.12.002
17.
AlmeidaLOAbrahaoACRosselli-MuraiLKGiudiceFSZagniCLeopoldinoAMet alNFκB mediates cisplatin resistance through histone modifications in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).FEBS Open Bio. (2014) 4:96–104. 10.1016/j.fob.2013.12.003
18.
AsfahaYSchrenkCAlves AvelarLALangeFWangCBandolikJJet alNovel alkoxyamide-based histone deacetylase inhibitors reverse cisplatin resistance in chemoresistant cancer cells.Bioorgan Med Chem. (2020) 28:115108. 10.1016/j.bmc.2019.115108
19.
De SchutterHKimpeMIsebaertSNuytsSet alA systematic assessment of radiation dose enhancement by 5-Aza-2’-deoxycytidine and histone deacetylase inhibitors in head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. (2009) 73:904–12. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.032
20.
SalouraVVougiouklakisTSieversCBurkittKNakamuraYHagerGet alThe role of protein methyltransferases as potential novel therapeutic targets in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.Oral Oncol. (2018) 81:100–8. 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.04.014
21.
Papillon-CavanaghSLuCGaydenTMikaelLGBechetDKaramboulasCet alImpaired H3K36 methylation defines a subset of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.Nat Genet. (2017) 49:180–5. 10.1038/ng.3757
22.
SalouraVChoHSKiyotaniKAlachkarHZuoZNakakidoMet alWHSC1 promotes oncogenesis through regulation of NIMA-related kinase-7 in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.Mol Cancer Res. (2015) 13:293–304. 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-14-0292-T
23.
SalouraVVougiouklakisTZewdeMKiyotaniKParkJHGaoGet alWHSC1L1 drives cell cycle progression through transcriptional regulation of CDC6 and CDK2 in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.Oncotarget. (2016) 7:42527–38. 10.18632/oncotarget.9897
24.
SalouraVVougiouklakisTZewdeMDengXKiyotaniKParkJHet alWHSC1L1-mediated EGFR mono-methylation enhances the cytoplasmic and nuclear oncogenic activity of EGFR in head and neck cancer.Sci Rep. (2017) 7:40664. 10.1038/srep40664
25.
LiuSYeDGuoWYuWHeYHuJet alG9a is essential for EMT-mediated metastasis and maintenance of cancer stem cell-like characters in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Oncotarget. (2015) 6:6887–901. 10.18632/oncotarget.3159
26.
LiKCHuaKTLinYSSuCYKoJYHsiaoMet alInhibition of G9a induces DUSP4-dependent autophagic cell death in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Mol Cancer. (2014) 13:172. 10.1186/1476-4598-13-172
27.
LiuCWHuaKTLiKCKaoHFHongRLKoJYet alHistone methyltransferase G9a drives chemotherapy resistance by regulating the glutamate-cysteine ligase catalytic subunit in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Mol Cancer Ther. (2017) 16:1421–34. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0567-T
28.
LuJHeMLWangLChenYLiuXDongQet alMiR-26a inhibits cell growth and tumorigenesis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma through repression of EZH2.Cancer Res. (2011) 71:225–33. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1850
29.
HuangJZhouLChenHWuCDuoZZhangY.EZH2 is overexpressed in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma and enhances the stem-like properties of AMC-HN-8 cells.Oncol Lett. (2016) 12:837–46. 10.3892/ol.2016.4704
30.
TongZTCaiMYWangXGKongLLMaiSJLiuYH.EZH2 supports nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell aggressiveness by forming a co-repressor complex with HDAC1/HDAC2 and Snail to inhibit E-cadherin.Oncogene. (2012) 31:583–94. 10.1038/onc.2011.254
31.
GannonOMMerida de LongLEndo-MunozLHazar-RethinamMSaundersNA.Dysregulation of the repressive H3K27 trimethylation mark in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma contributes to dysregulated squamous differentiation.Clin Cancer Res. (2013) 19:428–41. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2505
32.
HsuDSHwangWLYuhCHChuCHHoYHChenPBet alLymphotoxin-β interacts with methylated EGFR to mediate acquired resistance to Cetuximab in head and neck cancer.Clin Cancer Res. (2017) 23:4388–401. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1955
33.
KumarBYadavABrownNVZhaoSCipollaMJWakelyPEet alNuclear PRMT5, cyclin D1 and IL-6 are associated with poor outcome in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients and is inversely associated with p16-status.Oncotarget. (2017) 8:14847–59. 10.18632/oncotarget.14682
34.
AmanoYMatsubaraDYoshimotoTTamuraTNishinoHMoriYet alExpression of protein arginine methyltransferase-5 in oral squamous cell carcinoma and its significance in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition.Pathol Int. (2018) 68:359–66. 10.1111/pin.12666
35.
YangDLiangTGuYZhaoYShiYZuoXet alProtein N-arginine methyltransferase 5 promotes the tumor progression and radioresistance of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Oncol Rep. (2016) 35:1703–10. 10.3892/or.2015.4513
36.
RodriguesJGBalmañaMMacedoJAPoçasJFernandesÂde-Freitas-JuniorJCMet alGlycosylation in cancer: Selected roles in tumour progression, immune modulation and metastasis.Cell Immunol. (2018) 333:46–57. 10.1016/j.cellimm.2018.03.007
37.
FerreiraJAPeixotoANevesMGaiteiroCReisCAAssarafYGet alMechanisms of cisplatin resistance and targeting of cancer stem cells: adding glycosylation to the equation.Drug Resist Updat. (2016) 24:34–54. 10.1016/j.drup.2015.11.003
38.
WojtowiczKJanuchowskiRNowickiMZabelM.Inhibition of protein glycosylation reverses the MDR phenotype of cancer cell lines.Biomed Pharmacother. (2015) 74:49–56. 10.1016/j.biopha.2015.07.001
39.
YapYHSayYH.Resistance against apoptosis by the cellular prion protein is dependent on its glycosylation status in oral HSC-2 and colon LS 174T cancer cells.Cancer Lett. (2011) 306:111–9. 10.1016/j.canlet.2011.02.040
40.
JamalBSenguptaPKGaoZNNita-LazarMAminBJalisiSet alAberrant amplification of the crosstalk between canonical Wnt signaling and N-glycosylation gene DPAGT1 promotes oral cancer.Oral Oncol. (2012) 48:523–9. 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.01.010
41.
LinMCHuangMJLiuCHYangTLHuangMC.GALNT2 enhances migration and invasion of oral squamous cell carcinoma by regulating EGFR glycosylation and activity.Oral Oncol. (2014) 50:478–84. 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.02.003
42.
BaetenJSureshAJohnsonAPatelKKuriakoseMFlynnAet alMolecular imaging of oral premalignant and malignant lesions using fluorescently labeled lectins.Transl Oncol. (2014) 7:213–20. 10.1016/j.tranon.2014.02.006
43.
DongXLuoZWangYMengLDuanQQiuLet alAltered O-glycosylation is associated with inherent radioresistance and malignancy of human laryngeal carcinoma.Exp Cell Res. (2018) 362:302–10. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2017.11.031
44.
TanMLuoHLeeSJinFYangJSMontellierEet alIdentification of 67 histone marks and histone lysine crotonylation as a new type of histone modification.Cell. (2011) 146:1016–28. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.008
Summary
Keywords
post-translational modifications, acetylation, methylation, glycosylation, head and neck neoplasms
Citation
Zhang H and Han W (2020) Protein Post-translational Modifications in Head and Neck Cancer. Front. Oncol. 10:571944. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.571944
Received
12 June 2020
Accepted
11 September 2020
Published
30 September 2020
Volume
10 - 2020
Edited by
Richard Yuxiong Su, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Reviewed by
Katie Meehan, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, China; Rui Vitorino, University of Aveiro, Portugal
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2020 Zhang and Han.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Wei Han, doctorhanwei@hotmail.com
This article was submitted to Head and Neck Cancer, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.