SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Oncol., 18 December 2023

Sec. Breast Cancer

Volume 13 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1256747

Impact of statin use on breast cancer recurrence and mortality before and after diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • 1. Department of Infectious Diseases, The Third People’s Hospital of Longgang Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China

  • 2. Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China

  • 3. Clinical Medicine School of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China

Abstract

Objective:

Breast cancer is one of the most common causes of death among women. Statins, typically used for cholesterol management, have been hypothesized to reduce recurrence and mortality rates in breast cancer. However, this association remains a subject of debate. This study evaluates the potential impact of statins on breast cancer recurrence and mortality.

Methods:

A comprehensive search was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for articles published up to June 2023. These articles examined the effect of statins on breast cancer recurrence and mortality both before and after diagnosis. The analysis was performed using random-effects models, calculating pooled hazard ratios (HR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results:

A total of 31 cohort studies, involving 261,834 female breast cancer patients, were included in this analysis. It was found that statin use prior to diagnosis was associated with a decrease in overall mortality (HR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.69–0.93; I2 = 77.6%; P = 0.001) and breast cancer-specific mortality (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.67–0.87; I2 = 72.7%; P = 0.005). Additionally, statin use after diagnosis was observed to reduce the recurrence of breast cancer (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.61–0.82; I2 = 60%; P = 0.003), overall mortality (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70–0.92; I2 = 80.7%; P < 0.001), and breast cancer-specific mortality (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.67–0.86; I2 = 74.5%; P < 0.001).

Conclusions:

The findings of this study indicate that statin usage, both before and after breast cancer diagnosis, may be associated with reduced risks of overall and breast cancer-specific mortality, as well as lower recurrence rates.

Introduction

Breast cancer remains a major health issue for women worldwide. It is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths (, ), representing a quarter of all female cancer fatalities. In America, it ranks second only to lung cancer in terms of mortality rates (, ). While developed countries have seen a decrease in breast cancer incidence and improved outcomes, the situation is worsening in developing nations () due to limited treatment options. This highlights the urgent need for new and effective treatments.

Statins, primarily prescribed for treating dyslipidemia to reduce the risk of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events (, ), are now increasingly being explored for their potential anti-cancer properties, extending beyond their well-known cardiovascular benefits (, ). Initial studies suggest that statins may be effective in a variety of cancers (), potentially by inhibiting cell proliferation and inducing apoptosis (, ). The efficacy of statins appears to depend on their lipophilicity, dosage, and duration of treatment (). However, due to patient diversity, there are discrepancies between laboratory studies and clinical data. Some studies have indicated a correlation between statin use and reduced breast cancer mortality (–), while others have found no such association (–). This study, therefore, aims to clarify the relationship between statin use and the risk of mortality or recurrence in women with breast cancer.

Methods

This meta-analysis adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.

Search strategy and inclusion criteria

An extensive search was performed in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases for studies published up to 1 June, 2023. A combination of MeSH/Emtree terms and title/abstract keywords was used, focusing on “statins” and “breast cancer” (detailed in Stable 1). Included studies met these criteria: (1) involved adult patients diagnosed with breast cancer; (2) compared groups with and without statin use; (3) examined the relationship between statins and breast cancer mortality or recurrence; (4) provided detailed data on hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for outcomes such as recurrence, breast cancer-specific mortality, and all-cause mortality; and (5) were observational studies written in English. Exclusions were made for case reports, reviews, and preprints (search process illustrated in Figure 1).

Figure 1

Data extraction

Key information was extracted from selected studies, including the first author, publication year, study methodology, duration of follow-up, sample size, average age of participants, details of the statin intervention, and study outcomes.

Statistical analysis

The data for this meta-analysis were processed using STATA 12.0 software. To assess the impact of statins on breast cancer prognosis, HR and 95% CI from selected studies were extracted. Study variations were evaluated using the Q test and I2 index. A P-value less than 0.05 and I2 greater than 50% indicated significant heterogeneity, prompting the use of random-effects models for combined outcomes. Additionally, sensitivity analysis, Egger’s test, and funnel plots were employed to assess the robustness and potential publication bias of the findings.

Results

Study selection and characteristics

A total of 31 studies (–) were included in this meta-analysis, encompassing data from 261,834 female breast cancer patients. Among these, five studies (, , , , ) provided data on the impact of statin use prior to diagnosis on breast cancer-specific mortality, while another five (, , , , ) discussed its effects on all-cause mortality. Additionally, 13 studies (, , , , , –, , –) reported on the influence of statin use after diagnosis on breast cancer recurrence. A further 12 articles (, –, , , , , , , , ) and 19 studies (–, , –, , ) provided results regarding the effects of post-diagnosis statin use on overall mortality and breast cancer-induced mortality, respectively. The primary details from these studies are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1

StudyStudy designPatient characteristicsMedian Follow-upSample sizeMean age (years)Experimental interventionOutcomes
Ahern et al. 2021Prospective cohort studyResidents in Denmark diagnosed with stage I–III invasive breast cancers.6.8 years18,769NAPatients prescribed a statin were assumed to be exposed (i.e., statin users), whereas patients who were not prescribed a statin were assumed to be unexposed to statins (i.e., non-users).Breast cancer recurrence risk
Boudreau et al. 2014Cohort study>18 years; residing in Washington State SEER; stage I/II breast cancer; no bilateral disease.6.3 years4,21663Statins, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), beta blockers (BB), calcium blockers, and diuretics were the exposures of interest.Recurrence or second primary breast cancer
Chae et al. 2011NADiagnosed with stage II/III breast cancer.55 months70359.11Statin and ACEI or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) users were arbitrarily defined as patients who took the medication in non-evident disease (NED) stage for at least 6 months.Disease-free survival and overall survival
Choi et al. 2021Retrospective cohort studyHad undergone surgery for breast cancer.NA7,452NAExposure was defined as a recorded prescription of each drug within 12 months before diagnosis of breast cancer.Overall survival
Harborg et al. 2020Nationwide, population-based cohort studyPostmenopausal women diagnosis of stage I–III ER+breast cancer.Began 7 months after diagnosis to recurrence, death, emigration, 5 years elapsed or the end of available follow-up data on 25 September, 201814,773NAAscertained incident statin exposure (≥1 prescription post-diagnosis) from the Danish National Prescription Registry and modeled statins as a time-varying exposure lagged by 6 months.5-year breast cancer recurrence
Hosio et al. 2020Observational cohort studyWomen with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and diagnosed with breast cancer in Finland.4.6 years3,53372A patient who first purchased a statin ≥180 days before breast-cancer diagnosis was classified into the group of statin users.Breast cancer-related mortality rate
Inasu et al. 2022Cohort studyBreast cancer diagnosed.8.6 year360NAFor a patient to be defined as a statin user in the analyses, the patient had to fill a prescription of statins.Risk of breast cancer recurrence
Kwan et al. 2008Cohort studyDiagnosed from the ages of 18–79 years with a first primary breast cancer (stage I 1 cm, II, or IIIA).2.60 years1,94562.2Information on statin use was obtained from the KPNC pharmacy database.Risk of breast cancer recurrence
Lu et al. 2021Population-based cohort studyNewly diagnosed female breast cancer patients (ICD-9-CM 174) who were aged ≥20 years from Taiwan.NA6,11057.8Patients with statin treatment within 730 days (2 years) after breast cancer’s initial date were defined as the statin cohort to avoid immortal time bias.Occurrence of primary breast cancer
Sakellakis et al. 2016Retrospective studyFemale patients with stage I, II, or III breast cancer who had been surgically treated and who had subsequently received at least one adjuvant chemotherapy.NA61056 yearsWhether they were receiving a statin on a chronic basis or not. Information regarding statin use was obtained during the initial visit.Risk of recurrence
Sim et al. 2022Retrospective studyDiagnosed with breast cancer, and stage I–III invasive cancers were included.8.67 years7,858NAStatin use was defined as use after surgeryRisk of recurrence;
Disease-specific survival
Bjarnadottir et al. 2020Population-based prospective cohort studyAll residents of Malmö by 1 January, 1991 and born between 1926 and 1945.NA91056.4Information on statin use was obtained from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register from July 2005, when the registry was initiated, through 2016.Breast cancer-specific mortality
Borgquist et al. 2019Nationwide retrospective cohort studySwedish women diagnosed with breast cancer.61.6 months20,55964Statin use was obtained from the Swedish Prescription Registry. Patients were classified as exposed to statins if they had at least one statin prescription logged in their pharmaceutical records. Women prescribed a statin at least once were classified as statin users, whereas others were assumed to be unexposed to statins and therefore classified as non-users.Breast cancer-specific and overall mortality
Botteri et al. 2013Retrospective studyPostmenopausal women diagnosed and operated for early primary triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).NA80062 years in BB users and 59 years in non-usersThe only purpose of limiting the analysis to postmenopausal women was to avoid high heterogeneity between BB users and non-users. Patients were divided into two groups: the BB user group, which included patients who were using any BB at the moment of their diagnosis of TNBC, and the BB non-user group, which included all the other patients.Risk of breast cancer-related recurrence, metastasis, and breast cancer mortality
Brewer et al. 2013NADiagnosed with stage I–III of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC).2.9 years723NAStatin users were defined as being on statins at the initial evaluation. Based on Ahern et al.’s statin classification, clinical outcomes were compared by statin use and type (weakly lipophilic to hydrophilic (H-statin) vs lipophilic statins (L-statin)).Median progression-free survival, overall survival, and disease-specific survival
Desai et al. 2015Cohort studyPostmenopausal women aged 50–79 years, and it was classified into early (in situ and local)- versus late (regional and distant)-stage disease.11.5 years10,47463.4Statin use was defined as any HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor used at baseline or during participation in the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) prior to diagnosis of breast cancer.Breast cancer mortality
Haukka et al. 2017Cohort studyRandom sample of the people who had purchased and been reimbursed for at least one prescription of OAD medication (A10B) in the same period.2.0 years39,900NAStatin and metforminAll-cause and cause-specific mortality
Lacerda et al. 2014Cohort studyDiagnosed with stage I–III of IBC.2.5 years51949 yearsStatinsLocal recurrence-free survival
Li et al. 2019Single-institution, retrospective cohort studyWomen diagnosed with operable breast cancer.70.2 months1,52364.9StatinsOverall and disease-free survival
Menamin et al. 2016Retrospective cohort studyNewly diagnosed invasive breas t cancer patients.4 years1,190NAStatin useBreast cancer-specific mortality
Murtola et al. 2014Population-based cohortBreast cancer cases diagnosed in Finland.3.25 years31,236NAThe status of post-diagnostic statin use was updated prospectively for each year of follow-up since breast cancer diagnosis. The study participant was categorized as the statin user only for the years with recorded statin purchases, regardless of the amount.Disease-specific mortality
Nowakowska et al. 2021Cohort studyWomen aged ≥66 years who had stage I–III breast cancers were identified.4.4 years23,192NAStatin use, defined as the initiation of statin therapy in the 12 months after breast cancer diagnosis.Overall survival and breast cancer-specific survival
Scott et al. 2023Cohort studyEligible women were all those with a first primary breast cancer diagnosed.4.51 years14,976NAStatinsBreast cancer-specific mortality
Shaitelman et al. 2017Cohort studyWomen with invasive, non-metastatic TNBC.75.1 months869NAStatin use, defined as ever use during treatment vs never useMedian overall survival, distant metastases-free survival, and local-regional recurrence-free survival
Smith et al. 2016Cohort studyWomen with stage I–III breast cancers.4.9 years4,24366De novo post-diagnostic statin exposure was identified from prescriptions dispensed between breast cancer diagnosis and end of follow-up (death or 31 December, 2012, whichever occurred first).Breast cancer-specific or all-cause mortality
Smith et al. 2017Cohort studyWomen with stage I–III breast cancers.NA6,31471Patients with de novo post-diagnostic statin use were excluded from analyses to determine the effect of statin use in patients with pre-diagnostic use.Breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality
Takada et al. 2023Cohort studyDiagnosed with breast cancer, with a primary lesion of 2 cm or less identified by preoperative imaging, and who underwent surgery without preoperative chemotherapy.NA71958 yearsStatinsRecurrence-free survival or overall survival
Chang et al. 2023Cohort studyDiagnosed with breast cancer from Taiwan.4.10 years14,90265.06Patients receiving statins within 6 months before diagnosis of breast cancer were compared with those not receiving statins.Death, heart failure, and arterial and venous events
Cardwell et al. 2015Nested case-control cohort studyDiagnosed with breast cancer.5.7 years17,880NADose-response analyses were conducted, with a patient considered to be a non-user before 6 months after first use, a short-term user between 6 months after first use and 6 months after the 12th prescription (or 365 daily defined doses), and a longer-term user after this time.Breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality
Tryggvadottir et al. 2018Population-based prospective cohort studyWomen diagnosed with a primary breast cancer.7.0 years98561Medications were coded according to the Anatomic Therapeutic Chemical classification system codes; code C10AA was used for statins, 92.5% were using lipophilic statins (simvastatin or atorvastatin).Overall survival
Kim et al. 2021Population-based cohort studyAged 45 to 70 years old.7.6 years3,591NAWomen aged 45 to 70 years old who had taken statins for at least 6 months were compared to statin non-users of the same age.Breast cancer-related mortality after diagnosis

Characteristics of the included studies in the meta-analysis of statin vs non-statin use in adult breast cancer patients.

NA, not acquired.

Outcomes

The meta-analysis revealed that statin use, compared to non-use, was associated with a lower risk of overall mortality (HR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.69–0.93; I2 = 77.6%; P = 0.001; Figure 2) and breast cancer-specific mortality prior to diagnosis (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.67–0.87; I2 = 72.7%; P = 0.005; Figure 3). Post-diagnosis statin use also appeared to decrease breast cancer recurrence (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.61–0.82; I2 = 60%; P < 0.003; Figure 4), overall mortality (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70–0.92; I2 = 80.7%; P < 0.001; Figure 5), and breast cancer-specific mortality (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.67–0.86; I2 = 74.5%; P < 0.001; Figure 6). Sensitivity analysis indicated consistent results across studies (refer to Supplementary Figures 2, 5, 8, 11, 14). Egger’s tests and funnel plots suggested no significant publication bias (Egger’s tests: Supplementary Figure 3, P = 0.821; Supplementary Figure 6, P = 0.229; Supplementary Figure 9, P < 0.01; Supplementary Figure 12, P = 0.698; Supplementary Figure 15, P = 0.148; and funnel plots: Supplementary Figures 1, 4, 7, 10, 13).

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

For patients using statins for more than a year after diagnosis, a further reduced risk of recurrence was noted (HR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.55–0.90; I2 = 37.3%, P = 0.203; Figure 7). Additionally, statin use for over six months post-diagnosis was linked with a lower risk of cancer-related death (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.54–0.93, I2 = 87.7%, P < 0.001; Figure 8). Murtola et al. () observed that increased intensity of statin use post-diagnosis was associated with greater reductions in cancer-related deaths, especially in patients with metastatic tumors. The lowest intensity of statin use (14–183 defined daily doses/year) correlated with the smallest reduction in cancer deaths in metastatic patients (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.4–1.09), while medium (184–300 defined daily doses/year) and high intensity (301 or more defined daily doses/year) were associated with greater reductions in mortality (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.2–0.9 and HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.19–0.94, respectively).

Figure 7

Figure 8

Discussion

This meta-analysis synthesized data from 31 studies involving 2,611,014 women diagnosed with breast cancer. It focused on assessing the impact of statins on the risk of overall mortality, breast cancer-specific mortality, and the recurrence of breast cancer. Our findings suggest a beneficial effect of statins, both prior to and after diagnosis, in reducing overall mortality, breast cancer-specific mortality, and the recurrence of the disease. These results are in line with a previous study (44) that reviewed 23 articles involving 178,712 breast cancer patients, which also suggested that statin use could decrease overall mortality, disease-induced mortality, and recurrence in women with breast cancer. However, the earlier meta-analysis (44) was limited to post-diagnosis statin use and did not include data on pre-diagnosis use. Other research (45) has indicated that statins may reduce disease-induced mortality and recurrence in breast cancer patients, but did not differentiate between pre- and post-diagnosis use of statins, and found no significant impact on the risk of developing breast cancer. Additionally, a study (46) involving seven studies and 197,048 women with breast cancer indicated that statins might reduce both disease-induced and overall mortality. In addition, a randomized controlled study (47) showed that statin use after diagnosis was associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.7–1.91). Furthermore, there is evidence (48) suggesting an enhanced effect on breast cancer reduction when pitavastatin is used alongside neoadjuvant chemotherapy protocols.

Ongoing research is examining the mechanisms through which statins may decrease mortality in breast cancer patients. The mevalonate pathway, a common feature in cancerous lesions, is upregulated and can be inhibited by statins, exerting an anti-cancer effect. Statins also have an association with ferroptosis (49) and can impair autophagy flux, leading to breast cancer cell death via the ERK1/2 and Akt pathways (50, 51). Preclinical studies suggest that statins can reduce the activity of breast cancer cells, limit their proliferation, and induce apoptosis (52). Atorvastatin may enhance antitumor immunity by inhibiting extracellular vesicles programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) (53). Furthermore, altering cholesterol abundance in cancer cells could affect cellular membrane fluidity and signal transduction, influencing cancer progression (54). The role of statins in three estrogen receptor-positive cancers (breast, endometrial, and ovarian) is currently under investigation, with studies reporting a beneficial role in reducing incidence and mortality (55). In patients with estrogen-dependent breast cancer, post-diagnostic statin use has been linked to reduced cancer-specific mortality (56), potentially by disrupting hormone receptor-related pathways (57). The combination of metformin and simvastatin is reported to enhance the expression of prolyl hydroxylase 2, decreasing hypoxia-inducible factor 1α expression induced in endothelin 1, leading to more effective antiangiogenic and anti-cancer effects (58).

This meta-analysis has some limitations. Firstly, the specific types of statins used were not clearly detailed in the original studies, and different types of statins might yield different results. Secondly, while we included studies focusing on the effect of statins on the prognosis of breast cancer patients, the dosage of statins varied across these studies. Lastly, the studies included were observational, which may introduce more confounding bias and loss of follow-up.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the results of this meta-analysis indicate that the use of statins may beneficially impact the recurrence of breast cancer, as well as reduce all-cause mortality and breast cancer-specific mortality, irrespective of whether statins are used before or after a breast cancer diagnosis. However, these findings underscore the necessity for additional high-quality research to more definitively ascertain the effects of statins on the prognosis of women with breast cancer.

Statements

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

XJ: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YL: Formal Analysis, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft. ZX: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. QM: Formal Analysis, Software, Writing – original draft.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2023.1256747/full#supplementary-material

References

  • 1

    Fahad UllahM. Breast cancer: current perspectives on the disease status. Adv Exp Med Biol (2019) 1152:51–64.

  • 2

    KolakAKamińskaMSygitKBudnyASurdykaDKukiełka-BudnyBet al. Primary and secondary prevention of breast cancer. Ann Agric Environ Med (2017) 24(4):549–53. doi: 10.26444/aaem/75943

  • 3

    Ghoncheh MMZSalehiniyaH. Epidemiology, incidence and mortality of breast cancer in Asia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev (2016) 17(S3):47–52. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2016.17.S3.47

  • 4

    CoughlinSS. Breast cancer epidemiology, prevention, and screening. Adv Exp Med Biol (2019) 1152:9–29. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-20301-6_2

  • 5

    WintersSMartinCMurphyDShokarNK. Breast cancer epidemiology, prevention, and screening. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci (2017) 151:1–32. doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2017.07.002

  • 6

    FaubionSSKapoorEMoyerAMHodisHNMillerVM. Statin therapy: does sex matter? Menopause (2019) 26(12):1425–35. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001412

  • 7

    RochaKPereiraBMVRodriguesAC. An update on efflux and uptake transporters as determinants of statin response. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol (2018) 14(6):613–24. doi: 10.1080/17425255.2018.1482276

  • 8

    AhmadiMAmiriSPecicSMachajFRosikJŁosMJet al. Pleiotropic effects of statins: A focus on cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA) - Mol Basis Dis (2020) 1866(12):165968. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2020.165968

  • 9

    Fatehi HassanabadA. Current perspectives on statins as potential anti-cancer therapeutics: clinical outcomes and underlying molecular mechanisms. Trans Lung Cancer Res (2019) 8(5):692–9. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2019.09.08

  • 10

    Barbalata CITLAchimMTomutaIPorfireAS. Statins in risk-reduction and treatment of cancer. World J Clin Oncol (2020) 11(8):573–88. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i8.573

  • 11

    HuM-BZhangJWGaoJBQiYWGaoYXuLet al. Atorvastatin induces autophagy in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. Ultrastructural Pathol (2018) 42(5):409–15. doi: 10.1080/01913123.2018.1522406

  • 12

    HuangSWChyuanITShiueCYuMCHsuYFHsuMJ. Lovastatin-mediated MCF-7 cancer cell death involves LKB1-AMPK-p38MAPK-p53-survivin signalling cascade. J Cell Mol Med (2019) 24(2):1822–36. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.14879

  • 13

    SimYLimCPhyuNTanKTBChewLSTWongCYet al. The impact of statin use and breast cancer recurrence - A retrospective study in Singapore. Front Oncol (2022) 12. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.835320

  • 14

    TakadaKKashiwagiSIimoriNKouhashiRYabumotoAGotoWet al. Impact of oral statin therapy on clinical outcomes in patients with cT1 breast cancer. BMC Cancer (2023) 23(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-10631-w

  • 15

    BjarnadottirOFeldtMInasuMBendahlPOElebroKKimbungSet al. Statin use, HMGCR expression, and breast cancer survival - The Malmö Diet and Cancer Study. Sci Rep (2020) 10(1):558. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-57323-9

  • 16

    BorgquistSBrobergPTojjarJOlssonH. Statin use and breast cancer survival – a Swedish nationwide study. BMC Cancer (2019) 19(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-5263-z

  • 17

    HaukkaJNiskanenLAuvinenA. Risk of cause-specific death in individuals with cancer-modifying role diabetes, statins and metformin. Int J Cancer (2017) 141(12):2437–49. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31016

  • 18

    ScottOWTinTinSHarborgSKuper-HommelMJJLawrensonRElwoodJM. Post-diagnostic statin use and breast cancer-specific mortality: a population-based cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2023) 199(1):195–206. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06815-w

  • 19

    KimDSAhnHSKimHJ. Statin use and incidence and mortality of breast and gynecology cancer: A cohort study using the National Health Insurance claims database. Int J Cancer (2021) 150(7):1156–65. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33869

  • 20

    BotteriEMunzoneERotmenszNCipollaCDe GiorgiVSantilloBet al. Therapeutic effect of β-blockers in triple-negative breast cancer postmenopausal women. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2013) 140(3):567–75. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2654-3

  • 21

    BrewerTMMasudaHLiuDDShenYLiuPIwamotoTet al. Statin use in primary inflammatory breast cancer: a cohort study. Br J Cancer (2013) 109(2):318–24. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.342

  • 22

    Cardwell CRHBHughesCMurrayLJ. Statin use after diagnosis of breast cancer and survival: a population-based cohort study. Epidemiology (2015) 26(1):68–78. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000189

  • 23

    ChangW-TLinHWLinSHLiYH. Association of statin use with cancer- and noncancer-associated survival among patients with breast cancer in Asia. JAMA Network Open (2023) 6(4):e239515. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.9515

  • 24

    DesaiPLehmanAChlebowskiRTKwanMLArunMMansonJEet al. Statins and breast cancer stage and mortality in the Women’s Health Initiative. Cancer Causes Control (2015) 26(4):529–39. doi: 10.1007/s10552-015-0530-7

  • 25

    LacerdaLReddyJPLiuDLarsonRLiLMasudaHet al. Simvastatin radiosensitizes differentiated and stem-like breast cancer cell lines and is associated with improved local control in inflammatory breast cancer patients treated with postmastectomy radiation. Stem Cells Trans Med (2014) 3(7):849–56. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2013-0204

  • 26

    LiYRRoVSteelLCarriganENguyenJWilliamsAet al. Impact of long-term lipid-lowering therapy on clinical outcomes in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2019) 176(3):669–77. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05267-z

  • 27

    Mc MenaminÚCMurrayLJHughesCMCardwellCR. Statin use and breast cancer survival: a nationwide cohort study in Scotland. BMC Cancer (2016) 16(1). doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2651-0

  • 28

    WrightJMVisvanathanKArtamaMVainioHPukkalaE. Statin use and breast cancer survival: A nationwide cohort study from Finland. PloS One (2014) 9(10):e110231. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110231

  • 29

    NowakowskaMKLeiXThompsonMTShaitelmanSFWehnerMRWoodwardWAet al. Association of statin use with clinical outcomes in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer (2021) 127(22):4142–50. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33797

  • 30

    ShaitelmanSFStauderMCAllenPReddySLakoskiSAtkinsonBet al. Impact of statin use on outcomes in triple negative breast cancer. J Cancer (2017) 8(11):2026–32. doi: 10.7150/jca.18743

  • 31

    SmithAMurphyLSharpLO'ConnorDGallagherWMBennettKet al. De novo post-diagnosis statin use, breast cancer-specific and overall mortality in women with stage I–III breast cancer. Br J Cancer (2016) 115(5):592–8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.232

  • 32

    SmithAMurphyLZgagaLBarronTIBennettK. Pre-diagnostic statin use, lymph node status and mortality in women with stages I–III breast cancer. Br J Cancer (2017)117(4):588–96. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.227

  • 33

    TryggvadottirHHuzellLGustbéeESimonssonMMarkkulaAJirströmKet al. Interactions between ABCB1 genotype and preoperative statin use impact clinical outcomes among breast cancer patients. Front Oncol (2018) 8. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00428

  • 34

    AhernTPPedersenLTarpMCronin-FentonDPGarneJPSillimanRAet al. Statin prescriptions and breast cancer recurrence risk: A Danish nationwide prospective cohort study. JNCI J Natl Cancer Institute (2011) 103(19):1461–8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr291

  • 35

    BoudreauDMYuOChubakJWirtzHSBowlesEJFujiiMet al. Comparative safety of cardiovascular medication use and breast cancer outcomes among women with early stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2014) 144(2):405–16. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-2870-5

  • 36

    ChaeYKValsecchiMEKimJBianchiALKhemasuwanDDesaiAet al. Reduced risk of breast cancer recurrence in patients using ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and/or statins. Cancer Invest (2011) 29(9):585–93. doi: 10.3109/07357907.2011.616252

  • 37

    ChoiMHanJYangBRJangMJKimMLeeDWet al. Association of insulin, metformin, and statin with mortality in breast cancer patients. Cancer Res Treat (2021) 53(1):65–76. doi: 10.4143/crt.2020.430

  • 38

    HarborgSHeide-JørgensenUAhernTPEwertzMCronin-FentonDBorgquistS. Statin use and breast cancer recurrence in postmenopausal women treated with adjuvant aromatase inhibitors: a Danish population-based cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2020) 183(1):153–60. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05749-5

  • 39

    HosioMUrpilainenEHautakoskiAMarttilaMArffmanMSundRet al. Survival after breast cancer in women with type 2 diabetes using antidiabetic medication and statins: a retrospective cohort study. Acta Oncol (2020) 59(9):1110–7. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2020.1769858

  • 40

    InasuMFeldtMJernströmHBorgquistSHarborgS. Statin use and patterns of breast cancer recurrence in the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study. Breast (2022) 61:123–8. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.01.003

  • 41

    KwanMLHabelLAFlickEDQuesenberryCPCaanB. Post-diagnosis statin use and breast cancer recurrence in a prospective cohort study of early stage breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2007) 109(3):573–9. doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9683-8

  • 42

    LuY-CHuangDWChenPTTsaiCFLinMCLinCCet al. Association between statin use and second cancer risk in breast cancer patients: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2020) 185(3):773–83. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05969-9

  • 43

    SakellakisMAkinosoglouKKostakiASpyropoulouDKoutrasA. Statins and risk of breast cancer recurrence. Breast Cancer: Targets Ther (2016) 8:199–205. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S116694

  • 44

    ZhaoGJiYYeQYeXWoGChenXet al. Effect of statins use on risk and prognosis of breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Anti-Cancer Drugs (2021) 33(1):e507–18. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000001151

  • 45

    LvHShiDFeiMChenYXieFWangZet al. Association between statin use and prognosis of breast cancer: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. Front Oncol (2020) 10. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.556243

  • 46

    LiuBYiZGuanXZengYXMaF. The relationship between statins and breast cancer prognosis varies by statin type and exposure time: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat (2017) 164(1):1–11. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4246-0

  • 47

    AlarfiHYoussefLASalamoonM. A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study of a combination of simvastatin and chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. J Oncol 2020 (2020) p:4174395. doi: 10.1155/2020/4174395

  • 48

    DewidarSAHamdyOEltantawyAEl-MeseryMEl GayarAMSolimanMM. Effect of concomitant use of pitavastatin with neoadjuvant chemotherapy protocols in breast cancer patients: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Saudi Pharm J (2022) 30(10):1486–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2022.07.011

  • 49

    JiangWHuJWHeXRJinWLHeXY. Statins: a repurposed drug to fight cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res (2021) 40(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s13046-021-02041-2

  • 50

    YinLHeZYiBXueLSunJ. Simvastatin suppresses human breast cancer cell invasion by decreasing the expression of pituitary tumor-transforming gene 1. Front Pharmacol (2020) 11. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.574068

  • 51

    Castellanos-EsparzaYWuSHuangLBuquetCShenRSanchez GonzalezBet al. Synergistic promoting effects of pentoxifylline and simvastatin on the apoptosis of triple-negative MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. Int J Oncol (2018) 52(4):1246–54. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2018.4272

  • 52

    BytautaiteMPetrikaiteV. Comparative study of lipophilic statin activity in 2D and 3D in vitro models of human breast cancer cell lines MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7. OncoTargets Ther (2020) 13:13201–9. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S283033

  • 53

    ChoeE-JLeeCHBaeJHParkJMParkSSBaekMC. Atorvastatin enhances the efficacy of immune checkpoint therapy and suppresses the cellular and extracellular vesicle PD-L1. Pharmaceutics (2022) 14(8):1660. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14081660

  • 54

    CentonzeGNataliniDPiccolantonioASalemmeVMorellatoAArinaPet al. Cholesterol and its derivatives: multifaceted players in breast cancer progression. Front Oncol (2022) 12. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.906670

  • 55

    MarkowskaAAntoszczakMMarkowskaJHuczyńskiA. Statins: HMG-coA reductase inhibitors as potential anticancer agents against Malignant neoplasms in women. Pharmaceuticals (2020) 13(12):422. doi: 10.3390/ph13120422

  • 56

    XuW-HZhouY-H. The relationship between post-diagnostic statin usage and breast cancer prognosis varies by hormone receptor phenotype: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstetrics (2021) 304(5):1315–21. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06065-z

  • 57

    HyderTMartiJLGNasrazadaniABrufskyAM. Statins and endocrine resistance in breast cancer. Cancer Drug Resistance (2021) 4(2):356–64. doi: 10.20517/cdr.2020.112

  • 58

    LiuJWangHZhangMLiYWangRChenHet al. Metformin and simvastatin synergistically suppress endothelin 1-induced hypoxia and angiogenesis in multiple cancer types. Cancer Sci (2022) 114(2):640–53. doi: 10.1111/cas.15602

Summary

Keywords

statins, breast cancer, overall mortality, disease-induced mortality, recurrence

Citation

Jia X, Lu Y, Xu Z and Mu Q (2023) Impact of statin use on breast cancer recurrence and mortality before and after diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Oncol. 13:1256747. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1256747

Received

11 July 2023

Accepted

23 November 2023

Published

18 December 2023

Volume

13 - 2023

Edited by

Connie Irene Diakos, Royal North Shore Hospital, Australia

Reviewed by

Carmine De Angelis, University of Naples Federico II, Italy

Adam Brufsky, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, United States

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Xiaolin Jia,

†These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics