Abstract
Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a group of malignant clonal hematological disorders with heterogeneous clinical course and risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia. Genetic and epigenetic dysregulation, including alterations in microRNA (miRNA) expression, plays a pivotal role in MDS pathogenesis influencing disease development and progression. MiRNAs, known for their regulatory roles in gene expression, have emerged as promising biomarkers in various malignant diseases. This review aims to explore the diagnostic and prognostic roles of miRNAs in MDS. We discuss research efforts aimed at understanding the clinical utility of miRNAs in MDS management. MiRNA dysregulation is linked to specific chromosomal abnormalities in MDS, providing insights into the molecular landscape of the disease. Circulating miRNAs in plasma offer a less invasive avenue for diagnostic and prognostic assessment, with distinct miRNA profiles identified in MDS patients. Additionally, we discuss investigations concerning the role of miRNAs as markers for treatment response to hypomethylating and immunomodulating agents, which could lead to improved treatment decision-making and monitoring. Despite significant progress, further research in larger patient cohorts is needed to fully elucidate the role of miRNAs in MDS pathogenesis and refine personalized approaches to patient care.
Introduction
Myelodysplastic syndromes are a heterogenic group of clonal disorders of the hematopoietic stem cell, characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis, morphological manifestations of dysplasia and high risk of transformation into acute leukemia (). Numerous genetic and epigenetic factors are involved in the development, course and progression of the disease.
Epigenetics is all the information that is passed on during cell division but is not encoded in the DNA sequence. It refers to the modification of DNA and histone proteins to alter chromatin configuration and gene expression, influencing the regeneration, differentiation and development of hematopoietic progenitor cells. Epigenetic mechanisms include DNA methylation, post-translational modification of histone proteins and chromatin remodeling and synthesis of non-coding RNAs. Disturbances of epigenetic modifications have a key role in the maintenance of regenerative hematopoietic stem cells and leukemic stem cells ().
MicroRNAs are short non-coding RNAs and changes in their expression levels can contribute to hematological tumor development. MiRNAs have a key role in the regulation of hematopoiesis (), and their differential expression in MDS is associated with the clinical course of the disease (–), and its transformation in AML (). However, the exact role of miRNAs in the pathogenesis of MDS is still unclear. They participate in the process of oncogenesis through multiple processes leading to the avoidance of angiogenesis, cell differentiation, apoptosis and proliferation of tumor cells (). In addition, microRNAs also exert epigenetic control by influencing other epigenetic mechanisms - such as DNA methyltransferases, leading to global hypomethylation, or by overexpression of some enzymes of the PcG complex such as EZH2, and thus can function as oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Significant levels of microRNAs have been found in a number of body fluids such as plasma, serum, urine, breast milk and saliva. Specific panels of microRNAs have been identified as being associated with the diagnosis and outcome of a number of diseases and especially malignant ones. The role of microRNAs as diagnostic, prognostic and predictive markers in myelodysplastic syndromes is a subject in our analysis.
Biosynthesis of microRNAs
MicroRNAs are non-coding endogenous RNAs with a length of 19-25 nucleotides that are complementary to the 3’ untranslated region of the target genes. The main enzyme responsible for their transcription is RNA polymerase II, but this process is influenced by numerous other genetic and epigenetic factors such as the tumor suppressor gene p53 and CpG methylation (). RNA polymerase II leads to the synthesis of a primary miRNA (pri-miRNA), which has a 5’ cap and a 3’ poly(A) tail. It is further processed by a microprocessor complex composed of ribonuclease III, Drosha and DGCR8 (DiGeorge syndrome critical region 8), forming precursor miRNA (pre-miRNA), which is exported from the nucleus to the cell cytoplasm by exportin 5. There it is recognized by Dicer, which cuts the pre-miRNA to a fixed length, usually 21-25 nucleotides. The final product is a mature miRNA that is bound to a specific protein Argonaute (AGO) and thus an RNA induced silencing complex (RISC) is formed. Four AGO proteins are found in humans. The miRNA in the RISC complex binds to messenger RNA and this leads to translational repression. In addition, RISC also acts directly on ribosomal subunits by preventing the 60S from joining the translation complex or by inhibiting the formation of the 80S complex. There is another mechanism for mRNA repression by miRNAs through deadenylation of mRNAs by RISC. A small fraction of miRNAs can also be synthesized independently of Drosha and Dicer. A Drosha-independent pathway is enabled by the synthesis of mirtrons (). Mirtrons are encoded in an intronic region and thus precursors are generated by mRNA splicing mechanism that does not require Drosha. The mirtrons are then post-processed by Dicer. A Dicer-independent pathway in the synthesis of miRNA-451 (, ), has also been described. After Drosha-dependent processing, a structure containing 18 nucleotides is generated, which is too short for Dicer-dependent processing. Instead, pre-miRNA-451 directly binds to RISC, where AGO2-dependent cleavage generates ac-pre-miR-451 (AGO-cleaved pre-miR-451). This structure is further processed by a specific ribonuclease and thus mature miRNA-451 is synthesized ().
MicroRNAs in myelodysplastic syndrome as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers
The field of microRNAs in MDS is rapidly evolving, revealing their dysregulation as a hallmark feature of this disease. These small non-coding RNAs exhibit differential expression patterns in MDS, reflecting the underlying molecular mechanisms driving disease pathogenesis. As such, miRNAs hold immense potential and offer insights into disease subtype classification and patient outcome prediction. There is an increasing number of studies focusing on different microRNAs, highlighting a growing interest in their potential as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in MDS (Table 1).
Table 1
| MicroRNA | Sample source | Expression | Function | Target | Implication | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiR-16 | Bone marrow | Upregulated | Tumor suppressor | VEGF | Prognosis | () |
| MiR-22 | Bone marrow/Plasma | Upregulated | Role in HSC renewal | TET2 | Prognosis | () |
| MiR-146b | Bone marrow | Upregulated | Role in tumorigenesis, erythropoiesis, megakaryopoiesis | TRAF6, IRAK1, PDGFRA | Diagnostic and prognostic marker | (, ) |
| MiR-181 | Bone marrow | Upregulated | Regulator of granulocytic and macrophage differentiation | PRKCD, CTDSPL, CAMKK1 | Prognostic marker | (, , ) |
| MiR-320 | Bone marrow | Upregulated | Diagnostic and prognostic marker | (, ) | ||
| MiR-424 | Bone marrow | Downregulated | Regulator of monocyte and macrophage differentiation | VEGFR2 | Diagnostic marker, therapy response marker | (, , ) |
| MiRs in DLK1-DIO3 genomic region | Bone marrow | Upregulated | Apoptosis, regulation of HSPC differentiation | MEG3-DMR | Prognostic markers, Therapy response markers | () |
| MiR-194 | Bone marrow | Upregulated | Apoptosis | p53 | Prognostic marker | () |
| MiR-218 | Downregulated | Role in tumorigenesis | SLIT2/3 | Prognostic marker, Potential therapeutic target | () |
Diagnostic and prognostic microRNAs.
MicroRNA-16
A recent study revealed lower levels of miR-16 in bone marrow CD34+ cells obtained from patients diagnosed with high-risk MDS, coinciding with upregulated levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (). VEGF, a critical angiogenic factor, plays a pivotal role in hematopoietic stem cell regulation (), and its dysregulation is associated with tumor proliferation and angiogenesis, affecting both endothelial and leukemic cells (). Consistent findings across several studies have demonstrated the role of VEGF in the pathogenesis of MDS and high expression of VEGF was correlated with increased transfusion needs, overall survival, and leukemia-free survival (–). These observations support the hypothesis that apoptosis dysregulation characterizes MDS pathogenesis, with low-risk disease showing heightened apoptosis, while disease progression is marked by acquired apoptosis resistance and aberrant VEGF expression. Xiong et al. further corroborated these findings by verifying miR-16’s direct binding to the VEGF 3’-UTR, suggesting a tumor-suppressive role for miR-16 in MDS development by targeting VEGF ().
MicroRNA-22
MiR-22 is another miR upregulated in MDS and plays a role in hematopoiesis and hematopoietic stem cell renewal by negatively regulating TET2 protein levels (Figure 1) (). TET2, belonging to the TET methylcytosine dioxygenase family, is crucial for the conversion of 5-methylcytosine (5-mC) to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) (), and mutations in TET2 are frequently observed in MDS. Notably, Song et al. demonstrated a direct correlation between elevated miR-22 levels and poor survival rates in MDS patients, independent of factors such as blast count and cytogenetic karyotype. They proved that, by repressing TET2 expression, miR-22 can remodel the epigenetic landscape, resulting in global changes in 5-hmC levels and alterations in the expression of TET2 target genes like AIM2 and SP140. Additionally, miR-22 emerges as a potential therapeutic target in MDS, as inhibition of miR-22 in cell cultures lead to a reduction in their colony forming capability (). Further studies have highlighted the concordance between miR-22 expression levels in bone marrow CD34+ cells and plasma of MDS patients, with higher expression observed in high-risk disease (). Interestingly, expression levels of miR-22 tend to increase with disease progression from lower to higher risk stages but decline upon transformation to overt AML, although this trend lacks statistical significance due to limited cohorts. While miR-22 holds promise as a potential biomarker for response to hypomethylating agents due to its targeting of TET2, studies have not found a correlation between treatment response and miR-22 levels (), suggesting the need for further investigation into its therapeutic implications in MDS.
Figure 1
MicroRNA-150
MicroRNA-150 is another microRNA with a role in hematopoiesis, which is moderately expressed in megakaryocyte/erythrocyte precursors (). It is upregulated during megakaryocytic differentiation () and downregulated in normal erythropoiesis (). In a study conducted by Hussein et al., a significant elevation of miR-150 levels was observed in MDS with del(5q) compared to normal hematopoiesis (). The researchers suggested that miR-150 negatively regulates the expression of the myeloblastosis virus oncogene (MYB), a DNA-binding transcription factor crucial for hematopoietic development. Building on this, a more recent study by Liu et al. confirmed MYB as a direct target of miR-150 in MDS cells and also showed that miR-150 is targeted by the oncogene BC200, also known as brain cytoplasmic RNA 1 (BCYRN1) (). Their findings demonstrated that the overexpression of BC200 in MDS cells acted as a sponge for miR-150-5p, leading to an increase in MYB mRNA levels, highlighting the intricate regulatory network involving miR-150, MYB, and BC200 in the context of hematopoietic disorders.
MicroRNA-181
The miR-181 family serves as a crucial negative regulator of granulocytic and macrophage differentiation by directly targeting PRKCD, CTDSPL, and CAMKK1 (). Dysregulation of the miR-181 family expression is implicated in the pathogenesis of AML, with aberrantly elevated levels believed to contribute to disease development (). Pons et al. identified miR-181a with progressively increasing expression levels from controls to early-stage MDS, to advanced MDS, and post-MDS AML, suggesting its potential as a prognostic marker for disease progression (). Moreover, miR-181a-5p, miR-181b-5p, and miR-181d-5p were found to be overexpressed in MDS patients who later progressed to AML, independently of blast count (). Another study revealed high expression of four miR-181 family members in high-risk MDS, and also that elevated miR-181 expression in low-risk MDS correlated with reduced overall survival (). Additionally, miR-181c upregulation was observed in GATA2 deficiency (), a disorder associated with progressive cytopenias, bone marrow hypocellularity, severe immunodeficiency, sensorineural hearing loss, lymphedema, abnormal myeloid differentiation, and increased propensity to develop bone marrow failure, MDS, AML, or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (). Contrary to these findings, Liang et al. reported downregulation of miR-181a-2-3p in MDS patients compared to healthy controls, still secondary AML patients exhibited higher expression levels. Interestingly, low levels of miR-181a were associated with worse overall survival in MDS patients, but the analysis excluded patients with secondary AML (). Nonetheless, these findings present discrepancies that warrant further investigation, possibly attributable to the limitations of small sample cohorts, underscoring the need for larger-scale studies to elucidate the precise role of miR-181 family members in MDS and AML pathogenesis.
MicroRNA-765
MiR-765 has emerged as another player in the pathogenesis of MDS. A recent study by Kang et al. unveiled elevated levels of this miRNA in MDS patients, particularly those with multilineage dysplasia (). Functionally, miR-765 exerts its effects by inducing apoptosis. This effect occurs through the downregulation of proteolipid protein 2 (PLP2) (), an integral membrane protein located in the endoplasmic reticulum. Consequently, the upregulation of miR-765 in MDS leads to apoptosis induction via the inhibition of PLP2.
MicroRNA-320
Upregulation of the miR-320 family has been observed in MDS patients compared to controls (, ). Moreover, elevated levels of miR-320c and miR-320d have been associated with shorter OS in MDS patients and miR-320d has been identified as an independent prognostic factor for OS (). These findings underscore the clinical relevance of the miR-320 family in MDS management, warranting further investigation into its diagnostic and prognostic value.
MicroRNA-34a
MiR-34a plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of MDS through various mechanisms. Its function as a regulator of proliferation, as miR-34a inhibits cell proliferation by inducing apoptosis, thereby affecting hematopoietic stem cells (). Additionally, the upregulation of miR-34a, along with miR-155, has been linked to the inhibition of neutrophil migration by downregulating genes such as DOCK8, FGD4, and Rac1, further contributing to the dysregulated immune response observed in MDS (). Moreover, the overexpression of miR-34a has been implicated in reducing c-Fos levels, a factor that contributes to tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) overproduction in response to inflammatory stimuli in MDS, ultimately leading to ineffective hematopoiesis (). Furthermore, miR-34a has been implicated in inducing neutrophil apoptosis via the Cdc42-WASP-Arp2/3 pathway, contributing to the dysregulation of myeloid cell homeostasis in MDS (). These multifaceted roles of miR-34a underscore its significance in MDS pathogenesis.
MicroRNA-146b
The microRNA-146 family comprises two members, miR146a and miR146b, which are located on different chromosomes, but are nearly identical in sequence (). Studies have revealed that these microRNAs are implicated in inflammatory diseases and tumorigenesis by downregulating key molecules essential for NF-kB activation through the inhibition of tumor necrosis factor receptor–associated factor 6 (TRAF6) and interleukin-1 receptor–associated kinase 1 (IRAK1) (). Furthermore, microRNA-146b-5p has been identified as a significant player in erythropoiesis and megakaryopoiesis by targeting platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (). Notably, in animal models, knockout mice lacking miR-146a and miR-146b have shown a predisposition to developing hematopoietic malignancies with age, with miR-146a knockout mice developing lymphomas and miR-146b knockout mice developing lymphomas and acute myeloid leukemia (). In clinical studies, the expression of miR-146b-5p has emerged as a potential diagnostic marker for MDS, with elevated levels observed in MDS and aplastic anemia (AA) patients compared to healthy controls (). Additionally, research by Choi et al. has demonstrated a correlation between the expression levels of miR-146b-5p in bone marrow mononuclear cells and the prognosis of MDS patients, with significantly higher expression detected in high risk MDS cases ().
MicroRNA-424
MicroRNA-424 is another potential molecule in the pathogenesis of MDS. It has a role as a regulator of monocyte and macrophage differentiation () and is also associated with aberrant endothelial cell proliferation by directly targeting VEGFR2 and influencing angiogenic processes (). Notably, dysregulated expression of miR-424 has been observed in hematological diseases, such as its upregulation in AML with MN1 overexpression (). Studies have revealed the potential diagnostic value of miR-424, with its expression levels serving as a distinguishing factor among different hematological conditions.
It is found out to be downregulated in severe AA compared to MDS (). In another study, miR-424 levels were significantly reduced in cell lines derived from monoMAC patients with MDS (). Research by Kunze et al. utilizing next-generation sequencing and SNP array analysis in formalin- fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) bone marrow biopsies from MDS patients, unveiled reduced miR-424 expression (). This was linked to a recurrent microdeletion in Xq26.3, resulting in the loss of PHF6 expression, a potential tumor suppressor gene. MiR-424 has also a potential for therapeutic response assessment in MDS patients treated with azacitidine and lenalidomide (). While preliminary findings indicate promising avenues for miR-424, further investigations involving larger cohorts are warranted to validate its clinical utility in MDS management.
MicroRNA-597
MicroRNA-597 is located on chromosome 8, and trisomy 8 is present in 5-7% of patients with MDS, making it the most common chromosomal gain abnormality in MDS (). Moreover, miR-597 is found out to be dysregulated in various solid cancers such as hepatocellular carcinoma (), non-small cell lung cancer (), colorectal neoplasms (), and breast cancer (), implicating its role in tumorigenesis. Recent research conducted by Kang et al. unveiled elevated levels of miR-597 in MDS patients (). They performed an in vitro study, which demonstrated that miR-597 mimics induce apoptosis by downregulating FOS like 2 (FOSL2), shedding light on the role of miR-597 in MDS pathogenesis.
MicroRNA-218
MicroRNA-218 is also involved in carcinogenesis and it is known for targeting the tumor suppressor gene slit guidance ligand (SLIT2/3). It is correlated with clinical staging, prognosis and metastasis of solid tumors, which underscores its significance in disease development (). A study by Zhang et al. demonstrated that hypermethylation of the SLIT2 promoter leads to the repression of mir-218 expression, which is associated with disease progression in MDS and it is predictive of poor prognoses in both MDS and AML (). Furthermore, the overexpression of SLIT2-IT1/miR-218 demonstrated potent anti-leukemic effects by modulating cell proliferation, apoptosis, and colony formation both in vitro and in vivo, highlighting the therapeutic potential of microRNA-218 in combating hematologic malignancies.
MicroRNAs in DLK1-DIO3 genomic region
The DLK1–DIO3 genomic region is located on chromosome 14 (14q32) and contains one of the largest miRNA clusters (54 miRNAs) in the human genome (). These miRs exhibit dual roles as both oncogenic drivers and tumor suppressors, with frequent dysregulation observed across various cancer types. Their aberrant expression has been associated with disrupted apoptosis and suppression of proliferation (). Furthermore, these miRNAs play a crucial role in regulating hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell (HSPC) differentiation, highlighting their involvement in hematopoietic development ().
In another study by Merkerova et al., the expression levels of miRNAs within the DLK1-DIO3 region were investigated in patients with high-risk MDS and acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) (). Despite the small cohort size, intriguing findings emerged, with approximately half of the patients demonstrating increased expression of these miRNAs. Notably, following treatment with azacitidine a reduction in miRNA expression levels to near-normal was observed. Furthermore, the study revealed a correlation between the expression levels of these miRNAs in pretreatment samples and important clinical parameters, including bone marrow blast count, patient diagnoses, and outcomes such as overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). High expression was related with AML-MRC and poor outcome and low expression was associated with MDS and favorable outcome. These findings underscore the potential utility of miRNAs within the DLK1-DIO3 region as biomarkers for disease prognosis and treatment response in high-risk MDS and AML-MRC patients.
MicroRNAs and specific chromosome abnormalities
Chromosome abnormalities represent a hallmark feature in MDS, with specific MDS karyotypes potentially linked to distinct microRNA expression profiles. Understanding these associations is a point of several investigations (Table 2). For instance, Bousquet et al. demonstrated elevated expression levels of microRNA-125b in patients harboring the translocation (2;11)(p21;q23) compared to both healthy individuals and patients without this translocation (). Notably, mature miR-125b originates from two distinct loci: miR-125b-1, derived from the long noncoding RNA (lncRNA)–MIR100HG (miR-100/let-7a-2/miR-125b-1) on chromosome 11, and miR-125b-2, derived from the miRNA cluster (miR-99a/let-7c/miR-125b-2) on chromosome 21 (). The role of microRNA-125b is to block the myelomonocytic differentiation of cell lines in vitro (), shedding light on its potential role in MDS pathogenesis.
Table 2
| MicroRNA | Sample source | Karyotype association | Expression | Function | Target | Implication | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiR-150 | Bone marrow | MDS with del(5q) | Upregulated | Role in erythropoiesis, megakaryopoiesis | MYB, BC200 | Potential therapeutic target | () |
| MiR-125b | Bone marrow | t(2;11)(p21;q23) | Upregulated | Block the myelomonocytic differentiation | Potential therapeutic target | () | |
| MiR-194 | Bone marrow | Trisomy 1 | Upregulated | Apoptosis | p53 | Prognostic marker | () |
| MiR-595 | Bone marrow | Chromosome 7 abnormalities | Downregulated | Cellular proliferation, apoptosis, and defective ribosomal biogenesis | RPL27A | Potential therapeutic target | () |
| miR-449a, miR-300, miR-210, miR-874, miR-589, miR-451 miR-223, miR-128b, miR-342 | Bone marrow | MDS with del(5q) | Downregulated | Diagnostic markers | (, ) | ||
| miR-196b, miR-451, miR-98, miR-34a, miR-10a miR-10b, miR-126, miR-99b miR-130a, miR-199a, miR-125a, miR-125b | Bone marrow | MDS with del(5q) | Upregulated | Diagnostic markers | (, ) |
MicroRNAs associated with specific chromosome abnormalities.
In another study, Choi et al. looked into the involvement of microRNAs encoded on chromosomes 8 and 1q in patients with MDS (). They specifically examined the expression levels of nine microRNAs encoded on chromosome 8 and three on chromosome 1q. Their findings revealed increased expression of miR-194-5p in patients with trisomy 1, a chromosomal aberration frequently observed in MDS. Moreover, the expression levels of miR-194-5p correlated with OS, with lower levels of this microRNA significantly associated with decreased OS. The increased expression of miR-194 is known to inhibit cell growth and promote apoptosis by regulating p53 through the suppression of E3 ubiquitin–protein ligase Mdm2 (). Interestingly, p53, in turn, has been reported to induce the expression of miR-194, suggesting a complex interplay between microRNAs and key regulatory pathways implicated in MDS pathogenesis.
Expanding on the exploration of microRNAs in MDS, Alkhatabi et al. investigated miR-595, located on chromosome 7q (). MiR-595 is situated within one of the commonly deleted regions (CDR) identified in MDS with monosomy 7 (-7) or isolated loss of 7q (7q-). Their study revealed significant dysregulation of this microRNA in MDS patients with -7/-7q and those with complex karyotypes containing chromosome 7 anomalies, compared to patients with a normal karyotype. Furthermore, Alkhatabi et al. demonstrated that miR-595 regulates RPL27A, a ribosomal protein-coding gene. They found out that deficiency of RPL27A leads to both p53-dependent and independent effects, including attenuated cellular proliferation, apoptosis, and defective ribosomal biogenesis. These findings shed light on the intricate molecular mechanisms underlying MDS pathogenesis and highlight miR-595 as a potential therapeutic target in MDS patients with chromosome 7 abnormalities.
As part of their comprehensive investigation into microRNA dysregulation in MDS, Zuo et al. examined specific plasma microRNA expression patterns in patients with MDS harboring isolated del(7q)/-7 or del(20q), compared with other MDS cases (). Their investigation unveiled eight microRNAs significantly differentially expressed in MDS with isolated del(7q)/-7, four of which are mapped on chromosome 7 - miR-96, miR-196b, miR-25, and miR-590. Additionally, thirteen microRNAs exhibited significant differences in MDS with isolated del(20q), with two of them located on the long arm of chromosome 20. Intriguingly, the levels of these microRNAs were notably higher in this subset of patients. These findings contribute to our understanding of the molecular landscape of MDS and highlight the potential utility of plasma microRNAs in cases with specific chromosomal abnormalities.
In MDS, the 5q syndrome represents a distinct subtype characterized by a deletion of part of the long arm of chromosome 5 (del(5q)). This subtype typically manifests with cytopenias, particularly anemia, and displays a favorable prognosis compared to other MDS subtypes. Furthermore, the presence of the del(5q) abnormality is associated with specific clinical and molecular features, including responsiveness to lenalidomide therapy, suggesting a unique pathogenic mechanism mediated by dysregulated microRNAs. A certain number of studies have demonstrated a specific miR signature associated with 5q- phenotype. Distinct microRNA profiles have been identified in 5q syndrome, shedding light on its pathogenesis and potential therapeutic targets. Studies have revealed upregulation of miR-199a and miR-125a, as demonstrated by two independent investigations (, ). Furthermore, Votavova et al. uncovered increased expression of miR-10a, miR-10b, miR-34a, miR-451, miR-223, alongside downregulation of miR-128b and miR-342 (). Understanding the dynamic changes in microRNA expression profiles following treatment with lenalidomide is essential for unraveling the complex pathogenesis of 5q syndrome, offering insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying therapeutic responses. Merkerova et al. conducted a study investigating microRNA expression in response to lenalidomide treatment, revealing a notable increase in pro-apoptotic miR-34a and miR-34a* expression, which decreased over the course of lenalidomide exposure (). MiR-34a is directly regulated by p53, acting as a pro-apoptotic transcriptional target that modulates the expression of specific genes targeted by p53 (). Additionally, they observed that microRNAs initially unchanged, such as those located in the 14q32 locus and miR-145 and miR-146a, exhibited increased levels following treatment, suggesting dynamic regulatory shifts associated with therapeutic response (). MiR-145 and miR-146a are notable for their location within the 5q chromosomal region. Starczynowski et al. research demonstrated that reduced levels of these miRNAs in murine models led to a phenotype resembling MDS (), highlighting their potential significance in disease pathogenesis. A proposed model suggests that hemizygous deletion of the miR-145 and the protein-coding gene RPS14 may collaborate to increase megakaryocyte production, contributing to thrombocytosis in the 5q syndrome (). Moreover, miR-145 targets FLI1, a megakaryocyte and erythroid regulatory transcription factor who plays a central role in megakaryopoiesis (). However, contradictory findings arise from other studies that did not detect changes in the expression levels of these miRNAs in patients with 5q syndrome (, ). Interestingly, the observed increase in miR-145 and miR-146a levels following lenalidomide treatment () offers insight into Starczynowski’s findings, suggesting a dynamic regulatory response that may impact disease progression and therapeutic outcomes in MDS.
Circulating microRNAs as less invasive biomarkers
The collective findings from these studies underscore the potential of miRNAs as promising diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in MDS. The majority of these research primarily focuses on microRNAs isolated from bone marrow CD34+ cells, given their direct relevance to hematopoietic stem cell biology and disease pathogenesis. As we strive for less invasive diagnostic procedures, miRNAs could offer a non-invasive avenue, as they can be isolated from various materials including plasma, serum, and extracellular vesicles. Several research endeavors have explored the differential expression of miRNAs in plasma and serum samples from MDS patients, revealing distinct miRNA profiles that could serve as valuable indicators of disease status and prognosis. By elucidating the intricate molecular signatures associated with MDS progression, these studies contribute to the ongoing efforts to refine diagnostic and prognostic strategies for this heterogeneous disorder (Table 3).
Table 3
| Upregulated plasma microRNAs | Downregulated plasma microRNAs | Upregulated exosomal microRNAs | Downregulated exosomal microRNAs |
|---|---|---|---|
| miR-206, miR-34b, miR-503, miR-651, miR-655, miR-150 | miR-16, miR-let-7a, miR-144, miR-25, miR-451, miR-493, miR-92a, miR-96, miR-27a, miR-199a, | miR-103a, miR-103b, miR-107, miR-221, miR-221, miR-130b, miR-378i, miR-3200, miR-423, miR-1193, miR-143 | miR-426, miR-19b, miR-1180, miR-126, miR-382 |
Differentially expressed circulating microRNAs.
In one retrospective analysis, researchers compared the levels of let-7a and miR-16 in plasma samples from patients with MDS and healthy controls (). Significantly lower levels of both miRNAs were observed in MDS patients, and these levels were found to be predictive of both OS and PFS. Building upon these findings, Zuo et al. conducted a subsequent study involving 72 patients diagnosed with cytogenetically normal myelodysplastic syndrome and 12 healthy controls (). The study aimed to profile plasma miRNA expression patterns in MDS and identify miRNAs that could potentially serve as prognostic biomarkers. Utilizing an array containing 800 miRNAs, 639 of which generated analyzable signals, the patients were stratified into groups based on their survival outcomes, with a cutoff of 30 months for OS. Through this analysis, seven highly differentially expressed microRNAs (let-7a, miR-144, miR-16, miR-25, miR-451, miR-651, and miR-655) were identified, all of which demonstrated correlations with patient survival.
Merkerova et al. conducted a comprehensive genome-wide miRNA profiling study, analyzing plasma samples from a discovery cohort consisting of 14 patients with MDS and 7 healthy controls, using a microarray containing 2,006 miRNAs (). They identified 207 and 201 miRNAs in the MDS and control samples, respectively. Subsequently, the patients were stratified into lower and higher risk categories, and six hematopoiesis and/or oncology-related miRNAs (miR-16-5p, miR-27a-3p, miR-150-5p, miR-199-5p, miR-223-3p, and miR-451) were selected for validation in a cohort of 40 MDS patients and 20 healthy controls. In the validation cohort, plasma levels of miR-150-5p were elevated, while miR-16-5p, miR-27a-3p, miR-199a-5p, and miR-451a were decreased in MDS patients compared to healthy controls. Moreover, lower levels of miR-27a-3p, miR-199-5p, and miR-223-3p were identified in patients with higher-risk disease. Additionally, univariate analysis revealed a correlation between PFS and the levels of five miRNAs (miR-27a-3p, miR-150-5p, miR-199a-5p, miR-223-3p, and miR-451a), as well as between OS and miR-27a-3p and miR-223-3p.
MicroRNAs can be extracted from various sources including plasma, extracellular vesicles (EVs), and bone marrow, with specific small RNAs selectively packaged within EVs (). Hrustincova et al. conducted a study comparing the levels of miRNAs in total plasma with those in EVs, revealing substantial variability between the two types of material (). Interestingly, the content of miRNAs in EVs was found to be more homogenous than that of total plasma. Furthermore, the RNA profiles of total plasma and paired EVs exhibited differences among MDS patients but remained similar in healthy controls. Specifically, numerous hematopoiesis-related miRNAs, such as miR-103a-3p, miR-103b, miR-107, miR-221-3p, miR-221-5p, and miR-130b-5p, were elevated in both plasma and EVs of MDS patients compared to healthy controls. Intriguingly, several dysregulated miRNAs, including miR-127- 3p, miR-154-5p, miR 323-3p, miR-383-3p, miR-409-5p, and miR-485-3p, clustered on chromosomal region 14q32, were significantly upregulated in early MDS stages. This specific increase in miRNA expression in early MDS may be linked to excessive apoptosis, while advanced MDS is characterized by the inhibition of apoptosis and a proproliferative phenotype (). These findings shed light on the dynamic role of miRNAs in different stages of MDS pathogenesis. Another research conducted by Giudice et al. investigated exosomal microRNAs in patients with AA and MDS (). Their analysis revealed 25 exosomal miRs uniquely or commonly present in AA and/or MDS patients. Notably, 14 exosomal miRNAs were exclusively present in MDS patients, while 7 miRNAs were common to both SAA and MDS. This study underscores the potential of exosomal miRNAs as biomarkers for differentiating between these hematologic conditions and understanding their underlying pathophysiology.
When comparing cellular, plasma, and exosomal miRNAs, each type has distinct advantages and challenges. Cellular miRNAs can be isolated from CD34+ bone marrow cells, making them highly specific for the pathology of MDS. This specificity is invaluable for detailed research, and indeed, a substantial body of research focuses on these miRNAs. However, isolating cellular miRNAs is a more invasive procedure, which for example might complicate treatment response assessment due to the need for repeated bone marrow aspirations. On the other hand, plasma and exosomal miRNAs can be conveniently obtained from blood samples, offering a less invasive alternative. Exosomal miRNAs, in particular, are considered more reliable because they are tissue-specific, protected from degradation, and specifically loaded into vesicles from proliferating or apoptotic cells (, ). Nevertheless, there are technical challenges associated with exosome preparation and RNA extraction (), making them harder to obtain. Despite their potential, the lack of clear guidelines for data normalization in exosomal miRNA research remains a significant limitation (). In contrast, data normalization for circulating plasma miRNAs is well-established. It typically employs small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) and other robust methods like GeNormPlus, NormFinder, and the global mean of miRNA expression (). This standardization makes plasma miRNA data more accessible and reliable for clinical and research applications, despite the broader and potentially less specific nature of plasma-derived miRNAs.
MicroRNAs as markers for response to therapy
Hypomethylating agents are used as first-line therapy in patients with high-risk MDS, with azacitidine being preferred, resulting in better overall survival. Azacitidine prolongs patient survival, improves quality of life and delays time to AML progression. However it takes several months to determine the effect of the therapy and the response to the treatment occurs in approximately 40-50% of patients (, ). This necessitates the need for biomarkers to determine the sensitivity of patients to this type of therapy.
Certain miRs are associated with different response to azacitidine treatment. For example the plasma levels of miR-4474-3p and miR-762 are increased and the levels of miR-125b-5p, miR4324, miR-3156-3p are decreased in relation to later response ().
In a study conducted by Mongiorgi et al., the expression of miR-192-5p in MDS patients treated with azacitidine and lenalidomide was investigated. Their findings revealed a consistent increase in miR-192-5p levels in MDS patients compared to healthy controls (). MiR-192-5p, belonging to the miR-192/215 family, is recognized as a conserved tumor and leukemia-related miRNA (). It exerts a tumor-suppressive role by targeting key genes involved in oncogenic pathways, including BCL2, TP53, and TGF-beta signaling (–) while inhibiting CCNT2 in leukemia (), thereby suppressing cell proliferation and inducing G0/G1 cell cycle arrest in AML cells (). Interestingly, differences in miR-192-5p expression were noted between responders and patients who lost response early and therapy non-responders (). Furthermore, after four cycles of therapy, a statistically significant upregulation of miR-192-5p was observed, suggesting its association with treatment response. Additionally, Mongiorgi et al. demonstrated that miR-192 targets the BCL2 promoter, suggesting a potential mechanism underlying the suppressive role of miR-192-5p, as evidenced by the low BCL2 gene expression in MDS responder patients, possibly correlating with inhibition of proliferation in this subgroup. These findings underscore the intricate regulatory role of miR-192-5p in MDS pathogenesis and treatment response, offering valuable insights into its therapeutic potential and prognostic significance in this disease context.
MicroRNAs have also a role in chemoresistance, as evidenced by several studies in the field. For instance, Solly et al. investigated microRNAs associated with azacitidine resistance and identified seven microRNAs that were downregulated in azacitidine-resistant SKM1 cells, with five of these targeting DNMT1, a key enzyme inhibited by azacitidine. Among these microRNAs, miR-126-3p showed the most significant prognostic impact, with low levels correlating with reduced response rates, increased relapse rates, and shorter progression-free survival and overall survival (93). Notably, miR-126 interacts with DNMT1 to suppress its translation without affecting its transcription (94). In another study, Lei et al. explored decitabine (DAC) resistance and revealed that miR-4755-5p is overexpressed in extracellular vesicles from a DAC-resistant cell line (KG1a-DAC), promoting resistance by targeting the CDKN2B gene (95). Additionally, Li et al. demonstrated that both high and low levels of miR92a-Exos can induce chemoresistance to Ara-C in recipient cells, with low miR92a-Exos levels leading to a less pronounced resistance in SKM1 cells. Their findings highlighted the role of miR-92 in targeting PTEN and activating the Wnt/beta- catenin pathway to induce Ara-C resistance (96). These studies collectively underscore the intricate involvement of microRNAs in mediating chemoresistance mechanisms in various contexts (Table 4).
Table 4
| MicroRNA | Sample source | Karyotype association | Expression | Function | Target | Implication | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiR-22 | Bone marrow/Plasma | Upregulated | Role in HSC renewal | TET2 | Prognosis/Therapeutic target | () | |
| MiR-34a | Peripheral blood | Upregulated | Regulator of proliferation | DOCK8, FGD4, Rac1, c-Fos, Cdc42-WASP-Arp2/3 pathway | Potential therapeutic target | (–) | |
| MiR-150 | Bone marrow | MDS with del(5q) | Upregulated | Role in erythropoiesis, megakaryopoiesis | MYB, BC200 | Potential therapeutic target | () |
| MiR-765 | Bone marrow | Upregulated | Apoptosis | PLP2 | Potential therapeutic target | () | |
| MiRs in DLK1-DIO3 genomic region | Bone marrow | Upregulated | Apoptosis, regulation of HSPC differentiation | MEG3-DMR | Prognostic markers, Therapy response markers | () | |
| MiR-125b | Bone marrow | t(2;11)(p21;q23) | Upregulated | Block the myelomonocytic differentiation | Potential therapeutic target | () | |
| MiR-218 | Downregulated | Role in tumorigenesis | SLIT2/3 | Prognostic marker, Potential therapeutic target | () | ||
| MiR-595 | Bone marrow | Chromosome 7 abnormalities | Downregulated | Cellular proliferation, apoptosis, and defective ribosomal biogenesis | RPL27A | Potential therapeutic target | () |
| MiR-597 | Upregulated | Apoptosis | FOSL2 | Potential therapeutic target | () | ||
| MiR-192 | Bone marrow/plasma | Upregulated | Tumor suppressor | BCL2, TP53, and TGF-beta | Therapy response | () | |
| MiR-126 | Bone marrow | Downregulated | DNMT1 | Azacitidine resistance | (93) | ||
| MiR-4755 | Upregulated | CDKN2B | Decitabine resistance | (95) | |||
| MiR-92a | Exosomes | Upregulated | PTEN | Ara-C resistance | (96) | ||
| MiR-21 | Bone marrow | Upregulated | SMAD7, TGF-b | Therapeutic target | (97) | ||
| MiR-146a | TRAF6, IRAK1 | Therapeutic target | (98) |
MicroRNAs with implications in therapy.
MicroRNAs as therapeutics
MicroRNAs can not only be used as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers but also as therapeutic targets. These small, non-coding RNA molecules can act as tumor suppressors or oncogenes (oncomiRs) and have the ability to target multiple mRNAs that may be dysregulated in various diseases, making them promising candidates for therapeutic targets (Table 4). MicroRNA-based therapeutics can be broadly classified into two categories: microRNA mimics and microRNA inhibitors or antimiRs (99, 100). MicroRNA mimics are designed to replenish the lost miRNA expression in disease, thereby restoring normal cellular function. On the other hand, microRNA inhibitors or antimiRs are synthetic molecules with sequences complementary to the miRNA to be inhibited. By binding strongly to their target miRNAs, antimiRs effectively block the miRNAs function, thereby preventing its pathological effects.
The development of miRNAs as therapeutic agents presents several challenges, which must be addressed to ensure their efficacy and safety. One of the primary difficulties is the stability of miRNAs inside the body because they are susceptible to degradation by RNases present in the serum or within cellular endocytic compartments. One strategy to address this challenge is to modify the structure of oligonucleotides by altering the nucleotides or RNA backbone. Another strategy focuses on developing delivery vehicles, such as lipid nanoparticles, to encapsulate RNAs, offering protection and endosomal escape (100). Another concern is determining the proper administration routes to deliver miRNAs effectively to the target sites (101). Additionally, identifying the most suitable miRNA candidate for each disease remains a significant challenge. Addressing this issue requires a systematic analysis of existing data on various miRNA profiles across different diseases, and a thorough understanding of the miRNA-target networks involved in disease pathogenesis. By overcoming these hurdles, the potential of miRNAs as powerful therapeutic tools can be realized.
There are currently a few Phase I and II clinical trials testing these innovative therapeutic approaches involving miRNAs. One notable trial involves miravirsen, a 15-nucleotide antisense RNA oligo that targets miR-122-5p, designed for the treatment of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) (102). Additionally, MRX34, a miR-34 mimic developed by Mirna Therapeutics, was encapsulated in a lipid carrier (103) and entered a multicenter Phase I trial in 2013. This trial included patients with advenced solid tumours (104). Unfortunately, the trial was terminated due to immune-related adverse events, including patient deaths (105). The exact cause of these immune reactions remains unclear, highlighting the need for redesigned pre-clinical trials with a focused study on immune-related toxicities. Furthermore, another Phase I clinical trial was initiated for the LNA-based antimiR-155 (MRG-106; miRagen Therapeutics) in patients with cutaneous T cell lymphoma, mycosis fungoides subtype with promising preliminary results (106).
The potential utilization of miRNA therapeutics in myeloid malignancies is gaining significant interest, particularly with promising research findings. In a study conducted by Bhagat et al, researchers discovered elevated levels of miR-21, a microRNA that binds to SMAD7, a negative regulator of transforming growth factor–beta (TGF-b) receptor-I kinase, leading to reduced expression in hematopoietic cells (97). To explore the implications of this finding, they treated transgenic mice expressing a fusion gene (Alb/TGF) with chemically modified inhibitors of miR-21. Remarkably, the treated mice were with significantly increased hematocrit levels and showed enhanced capacity to form erythroid colonies from marrow-derived cells. The researchers further tested miR-21 inhibitors in primary MDS bone marrow samples, observing a notable increase in erythroid (BFU-E) colony numbers. These findings highlight the potential of miR-21 as a therapeutic target in hematologic disorders, suggesting a promising avenue for future research and clinical applications. Another recent study explored the therapeutic effects of a chemically modified miRNA-146a mimic oligonucleotide conjugated to a scavenger receptor/Toll-like receptor 9 agonist (C-miR146a) in miR-146a knockout mice (98). Reduced expression of miR-146a is known to contribute to the development of del(5q) MDS () and its progression to AML through IRAK1- and TRAF6-dependent activation of NF-kB (107, 108). In this study, intravenous injection of C-miR146a successfully restored miR-146a-5p levels in target myeloid cells, achieving complete elimination of exacerbated NF-kB activity in miR-146a knockout mice. This restoration prevented exaggerated inflammatory responses and aberrant myeloproliferation, leading to near-complete and durable inhibition of classic miR-146a targets, IRAK1 and TRAF6 (Figure 2). Furthermore, C-miR146a demonstrated cytotoxic effects on human MDSL, HL-60, and MV4-11 leukemia cells in vitro. Repeated intravenous administration of C-miR146a inhibited the expression of NF-kB target genes, thereby thwarting the progression of disseminated HL-60 leukemia. These findings underscore the therapeutic potential of miRNA mimics in treating myeloid malignancies, highlighting the ability to correct specific molecular dysfunctions and inhibit key pathological pathways.
Figure 2
Conclusions
In summary, the dysregulation of microRNAs in MDS patients underscores their potential as crucial players in disease pathogenesis. With distinct miRNA profiles associated with various types of MDS, these small regulatory molecules offer promise as less invasive diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. Moreover, their potential as indicators for response to therapy suggests a future role in treatment decision-making and monitoring. However, despite significant progress, there remain many unanswered questions, highlighting the need for further research in larger cohorts of patients. Continued exploration of miRNA dysregulation in MDS holds the key to unlocking novel insights into disease mechanisms and refining personalized approaches to patient care.
Statements
Author contributions
IM: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. SA: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2024.1410656/full#supplementary-material
References
1
MaherMDieschJLe PannérerMMBuschbeckM. Epigenetics in a spectrum of myeloid diseases and its exploitation for therapy. Cancers. (2021) 13:1746. doi: 10.3390/cancers13071746
2
IwamaASashidaG. Epigenetic regulation of hematopoiesis. Int J Hematol. (2012) 96:405–12. doi: 10.1007/s12185-012-1183-x
3
FenauxPItzyksonR. Epigenetics of myelodysplastic syndromes. Leukemia. (2014) 28:497–506. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.343
4
ChoiJ-SNamM-HYoonSYKangSH. Microrna-194-5p could serve as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in myelodysplastic syndromes. Leukemia Res. (2015) 39:763–8. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2015.04.013
5
ZuoZCalinGAde PaulaHMMedeirosLJFernandezMHShimizuM. Circulating micrornas let-7a and mir-16 predict progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with myelodysplas-tic syndrome. Blood. (2011) 118:413–5. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-01-330704
6
WangHZhangTTJinSLiuHZhangXRuanCHet al. Pyrosequencing quantified methylation level of mir-124 predicts shorter survival for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Clin Epigenet. (2017) 9. doi:Â 10.1186/s13148-017-0388-5
7
PonsANomdedeuBNavarroAGayaAGelBDiazTet al. Hematopoiesis-related microrna expression in myelodysplastic syndromes. Leukemia lymphoma. (2009) 50:1854–9. doi: 10.3109/10428190903147645
8
MilunovićVMandac RoguljIPlaninc-PeraicaABulychevaEKolonić OstojićS. The role of microrna in myelodysplastic syndromes: beyond dna methylation and histone modification. Eur J haematology. (2016) 96:553–63. doi: 10.1111/ejh.12735
9
BartelDPRubyJGJanCH. Intronic microrna precursors that bypass drosha processing. Nature. (2007) 448:83–6. doi: 10.1038/nature05983
10
CheloufiSDos SantosCOChongMMHannonGJ. A dicer independent mirna biogenesis pathway that requires ago catalysis. Nature. (2010) 465:584–9. doi: 10.1038/nature09092
11
CifuentesDXueHTaylorDWPatnodeHMishimaYCheloufiSet al. A novel mirna processing pathway independent of dicer requires argonaute2 catalytic activity. Science. (2010) 328:1694–8. doi: 10.1126/science.1190809
12
YodaMCifuentesDIzumiNSakaguchiYSuzukiTGiraldezAJet al. Poly(a)-specific ribonuclease mediates 3’-end trimming of argonaute2-cleaved precursor micrornas. Cell Rep. (2013) 5:715–26. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.09.029
13
XiongBNieYYuYWangSZuoX. Reduced mir-16 levels are associated with vegf upregulation in high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. J Cancer. (2021) 12:1967–77. doi: 10.7150/jca.52455
14
SongSJItoKAlaUKatsLWebsterKSunSMet al. The oncogenic microrna mir-22 targets the tet2 tumor suppressor to promote hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and transformation. Cell Stem Cell. (2013) 13:87–101. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2013.06.003
15
HosokawaKKajigayaSFengXDesiertoMJFernandez IbanezMDRiosOet al. A plasma microrna signature as a biomarker for acquired aplastic anemia. Haematologica. (2017) 102:69–78. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2016.151076
16
ChoiYHurEHMoonJHGooBKChoiDRLeeJH. Expression and prognostic significance of micrornas in korean patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Korean J Internal Med. (2019) 34:390–400. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2016.239
17
GuoYStricklandSAMohanSLiSBosompemAVickersKCet al. Micrornas and trna-derived fragments predict the transformation of myelodysplastic syndromes to acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia Lymphoma. (2017) 58:1–15. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2016.1272680
18
SokolLCaceresGVoliniaSAlderHNuovoGJLiuCGet al. Identification of a risk dependent microrna expression signature in myelodysplastic syndromes. Br J haematology. (2011) 153:24–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08581.x
19
WanCWenJLiangXXieQWuWWuMet al. Identifcation of mir-320 family members as potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in myelodysplastic syndromes. Sci Rep. (2021) 11:183. doi:Â 10.1038/s41598-020-80571-z
20
WangWChenRDrollSBarberESalehLCorrigan-CumminsMet al. Mcl-1 and mir-181c in gata2 mutation associated monomac and familial myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood. (2012) 120:3807. doi:Â 10.1182/blood.V120.21.3807.3807
21
FolloMYPellagattiAArmstrongRNRattiSMongiorgiSAstolfiAet al. Gene mutations and microrna signature in myelodysplastic syndromes during azacitidine and lenalidomide therapy. Blood. (2017) 130:5299. doi:Â 10.1182/blood.V130.Suppl_1.5299.5299
22
MerkerovaMDRemesovaHKrejcikZLoudovaNHrustincovaASzikszaiKet al. Relationship between altered mirna expression and dna methylation of the dlk1-dio3 region in azacitidine-treated patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes. Cells. (2018) 7:138. doi:Â 10.3390/cells7090138
23
ZhangTJXuZJWenXMGuYMaJCYuanQet al. Slit2 promoter hypermethylation-mediated slit2-it1/mir-218 repression drives leukemogenesis and predicts adverse prognosis in myelodysplastic neoplasm. Leukemia. (2022) 36:2488–98. doi: 10.1038/s41375-022-01659-1
24
GerberHPMalikAKSolarGPShermanDLiangXHMengGet al. Reduced mir-16 levels are associated with VEGF upregulation in high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Nature. (2002) 417:954–8. doi: 10.1038/nature00821
25
HeRLiuBYangCYangRCTobelemGHanZC. Inhibition of k562 leukemia angiogenesis and growth by expression of antisense vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) sequence. Cancer Gene Ther. (2003) 10:879–86. doi: 10.1038/sj.cgt.7700645
26
WimazalFKrauthMTValesABöhmAAgisHSonneckKet al. Immunohistochemical detection of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the bone marrow in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: correlation between VEGF expression and the fab category. Leukemia lymphoma. (2006) 47:451–60. doi: 10.1080/10428190500353083
27
GianelliUFracchiollaNSBucciarelliPFerlaVBoiocchiLSaviFet al. High levels of vascular endothelial growth factor protein expression are associated with an increased risk of transfusion dependence in myelodysplastic syndromes. Am J Clin Pathol. (2013) 139:380–7. doi: 10.1309/AJCP5O3YBKTGGWNQ
28
BellamyWTRichterLSirjaniDRoxasCGlinsmann-GibsonBFrutigerYet al. Vascular endothelial cell growth factor is an autocrine promoter of abnormal localized immature myeloid precursors and leukemia progenitor formation in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. (2001) 97:1427–34. doi: 10.1182/blood.V97.5.1427
29
ItoSD’AlessioATaranovaOHongKwSowersLCZhangY. Role of tet proteins in 5mc to 5hmc conversion, es-cell self-renewal and inner cell mass specification. Nature. (2010) 466:1129–33. doi: 10.1038/nature09303
30
MengYMaYQiaoT. Increased expression of mir-22 corresponds to the high-risk subtypes of myelodysplastic syndromes and lower os rate. Leukemia lymphoma. (2020) 61:1763–5. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1734591
31
YunJJiYSJangGHLimSHKimSHKimCKet al. Tet2 mutation and high mir-22 expression as biomarkers to predict clinical outcome in myelodysplastic syndrome patients treated with hypomethylating therapy. Curr Issues Mol Biol. (2021) 43:917–31. doi: 10.3390/cimb43020065
32
LuJGuoSEbertBLZhangHPengXBoscoJet al. Microrna-mediated control of cell fate in megakaryocyte-erythrocyte progenitors. Dev Cell. (2008) 14:843–53. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.03.012
33
BruchovaHYoonDAgarwalAMMendellJPrchalJT. Regulated expression of micrornas in normal and polycythemia vera erythropoiesis. Exp Hematol. (2007) 35:1657–67. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2007.08.021. https://www.exphem.org/article/S0301-472X(07)00530-9/fulltext.
34
HusseinKTheophileKBüscheGSchlegelbergerBGöhringGKreipeHet al. Significant inverse correlation of microrna-150/myb and microrna-222/p27 in myelodysplastic syndrome. Leukemia Res. (2010) 34:328–34. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2009.06.014
35
LiuZWangPYuanSWangYCaoPWenFet al. Lncrna bc200/mir-150-5p/myb positive feedback loop promotes the Malignant proliferation of myelodysplastic syndrome. Cell Death Dis. (2022) 13:126. doi:Â 10.1038/s41419-022-04578-2
36
SuRLinHSZhangXHYinXLNingHMLiuBet al. Mir-181 family: regulators of myeloid differentiation and acute myeloid leukemia as well as potential therapeutic targets. Oncogene. (2015) 34:3226–39. doi: 10.1038/onc.2014.274
37
WangWChenRDrollSBarberESalehLCorrigan-CumminsMet al. mir-181c regulates mcl1 and cell survival in gata2 deficient cells. J leukocyte Biol. (2022) 111:805–16. doi: 10.1002/JLB.2A1220-824R
38
GanapathiKATownsleyDMHsuAPArthurDCZerbeCSCuellar-RodriguezJet al. Gata2 deficiency-associated bone marrow disorder differs from idiopathic aplastic anemia. Blood. (2015) 125:56–70. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-06-580340
39
LiangXShiZHuangXWanCZhuSWuMet al. Mir-181a-2-3p as a potential diagnostic and prognostic marker for myelodysplastic syndrome. Hematol (Amsterdam Netherlands). (2022) 27:1246–52. doi: 10.1080/16078454.2022.2149971
40
ChoiJiSKangS-H. Microrna-765 is upregulated in myelodysplastic syndromes and induces apoptosis via plp2 inhibition in leukemia cells. Blood Res. (2023) 58:133–7. doi: 10.5045/br.2023.2023097
41
XiaoWWangCChenKWangTXingJZhangXet al. Mir-765 functions as a tumour suppressor and eliminates lipids in clear cell renal cell carcinoma by downregulating plp2. EBioMedicine. (2020) 51. doi:Â 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.102622
42
Dostalova MerkerovaMKrejcikZVotavovaHBelickovaMVasikovaACermakJ. Distinctive microrna expression profiles in cd34+ bone marrow cells from patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet. (2011) 19:313–9. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.209
43
CaoMShikamaYKimuraHNojiHIkedaKOnoTet al. Mechanisms of impaired neutrophil migration by micrornas in myelodysplastic syndromes. J Immunol. (2017) 198:1887–99. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1600622
44
ShikamaYCaoMOnoTFengXNojiHKimuraHet al. Reduction of c-fos via overexpression of mir-34a results in enhancement of tnf-production by lps in neutrophils from myelodysplastic syndrome patients. PLoS One. (2016) 11. doi:Â 10.1371/journal.pone.0158527
45
CaoMPengBChenHYangMChenPYeLet al. mir-34a induces neutrophil apoptosis by regulating cdc42-wasp-arp2/3 pathway-mediated f-actin remodeling and ros production. Redox Rep Commun Free Radical Res. (2022) 27:167–75. doi: 10.1080/13510002.2022.2102843
46
PatersonMRKriegelAJ. Mir-146a/b: a family with shared seeds and different roots. Physiol Genomics. (2017) 49:243–52. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00133.2016
47
TaganovKDBoldinMPChangKJBaltimoreD. Nf-kappab-dependent induction of microrna mir-146, an inhibitor targeted to signaling proteins of innate immune responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2006) 103:12481–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605298103
48
ZhaiPFWangFSuRLinHSJiangCLYangGHet al. The regulatory roles of microrna-146b-5p and its target platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (pdgfra) in erythropoiesis and megakaryocytopoiesis. J Biol Chem. (2014) 289:22600–13. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.547380
49
MitsumuraTItoYChibaTMatsushimaTKurimotoRTanakaYet al. Ablation of mir-146b in mice causes hematopoietic Malignancy. Blood Adv. (2018) 2:3483–91. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018017954
50
RosaABallarinoMSorrentinoASthandierODe AngelisFGMarchioniMet al. The interplay between the master transcription factor pu.1 and mir-424 regulates human monocyte/macrophage differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2007) 104:19849–54. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706963104
51
Chamorro-JorganesAAraldiEPenalvaLOSandhuDFernández-HernandoCSuárezY. Microrna-16 and microrna-424 regulate cell-autonomous angiogenic functions in endothelial cells via targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 and fibroblast growth factor receptor-1. Arteriosclerosis thrombosis Vasc Biol. (2011) 31:2595–606. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.236521
52
MarcucciGMrózekKRadmacherMDGarzonRBloomfieldCD. The prognostic and functional role of micrornas in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. (2011) 117:1121–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-09-191312
53
KunzeKGamerdingerULeßig-OwlanjJSorokinaMBrobeilATurMKet al. Detection of an activated jak3 variant and a xq26.3 microdeletion causing loss of phf6 and mir-424 expression in myelodysplastic syndromes by combined targeted next generation sequencing and snp array analysis. Pathol - Res Pract. (2014) 210:369–76. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2014.02.006
54
SaumellSFlorensaLLuñoESanzoCCañizoCHernándezJMet al. Prognostic value of trisomy 8 as a single anomaly and the influence of additional cytogenetic aberrations in primary myelodysplastic syndromes. Br J haematology. (2012) 159:311–21. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12035
55
HuYQiuWKongZWuSLiuYZhuCet al. Lncrna gstm3tv2 promotes cell proliferation and invasion via mir-597/fosl2 axis in hepatocellular carcinoma. BioMed Res Int. (2021) 2021. doi:Â 10.1155/2021/3445970
56
ZhongMYuD-JLiY-H. Microrna-597 inhibits nsclc progression through negatively regulating cdk2 expression. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. (2020) 24:4288–97. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202004_21009
57
LiSLiuZFangXDWangXYFeiBY. Microrna (mir)-597-5p inhibits colon cancer cell migration and invasion by targeting fos-like antigen 2 (fosl2). Front Oncol. (2019) 9:495. doi:Â 10.3389/fonc.2019.00495
58
HeJMaiJLiYChenLXuHZhuXet al. mir-597 inhibits breast cancer cell proliferation, migration and invasion through fosl2. Oncol Rep. (2017) 37:2672–8. doi: 10.3892/or.2017.5558
59
ChoiJiSKangS-HKimH-B. Upregulation of microrna-597 in myelodysplastic syndromes induces apoptosis through fosl2 inhibition. Eur J Haematology. (2022) 109:680–5. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13852
60
LuYFZhangLWayeMMFuWMZhangJF. Mir-218 mediates tumorigenesis and metastasis: Perspectives and implications. Exp Cell Res. (2015) 334:173–82. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2015.03.027
61
BenetatosLHatzimichaelELondinEVartholomatosGLoherPRigoutsosIet al. The micrornas within the dlk1-dio3 genomic region: involvement in disease pathogenesis. Cell Mol Life sciences: CMLS. (2013) 70:795–814. doi: 10.1007/s00018-012-1080-8
62
FormosaAMarkertEKLenaAMItalianoDFinazzi-Agro'ELevineAJet al. Micrornas, mir-154, mir-299-5p, mir-376a, mir-376c, mir-377, mir-381, mir-487b, mir-485-3p, mir-495 and mir-654-3p, mapped to the 14q32.31 locus, regulate proliferation, apoptosis, migration and invasion in metastatic prostate cancer cells. Oncogene. (2014) 33:5173–82. doi: 10.1038/onc.2013.451
63
McNieceIChoongMLYangHHe. Microrna expression profiling during human cord blood-derived cd34 cell erythropoiesis. Exp Hematol. (2007) 35:551–64. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2006.12.002
64
BousquetMQuelenCRosatiRMansat-De MasVLa StarzaRBastardCet al. Myeloid cell differentiation arrest by mir-125b-1 in myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia with the t(2;11)(p21;q23) translocation. J Exp Med. (2008) 205:2499–506. doi: 10.1084/jem.20080285
65
AlkhatabiHAMcLornanDPKulasekararajAGMalikFSeidlTDarlingDet al. Rpl27a is a target of mir-595 and may contribute to the myelodysplastic phenotype through ribosomal dysgenesis. Oncotarget. (2016) 7:47875–90. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.v7i30
66
VotavovaHGrmanovaMDostalova MerkerovaMBelickovaMVasikovaANeuwirtovaRet al. Differential expression of micrornas in cd34+ cells of 5q-syndrome. J Hematol Oncol. (2011) 4:1. doi:Â 10.1186/1756-8722-4-1
67
MerkerovaMDKrejcikZBelickovaMHrustincovaAKlemaJStaraEet al. Genome-wide mirna profiling in myelodysplastic syndrome with del(5q) treated with lenalidomide. Eur J Haematology. (2015) 95:35–43. doi: 10.1111/ejh.12458
68
ZengGWangYJiangY. The emerging roles of mir-125b in cancers. Cancer Manage Res. (2020) 12:1079–88. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S232388
69
BraunCJZhangXSavelyevaIWolffSMollUMSchepelerTet al. P53-responsive micrornas 192 and 215 are capable of inducing cell cycle arrest. Cancer Res. (2008) 68:10094–104. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1569
70
ZuoZMaitiSHuSLoghaviSCalinGAGarcia-ManeroGet al. Plasma circulating-microrna profiles are useful for assessing prognosis in patients with cytogenetically normal myelodysplastic syndromes. Modern Pathol. (2015) 28:373–82. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2014.108
71
HusseinKTheophileKBüscheGSchlegelbergerBGöhringGKreipeHet al. Aberrant microrna expression pattern in myelodysplastic bone marrow cells. Leukemia Res. (2010) 34:1169–74. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2010.04.012
72
NavarroFLiebermanJ. Mir-34 and p53: New insights into a complex functional relationship. PLoS One. (2015) 10. doi:Â 10.1371/journal.pone.0132767
73
StarczynowskiDTKuchenbauerFArgiropoulosBSungSMorinRMuranyiAet al. Identification of mir-145 and mir-146a as mediators of the 5q- syndrome phenotype. Nat Med. (2010) 16:49–58. doi: 10.1038/nm.2054
74
KumarMSNarlaANonamiAMullallyADimitrovaNBallBet al. Coordinate loss of a microrna and protein-coding gene cooperate in the pathogenesis of 5q- syndrome. Blood. (2011) 118:4666–73. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-12-324715
75
Dostalova MerkerovaMHrustincovaAKrejcikZVotavovaHRatajovaECermakJet al. Microarray profiling defines circulating micrornas associated with myelodysplastic syndromes. Neoplasma. (2017) 64:571–8. doi: 10.4149/neo_2017_411
76
LunavatTRChengLKimDKBhaduryJJangSCLässerCet al. Small rna deep sequencing discriminates subsets of extracellular vesicles released by melanoma cells - evidence of unique microrna cargos. RNA Biol. (2015) 12:810–23. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2015.1056975
77
HrustincovaAKrejcikZKundratDSzikszaiKBelickovaMPecherkovaPet al. Circulating small noncoding rnas have specific expression patterns in plasma and extracellular vesicles in myelodysplastic syndromes and are predictive of patient outcome. Cells. (2020) 9:794. doi:Â 10.3390/cells9040794
78
DiamantidisMDimoudisSKlonizakisPBadekasKKoutourliKHaralambidou-VranitsaSet al. The role of apoptosis and current therapeutic challenges in myelodysplastic syndromes. Hippokratia. (2007) 11:178–82.
79
GiudiceVBanaszakLGGutierrez-RodriguesFKajigayaSPanjwaniRIbanezMDPFet al. Circulating exosomal micrornas in acquired aplastic anemia and myelodysplastic syndromes. Haematologica. (2018) 103:1150–9. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2017.182824
80
TomasettiMLeeWSantarelliLNeuzilJ. Exosome-derived micrornas in cancer metabolism: possible implications in cancer diagnostics and therapy. Exp Mol Med. (2017) 49:e285. doi:Â 10.1038/emm.2016.153
81
WhitesideTLBoyiadzisM. Information transfer by exosomes: A new frontier in hematologic Malignancies. Blood Rev. (2015) 29:281–90. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2015.01.004
82
WitwerKWBuzásEIBemisLTBoraALässerCLötvallJet al. Standardization of sample collection, isolation and analysis methods in extracellular vesicle research. J extracellular vesicles. (2013) 2. doi: 10.3402/jev.v2i0.20360
83
ThéryCWitwerKWAikawaEAlcarazMJAndersonJDAndriantsitohainaRet al. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (misev2018): a position statement of the international society for extracellular vesicles and update of the misev2014 guidelines. J Extracellular Vesicles. (2018) 7. doi: 10.1080/20013078.2018.1535750
84
FenauxPMuftiGJHellstrom-LindbergESantiniVFinelliCGiagounidisAet al. Efficacy of azacitidine compared with that of conventional care regimens in the treatment of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: A randomised, open-label, phase iii study. Lancet Oncol. (2009) 10:223–32. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70003-8
85
KornblithABHerndonJE2ndSilvermanLRDemakosEPOdchimar-ReissigRHollandJFet al. Impact of azacytidine on the quality of life of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome treated in a randomized phase iii trial: A cancer and leukemia group b study. J Clin Oncol. (2002) 20:2441–52. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.04.044
86
MongiorgiSDe StefanoARattiSIndioVAstolfiACasalinIet al. A mirna screening identifies mir-192-5p as associated with response to azacitidine and lenalidomide therapy in myelodysplastic syndromes. Clin Epigenet. (2023) 15:27. doi:Â 10.1186/s13148-023-01441-9
87
RenFJYaoYCaiXYFangGY. Emerging role of mir-192-5p in human diseases. Front Pharmacol. (2021) 12:614068. doi:Â 10.3389/fphar.2021.614068
88
ChenJWangJLiHWangSXiangXZhangD. p53 activates mir-192-5p to mediate vancomycin induced aki. Sci Rep. (2016) 6. doi:Â 10.1038/srep38868
89
PuppoMBucciGRossiMGiovarelliMBordoDMoshiriAet al. mirna mediated khsrp silencing rewires distinct post-transcriptional programs during tgf–induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Cell Rep. (2016) 16:967–78. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.06.055
90
JinYLuJWenJShenYWenX. Regulation of growth of human bladder cancer by mir-192. Tumour Biol. (2015) 36:3791–7. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-3020-8
91
KeSLiRCLuJMengFKFengYKFangMH. Microrna-192 regulates cell proliferation and cell cycle transition in acute myeloid leukemia via interaction with ccnt2. Int J Hematol. (2017) 106:258–65. doi: 10.1007/s12185-017-2232-2
92
LiQLuanQZhuHZhaoYJiJWuFet al. Circular rna circ0005774 contributes to proliferation and suppresses apoptosis of acute myeloid leukemia cells via circ0005774/mir-192-5p/ulk1 cerna pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2021) 551:78–85. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.02.058
93
SollyFKoeringCMohamedAMMaucort-BoulchDRobertGAubergerPet al. An mirna-dnmt1 axis is involved in azacitidine resistance and predicts survival in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and low blast count acute myeloid leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. (2017) 23:3025–34. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2304
94
ZhaoSWangYLiangYZhaoMLongHDingSet al. Microrna-126 regulates dna methylation in cd4+ t cells and contributes to systemic lupus erythematosus by targeting dna methyltransferase 1. Arthritis Rheumatism. (2011) 63:1376–86. doi: 10.1002/art.30196
95
LeiLWangYLiuRFengJTangJGouJet al. Transfer of mir-4755-5p through extracellular vesicles and particles induces decitabine resistance in recipient cells by targeting cdkn2b. Mol carcinogenesis. (2023) 62:743–53. doi: 10.1002/mc.23521
96
LiHXieCLuYChangKGuanFLiX. Exosomal mir92a promotes cytarabine resistance in myelodysplastic syndromes by activating wnt/beta-catenin signal pathway. Biomolecules. (2022) 12:1448. doi:Â 10.3390/biom12101448
97
BhagatTDZhouLSokolLKesselRCaceresGGundaboluKet al. mir-21 mediates hematopoietic suppression in mds by activating tgf-beta signaling. Blood. (2013) 121:2875–81. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-12-397067
98
SuYLWangXMannMAdamusTPWangDMoreiraDFet al. Myeloid cell-targeted mir-146a mimic inhibits nf-kb-driven inflammation and leukemia progression in vivo. Blood. (2020) 135:167–80. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019002045
99
RanaTMLiZ. Therapeutic targeting of micrornas: current status and future challenges. Nature reviews. Drug Discovery. (2014) 13:622–38. doi: 10.1038/nrd4359
100
SlackFJRupaimooleR. Microrna therapeutics: towards a new era for the management of cancer and other diseases. Nature reviews. Drug Discovery. (2017) 16:203–22. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2016.246
101
MeeseEDienerCKellerA. Emerging concepts of mirna therapeutics: from cells to clinic. Trends genetics: TIG. (2022) 38:613–26. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2022.02.006
102
JanssenHLReesinkHWLawitzEJZeuzemSRodriguez-TorresMPatelKet al. Treatment of hcv infection by targeting microrna. New Engl J Med. (2013) 368:1685–94. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209026
103
BaderAG. Mir-34 - a microrna replacement therapy is headed to the clinic. Front Genet. (2012) 3:120. doi:Â 10.3389/fgene.2012.00120
104
BegMSBrennerAJSachdevJBoradMKangYKStoudemireJet al. Phase I study of mrx34, a liposomal mir-34a mimic, administered twice weekly in patient's with advanced solid tumors. Investigational New Drugs. (2017) 35:180–8. doi: 10.1007/s10637-016-0407-y
105
HongDSKangYKBoradMSachdevJEjadiSLimHYet al. Phase 1 study of mrx34, a liposomal mir-34a mimic, in patients with advanced solid tumours. Br J Cancer. (2020) 122:1630–7. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-0802-1
106
QuerfeldCHPachecoTHFossFRMHalwaniASPorcuPSetoAGet al. Preliminary results of a phase 1 trial evaluating mrg-106, a synthetic microrna antagonist (lna antimir) of microrna-155, in patients with ctcl. Blood. (2016) 128:1829. doi:Â 10.1182/blood.V128.22.1829.1829
107
BoldinMPTaganovKDRaoDSYangLZhaoJLKalwaniMet al. mir-146a is a significant brake on autoimmunity, myeloproliferation, and cancer in mice. J Exp Med. (2011) 208:1189–201. doi: 10.1084/jem.20101823
108
ZhaoJLRaoDSBoldinMPTaganovKDO'ConnellRMBaltimoreD. Nf-kappab dysregulation in microrna-146a-deficient mice drives the development of myeloid Malignancies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2011) 108:9184–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1105398108
Summary
Keywords
myelodysplastic syndromes, microRNA, diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, therapeutic microRNAs, circulating microRNA
Citation
Micheva ID and Atanasova SA (2024) MicroRNA dysregulation in myelodysplastic syndromes: implications for diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic response. Front. Oncol. 14:1410656. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1410656
Received
01 April 2024
Accepted
12 July 2024
Published
02 August 2024
Volume
14 - 2024
Edited by
Ulrich Germing, Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf, Germany
Reviewed by
Valentina Giudice, University of Salerno, Italy
Philippe Lewalle, Université libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
Zhenhua Chen, City of Hope, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2024 Micheva and Atanasova.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Svilena Angelova Atanasova, svilena.rangelova@yahoo.com
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.