In the published article, there was a mistake in the corresponding author. The corresponding author has been updated to E. James Jebaseelan Samuel, with the email ID `ejames@vit.ac.in.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Statements
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Summary
Keywords
177Lu treatments, patient-specific dosimetry, clinical implementation, dose calibration, registration error, treatment day checklist, clinical workflow, hybrid imaging system QA
Citation
George SC, Tolakanahalli R, Aguirre S, Kim TP, Samuel EJJ and Mishra V (2024) Corrigendum: A single-institution experience with 177Lu RPT workflow improvements and qualifying the SPECT/CT imaging for dosimetry. Front. Oncol. 14:1410818. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1410818
Received
01 April 2024
Accepted
02 April 2024
Published
12 April 2024
Approved by
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland
Volume
14 - 2024
Updates
Copyright
© 2024 George, Tolakanahalli, Aguirre, Kim, Samuel and Mishra.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: E. James Jebaseelan Samuel, ejames@vit.ac.in
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.