CORRECTION article

Front. Oncol., 12 November 2024

Sec. Radiation Oncology

Volume 14 - 2024 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1507589

Corrigendum: A comparative study of two in vivo PET verification methods in clinical cases

  • 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China

  • 2. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China

  • 3. Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China

  • 4. College of Physics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

  • 5. Key Laboratory of Radiation Physics and Technology, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China

  • 6. Department of Medical Physics, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China

  • 7. Department of Radiotherapy, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China

In the published article, there was an error in the Funding statement. The funding statement for the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai was displayed as “21ZR460300”. The correct statement is “Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (21ZR1460300)’’.

The correct Funding statement appears below.

“This project was supported by the Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (Grant No. 202040279), the Pudong New Area Science and Technology Development Foundation (No. PKJ 2020-Y56), and the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (21ZR1460300).’’

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Statements

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Summary

Keywords

proton therapy, breast cancer, positron emission tomography, depth verification, methods comparison

Citation

Zhang J, Lu Y, Sheng Y, Wang W, Hong Z, Sun Y, Zhou R and Cheng J (2024) Corrigendum: A comparative study of two in vivo PET verification methods in clinical cases. Front. Oncol. 14:1507589. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1507589

Received

08 October 2024

Accepted

31 October 2024

Published

12 November 2024

Approved by

Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

Volume

14 - 2024

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Jingyi Cheng,

†These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics