ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Cancer Imaging and Image-directed Interventions

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1498832

This article is part of the Research TopicQuantitative Imaging: Revolutionizing Cancer Management with biological sensitivity, specificity, and AI integrationView all 24 articles

A Deep Learning aided bone marrow segmentation of quantitative fat MRI for myelofibrosis patients

Provisionally accepted
Humera  TariqHumera Tariq*Lubomir  HadjiiskiLubomir HadjiiskiDariya  MalyarenkoDariya MalyarenkoMoshe  TalpazMoshe TalpazKristen  PettitKristen PettitGary  D LukerGary D LukerBrian  D RossBrian D RossThomas  L ChenevertThomas L Chenevert*
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

To automate bone marrow segmentation within pelvic bones in quantitative fat MRI of myelofibrosis (MF) patients using deep-learning (DL) U-Net models.Methods: Automated segmentation of bone marrow (BM) was evaluated for four U-Net models: 2D U-Net, 2D attention U-Net (2D A-U-Net), 3D U-Net and 3D attention U-Net (3D A-U-Net). An experienced annotator performed the delineation on in-phase (IP) pelvic MRI slices to mark the boundaries of BM regions within two pelvic bones: proximal femur and posterior ilium. The dataset comprising volumetric images of 58 MF patients was split into 32 training, 6 validation and 20 test sub-sets. Model performance was assessed using conventional metrics: average Jaccard Index (AJI), average Volume Error (AVE), average Hausdorff Distance (AHD), and average Volume Intersection Ratio (VIR). Iterative model optimization was performed based on maximizing validation sub-set AJI. Wilcoxon's rank sum test with Bonferroni corrected significance threshold of p<0.003 was used to compare DL segmentation models for test sub-set.Results: 2D segmentation models performed best for iliac BM with achieved scores of 95-96% for the VIR and 87-88% for AJI agreement with expert annotations on the test set. Similar performance was observed for femoral BM segmentation with slightly better VIR but worth AJI agreement for U-Net (94% and 86%) versus A-U-Net (92% and 87%). 2D models also exhibited lower AVE variability (8-9%) and ilium AHD (16mm). The 3D segmentation models have shown marginally higher errors (AHD of 19-20mm for ilium and 10-12% AVE-SD for both bones) and generally lower agreement scores (VIR of 91-93% for ilium and 89-91%for femur with 85-86% AJI).

Keywords: myelofibrosis, proton density fat fraction (PDFF), Pelvic MRI, In-phase (IP), Proximal femur, Posterior ilium, segmentation, U-net

Received: 19 Sep 2024; Accepted: 28 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Tariq, Hadjiiski, Malyarenko, Talpaz, Pettit, Luker, Ross and Chenevert. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Humera Tariq, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
Thomas L Chenevert, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.