Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Cancer Imaging and Image-directed Interventions

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1570493

This article is part of the Research TopicRevolutionizing Breast Cancer Treatment: The Role of Adaptive Clinical Trials and Predictive BiomarkersView all articles

Ultrasound-based radiomics combined with B3GALT4 level to predict sentinel lymph node metastasis in primary breast cancer

Provisionally accepted
Yongliang  ShaYongliang Sha1Song  GeSong Ge1Yiqiu  WangYiqiu Wang1Shilong  CaiShilong Cai1Wang  ChengyiWang Chengyi2Huijie  ZhuangHuijie Zhuang1Jin  ShiJin Shi1Shiqing  HeShiqing He1Xia  SunXia Sun1Li  MaLi Ma1Hao  GuoHao Guo1Hui  ChengHui Cheng1*
  • 1Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
  • 2Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: To evaluate the value of the clinical model for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) of breast cancer before operation by integrating ultrasound (US) and β-1,3-galactosyltransferase-4 (B3GALT4) expression level of the primary tumor.: A total of 135 breast cancer patients who underwent US examination and axillary lymph nodes dissection (ALND) were enrolled. They were randomly divided into a training group (95 cases) and a verification group (40 cases). The ultrasound imaging characteristics of the primary tumor were extracted from each region of interest (ROI), and the Spearman correlation coefficient, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and the minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) were used for feature selection. The radiomics model was constructed by eighteen machine-learning techniques. B3GALT4 expression level of the primary tumor was analyzed using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). A clinical model was constructed based on B3GALT4 mRNA level. Further, a nomogram was established by integrating B3GALT4 and the radiomics signature. The effectiveness of each model was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, Hosmer-Lemeshow test, calibration curve, and decision curve analyses (DCA). Results A total of 1562 radiomics features were extracted, and 30 features were selected. The SVM model had the highest AUC values of 0.937 and 0.932 in the training and validation sets. The AUC of the radiomics model was 0.937 (95% CI: 0.885-0.989) in the training cohort and 0.932 (95% CI: 0.860-1.000) in the external validation cohort, respectively. The levels of B3GALT4 mRNA were significantly different between the ALNM and non-ALNM groups (P<0.001). The clinical model achieved a higher AUC (training group, 0.904; validation group, 0.887). The nomogram performed well in both the training set (AUC = 0.991) and the validation set (AUC = 0.975). The nomogram had satisfactory clinical utility.The nomogram constructed by ultrasound features and B3GALT4 of the primary tumor can be used as an effective tool for individualized prediction of ALNM in breast cancer.

Keywords: breast cancer, Axillary lymph node metastasis, β-1, 3-galactosyltransferase-4, ultrasound radiomics, machine learning

Received: 03 Feb 2025; Accepted: 26 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Sha, Ge, Wang, Cai, Chengyi, Zhuang, Shi, He, Sun, Ma, Guo and Cheng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Hui Cheng, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, 221000, Jiangsu Province, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.