ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Surgical Oncology

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1582322

This article is part of the Research TopicArtificial Intelligence in Clinical Oncology: Enhancements in Tumor ManagementView all 5 articles

Deep learning-assisted diagnosis of liver tumors using non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging: a multicenter study

Provisionally accepted
Shihui  ZhenShihui Zhen1,2*Peng  ZhangPeng Zhang1Hanxiao  HuangHanxiao Huang1Zhiyu  JiangZhiyu Jiang2Yankai  JiangYankai Jiang1Jihong  SunJihong Sun2Liqing  ZhangLiqing Zhang3Mei  RuanMei Ruan3Qingqing  ChenQingqing Chen2Yujun  WangYujun Wang4Yubo  TaoYubo Tao1Weizhi  LuoWeizhi Luo1Ming  ChengMing Cheng1Zhetuo  QiZhetuo Qi1Wei  LuWei Lu5Hai  LinHai Lin1Xiujun  CaiXiujun Cai2
  • 1Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
  • 2sir run run shaw hospital ,zhejiang university, hangzhou, China
  • 3Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
  • 4Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
  • 5Department of Medical Imaging, Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objectives: Non-contrast MRI(NC-MRI) is an attractive option for liver tumors screening and followup. This study aims to develop and validate a deep convolutional neural network for the classification of liver lesions using non-contrast MRI.Methods: A total of 50418 enhanced MRI images from 1959 liver tumor patients across three centers were included. Inception-ResNet V2 was used to generate four models through transfer-learning for three-way lesion classification, which processed T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted (DWI) and multiphasic T1-weighted images. The models were then validated using one independent internal and two external datasets with 5172, 2916, and 1338 images, respectively. The efficacy of non-contrast models (T2,T2+DWI) in differentiating between benign and malignant liver lesions at the patient level was also evaluated and compared with radiologists. The performance of models was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC),sensitivity and specificity.Results: Similar to multi-sequence and enhanced image-based models, the non-contrast models showed comparable accuracy in classifying liver lesions as benign, primary malignant or metastatic.In the independent internal cohort, the T2+DWI model achieved AUC of 0.91(95% CI,0.888-0.932), 0.873(0.848-0.899), and 0.876(0.840-0.911) for three tumour categories, respectively. The sensitivities for distinguishing malignant tumors in three validation sets were 98.1%, 89.7%, and 87.5%%, with specificities over 70% in all three sets. Conclusions: Our deep-learning-based model yielded good applicability in classifying liver lesions in non-contrast MRI. It provides a potential alternative for screening liver tumors with the advantage of reducing costs, scanning time and contrast-agents risks. It is more suitable for benign tumours followup, surveillance of HCC and liver metastasis that need periodic repetitive examinations.

Keywords: deep learning, Liver tumor, Classification, Non-contrast, Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Received: 24 Feb 2025; Accepted: 13 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zhen, Zhang, Huang, Jiang, Jiang, Sun, Zhang, Ruan, Chen, Wang, Tao, Luo, Cheng, Qi, Lu, Lin and Cai. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Shihui Zhen, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.