Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Neuro-Oncology and Neurosurgical Oncology

Validation of a prognostic scoring system for brain metastases with synchronous detection of primary cancers at initial consultation

Provisionally accepted
Yohei  YamamotoYohei Yamamoto1Gentoku  SaitoGentoku Saito1Tomona  MaetaniTomona Maetani1Yurika  TerasawaYurika Terasawa1Naoki  KatoNaoki Kato1Takuya  IshiiTakuya Ishii1Yasuharu  AkasakiYasuharu Akasaki2Yuichi  MurayamaYuichi Murayama2Toshihide  TanakaToshihide Tanaka2*
  • 1Jikei University Daisan Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
  • 2Jikei University School of Medicine, Minato, Japan

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: To develop and validate a simple 0–7 point prognostic score for patients with synchronous brain metastases (s-BM) at initial consultation and to provide an exploratory comparison with metachronous BM (m-BM). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 297 patients with BM (2014–2022): s-BM n=64 and m-BM n=233. The score uses five pre-treatment factors available at time-zero: age <70 y (1 point), KPS ≥70 (2 points), absence of extracranial metastases (ECM) (2 points), presence of a lung mass on imaging (1 point), and absence of a digestive-tract mass (1 point). Patients were stratified as Score A (0), B (1–4), and C (5–7). Discrimination and parsimony were assessed by Harrell’s C-index and AIC; proportional-hazards (PH) assumptions by global Schoenfeld test; time-dependent AUCs at 6/12 months were calculated; bootstrap (B=500) provided optimism-corrected C-indices. (Synchronous was defined as ≤30 days between first ascertainment of primary tumor and BM; m-BM >30 days.) Results: Median OS appeared similar for s-BM and m-BM in this cohort (5.2 vs 6.4 months; exploratory). In s-BM, KPS ≥70 and absence of ECM were independent predictors of longer survival. The proposed score produced stepwise separation across A/B/C. It showed the highest C-index (0.690) and lowest AIC (375.57) versus RPA, GPA, SIR, and BSBM, with no PH violations (global p=0.983). AUCs were 0.779 (6 mo) and 0.795 (12 mo); bootstrap-corrected C-index ≈0.691. A coefficient-weighted variant yielded a similar C-index (0.694) but a higher AIC (381.9). Conclusions: A five-factor, 1–2 point score usable at initial consultation provides superior discrimination and parsimony in s-BM compared with established systems. External, multicenter validation is warranted.

Keywords: Brain metastases (BM), synchronous brain metastases, prognostic factors (PF), prognostic scoring system, survival analysis

Received: 24 Apr 2025; Accepted: 27 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Yamamoto, Saito, Maetani, Terasawa, Kato, Ishii, Akasaki, Murayama and Tanaka. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Toshihide Tanaka, ttanaka@jikei.ac.jp

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.