ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Gastrointestinal Cancers: Colorectal Cancer
This article is part of the Research TopicArtificial Intelligence in Immunotherapy for Gastrointestinal Cancers: From Prediction to Precision MedicineView all 5 articles
Analysis of Risk Factors for prolonged Intensive Care Unit Stay After Colorectal Cancer Surgery
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Hematology, Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, Taiyuan, China
- 2Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
- 3Hebei Medical University, Shijiahzuang, China
- 4Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, shijiazhuang, China
- 5Hebei Medical U, shijiazhuang, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: This study employed a retrospective analysis to investigate the risk factors associated with prolonged ICU stay following colorectal cancer surgery. Methods: A total of 325 patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery and were subsequently transferred to the ICU were enrolled as the colorectal cancer group. ICU length of stay was stratified by quartiles, with the 75th percentile (≥61 hours) defined as the prolonged ICU stay group. Results: Among the 325 enrolled patients (median age 77 years), 183 (56.3 %) were male and 142 (43.7 %) were female. The cohort was divided into a normal group (n = 243) and a prolonged group (n = 82). Univariate analysis identified preoperative obstruction, preoperative perforation, Class IV surgical incisions, open surgical approach, intraoperative blood loss, duration of mechanical ventilation, perioperative sepsis, perioperative AKI, lower extremity deep vein thrombosis , and mean postoperative platelet count, albumin, and blood urea nitrogen levels within the first 24 hours of ICU admission as risk factors for prolonged ICU stay. After adjusting for confounding factors, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the laparotomy, perioperative sepsis, postoperative duration of mechanical ventilation, occurrence of lower extremity DVT, and mean platelet count within the first day of ICU admission were independent risk factors for prolonged ICU stay. ROC curve was 0.8081 (95% CI: 0.745–0.870), indicating strong discriminatory ability. Calibration curve demonstrated excellent agreement between predicted and observed outcomes ( [O:E] ratio = 1.000, [CITL] = -0.000, slope = 1.000). Bootstrap validation yielded a Brier score of 24.1%, a concordance statistic (C-statistic) of 0.772, an E:O ratio of 0.981, a slope of 0.756, and a CITL of 0.029. DCA revealed a high net benefit for predicting prolonged ICU stay at lower threshold probabilities. Subgroup analysis by surgical site (left-sided vs. right-sided colon cancer) showed AUCs of 0.7892 (95% CI: 0.71–0.87) for left-sided colon cancer and for right-sided colon cancer of 0.8253 (95% CI: 0.72–0.93) . Conclusion: The laparotomy, perioperative sepsis, postoperative duration of mechanical ventilation, occurrence of DVT, and mean platelet count within the first day of ICU admission were independent risk factors for prolonged ICU stay following colorectal cancer surgery.
Keywords: colorectal cancer, ICU length of stay, predictive, risk factors, Sugery
Received: 30 Apr 2025; Accepted: 15 Dec 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Song, Liu and Dong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Biao Dong
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
