Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy

Volume 15 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1621860

This article is part of the Research TopicBreaking Barriers: New Frontiers in Immunotherapy for Resistant CancersView all 6 articles

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge therapy in the treatment of advanced acquired immune-resistant nonsmall cell lung cancer: a retrospective study

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Quzhou City People's Hospital, Quzhou, China
  • 2Changsha Medical University, changsha, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who have failed first-line immunotherapy and lack driver gene mutations face limited options for subsequent treatment. A working group recently proposed updated clinical diagnostic criteria for acquired immune resistance.Based on these criteria, this study evaluated the efficacy and safety of immune rechallenge therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC exhibiting acquired resistance.The study involved 13 patients diagnosed with advanced immune-acquired resistance NSCLC. These patients initially exhibited a partial response to immunotherapy but experienced disease progression within six months following their last immune checkpoint inhibitors treatment. Subsequently, they received ICIs again. The outcomes assessed included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. PFS1 refers to the time from the first administration of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy to PD. PFSR was defined as the duration from the first day of the second ICIs administration to disease progression, death, or the last follow-up date. OS was defined as the time from the first day of the second ICIs administration to the date of death or the last follow-up date.The median age was 67 years, and 76.9% of patients were male. The disease control rate (DCR) was 61.5%, with an ORR of 0%. The median PFSR was 2.90 months (95% CI, 1.97-3.83), and the median PFS1 was 5.97 months (95% CI, 4.13-7.81). Poor ECOG performance status was significantly associated with shorter PFS (HR = 6.839, 95% CI: 1.557-30.032, p = 0.011).During initial ICIs treatment, the most common adverse events were fatigue (46.1%) and anemia (38.5%).Grade 3-4 toxicities included anemia and neutropenia (15.4% each), leukopenia (7.8%), and fatigue (7.8%). In the ICIs rechallenge phase, anemia (38.5%) and fatigue (30.7%) remained the most frequent adverse events, with only one Grade 3-4 event reported (anemia, 7.8%).Patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who exhibit immune-acquired resistance may still derive clinical benefit from rechallenging with immune checkpoint inhibitors, particularly in those with a favorable ECOG performance status. Further prospective clinical trials and molecular investigations are necessary to validate these findings and better define the patient subgroups most likely to benefit from this therapeutic approach.

Keywords: Non-small cell lung cancer, Immune checkpoint inhibitor, Rechallenge, efficacy, adverse events

Received: 02 May 2025; Accepted: 08 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Gao and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Jianxin Chen, Quzhou City People's Hospital, Quzhou, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.