Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

REVIEW article

Front. Oncol., 09 January 2026

Sec. Cancer Cell Signaling

Volume 15 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1669432

Ferroptosis: a new dawn in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Jiongping Han&#x;Jiongping HanYifan Yang&#x;Yifan YangYuxin WeiYuxin WeiJing JinJing JinWeiying Feng*Weiying Feng*
  • Department of Hematology, Shaoxing People’s Hospital, The First Hospital of Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, China

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia poses substantial challenges in therapeutic management. As a novel form of programmed cell death, ferroptosis has emerged as a promising research direction in cancer therapy. Studies have emphasized the pivotal role of ferroptosis in ALL, indicating that targeting this pathway could provide a novel therapeutic strategy. This article systematically reviews the molecular regulatory mechanisms of ferroptosis in ALL and explores its potential clinical applications in the treatment and prognostic evaluation of the disease.

1 Introduction

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a malignant clonal disease originating from lymphocytes, and is classified into acute T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia (T-cell ALL, T-ALL) and acute B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia (B-cell ALL, B-ALL) (1). According to the latest report from the American Cancer Society, approximately 6,100 new cases of ALL are expected to be diagnosed in 2025, with an estimated 1,400 deaths (2). Current treatment regimens primarily involve multi-drug combination chemotherapy, consolidation and maintenance therapy, and bridging to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (3, 4). However, with prolonged chemotherapy, patients often develop drug resistance, cumulative toxicity, and bone marrow suppression, leading to an increased risk of relapse and mortality among ALL patients (5). For relapsed/refractory ALL, effective salvage therapies remain limited, underscoring the urgent need for novel treatment strategies. To improve the long-term prognosis and quality of life for ALL patients, it is essential to explore novel therapeutic approaches that are both highly effective and minimally toxic.

Since Dixon et al. first introduced the concept of “ferroptosis” in 2012, its unique mechanistic properties have garnered significant attention, opening new avenues in cancer therapy (6, 7). Ferroptosis is an iron-dependent, lipid peroxidation-driven form of programmed cell death. It is primarily characterized by glutathione (GSH) depletion, inhibition of glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4), and accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Morphologically, it manifests as compromised plasma membrane integrity, increased mitochondrial membrane density, and reduced mitochondrial cristae (810). Recent studies have demonstrated the antitumor potential of ferroptosis in various malignancies (11), including bladder cancer (12), gastric cancer (13), pancreatic cancer (14), and breast cancer (15). Notably, ALL cells exhibit a unique sensitivity to ferroptosis, offering a promising direction for the development of targeted therapies. This review provides an overview of the regulatory pathways governing ferroptosis, with a specific focus on its role in ALL, thereby laying a theoretical foundation for precision treatment and prognosis evaluation.

2 Overview of ferroptosis

Cells are the fundamental organizational units of life, and their proliferation, differentiation, and death are crucial for maintaining physiological homeostasis. Ferroptosis, an iron-dependent and lipid peroxidation-mediated form of cell death, involves a complex molecular regulatory network (16). The following sections elaborate on the specific regulatory mechanisms of ferroptosis from four perspectives: dysregulated iron metabolism, lipid metabolism pathways, antioxidant system imbalance, and autophagy regulation (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Illustration showing the process of ferroptosis, a form of regulated cell death. It depicts iron transport and metabolism through transferrin receptor, endosome, and ferritin breakdown. Key elements include lipid peroxidation, involvement of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and pathways through AMPK, ATM, P53, and GSH. Enzymes like GPX4, ACSL4, and HMGR are highlighted, alongside molecules such as cystine, glutamine, acetyl-CoA, and CoQ10. The diagram outlines interactions between these components leading to cell death.

Figure 1. The mechanisms of ferroptosis.

2.1 Dysregulated iron metabolism

Iron, an essential trace element, plays a vital role in numerous physiological processes, including oxygen transport, electron transfer, and enzymatic catalysis (17, 18). In the body, Fe2+ formed by intestinal absorption or red blood cell degradation can be oxidized to Fe3+ by ceruloplasmin. Fe3+ binds to transferrin (TF) and is transported into cells through the transferrin receptor (TFRC). It is reduced to divalent Fe2+ in the cell and stored in unstable iron pools and ferritin. Intracellular iron homeostasis relies on the balance between iron uptake, export, utilization, and storage. However, when iron metabolism is not ordered, a large amount of ferrous iron will undergo Fenton reaction with peroxide to produce Fe3+ and ROS (19). The production of these lipid peroxides and hydroxyl radicals will further promote the chain reaction of lipid free radicals and initiate or enhance ferroptosis (20). Therefore, regulating iron transport and absorption by using related inducers or inhibitors may be an effective way to regulate the level of ferroptosis in cells.

2.2 Lipid metabolism pathways

Uncontrolled lipid peroxidation is another key hallmark of ferroptosis. During this process, polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) such as arachidonic acid (AA) and adrenic acid (AdA) are esterified to phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) by acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 4 (ACSL4) and lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase 3 (LPCAT3), forming AA-PE and AdA-PE conjugates (21, 22). Subsequently, these phosphatidylethanolamines are oxidized by 15-lipoxygenase (ALOX15) to form phospholipid hydroperoxides (PLOOH) (23). In the absence of reduction to the corresponding alcohols by GPX4 or other antioxidant pathways, this oxidation perpetuates, resulting in the accumulation of lipid peroxides. This chain reaction irreversibly damages the structure and function of cellular membranes, leading to ferroptotic cell death (24, 25).

2.3 Antioxidant pathways

Cellular redox balance is maintained by several antioxidant systems, including the GSH-GPX4, ferroptosis suppressor protein 1 (FSP1)- coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH)-CoQ10, and GTP cyclohydrolase 1 (GCH1)-tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) pathways. Intracellular ROS levels directly influence lipid peroxidation, with GPX4 serving as the principal enzyme regulating ROS detoxification (26, 27). The cystine/glutamate antiporter System Xc facilitates cystine uptake, which is reduced to cysteine intracellularly and subsequently combined with glutamate and glycine to form GSH (28, 29). As the most abundant intracellular reducing agent, GSH provides reducing equivalents to GPX4, thereby mitigating oxidative stress and inhibiting ferroptosis (30). Thus, the synthesis of GSH, function of System Xc, and activity of GPX4 collectively safeguard cells from ferroptosis under oxidative conditions.

In addition to the classical GPX4 pathway, the FSP1-CoQ10 pathway represents an independent antioxidant system. FSP1 reduces CoQ10 to ubiquinol using NADH, directly neutralizing lipid radicals and halting lipid peroxidation (31, 32). Similarly, DHODH contributes to ferroptosis resistance by catalyzing the mitochondrial reduction of CoQ10 (33). This process specifically occurs in the inner mitochondrial membrane and depends on the metabolic environment of the mitochondrial oxidative respiratory chain. Additionally, GCH1 protects against ferroptosis through its downstream product, BH4, which prevents oxidative degradation of phospholipids containing two PUFA chains (34, 35).

2.4 Autophagy regulates ferroptosis

Mitochondria are not only central to energy metabolism but also play critical roles in cancer development and the regulation of cell death. Voltage-dependent anion channels (VDACs), located on the outer mitochondrial membrane, serve as key transmembrane channels for the transport of ions and metabolites. The ferroptosis inducer erastin has been shown to act on VDACs, leading to mitochondrial dysfunction, altered membrane permeability, inhibition of glycolysis, and increased ROS release (36, 37).

Autophagy, a fundamental process for maintaining intracellular homeostasis, involves the degradation and recycling of cellular components (38). Some studies have suggested that disruption of iron homeostasis results in excessive accumulation of active iron within mitochondria, which triggers mitophagy. This, in turn, leads to the release of large amounts of divalent iron and its subsequent accumulation in the cytoplasm, thereby increasing cellular sensitivity to ferroptosis (39). Ferritinophagy, a selective form of autophagy, involves the binding of nuclear receptor coactivator 4 (NCOA4) to ferritin heavy chain 1 (FTH1), mediating its transport to lysosomes for degradation. This process releases free Fe2+ and regulates ROS production, thereby influencing the progression of ferroptosis (40, 41).

3 Candidate ferroptosis-related therapeutic targets in ALL

3.1 Iron metabolism-mediated regulation of ferroptosis in ALL

Beyond the disease itself, the tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a critical role in tumor progression and metastasis. The TME constitutes a multifaceted ecosystem composed of tumor cells, immune cells, stromal cells, and other components. Through molecular signals such as cytokines and their receptors, signal transduction networks, and various trace elements, tumor cells interact bidirectionally with their microenvironment, thereby reciprocally regulating each other’s biological behaviors (42). Iron is an essential nutrient that regulates numerous physiological processes within cells. Compared with non-malignant cells, cancer cells exhibit a heightened demand for iron to support their rapid growth and proliferation, making them more susceptible to ferroptosis. As a result, targeting iron metabolism has emerged as a promising strategy in the development of anti-cancer therapies. Iron chelators, which modulate intracellular iron concentrations and the activity of iron regulatory proteins, can suppress cancer cell invasiveness. For example, high-dose deferoxamine has been shown to disrupt iron homeostasis and induce apoptosis in breast cancer cells (43). The iron chelator deferasirox (44) has been reported to promote the death of multiple myeloma cells by inhibiting proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2. Benadiba et al. (45) reported that murine PTEN-deficient T-cell lymphoma and human T lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma cells exhibit characteristics of “iron addiction” in terms of survival and metabolism. Deferoxamine (DFO) chelates iron, thereby inhibiting iron-dependent antioxidant enzymes, leading to ROS accumulation and DNA damage in T-ALL cells. Moreover, combining DFO with chemotherapeutic agents such as L-asparaginase, dexamethasone, or doxorubicin, or with PARP inhibitors, has been shown to synergistically enhance anti-T-ALL effects, offering a novel strategy for combination therapies targeting iron metabolism. It has been reported that neutrophils exhibit sensitivity to ferroptosis induction. Disrupting the vicious cycle between Fer-CD4 T cells and neutrophils can effectively reverse chemotherapy resistance (46). Specifically, Fer-1 has the potential to prevent neutrophil cell death. As a result, when combined with the polo-like kinase inhibitor volasertib, it may generate additional therapeutic benefits (47). In addition, another research study indicates that the transcription factor MYB is highly expressed in various leukemia cells. MYB inhibits sorafenib-induced ferroptosis by upregulating FTH1, thereby endowing human leukemia cells with resistance to sorafenib. Consequently, the combination therapy of sorafenib with FTH1 or MYB inhibitors may hold the key to overcoming sorafenib resistance in patients (48).

3.2 Lipid metabolism-mediated regulation of ferroptosis in ALL

With the identification of PLOOHs as central mediators of ferroptosis, targeting lipid metabolism has become a promising strategy for inducing ferroptosis in ALL cells. Studies have shown that lipoxygenases (LOX) play a critical role in regulating ferroptosis in ALL. Experimental evidence indicates that LOX is involved in RSL3-induced lipid peroxidation and ROS bursts in ALL cells, triggering ferroptosis. Inhibition of ferroptosis in ALL cells by selective 12/15-LOX inhibitor baicalein and the pan-LOX inhibitor nordihydroguaiaretic acid has been observed, demonstrating their protective effects against RSL3-induced lipid peroxidation (49). These findings provide an experimental foundation for targeting lipid peroxidation in leukemia therapy.

Arsenic compounds are well-established as first-line treatments for acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Among these, the active component of the natural arsenic sulfide mineral realgar, tetraarsenic tetrasulfide (As4S4), has attracted attention for its potential application in ALL treatment. Bai et al. (50) demonstrated that As4S4 targets hexokinase-2 (HK2) in B-ALL cells to regulate the Warburg effect, inhibit glycolysis, induce ROS accumulation, activate the ROS/p53 signaling axis, and ultimately trigger ferroptosis. In APL, As4S4 has also been shown to induce cell death by modulating the Bcl-2/Bax/Cyt-C/AIF signaling pathway (51). Clinical research further supports the therapeutic advantages of As4S4, with evidence indicating superior efficacy and prognosis compared to arsenic trioxide (ATO), suggesting promising prospects for clinical application (52).

3.3 Antioxidant pathwathway-mediated regulation of ferroptosis in ALL

Targeting antioxidant pathways has become an important approach for regulating ferroptosis. The ferroptosis inducer erastin reduces intracellular GSH levels in T-ALL cells in a dose-dependent manner and downregulates the expression of SLC7A11 and GPX4. This process is positively regulated by the p38 MAPK signaling pathway and negatively regulated by the ERK1/2 pathway, with the dominant pro-ferroptotic effect mediated by p38 MAPK, ultimately leading to ferroptosis (53). Dihydroartemisinin (DHA), a derivative of the anti-malarial compound artemisinin (ART), has drawn significant interest due to its anti-cancer potential. DHA enhances the sensitivity of cancer cells to ferroptosis by depleting cysteine and inhibiting GPX4. In a study by Tang et al. (54), DHA was shown to induce ferroptosis in T-ALL cells by downregulating SLC7A11 and activating the ATF4-CHOP signaling pathway, which is associated with endoplasmic reticulum stress. This effect could be reversed by the ferroptosis inhibitor Ferrostatin-1. Another study indicated that AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), a central regulator of energy metabolism, when activated, can promote pro-apoptotic effects in ALL cells (55, 56). Recent findings have revealed that apigenin significantly downregulates GPX4 and SLC7A11 expression and upregulates the pro-ferroptotic protein ACSL4 by activating the AMPK signaling pathway (57).

Progress has also been made in the development of targeted drugs. The Niu team (58) developed a non-covalent peptide PROTAC targeting GPX4, referred to as Au-PGPD (peptide GPX4 PROTAC drug), based on the elevated GPX4 expression in ALL cells. This innovative strategy leverages the high expression of MDM2 in ALL cells to serve as an E3 ligase, selectively binding and degrading GPX4, thereby effectively inhibiting the proliferation of ALL cells. Furthermore, Ashoub et al. (59) utilized black cardamom extract to assist in the biosynthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs), which were found to induce ferroptosis in Pre-B ALL cells (Nalm-6 and REH) by significantly reducing the mRNA-level expression of SLC7A11 and GPX4, while upregulating the expression of ACSL4 and ALOX15. Surprisingly, Au-PGPD and ZnO NPs exhibit no significant toxicity to normal cells, underscoring the selectivity and safety of the ferroptosis-targeted design. Nevertheless, a critical limitation of this study is the lack of in vivo experimental validation for the antitumor efficacy and biosafety of Au-PGPD and ZnO NPs. Evidence solely from cellular-level studies cannot adequately reflect their performance in complex living systems. Thus, subsequent research must urgently incorporate mouse models to specifically evaluate the in vivo pharmacokinetics, distribution, toxicity, and tumor-suppressive effects of these nanoparticles. Exploring their potential for combination therapies is also essential, as this will lay a crucial foundation for their future clinical translation.

3.4 Autophagy-mediated regulation of ferroptosis in ALL

Significant progress has been made in exploring the regulation of ferroptosis in ALL through autophagy. Pharmacological interventions targeting the autophagy pathway have been shown to markedly increase the sensitivity of ALL cells to ferroptosis, offering a novel therapeutic approach for ALL. In a study by Zhu’s research team (60), a combination of the autophagy activator rapamycin and erastin was used in an ALL xenograft mouse model. Silencing of the E3 ubiquitin ligase FBXW7, which specifically targets VDAC3, led to reduced VDAC3 ubiquitination and its increased protein stability. This enhancement significantly improved the responsiveness of ALL cells to erastin, thereby increasing their sensitivity to ferroptosis and prolonging the survival of the model mice. In the realm of natural medicine, the flavonoid lignan extract Hydnocarpin D (HD), derived from Hydnocarpus anthelminticus, has been found to induce autophagy by upregulating Beclin-1 and LC3-II expression. This process is accompanied by the downregulation of GPX4 protein and disruption of ROS homeostasis, ultimately inducing ferroptosis in T-ALL cells (61). Notably, HD also exerts anti-cancer effects in colon cancer models by inhibiting the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway (62). Additionally, poricoic acid A (PAA), a bioactive component of the traditional Chinese medicine Poria cocos, demonstrates potent anti-ALL effects. PAA induces autophagy in T-ALL cells through regulation of the AMPK/mTOR signaling axis and LC3 expression, while simultaneously inhibiting GPX4 activity. This leads to the accumulation of lipid peroxidation products and the induction of ferroptosis (63).

Analogous to normal hematopoietic stem cells, leukemia stem cells depend on a specific microenvironment to sustain self-renewal and survival (64). This bone marrow microenvironment, which consists of diverse cells and matrices, can be remodeled by leukemia cells to establish a niche that supports their proliferation, survival, and drug resistance (65). Previous research has demonstrated that the Notch signaling pathway can influence the development of T cells and B cells through interactions with the bone marrow and thymus microenvironments (66). The aberrant activation of the Notch signaling pathway has been closely associated with drug resistance in various cancers. Among these, NOTCH1 mutations are frequently observed in T-ALL (67). Clinical evidence suggests that the mutational status of NOTCH1 and FBXW7 has prognostic value: patients with NOTCH1/FBXW7 mutations tend to have favorable outcomes, whereas those without these mutations or with RAS/PTEN mutations exhibit poorer prognoses. This finding suggests that the Notch pathway can be used as a biomarker for molecular stratification of T-ALL (6871). Targeted therapeutic strategies against the Notch pathway have also shown promise. γ-Secretase inhibitors (GSIs), which block the proteolytic activation of Notch receptors, have demonstrated efficacy in targeting leukemia-initiating cells in vitro and in clinical trials (7274). However, the effectiveness of GSI monotherapy is limited, spurring interest in combination therapies. For example, Cullion et al. (73) demonstrated that combining GSI with rapamycin significantly enhanced the growth-inhibitory effect on T-ALL cell lines and improved survival in a mouse transplant model. Subsequent mechanistic studies by Herranz et al. (75) revealed that autophagy induction could synergize with anti-Notch1 therapy, providing a new avenue for treating refractory ALL. Current research is increasingly focused on the interplay between the Notch pathway, autophagy, and ferroptosis, which may drive the clinical implementation of precision medicine strategies targeting Notch.

3.5 Genes that regulate ferroptosis in ALL

Cancer cells may exploit genetic mechanisms to counteract metabolic and oxidative stress, such as the upregulation of SLC7A11 or the antioxidant transcription factor NRF2, indicating that the genetic background of a tumor plays a decisive role in ferroptosis regulation. Circular RNAs (circRNAs), a class of non-coding RNAs widely expressed in eukaryotic cells, have been shown to exert regulatory control in various malignancies. Studies have revealed that circ_0000745 is upregulated in ALL and activates the ERK signaling pathway to promote ALL cell viability (76). Further investigation demonstrated that circ_0000745 acts as a molecular sponge for miR-494-3p, thereby inducing the expression of the downstream target gene NET1 and suppressing ferroptosis in ALL cells. Conversely, the knockdown of circ_0000745 disrupts cell cycle progression and glycolysis, ultimately promoting ferroptosis (77). These findings highlight the regulatory role of circRNAs in ferroptosis within the context of ALL.

PAQR3, a known tumor suppressor, is characterized by low expression across multiple malignancies, including ALL, osteosarcoma, glioma, breast cancer, and non-small cell lung cancer (78). In ALL, PAQR3 modulates the stability of NRF2, a key regulator of oxidative stress, via the ubiquitination pathway, thereby promoting ferroptosis in ALL cells (79). Furthermore, In ALL cell lines, the ferroptosis suppressor protein 1 (FSP1) is inhibited in expression due to high promoter methylation, leading to a greater reliance of cancer cells on the glutathione (GSH)-dependent anti-ferroptosis pathway. This makes ALL cells sensitive to compounds targeting the GSH pathway, while overexpression of FSP1 can enhance resistance and promote tumor growth, revealing the metabolic vulnerability and therapeutic potential of ALL (80).

Collectively, these studies not only underscore the critical role of ferroptosis in ALL pathophysiology but also provide a theoretical and practical foundation for developing effective, low-toxicity targeted therapies (Table 1).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Experimental studies of drugs or monomers for ferroptosis treatment of ALL.

4 Molecular markers of ferroptosis in ALL

In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to the prognostic stratification of ALL based on molecular markers. Tian et al. (81) selected differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from the GSE46170 database, then cross-compared them with ferroptosis-related genes (FRGs) in the FerrDb database to screen out the iron death-related DEGs. Through PPI network analysis, five ferroptosis hub genes related to ALL were identified: LCN2, LTF, HP, SLC40A1, and TFRC. Among these, LCN2 is highly expressed in T-ALL, and its silencing has been shown to significantly increase the sensitivity of T-ALL cells to ferroptosis. Lalonde et al. (82) conducted a genome-wide CRISPR screen in B-ALL and identified ferroptosis-related genes, including PAX5, RUNX1, TCF3, EBF1, CD79A, CD79B, and PIK3CD. Similarly, Hong et al. (83) analyzed clinical data and RNA-seq results from 80 Ph-negative B-ALL patients and identified eight FRGs: ALOX15, ATP5G3, CARS, CDKN1A, LPCAT3, SAT1, SLC1A5, and TFRC. These studies affirm the prognostic significance of FRGs in ALL, independent of traditional clinical parameters. Collectively, these hub genes serve as valuable targets for the development of precision therapies targeting ferroptosis and hold promise as reliable prognostic biomarkers for ALL.

5 Summary

Ferroptosis, as a relatively novel form of programmed cell death, presents a promising direction for improving treatment and prognostic evaluation in ALL. The existing evidence indicates that targeting the iron metabolism pathway or regulating the antioxidant system can effectively trigger ferroptosis in leukemia cells, providing new molecular targets and strategies for the treatment of ALL (especially refractory/relapsed cases). Basic research has fully demonstrated the dual value of inducing ferroptosis in the treatment of ALL: it can be used as an independent anti-tumor agent and can also be combined with traditional chemotherapy drugs to significantly enhance the responsiveness of leukemia cells. The combination of ferroptosis induction with traditional anti-tumor treatment methods such as chemotherapy and immunotherapy may have more clinical translational significance. In recent years, new platforms for precise delivery, such as nanobiotechnology and antibody-drug conjugates, have emerged continuously. These new approaches, such as iron-based nanomaterials and functionalized polymer nanocarriers, are expected to effectively enhance the efficiency of drug delivery, improve the anti-tumor effect by enhancing targeting and bioavailability, and significantly reduce systemic toxicity, demonstrating great potential in clinical applications.

Despite mounting evidence supporting its critical role in ALL, the intricate and interconnected signaling pathways involved remain incompletely understood. To date, research in this field has primarily relied on in vitro and animal models. Therefore, it is imperative to expand clinical validation efforts, accelerate the translation of basic findings into clinical practice, and pursue more experimental studies focusing on ferroptosis-targeted drug interventions for ALL prevention and treatment. Additionally, the potential of combining ferroptosis inducers with conventional chemotherapeutics or agents with different mechanisms warrants thorough investigation. Such combination strategies could offer more effective treatment regimens. As research into ferroptosis in ALL progresses, the development and clinical evaluation of targeted therapeutics is expected to drive significant breakthroughs in precision treatment and prognosis management for ALL patients. It is expected that in-depth exploration of the related mechanisms and clinical translation in the future will bring new hope to more patients.

Author contributions

JH: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft. YY: Writing – original draft. YW: Writing – review & editing. JJ: Writing – review & editing. WF: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Resources, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This study was supported by the Zhejiang Provincial Program for the Cultivation of High-Level Innovative Health Talents, Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Zhejiang Province (Grant No.2023KY348), Medical and Health Science and Technology Program of Zhejiang Province (Grant No.2025KY1658).

Acknowledgments

We thank LetPub (www.letpub.com.cn) for linguistic assistance and pre-submission expert review. We also thank Figdraw (www.figdraw.com) for assistance creating Figure.

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Duffield AS, Mullighan CG, and Borowitz MJ. International Consensus Classification of acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma. Virchows Arch. (2023) 482:11–26. doi: 10.1007/s00428-022-03448-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Siegel RL, Kratzer TB, Giaquinto AN, Sung H, and Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2025. CA Cancer J Clin. (2025) 75:10–45. doi: 10.3322/caac.21871

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Attarbaschi A, Möricke A, Harrison CJ, Mann G, Baruchel A, De Moerloose B, et al. Outcomes of childhood noninfant acute lymphoblastic leukemia with 11q23/KMT2A rearrangements in a modern therapy era: A retrospective international study. J Clin Oncol. (2023) 41:1404–22. doi: 10.1200/jco.22.01297

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Gupta S, Rau RE, Kairalla JA, Rabin KR, Wang C, Angiolillo AL, et al. Blinatumomab in standard-risk B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children. N Engl J Med. (2025) 392:875–91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2411680

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Locatelli F, Zugmaier G, Mergen N, Bader P, Jeha S, Schlegel PG, et al. Blinatumomab in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of the RIALTO trial, an expanded access study. Blood Cancer J. (2020) 10:77. doi: 10.1038/s41408-020-00342-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Lei G, Zhuang L, and Gan B. Targeting ferroptosis as a vulnerability in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. (2022) 22:381–96. doi: 10.1038/s41568-022-00459-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Dixon SJ, Lemberg KM, Lamprecht MR, Skouta R, Zaitsev EM, Gleason CE, et al. Ferroptosis: an iron-dependent form of nonapoptotic cell death. Cell. (2012) 149:1060–72. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.042

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Yan HF, Zou T, Tuo QZ, Xu S, Li H, Belaidi AA, et al. Ferroptosis: mechanisms and links with diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther. (2021) 6:49. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-00428-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Hadian K and Stockwell BR. SnapShot: ferroptosis. Cell. (2020) 181:1188–1188.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.039

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Dixon SJ and Olzmann JA. The cell biology of ferroptosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. (2024) 25:424–42. doi: 10.1038/s41580-024-00703-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Zhou Q, Meng Y, Li D, Yao L, Le J, Liu Y, et al. Ferroptosis in cancer: From molecular mechanisms to therapeutic strategies. Signal Transduct Target Ther. (2024) 9:55. doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-01769-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Kong N, Chen X, Feng J, Duan T, Liu S, Sun X, et al. Baicalin induces ferroptosis in bladder cancer cells by downregulating FTH1. Acta Pharm Sin B. (2021) 11:4045–54. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.03.036

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Yang Z, Zou S, Zhang Y, Zhang J, Zhang P, Xiao L, et al. ACTL6A protects gastric cancer cells against ferroptosis through induction of glutathione synthesis. Nat Commun. (2023) 14:4193. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39901-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Cao Y, Wang X, Liu Y, Liu P, Qin J, Zhu Y, et al. BHLHE40 inhibits ferroptosis in pancreatic cancer cells via upregulating SREBF1. Adv Sci (Weinh). (2024) 11:e2306298. doi: 10.1002/advs.202306298

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Zhao Y, Liu Z, Liu G, Zhang Y, Liu S, Gan D, et al. Neutrophils resist ferroptosis and promote breast cancer metastasis through aconitate decarboxylase 1. Cell Metab. (2023) 35:1688–703.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2023.09.004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Jiang X, Stockwell BR, and Conrad M. Ferroptosis: mechanisms, biology and role in disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. (2021) 22:266–82. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-00324-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Salnikow K. Role of iron in cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. (2021) 76:189–94. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.04.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Bozkurt AS and Yılmaz ŞG. Effect of bovine lactoferrin treatment on iron homeostasis and gene expression changes in multiple organ dysfunctions during wound healing process in rats. Curr Gene Ther. (2024) 24:410–21. doi: 10.2174/0115665232279426240217174738

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Gonciarz RL, Collisson EA, and Renslo AR. Ferrous iron-dependent pharmacology. Trends Pharmacol Sci. (2021) 42:7–18. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2020.11.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Co HKC, Wu CC, Lee YC, and Chen SH. Emergence of large-scale cell death through ferroptotic trigger waves. Nature. (2024) 631:654–62. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07623-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Lee JY, Kim WK, Bae KH, Lee SC, and Lee EW. Lipid metabolism and ferroptosis. Biol (Basel). (2021) 10:184. doi: 10.3390/biology10030184

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Wang Y, Hu M, Cao J, Wang F, Han JR, Wu TW, et al. ACSL4 and polyunsaturated lipids support metastatic extravasation and colonization. Cell. (2025) 188:412–29.e27. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.10.047

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Rochette L, Dogon G, Rigal E, Zeller M, Cottin Y, and Vergely C. Lipid peroxidation and iron metabolism: two corner stones in the homeostasis control of ferroptosis. Int J Mol Sci. (2022) 24:449. doi: 10.3390/ijms24010449

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Mortensen MS, Ruiz J, and Watts JL. Polyunsaturated fatty acids drive lipid peroxidation during ferroptosis. Cells. (2023) 12:804. doi: 10.3390/cells12050804

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Tang H, Zhang Q, Zhang P, Li Y, Guo Y, Gao J, et al. Chaigui Bitong decoction inhibits rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocyte injury through regulating the ferroptosis signaling pathway via Nrf2/HO-1/GPX4 axis. Curr Pharm Analysis. (2025) 21:179–91. doi: 10.1016/j.cpan.2025.03.003

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Yang WS, SriRamaratnam R, Welsch ME, Shimada K, Skouta R, Viswanathan VS, et al. Regulation of ferroptotic cancer cell death by GPX4. Cell. (2014) 156:317–31. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.010

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Seibt TM, Proneth B, and Conrad M. Role of GPX4 in ferroptosis and its pharmacological implication. Free Radic Biol Med. (2019) 133:144–52. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.09.014

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Zhang L, Huang Y, Ling J, Zhuo W, Yu Z, Luo Y, et al. Overexpression of SLC7A11: a novel oncogene and an indicator of unfavorable prognosis for liver carcinoma. Future Oncol. (2018) 14:927–36. doi: 10.2217/fon-2017-0540

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Cao JY and Dixon SJ. Mechanisms of ferroptosis. Cell Mol Life Sci. (2016) 73:2195–209. doi: 10.1007/s00018-016-2194-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Kang N, Son S, Min S, Hong H, Kim C, An J, et al. Stimuli-responsive ferroptosis for cancer therapy. Chem Soc Rev. (2023) 52:3955–72. doi: 10.1039/d3cs00001j

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Doll S, Freitas FP, Shah R, Aldrovandi M, da Silva MC, Ingold I, et al. FSP1 is a glutathione-independent ferroptosis suppressor. Nature. (2019) 575:693–8. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1707-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Bersuker K, Hendricks JM, Li Z, Magtanong L, Ford B, Tang PH, et al. The CoQ oxidoreductase FSP1 acts parallel to GPX4 to inhibit ferroptosis. Nature. (2019) 575:688–92. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1705-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Mishima E, Nakamura T, Zheng J, Zhang W, Mourão ASD, Sennhenn P, et al. DHODH inhibitors sensitize to ferroptosis by FSP1 inhibition. Nature. (2023) 619:E9–e18. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06269-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Kraft VAN, Bezjian CT, Pfeiffer S, Ringelstetter L, Müller C, Zandkarimi F, et al. GTP cyclohydrolase 1/tetrahydrobiopterin counteract ferroptosis through lipid remodeling. ACS Cent Sci. (2020) 6:41–53. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.9b01063

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Xue J, Yu C, Sheng W, Zhu W, Luo J, Zhang Q, et al. The Nrf2/GCH1/BH4 axis ameliorates radiation-induced skin injury by modulating the ROS cascade. J Invest Dermatol. (2017) 137:2059–68. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2017.05.019

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Zhang Q, Yi H, Yao H, Lu L, He G, Wu M, et al. Artemisinin derivatives inhibit non-small cell lung cancer cells through induction of ROS-dependent apoptosis/ferroptosis. J Cancer. (2021) 12:4075–85. doi: 10.7150/jca.57054

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Li M, Wang X, Lu S, He C, Wang C, Wang L, et al. Erastin triggers autophagic death of breast cancer cells by increasing intracellular iron levels. Oncol Lett. (2020) 20:57. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.11918

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Zhao P, Yin S, Qiu Y, Sun C, and Yu H. Ferroptosis and pyroptosis are connected through autophagy: a new perspective of overcoming drug resistance. Mol Cancer. (2025) 24:23. doi: 10.1186/s12943-024-02217-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Li T, Sun M, Sun Q, Ren X, Xu Q, Sun Z, et al. PM(2.5)-induced iron homeostasis imbalance triggers cardiac hypertrophy through ferroptosis in a selective autophagy crosstalk manner. Redox Biol. (2024) 72:103158. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2024.103158

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Wu H, Liu Q, Shan X, Gao W, and Chen Q. ATM orchestrates ferritinophagy and ferroptosis by phosphorylating NCOA4. Autophagy. (2023) 19:2062–77. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2023.2170960

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Yang S, Zhang T, Ge Y, Cheng Y, Yin L, Pu Y, et al. Ferritinophagy mediated by oxidative stress-driven mitochondrial damage is involved in the polystyrene nanoparticles-induced ferroptosis of lung injury. ACS Nano. (2023) 17:24988–5004. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.3c07255

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Lei G, Zhuang L, and Gan B. The roles of ferroptosis in cancer: Tumor suppression, tumor microenvironment, and therapeutic interventions. Cancer Cell. (2024) 42:513–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2024.03.011

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Bajbouj K, Shafarin J, and Hamad M. High-dose deferoxamine treatment disrupts intracellular iron homeostasis, reduces growth, and induces apoptosis in metastatic and nonmetastatic breast cancer cell lines. Technol Cancer Res Treat. (2018) 17:1533033818764470. doi: 10.1177/1533033818764470

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Kamihara Y, Takada K, Sato T, Kawano Y, Murase K, Arihara Y, et al. The iron chelator deferasirox induces apoptosis by targeting oncogenic Pyk2/β-catenin signaling in human multiple myeloma. Oncotarget. (2016) 7:64330–41. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11830

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Benadiba J, Rosilio C, Nebout M, Heimeroth V, Neffati Z, Popa A, et al. Iron chelation: an adjuvant therapy to target metabolism, growth and survival of murine PTEN-deficient T lymphoma and human T lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma. (2017) 58:1433–45. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2016.1239257

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Zeng W, Zhang R, Huang P, Chen M, Chen H, Zeng X, et al. Ferroptotic neutrophils induce immunosuppression and chemoresistance in breast cancer. Cancer Res. (2025) 85:477–96. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.Can-24-1941

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Stachura P, Lu Z, Kronberg RM, Xu HC, Liu W, Tu JW, et al. Deep transfer learning approach for automated cell death classification reveals novel ferroptosis-inducing agents in subsets of B-ALL. Cell Death Dis. (2025) 16:396. doi: 10.1038/s41419-025-07704-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Tao X, Wang Y, Shen S, Fang H, Song H, Zhang J, et al. MYB confers sorafenib resistance in human leukemia cells via inhibiting ferroptosis through FTH1 upregulation. Genes (Basel). (2025) 16:737. doi: 10.3390/genes16070737

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Probst L, Dächert J, Schenk B, and Fulda S. Lipoxygenase inhibitors protect acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells from ferroptotic cell death. Biochem Pharmacol. (2017) 140:41–52. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2017.06.112

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Bai W, Liu D, Cheng Q, Yang X, Zhu L, Qin L, et al. Tetraarsenic tetrasulfide triggers ROS-induced apoptosis and ferroptosis in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia by targeting HK2. Transl Oncol. (2024) 40:101850. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2023.101850

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Li Z, Zhang R, Yin X, Li N, Cui S, Wang T, et al. Realgar (As(4)S(4)), a traditional Chinese medicine, induces acute promyelocytic leukemia cell death via the Bcl-2/Bax/Cyt-C/AIF signaling pathway in vitro. Aging (Albany NY). (2022) 14:7109–25. doi: 10.18632/aging.204281

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Zhang X, Wu S, Yang J, Zhang G, Su Y, Zhang M, et al. Long-term retrospective study of retinoic acid combined with arsenic and chemotherapy for acute promyelocytic leukemia. Int J Hematol. (2023) 117:530–7. doi: 10.1007/s12185-022-03507-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Liu N, Liu G, Jiang H, Yu J, Jin Y, and Wang H. Effect of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway on the erastin-induced ferroptosis of molt-4 cells. DNA Cell Biol. (2023) 42:348–56. doi: 10.1089/dna.2022.0661

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Tang N, Liu X, Liu Y, Wang H, Zhao Y, Wang H, et al. Dihydroartemisinin induces ferroptosis in T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells by downregulating SLC7A11 and activating the ATF4−CHOP signaling pathway. Oncol Lett. (2024) 28:337. doi: 10.3892/ol.2024.14470

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Vara-Ciruelos D, Dandapani M, Russell FM, Grzes KM, Atrih A, Foretz M, et al. Phenformin, but not metformin, delays development of T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma via cell-autonomous AMPK activation. Cell Rep. (2019) 27:690–8.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.03.067

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Accordi B, Galla L, Milani G, Curtarello M, Serafin V, Lissandron V, et al. AMPK inhibition enhances apoptosis in MLL-rearranged pediatric B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells. Leukemia. (2013) 27:1019–27. doi: 10.1038/leu.2012.338

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

57. He C, Zhang T, Xiong W, Wang S, and Sun X. Apigenin facilitates apoptosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells via AMP-activated protein kinase-mediated ferroptosis. Oncol Res. (2025) 33:421–9. doi: 10.32604/or.2024.049757

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Niu F, Yang R, Feng H, Liu Y, Liu R, and Ma B. A GPX4 non-enzymatic domain and MDM2 targeting peptide PROTAC for acute lymphoid leukemia therapy through ferroptosis induction. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2023) 684:149125. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2023.149125

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Ashoub MH, Amiri M, Fatemi A, and Farsinejad A. Evaluation of ferroptosis-based anti-leukemic activities of ZnO nanoparticles synthesized by a green route against Pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells (Nalm-6 and REH). Heliyon. (2024) 10:e36608. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36608

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Zhu T, Liu B, Wu D, Xu G, and Fan Y. Autophagy regulates VDAC3 ubiquitination by FBXW7 to promote erastin-induced ferroptosis in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Front Cell Dev Biol. (2021) 9:740884. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.740884

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Lou S, Hong H, Maihesuti L, Gao H, Zhu Z, Xu L, et al. Inhibitory effect of hydnocarpin D on T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia via induction of autophagy-dependent ferroptosis. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). (2021) 246:1541–53. doi: 10.1177/15353702211004870

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Lee MA, Kim WK, Park HJ, Kang SS, and Lee SK. Anti-proliferative activity of hydnocarpin, a natural lignan, is associated with the suppression of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in colon cancer cells. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. (2013) 23:5511–4. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.08.065

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Chen L, Fang W, Liu J, Qi X, Zhao L, Wang Y, et al. (PAA) inhibits T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia through inducing autophagic cell death and ferroptosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2022) 608:108–15. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.03.105

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Simioni C, Conti I, Varano G, Brenna C, Costanzi E, and Neri LM. The complexity of the tumor microenvironment and its role in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: implications for therapies. Front Oncol. (2021) 11:673506. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.673506

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Ferrao Blanco MN, Kazybay B, Belderbos M, Heidenreich O, and Vormoor HJ. Distinct stromal cell populations define the B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia microenvironment. Leukemia. (2025) 39:2622–39. doi: 10.1038/s41375-025-02734-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Nwabo Kamdje AH and Krampera M. Notch signaling in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: any role for stromal microenvironment? Blood. (2011) 118:6506–14. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-08-376061

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Weng AP, Ferrando AA, Lee W, Morris JPT, Silverman LB, Sanchez-Irizarry C, et al. Activating mutations of NOTCH1 in human T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Science. (2004) 306:269–71. doi: 10.1126/science.1102160

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Asnafi V, Buzyn A, Le Noir S, Baleydier F, Simon A, Beldjord K, et al. NOTCH1/FBXW7 mutation identifies a large subgroup with favorable outcome in adult T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL): a Group for Research on Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (GRAALL) study. Blood. (2009) 113:3918–24. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-10-184069

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Valliyammai N, Nancy NK, Sagar TG, and Rajkumar T. Study of NOTCH1 and FBXW7 mutations and its prognostic significance in south Indian T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. (2018) 40:e1–8. doi: 10.1097/mph.0000000000001006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Feng J, Li Y, Jia Y, Fang Q, Gong X, Dong X, et al. Spectrum of somatic mutations detected by targeted next-generation sequencing and their prognostic significance in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Hematol Oncol. (2017) 10:61. doi: 10.1186/s13045-017-0431-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Trinquand A, Tanguy-Schmidt A, Ben Abdelali R, Lambert J, Beldjord K, Lengliné E, et al. Toward a NOTCH1/FBXW7/RAS/PTEN-based oncogenetic risk classification of adult T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Group for Research in Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia study. J Clin Oncol. (2013) 31:4333–42. doi: 10.1200/jco.2012.48.5292

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

72. O'Neil J, Calvo J, McKenna K, Krishnamoorthy V, Aster JC, Bassing CH, et al. Activating Notch1 mutations in mouse models of T-ALL. Blood. (2006) 107:781–5. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-06-2553

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Cullion K, Draheim KM, Hermance N, Tammam J, Sharma VM, Ware C, et al. Targeting the Notch1 and mTOR pathways in a mouse T-ALL model. Blood. (2009) 113:6172–81. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-02-136762

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Sanchez-Martin M and Ferrando A. The NOTCH1-MYC highway toward T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. (2017) 129:1124–33. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-09-692582

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Herranz D, Ambesi-Impiombato A, Sudderth J, Sánchez-Martín M, Belver L, Tosello V, et al. Metabolic reprogramming induces resistance to anti-NOTCH1 therapies in T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Med. (2015) 21:1182–9. doi: 10.1038/nm.3955

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Liu X, Zhou C, Li Y, Deng Y, Lu W, and Li J. Upregulation of circ-0000745 in acute lymphoblastic leukemia enhanced cell proliferation by activating ERK pathway. Gene. (2020) 751:144726. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2020.144726

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Yang X, Li Y, Zhang Y, and Liu J. Circ_0000745 promotes acute lymphoblastic leukemia progression through mediating miR-494-3p/NET1 axis. Hematology. (2022) 27:11–22. doi: 10.1080/16078454.2021.2008590

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Guo Q, Liu XL, Zhai K, Chen C, Ke XX, Zhang J, et al. The emerging roles and mechanisms of PAQR3 in human cancer: pathophysiology and therapeutic implications. Int J Gen Med. (2023) 16:4321–8. doi: 10.2147/ijgm.S422523

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Jin L and Tong L. PAQR3 inhibits proliferation and aggravates ferroptosis in acute lymphoblastic leukemia through modulation Nrf2 stability. Immun Inflammation Dis. (2021) 9:827–39. doi: 10.1002/iid3.437

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Pontel LB, Bueno-Costa A, Morellato AE, Carvalho Santos J, Roué G, and Esteller M. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia necessitates GSH-dependent ferroptosis defenses to overcome FSP1-epigenetic silencing. Redox Biol. (2022) 55:102408. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2022.102408

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Tian C, Zheng M, Lan X, Liu L, Ye Z, and Li C. Silencing LCN2 enhances RSL3-induced ferroptosis in T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Gene. (2023) 879:147597. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2023.147597

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Lalonde ME, Sasseville M, Gélinas AM, Milanese JS, Béland K, Drouin S, et al. Genome-wide CRISPR screens identify ferroptosis as a novel therapeutic vulnerability in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica. (2023) 108:382–93. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2022.280786

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Hong Y, Zhang L, Tian X, Xiang X, Yu Y, Zeng Z, et al. Identification of immune subtypes of Ph-neg B-ALL with ferroptosis related genes and the potential implementation of Sorafenib. BMC Cancer. (2021) 21:1331. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-09076-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: ferroptosis, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, molecular mechanism, ferroptosis-inducing drugs, ferroptosis-related genes

Citation: Han J, Yang Y, Wei Y, Jin J and Feng W (2026) Ferroptosis: a new dawn in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Front. Oncol. 15:1669432. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1669432

Received: 21 July 2025; Accepted: 16 December 2025; Revised: 22 October 2025;
Published: 09 January 2026.

Edited by:

Sharon R. Pine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, United States

Reviewed by:

Veenita Khare, University of California, San Diego, United States
Wei Zhang, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, China

Copyright © 2026 Han, Yang, Wei, Jin and Feng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Weiying Feng, ZmVuZ3dlaXlpbmcxOTk3QDEyNi5jb20=

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.