Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CASE REPORT article

Front. Oncol., 15 December 2025

Sec. Gastrointestinal Cancers: Gastric and Esophageal Cancers

Volume 15 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1685259

Long-term survival of an advanced gastric cancer patient with multiple liver metastases following maintenance therapy with envafolimab and oral chemotherapy: a case report

Updated
Sen WangSen Wang1Heng ZongHeng Zong1Linlin WuLinlin Wu1Yuandong WeiYuandong Wei1Heng Wang*Heng Wang2*
  • 1Department of Medical Oncology, Anhui No.2 Provincial People’s Hospital, Hefei, China
  • 2Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, China

The survival of advanced gastric cancer with liver metastases has a grim outlook, especially in tumors which are immune cold like with HER2 negativity, PD-L1 CPS less than 1, microsatellite stable, and low tumor mutational burden. A 65-year-old patient with poorly differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma having several hepatic metastases and stage IV which stopped the first-line FOLFOX because of grade III gastrointestinal toxicity and myelosuppression is reported in this case. Molecular profiling affirmed an immune cold phenotype, and individualization of the maintenance regimen to weekly subcutaneous envafolimab and oral S-1 was induced. This was treated well and the laboratory parameters were stable thus there were no serious adverse event related to immune reactions. Serial imaging showed sustained regression and stabilization of hepatic metastases, total regression of primary lesion of the gastric lesion, and nonexistent disease. The patient had 46 months of overall survival time with a good performance status. This case recommends that maintenance therapy comprising of both PD-L1 blockage and oral fluoropyrimidine can serve as long-duration disease control and significant long-term advantage to a subset of the patients with metastatic immune-cold gastric cancer.

Introduction

Gastric cancer is one among the most frequently found malignancies in the world, and it is mainly prevalent in the Eastern Asia region, where it has also been the leading cause of mortality due to cancer (1). The disease has a high likelihood of being at an advanced or metastatic stage when it is detected, thus high percentage is present at an advanced stage, thus with lower curability and poor survival (2). Regular chemotherapy has minimal survival advantage and even though targeted therapies and immunologic checkpoint inhibitors have enlarged the treatment, their performance as single agents still do not represent a strengths of most patients (3). In the case of metastatic gastric cancer, overall survival of the disease is normally 6 to 9 months with a 5-year survival of less than 10% despite the use of the systemic therapy (4).

The newest developments in precision oncology have spurred the combination of chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy to enhance outcome in a small subset of patients with PD-L1-positive or MSI-H gastric tumors (5); but again, their activity is significantly less in tumors with PD-L1 negativity and microsatellite stability (MSS) aka immune cold tumors (6, 7). Therefore, the treatment strategies using disease burden-reductive, tolerability, and sustained immunomodulation tactics should be implemented to maximize the therapeutic responses.

The presented report describes the clinical history of a patient with stage IV adenocarcinoma in the gastric area and hepatic multiple metastases with a profound level of toxicity indices during the first-line chemotherapy. The patient has had a lasting complete remission and long-term survival after changing the treatment strategy and having the combination of an oral fluoropyrimidine and a PD-L1 inhibitor. The case demonstrates the possible effect of tailored, multimodal methods of treatment to close the immune-cold gastric cancer drawbacks and enhance the overall outcomes.

Case presentation

A 65-year-old woman reported to the clinic in October 2021 with the progressive pain in the upper abdomen, regular, intermittent distension, and intentional weight loss because she lost about 5–10 kg within a month. On physical examination, slight abdominal tenderness in the upper parts. A gastroscopy done in a local hospital showed that there was an ulcerated infiltrative lesion in the gastric fundus and biopsy showed that there was poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma.

Primary lab testing revealed high carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA, 8.04 ng/mL) and significantly impaired liver testing (ALT 73 U/L, AST 128 U/L and GGT 965 U/L). Nutritional risk screening (NRS) is 0 and the patient is in good functional condition (ECOG 0, KPS 90).

Positive results in immunohistochemistry revealed CK7, negative HER2, and high proliferative index (Ki-67 ~80%). CK20 was negative. Molecular profiling also suggested microsatellite stability (MSS), a low rate of tumor mutational burden, and expression of PD-L1 that was lower than the clinical threshold (CPS <1). Testing of Claudin18.2 was not done.

The initial diagnosis was based on clinical, imaging, and pathological evidence and was made as stage IV gastric adenocarcinoma with multiple liver metastases and HER-2 negative (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Image panel with three sections labeled a, b, and c. Panel a shows an endoscopic view with irregular tissue appearance and white discoloration. Panel b presents a histological slide with structures stained in purple, showing varied cellular patterns. Panel c is an abdominal CT scan, displaying internal organs with varying densities.

Figure 1. Gastroscopy revealed a new growth in the stomach (a). Histopathological examination showed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (b). CT scan showed multiple tumor metastases in the liver (c).

In October 2021, the patient was initiated on the first-line chemotherapy (FOLOX). Treatment was stopped after three cycles with CTCAE grade III gastrointestinal toxicity and bone marrow suppression, along with increasing tumor markers, which was a sign of poor tolerance and poor response.

After supportive care and MDT assessment, the transition to a less intolerable long-term approach was advised. Molecular analysis showed an immune-cold pattern (HER2–, PD-L1 CPS <1, MSS, TMB-L) with little usefulness in the monotherapy of immunotherapy but possibly benefits in the combination model. Taking into account evidence that is covered by guidelines, and the lack of tolerance of the patient to 5-FU infusion, a personalized plan to use was chosen that incorporates both oral fluoropyrimidine and PD-L1 blockade.

In May 2022, the patient-initiated maintenance therapy with envafolimab (150 mg subcutaneously weekly) plus S-1 (40 mg twice daily on days 1–14 of a 21-day cycle). The regimen was well tolerated, with only mild fatigue and no grade ≥2 hematologic or immune-related adverse events. Laboratory parameters remained stable throughout treatment.

The patient has maintained complete remission for more than 43 months with ECOG 0 performance status. Sequential CT evaluations demonstrated consistent shrinkage and long-term stabilization of hepatic metastases, with no new lesions detected throughout follow-up (Figure 2).

Figure 2
CT scan images show six axial slices of the abdomen labeled a to f. Each panel reveals cross-sectional views of the liver, stomach, and surrounding structures. Variations in tissue density and structural details can be observed across the slices.

Figure 2. Serial contrast-enhanced CT scans demonstrated progressive reduction of hepatic metastatic lesions. The initial scans showed multiple billboard metastases on June 21, 2022 (a), November 2, 2022 (b), and January 5, 2023 (c). Follow-up imaging on March 6, 2024 (d), September 5, 2024 (e), and April 9, 2025 (f) revealed marked regression with minimal residual abnormalities and near-complete radiologic remission.

Discussion

Gastric cancer often portends a very dismal prognosis, particularly in the immune-cold type of tumor, including HER2 negativity, PD-L1 CPS <1, microsatellite stability, and low tumor mutational burden (6, 8). Such biological characteristics are also linked to little immunosecheckpoint inhibitor monotherapy responsiveness and therefore novel treatment modalities are necessitated.

Early termination of FOLFOX in this case by intense toxicity necessitated the therapeutic priorities to be reviewed. It is now indicated by the work of CheckMate-649 and ORIENT-16 that a reduction in tumor burden following chemotherapy can sensitize later responsiveness to checkpoint blockade, even in PD-L1-negative illness (9, 10). Another theory that stimulates the initiation of immunotherapy under the low-disease-burden state is that of immunogenic cell death in facilitating antigen exposures and T-cell priming (11).

Envafolimab and S-1 were selected as they were selected because it was more tolerable and synergistic. Envafolimab is associated with a lower risk of infusion and a sustained chronologic relationship of subcutaneous PD-L1 inhibition and the development of S-1 shows 5-FU that is better tolerated with cytostatic control (12, 13). Also, it is hinted that fluoropyridines can help to enhance antitumor immunity, which supports that such a combination is biologically plausible (14, 15).

The remarkable long-term complete remission in this immune cold tumor means that special consideration should be given when formulating treatment. In patients selected who have succeeded in controlling disease by initial chemotherapy, maintenance immunotherapy administered with oral fluoropyrimidine can give long-term advantage without loss of quality of life.

Nevertheless, the lack of post-treatment biopsy and absence of Claudin18.2 testing limit deeper biological interpretation (16). Prospective studies are needed to determine which subgroups of immune-cold gastric cancer may derive the greatest benefit from maintenance strategies.

Conclusion

This case demonstrates that individualized maintenance therapy combining envafolimab and S-1 can produce durable remission and long-term survival in metastatic gastric cancer with immune-cold characteristics. This strategy may benefit patients intolerant to intensive chemotherapy, though larger studies are needed to refine patient selection.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

Ethical approval was not required for the study involving humans in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent to participate in this study was not required from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article. Written informed consent was obtained from the participant/patient(s) for the publication of this case report.

Author contributions

SW: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – original draft. HZ: Investigation, Writing – original draft. LW: Investigation, Writing – original draft. YW: Writing – original draft. HW: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Correction note

A correction has been made to this article. Details can be found at: 10.3389/fonc.2026.1798299.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Huang J, Lucero-Prisno DE, Zhang L, Xu W, Wong SH, Ng SC, et al. Updated epidemiology of gastrointestinal cancers in East Asia. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2023) 20:271–87. doi: 10.1038/s41575-022-00726-3, PMID: 36631716

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Chen ZD, Zhang PF, Xi HQ, Wei B, Chen L, and Tang Y. Recent advances in the diagnosis, staging, treatment, and prognosis of advanced gastric cancer: a literature review. Front Med (Lausanne). (2021) 8:744839. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.744839, PMID: 34765619

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Wilky BA. Immune checkpoint inhibitors: the linchpins of modern immunotherapy. Immunol Rev. (2019) 290:6–23. doi: 10.1111/imr.12766, PMID: 31355494

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Montagnani F, Crivelli F, Aprile G, Vivaldi C, Pecora I, De Vivo R, et al. Long-term survival after liver metastasectomy in gastric cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors. Cancer Treat Rev. (2018) 69:11–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.04.002, PMID: 29860024

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Asrina A, Sekolah T, Ilmu K, and Kuningan K. Precision medicine approaches in oncology: current trends and future directions. Adv Healthc Res. (2024) 2:36–48. doi: 10.60079/ahr.v2i1.370

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Peshin S, Bashir F, Kodali NA, Dharia A, Zaiter S, Singal S, et al. Immunotherapy in GI cancers: lessons from key trials and future clinical applications. Antibodies. (2025) 14:58. doi: 10.3390/antib14030058, PMID: 40700298

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Zhao P, Jin R, Zhao B, Han L, Chen W, Hao N, et al. The efficacy-associated biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitors in gastrointestinal cancer: a literature review. J Gastrointest Oncol. (2024) 15:514–28. doi: 10.21037/jgo-23-343, PMID: 38482240

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Li W, Xu M, Cheng M, Wei J, Zhu L, Deng Y, et al. Current advances and future directions for sensitizing gastric cancer to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cancer Med. (2025) 14:e71065. doi: 10.1002/cam4.71065, PMID: 40686307

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Xu J, Jiang H, Pan Y, Gu K, Cang S, Han L, et al. Sintilimab plus chemotherapy for unresectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: the ORIENT-16 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. (2023) 330:2064–74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.21043

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Janjigian YY, Shitara K, Moehler M, Garrido M, Salman P, Shen L, et al. First-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (CheckMate 649): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. (2021) 398:27–40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00797-2, PMID: 34102137

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Choi M, Shin J, Lee CE, Chung JY, Kim M, Yan X, et al. Immunogenic cell death in cancer immunotherapy. BMB Rep. (2023) 56:275–88. doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2023.56.5.003

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Chen M, Jiang M, Wang X, Shen L, and Li J. Envafolimab–first PD-1/PD-L1 antibody to be administered by subcutaneous injection for MSI-H or dMMR advanced solid tumors. Expert Opin Biol Ther. (2022) 22:1227–32. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2022.2125799, PMID: 36124972

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. ter Veer E, Mohammad NH, Lodder P, Ngai LL, Samaan M, van Oijen MGH, et al. The efficacy and safety of S-1-based regimens in the first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastric Cancer. (2016) 19:696–712. doi: 10.1007/s10120-015-0587-8, PMID: 26754295

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Dong S, Zhang S, Zhao P, Lin G, Ma X, Xu J, et al. Depleted extracellular matrix and enhanced immune processes co-contribute to fluorouracil beneficial responses in gastric cancer. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:1012343. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1012343

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Xu JL, Yuan L, Hu C, Weng CY, Xu HD, Shi YF, et al. Trametes robiniophila Murr sensitizes gastric cancer cells to 5-fluorouracil by modulating tumor microenvironment. Front Pharmacol. (2022) 13:911663. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.911663, PMID: 35656301

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Kim TY, Kwak Y, Nam SK, Han D, Oh DY, Im SA, et al. Clinicopathological analysis of claudin 18.2 focusing on intratumoral heterogeneity and survival in patients with metastatic or unresectable gastric cancer. ESMO Open. (2024) 9:104000. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104000, PMID: 39615405

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: advanced gastric cancer, liver metastases, immunotherapy, envafolimab, raltitrexed, maintenance therapy, long-term survival

Citation: Wang S, Zong H, Wu L, Wei Y and Wang H (2025) Long-term survival of an advanced gastric cancer patient with multiple liver metastases following maintenance therapy with envafolimab and oral chemotherapy: a case report. Front. Oncol. 15:1685259. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1685259

Received: 13 August 2025; Accepted: 28 November 2025; Revised: 21 November 2025;
Published: 15 December 2025; Corrected: 10 February 2026.

Edited by:

Jipeng Li, Air Force Medical University, China

Reviewed by:

Masaichi Ohira, Osaka City University, Japan
Yahya Jand, Zist Balin Co. Iran

Copyright © 2025 Wang, Zong, Wu, Wei and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Heng Wang, aGVuZ3dhbmc3MThAZ21haWwuY29t

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.