Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Cancer Imaging and Image-directed Interventions

Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Vertebral Compression Fractures Based on CT Radiomics Model

Provisionally accepted
Xinrui  LiuXinrui Liu1,2Song  ChenSong Chen3Yifan  WangYifan Wang4Jiashi  CaoJiashi Cao5,6Zhuangfei  NiuZhuangfei Niu2Yuxian  JinYuxian Jin4Xingdan  PanXingdan Pan1,2Zhengwei  ZhangZhengwei Zhang1,2Tielong  LiuTielong Liu1,5Wei  LiangWei Liang7*Panfeng  YuPanfeng Yu8*Weiwei  ZouWeiwei Zou1,2*
  • 1University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
  • 2Shanghai Changzheng Hospital Department of Radiology, Shanghai, China
  • 3Shanghai Baoshan District Wusong Central Hospital (Zhongshan Hospital Wusong Branch, Fudan University), Shanghai, China
  • 4Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Shanghai, China
  • 5Shanghai Changzheng Hospital Department of Orthopedic Oncology, Shanghai, China
  • 6Navy Medical Center, the Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China
  • 7Shanghai 411 Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Shanghai University, Shanghai, China
  • 8Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objectives: This study aims to develop a CT radiomics-based predictive model integrating clinical characteristics to distinguish benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 208 patients with VCFs treated at our institution between January 2020 and November 2024. Patients were randomly divided into a training cohort (n = 145) and a validation cohort (n = 63). CT images were obtained, and three-dimensional lesion regions were manually segmented. A total of 1,316 radiomics features were extracted. Dimensionality reduction was performed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis and 5-fold cross-validation to identify key features. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used for identifying independent clinical predictors. Three models were constructed: a clinical model, a radiomics model, and a combined clinical–radiomics model. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Predictive efficacy and clinical utility were further assessed via ROC curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA), along with clinical impact curves (CIC) and net reduction curves. The Delong test was used for statistical comparisons among different models, and a nomogram was developed to facilitate the visualization of the optimal model. Results: Carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) and posterior vertebral involvement were identified as independent clinical predictors. The combined model achieved the highest AUC value of 0.846 in the validation cohort, followed by the radiomics model (0.842), and the clinical model (0.640). Calibration curves and DCA confirmed its superior predictive accuracy and clinical benefit. Conclusions: The CT-based clinical–radiomics model demonstrated robust performance in differentiating benign from malignant VCFs and holds promise for guiding individualized patient management.

Keywords: clinical predictors, Computedtomography (CT), machine learning, Radiomics, Vertebral compression fractures (VCF)

Received: 02 Sep 2025; Accepted: 04 Dec 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Liu, Chen, Wang, Cao, Niu, Jin, Pan, Zhang, Liu, Liang, Yu and Zou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Wei Liang
Panfeng Yu
Weiwei Zou

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.