Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Gastrointestinal Cancers: Colorectal Cancer

This article is part of the Research TopicReviews in Gastrointestinal Cancers: Colorectal CancerView all articles

Association between cholecystectomy/gallbladder pathology and colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Department of Big Data in Health Sciences, and Center for Clinical Big Data and Statistics, Second Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
  • 2Zhejiang University School of Medicine Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital Department of General Surgery, Hangzhou, China
  • 3People's Hospital Affiliated to Chongqing Three Gorges Medical College, Chongqing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Gallbladder-related pathologies may influence colorectal carcinogenesis, yet systematic evaluation of their associations with precursor lesions remains limited. This study addresses critical knowledge gaps by investigating the dual-axis relationship between cholecystectomy/gallbladder pathologies and colorectal polyp risk while elucidating geographical and biological effect modifiers. Methods: In accordance with the MOOSE/Cochrane guidelines, 27 observational studies were analysed through PROSPERO (CRD420251012876). Comprehensive meta-analysis was performed to assess the effects of cholecystectomy across polyp subtypes and gallbladder pathology (stones/polyps) associations. Heterogeneity was quantified via I² statistics, and pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated via the DerSimonian‒Laird random effects model to account for between-study variance. Subgroup analysis stratified by geography, pathology type, and adjustment model was performed with χ² tests for subgroup differences. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias were assessed through leave-one-out methods, funnel plots and Egger's test. Results: Cholecystectomy was associated with a 39% increased risk (OR=1.39, 95% CI: 1.21–1.59), with East Asian populations exhibiting a nearly doubled risk compared with North American populations (OR=1.95 vs. 1.16; P=0.002). Compared with unclassified polyps, adenomas were more strongly associated (OR=1.37, 95% CI: 1.16–1.62). Medium-sized studies (OR=1.69, 95% CI: 1.36–2.11) and those adjusted for health factors (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.12–1.61) yielded higher estimates, whereas dietary adjustment nullified significance. Gallbladder pathology (stones/polyps) conferred a 27% higher risk overall, with gallbladder polyps showing greater risk (OR=1.30, 95% CI: 1.17--1.38) than stones (OR=1.20, 95% CI: 1.08--1.32). Older populations (≥50 years) had stronger associations (OR=1.41 vs. 1.20 in younger groups). Adjustment for smoking, alcohol, and BMI strengthened the estimates (OR=1.43, 95% CI: 1.22--1.68). Sensitivity analysis supported the robustness of the primary findings, particularly for cholecystectomy. Conclusions: This comprehensive analysis establishes gallbladder status as an independent risk modulator for early colorectal lesions, with cholecystectomy demonstrating the highest risk magnitude. These findings advocate personalized

Keywords: Colorectal (colon) cancer, colorectal polyps, gallbladder disease, Gallbladder polyp, gallstone, Meta - analysis

Received: 14 Oct 2025; Accepted: 16 Dec 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Li, Deng, Dai, Fan, Xiong and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Dehai Xiong
Xiuyang Li

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.