Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CASE REPORT article

Front. Oncol., 15 January 2026

Sec. Gastrointestinal Cancers: Gastric and Esophageal Cancers

Volume 15 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1726271

Case Report: Pathologic complete response to PRaG therapy in an elderly patient with refractory metastatic gastric cancer

Jun Lv&#x;Jun LvFayi Yu&#x;Fayi YuLinjiang Pan&#x;Linjiang PanYeying FangYeying FangZhenghong ZhongZhenghong ZhongXue BaiXue BaiJinbiao GaoJinbiao GaoZhuxin Wei*Zhuxin Wei*
  • Department of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) is a rare histologic subtype of gastric cancer with distinct pathological features and poor prognosis. Surgery and chemotherapy remain the primary treatment modalities, but outcomes are generally unsatisfactory. Radiotherapy can enhance tumor immunogenicity by releasing tumor antigens, thereby promoting antitumor immune responses and potentiating the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. We report a case of advanced HAS that progressed after first-line treatment with chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy. The patient subsequently received a combination of radiotherapy, programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)—termed PRaG therapy. The tumor demonstrated significant shrinkage following PRaG treatment and ultimately achieved pathologic complete response (pCR), with no serious adverse events aside from mild abdominal pain (NRS score 2). This case suggests that PRaG therapy may represent a promising therapeutic approach for patients with metastatic HAS.

1 Introduction

Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS) is a rare and aggressive subtype of gastric cancer, accounting for approximately 0.17% of all cases, with an annual incidence of 0.58–0.83 per million individuals (1). Characterized by frequent hepatic metastases, HAS portends a dismal prognosis, with reported 5-year survival rates as low as 8.3% to 9% (2, 3). No standardized treatment guidelines exist; management relies on extrapolation from case reports and limited evidence. Conventional surgery and chemotherapy offer minimal benefit, highlighting an urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies. Here, we describe a case of metastatic HAS in an elderly patient who achieved a remarkable and durable response following PRaG therapy, a novel combination of PD-1 blockade, Radiotherapy, and GM-CSF. This regimen leverages synergistic mechanisms: PD-1 inhibition reverses T-cell exhaustion (4), GM-CSF enhances dendritic cell maturation and antitumor immunity (57), and radiotherapy induces immunogenic cell death and potentially systemic abscopal effects (8).

2 Case description

2.1 Clinical presentation and initial diagnosis

A 76-year-old man presented with melena and fatigue in November 2022. Upper endoscopy revealed a gastric antral mass (Figure 1A). Key diagnostic findings are summarized below. We have investigated the patient’s family and genetic information and confirmed that there is no family history of malignant tumors. The baseline diagnostic assessment and results after admission are as follows (Table 1; Figure 2).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Baseline diagnostic workup and findings.

Figure 1
Endoscopic images labeled A and B. Image A shows an inflamed, ulcerated area with darkened tissue and irregular surfaces. Image B displays a similarly inflamed but more uniformly red and swollen mucosal lining. Both images depict abnormal gastrointestinal conditions.

Figure 1. Endoscopic findings of the patient. (A) A large mass on the anterior wall of the gastric antrum with a superficial ulcer before treatment; (B) The gastric antral mass resolved following PRaG therapy.

Figure 2
Three rows of two abdominal CT scan images showing cross-sectional views of the abdomen. Various organs and structures are visible, including the spine, kidneys, liver, and intestines. Contrasting densities highlight anatomical details and internal features.

Figure 2. Pre-treatment CT scan demonstrating gastric antral wall thickening (findings suspicious for malignancy), retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis, and multiple liver metastases.

2.2 Treatment timeline and therapeutic response

Initial therapy with S-1, tislelizumab (PD-1 inhibitor), and apatinib failed, with rising AFP and radiographic progression after two cycles (Figure 3A). Subsequently, PRaG therapy was initiated. The treatment schedule and efficacy assessment at each stage are as follows (Table 2; Figures 1B, 3B, 4; Supplementary Figure S1).

Figure 3
CT scans showing two panels labeled A and B. Panel A displays two axial slices of the abdomen showing liver and surrounding structures. Panel B shows two additional axial slices highlighting different areas of the abdominal cavity. Structures such as vertebrae, kidneys, and various soft tissues are visible in both panels.

Figure 3. (A) Disease progression after triple-drug therapy with enlargement of liver metastases. (B) Partial response was achieved after two cycles of PRaG therapy, with a significant reduction in both primary and metastatic lesions.

Figure 4
CT scan images showing four transverse abdominal views highlighting various internal structures such as the liver, kidneys, and surrounding tissues. Each image provides a different cross-sectional view for diagnostic evaluation.

Figure 4. Partial response (PR) was achieved after 4 cycles of PRaG therapy, with continued tumor shrinkage on CT imaging.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Treatment timeline and efficacy assessment.

3 Discussion

This case demonstrates an exceptional and durable pathologic complete response to PRaG therapy in a patient with treatment-naïve, AFP-positive metastatic HAS—a disease with a typically grave prognosis.

3.1 Contextualizing the outcome within existing literature

The efficacy observed here starkly contrasts with historical outcomes for metastatic HAS. Standard first-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (e.g., fluoropyrimidine/platinum regimens) yields median overall survival (OS) of 8–14 months, with responses in HAS often being suboptimal and transient. The aggressive biology of HAS, frequently associated with AFP production and TP53 mutations as seen in our case, further contributes to chemoresistance (911). While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized treatment for some gastrointestinal cancers, their efficacy in microsatellite-stable (MSS) gastric cancer, including most HAS cases, remains limited as monotherapy. Our patient’s rapid progression on initial PD-1 inhibitor combination therapy underscores this limitation.

3.2 Mechanistic rationale for PRaG synergy and the abscopal effect

The profound response following PRaG therapy can be attributed to multimodal synergy. Radiotherapy, particularly SBRT, does not only locally ablate tumors but also induces immunogenic cell death, releasing tumor antigens and activating dendritic cells (DCs) (12, 16). The chosen hypofractionated schedules (e.g., 8 Gy x 3) are supported by preclinical data demonstrating optimal induction of type I interferon signaling and systemic immune activation compared to single high-dose or conventional fractionation (1618). GM-CSF acts as a critical adjuvant in this setting by promoting the maturation and migration of antigen-presenting DCs, thereby bridging innate and adaptive immunity (19). Clinical studies in melanoma have shown that adding GM-CSF to immunotherapy can improve survival outcomes (20, 21). Concurrent PD-1 blockade prevents the inactivation of newly primed T-cells, enabling a sustained systemic attack. This synergistic triad likely enabled the observed abscopal effect—the complete regression of non-irradiated liver metastases—a rare phenomenon strongly suggestive of robust systemic antitumor immunity (1315).

3.3 Clinical implications and future directions

This report provides proof-of-concept that combining radiotherapy with immune modulation (PD-1 blockade + GM-CSF) can overcome resistance in an aggressively chemorefractory tumor. It suggests that PRaG therapy warrants further investigation in selected patients with advanced HAS or other immunotherapy-resistant, MSS gastrointestinal malignancies. Future efforts must focus on identifying predictive biomarkers (beyond MSI/PD-L1) for such combinations, optimizing radiation dose/fractionation, and managing unique toxicity profiles like immune-mediated gastritis. Larger, prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and define the precise role of this multimodal approach in the therapeutic landscape.

4 Conclusion

We present a case of metastatic hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach achieving a durable pathologic complete response with PRaG therapy after failing initial treatment. This outcome highlights the potential of combining radiotherapy with dual immune modulation (PD-1 inhibition and GM-CSF) to generate potent systemic antitumor immunity, even in traditionally immunotherapy-resistant tumors. While promising, this strategy requires validation in larger clinical trials to ascertain its efficacy, safety, and optimal application.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

JL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Investigation. FY: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Data curation, Writing – original draft. LP: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Formal Analysis. YF: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Methodology, Investigation. ZZ: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Formal Analysis. XB: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Formal Analysis. JG: Project administration, Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. ZW: Project administration, Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by Guangxi TCM appropriate technology promotion project (GZSY23-56).

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2025.1726271/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary Figure 1 | Complete response (CR) was observed on CT imaging 16 months after cessation of anti-tumor therapy, with total resolution of the tumor.

References

1. Zeng XY, Yin YP, Xiao H, Zhang P, He J, Liu WZ, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach: evaluation of a pooled case series. Curr Med Sci. (2018) 38:1054–61. doi: 10.1007/s11596-018-1983-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Yang J, Wang R, Zhang W, Zhuang W, Wang M, and Tang C. Clinicopathological and prognostic characteristics of hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach. Gastroenterol Res Pract. (2014) 2014:140587. doi: 10.1155/2014/140587

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Shiozaki S, Yanagawa S, Yamamoto Y, Takei D, Oshita A, and Noriyuki T. Conversion hepatectomy after chemotherapy including nivolumab for multiple liver metastases of hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach: A case report and literature review. Int J Surg Case Rep. (2024) 125:110591. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.110591

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Topalian SL, Drake CG, and Pardoll DM. Targeting the PD-1/B7-H1(PD-L1) pathway to activate anti-tumor immunity. Curr Opin Immunol. (2012) 24:207–12. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2011.12.009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Kumar A, Taghi Khani A, Sanchez Ortiz A, and Swaminathan S. GM-CSF: A double-edged sword in cancer immunotherapy. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:901277. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.901277

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Liu Y and Kron SJ. Could senescent cells be the prescription for therapeutic cancer vaccines? Immunotherapy. (2024) 16:1091–3.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

7. Kim IW, Yoon AR, Hong J, Kasala D, and Yun CO. Synergistic antitumor immune response mediated by paclitaxel-conjugated nanohybrid oncolytic adenovirus with dendritic cell therapy. Front Immunol. (2024) 15:1355566. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1355566

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Wu M, Huang Q, Xie Y, Wu X, Ma H, Zhang Y, et al. Improvement of the anticancer efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade via combination therapy and PD-L1 regulation. J Hematol Oncol. (2022) 15:24. doi: 10.1186/s13045-022-01242-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Chen W, Peng J, Ye J, Dai W, Li G, and He Y. Aberrant AFP expression characterizes a subset of hepatocellular carcinoma with distinct gene expression patterns and inferior prognosis. J Cancer. (2020) 11:403–13. doi: 10.7150/jca.31435

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Konstantinopoulos PA, Cai M, Lee EK, Krasner C, Campos SM, Liu JF, et al. Serial circulating tumor DNA sequencing to monitor response and define acquired resistance to letrozole/abemaciclib in endometrial cancer. JCO Precis Oncol. (2025) 9:e2400882. doi: 10.1200/PO-24-00882

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Zhao W, Qiu L, Liu H, Xu Y, Zhan M, Zhang W, et al. Circulating tumor DNA as a potential prognostic and predictive biomarker during interventional therapy of unresectable primary liver cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol. (2020) 11:1065–77. doi: 10.21037/jgo-20-409

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Zhu M, Yang M, Zhang J, Yin Y, Fan X, Zhang Y, et al. Immunogenic cell death induction by ionizing radiation. Front Immunol. (2021) 12:705361. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.705361

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Welsh J, Bevelacqua JJ, Dobrzyński L, Mortazavi SAR, Farjadian SH, and Mortazavi SMJ. Abscopal effect following radiation therapy in cancer patients: A new look from the immunological point of view. J BioMed Phys Eng. (2020) 10:537–42.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

14. Yoo GS, Ahn WG, Kim SY, Kang W, Choi C, and Park HC. Radiation-induced abscopal effect and its enhancement by programmed cell death 1 blockade in the hepatocellular carcinoma: A murine model study. Clin Mol Hepatol. (2021) 27:144–56. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2020.0095

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Luke JJ, Lemons JM, Karrison TG, Pitroda SP, Melotek JM, Zha Y, et al. Safety and clinical activity of pembrolizumab and multisite stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. (2018) 36:1611–8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.2229

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Dewan MZ, Galloway AE, Kawashima N, Dewyngaert JK, Babb JS, Formenti SC, et al. Fractionated but not single-dose radiotherapy induces an immune-mediated abscopal effect when combined with anti-CTLA-4 antibody. Clin Cancer Res. (2009) 15:5379–88. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0265

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Vanpouille-Box C, Alard A, Aryankalayil MJ, Sarfraz Y, Diamond JM, Schneider RJ, et al. DNA exonuclease Trex1 regulates radiotherapy-induced tumour immunogenicity. Nat Commun. (2017) 8:15618. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15618

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Kulzer L, Rubner Y, Deloch L, Allgäuer A, Frey B, Fietkau R, et al. Norm- and hypo-fractionated radiotherapy is capable of activating human dendritic cells. J Immunotoxicol. (2014) 11:328–36. doi: 10.3109/1547691X.2014.880533

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Shi Y, Liu CH, Roberts AI, Das J, Xu G, Ren G, et al. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and T-cell responses: what we do and don’t know. Cell Res. (2006) 16:126–33. doi: 10.1038/sj.cr.7310017

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Hodi FS, Lee S, McDermott DF, Rao UN, Butterfield LH, Tarhini AA, et al. Ipilimumab plus sargramostim vs ipilimumab alone for treatment of metastatic melanoma: a randomized clinical trial. Jama. (2014) 312:1744–53. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.13943

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. O’Day SJ, Boasberg PD, Piro L, Kristedja TS, Wang HJ, Martin M, et al. Maintenance biotherapy for metastatic melanoma with interleukin-2 and granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor improves survival for patients responding to induction concurrent biochemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. (2002) 8:2775–81.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Keywords: case report, metastatic gastric cancer, pathologic complete response (pCR), PRaG therapy, refractory

Citation: Lv J, Yu F, Pan L, Fang Y, Zhong Z, Bai X, Gao J and Wei Z (2026) Case Report: Pathologic complete response to PRaG therapy in an elderly patient with refractory metastatic gastric cancer. Front. Oncol. 15:1726271. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1726271

Received: 16 October 2025; Accepted: 16 December 2025; Revised: 01 December 2025;
Published: 15 January 2026.

Edited by:

Shigao Huang, Air Force Medical University, China

Reviewed by:

Yunxiang Zhou, Zhejiang University, China
Bing Feng, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, United States

Copyright © 2026 Lv, Yu, Pan, Fang, Zhong, Bai, Gao and Wei. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Zhuxin Wei, d2Vpemh1eGluMjAxMUAxNjMuY29t

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.