Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CORRECTION article

Front. Oncol., 06 January 2026

Sec. Radiation Oncology

Volume 15 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1766619

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvancing AI Transparency and Reliability in Radiation OncologyView all 3 articles

Correction: Benchmarking GPT-5 in radiation oncology: measurable gains, but persistent need for expert oversight

This article is a correction to:

  1. Benchmarking GPT-5 in radiation oncology: measurable gains, but persistent need for expert oversight

    1. Read original article
Ugur Din,,*Ugur Dinç1,2,3*Jibak Sarkar,,Jibak Sarkar1,2,3Philipp Schubert,,Philipp Schubert1,2,3Sabine Semrau,,Sabine Semrau1,2,3Thomas Weissmann,,Thomas Weissmann1,2,3Andre Karius,,Andre Karius1,2,3Johann Brand,,Johann Brand1,2,3Bernd-Niklas Axer,,Bernd-Niklas Axer1,2,3Ahmed Gomaa,,Ahmed Gomaa1,2,3Pluvio Stephan,,Pluvio Stephan1,2,3Ishita Sheth,,Ishita Sheth1,2,3Sogand Beirami,,Sogand Beirami1,2,3Annette Schwarz,,Annette Schwarz1,2,3Udo Gaipl,,&#x;Udo Gaipl1,2,3†Benjamin Frey,,Benjamin Frey1,2,3Christoph Bert,,Christoph Bert1,2,3Stefanie Corradini,Stefanie Corradini3,4Rainer Fietkau,,Rainer Fietkau1,2,3Florian Putz,,Florian Putz1,2,3
  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
  • 2Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-Europäische Metropolregion Nürnberg (European Metropolitan Region Nuremberg) (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
  • 3Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
  • 4Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany

A Correction on
Benchmarking GPT-5 in radiation oncology: measurable gains, but persistent need for expert oversight

By Dinç U, Sarkar J, Schubert P, Semrau S, Weissmann T, Karius A, Brand J, Axer B-N, Gomaa A, Stephan P, Sheth I, Beirami S, Schwarz A, Gaipl U, Frey B, Bert C, Corradini S, Fietkau R and Putz F (2025) Front. Oncol. 15:1695468. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1695468

Author “Ugur Dinç” was erroneously spelled as “Udo S. Dinc”.

The original version of this article has been updated.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: GPt-5, artificial intelligence, radiation oncology, large language models, treatment recommendation, oncologic decision support, hallucination, real-world evaluation

Citation: Dinç U, Sarkar J, Schubert P, Semrau S, Weissmann T, Karius A, Brand J, Axer B-N, Gomaa A, Stephan P, Sheth I, Beirami S, Schwarz A, Gaipl U, Frey B, Bert C, Corradini S, Fietkau R and Putz F (2026) Correction: Benchmarking GPT-5 in radiation oncology: measurable gains, but persistent need for expert oversight. Front. Oncol. 15:1766619. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1766619

Received: 12 December 2025; Accepted: 22 December 2025; Revised: 15 December 2025;
Published: 06 January 2026.

Approved by:

Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

Copyright © 2026 Dinç, Sarkar, Schubert, Semrau, Weissmann, Karius, Brand, Axer, Gomaa, Stephan, Sheth, Beirami, Schwarz, Gaipl, Frey, Bert, Corradini, Fietkau and Putz. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Ugur Dinç, dWd1ci5kaW5jQGZhdS5kZQ==

†ORCID: Udo Gaipl, orcid.org/0000-0001-6375-5476

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.