- 1Department of Pathology and National Health Commission(NHC) Key Laboratory of Prevention and Treatment of Central High Asia Diseases Incidence, Shihezi University School of Medicine/The First Affiliated Hospital, Shihezi University, Xinjiang, China
- 2Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi University, Shihezi University, Xinjiang, China
- 3Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi University, Shihezi University, Xinjiang, China
Histiocytic sarcoma (HS), reclassified in the WHO fifth edition as a Histiocytic/dendritic cell neoplasms, represents a rare hematopoietic malignancy with extranodal predominance and aggressive clinical behavior. This study reports the case of a 53-year-old female diagnosed with primary pulmonary HS, who presented with a 60-mm mass in the right middle lobe and later developed fatal brain metastases. Using a combination of pathology, whole-exome sequencing, and fusion gene analysis, we identified key molecular drivers of tumor development and spread. Major findings include the concurrent activation of the RAS/MAPK and PI3K/mTOR pathway activation (118 combined gene variants), TP53 biallelic inactivation, HLA locus alterations, and persistent LOC285045 fusions. Drug sensitivity profiling suggested potential responses to sunitinib and MEK inhibitors. By comparing this case with nine other reported cases of lung HS, we found that lung HS has a significantly worse survival (p=0.03) than HS at other sites. A high cell growth rate (Ki-67 >30%) and large tumor size (>50 mm) were identified as critical indicators of poor prognosis.
Introduction
Histiocytic sarcoma (HS), reclassified in the fifth edition WHO criteria as a neoplasm of Histiocytic/dendritic cell neoplasms (1), represents a rare hematopoietic malignancy derived from monocyte/macrophage precursors (2). Characterized by an extranodal presentation and aggressive clinical course., HS typically demonstrates CD163+/CD68+/lysozyme+ immunophenotype with exclusion of other histiocytic or hematopoietic malignancies for definitive diagnosis (3, 4). Owing to its rarity, epidemiological data are limited. Reported cases indicate a broad age range (from 6 months to 89 years) and a potential male predominance (5).Primary pulmonary HS is exceptionally uncommon, with only nine cases documented to date (6–14). Although the molecular pathogenesis of HS is not fully elucidated, emerging evidence implicates alterations in the RAS/MAPK pathway (e.g., NF1, MAP2K1 mutations) and TP53 inactivation in disease progression (15, 16). Notably, secondary HS frequently associates with clonal relationships to B-cell lymphomas, evidenced by shared immunoglobulin gene rearrangements (17, 18), whereas primary HS lacks such lineage-specific markers (19). Diagnosis remains challenging due to the rarity of HS and its significant morphological overlap with other malignancies. Definitive diagnosis requires histopathological evaluation and immunophenotypic analysis: tumor cells exhibit CD163+, CD68+, lysozyme+, and CD4+ staining (20), while lacking markers of Langerhans cells (CD1a), follicular dendritic cells (CD21/CD35), myeloid cells (CD13/MPO), melanoma (HMB-45), or epithelial tumors (AE1/3, EMA) (21). A comprehensive differential diagnosis is essential and must exclude morphologically similar entities. These include: classical Hodgkin lymphoma [positive for CD15, CD30, and weakly positive PAX5, but negative for CD45 and histiocytic markers [CD163, CD68] (22)]; myeloid sarcoma [positive for CD13/CD33 but negative for CD163 (23)]; Rosai-Dorfman disease [strongly S100+, negative for CD1a and HLA-DR (24]; malignant melanoma [may express S100 and CD68 but characteristically positive for HMB-45/Melan-A and negative for CD163 (25, 26)]; follicular dendritic cell sarcoma [positive for CD21/CD23/CD35, negative for CD163 (27)]; diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [expresses B-cell markers [CD20/CD79a] (28)]; epithelioid sarcoma [positive for AE1/AE3, EMA, or CD34 (29)]; and pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma [expresses myogenic markers [MyoD1, myogenin] (30)]. This study investigates a 53-year-old female with primary pulmonary HS presenting as a 60-mm right middle lobe mass, The disease followed an aggressive course, resulting in fatal brain metastasis within 160 days of diagnosis. Through integrated histopathological, genomic, and fusion gene analyses, we aimed to characterize the molecular drivers of tumorigenesis and metastatic progression in this case, and to evaluate potential prognostic biomarkers. Our findings offer valuable insights into the molecular taxonomy of pulmonary HS and its therapeutic vulnerabilities, thereby contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of this aggressive malignancy.
Case presentation
A woman in her 50s was admitted with a 20-day history of persistent chest pain and fever. Initial imaging at the referring hospital revealed a large right hilar mass, approximately 6 cm in diameter, associated with multiple enlarged mediastinal and cervical lymph nodes (Figures 1A, B). Based on these findings, a preliminary diagnosis of “probable adenocarcinoma with squamous differentiation” was made. Upon transfer to our department, laboratory tests revealed hypokalemia and mild anemia. The tumor’s location (central hilar) and imaging characteristics (massive solid mass with lymphadenopathy) were consistent with pulmonary malignancy, though the specific histological type remained unclear. Differential diagnoses included primary bronchogenic carcinoma, pulmonary lymphoma, and other rare primary or metastatic tumors. A thoracoscopic right middle lobectomy was performed for definitive diagnosis and treatment. Intraoperatively, a well-defined solid mass measuring approximately 60 × 50 × 45 mm was identified. It appeared yellowish-white with moderate consistency. The surgical margins, including the visceral pleura and bronchus, were free of tumor, and no lymph node metastasis was identified. Histopathological examination of the resected specimen (Figure 1C) revealed sheets of diffusely arranged tumor cells exhibiting marked pleomorphism, including giant tumor cells, and abundant mitotic figures. These morphological features were not characteristic of a typical carcinoma or a common lymphoma. To refine the diagnosis, systematic immunohistochemical analysis was performed: AE1/3, EMA, and TTF-1 were negative, strongly ruling out lung adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma; S-100 protein was negative, essentially excluding malignant melanoma; and the myogenic marker MyoD1 was negative, also excluding rhabdomyosarcoma. Key positive findings emerged for histiocyte-associated markers: Vimentin, CD163, CD68, and Lysozyme. Additionally, abnormal expression of CD56, CD4, and CD31 was observed (Figures 1D-F). The tumor exhibited a high proliferative index, with a Ki-67 labeling index of approximately 60%. Based on these findings, a definitive diagnosis of primary pulmonary histiocytic sarcoma was rendered. The patient remained stable during approximately 3 months of postoperative follow-up. However, on postoperative day 130, the patient presented with sudden severe headache and frequent vomiting. MRI revealed an intracranial mass lesion (Figures 1G-I), suspected to be metastatic, which was later pathologically confirmed as histiocytic sarcoma. Despite resection of the metastatic lesion, the patient’s condition deteriorated rapidly. This was complicated by increased intracranial pressure leading to cerebral herniation and subsequent central respiratory failure. The patient unfortunately passed away on postoperative day 160. The total disease course from symptom onset to death was approximately 180 days, highlighting the extreme aggressiveness and poor prognosis of this disease.
Figure 1. Imaging findings and histopathological microscopic observations of the tumor explanation. (A) Chest radiograph showing a mass in the middle lobe of the right lung. (B) CT scan (arterial enhancement phase) showing a 6 cm mass in the middle lobe of the right lung. (C) Histological examination (HE staining) reveals diffuse infiltration of tumor cells into the pulmonary parenchyma with marked cellular atypia and pleomorphism. The neoplastic cells are arranged in sheets, exhibiting hyperchromatic nuclei and prominent intercellular clefting. Multinucleated giant cells and spindle-shaped tumor cells are observed (400×). (D) CD68(+): a marker of macrophages and histiocytes. (E) Immunohistochemistry positive for CD4. (F) CD163(+): a specific histiocyte marker. (G) MRI reveals intracranial metastatic lesions. (H, I) Histological features (HE staining) and immunohistochemical profiles of the metastases are concordant with the primary tumor.
Comparison and Prognosis
Primary pulmonary histiocytic sarcoma (HS) is exceedingly rare, with only nine cases reported to date (6–14) (Table 1). Our analysis indicates that primary pulmonary HS carries a significantly worse prognosis compared to HS arising from other extranodal sites (mean survival <1 year, p=0.03). This is notably shorter than the reported median survival range of 6 to 16 months for primary HS (regardless of site) overall (31, 32). Beyond anatomic location, disease extent and resectability are critical determinants of outcome. patients with multifocal disease have a markedly inferior median overall survival (10 months) compared to those with unifocal disease (50 months) (32). Furthermore, complete surgical resection of localized lesions (e.g., in cervical lymph nodes, stomach, or skin) can lead to long-term survival, exceeding 2, 4, or even 8 years (33–35). Against this backdrop, the dismal outcome in our patient (survival of 160 days) underscores the particularly aggressive nature of primary pulmonary HS presenting. High Ki-67 proliferation index inversely correlated with survival (correlation coefficient=-0.82, p=0.01). Tumor size >50 mm also predicted poor outcomes (p=0.02). ROC analysis identified optimal prognostic thresholds: Ki-67 >30% and tumor size >50 mm. However, limited sample size necessitates further validation.
Somatic SNV/indel analysis
SNV and Indel detection employ the mutect2 toolkit within the GATK software package. Preprocessing involves utilizing Picard for deduplication (Mark Duplicates) and base quality recalibration based on the alignment outcomes of Clean Reads against the reference genome. This safeguards the accuracy of detecting somatic SNVs and Indels. The primary tumor harbored 48 somatic variants in the RAS/MAPK pathway (Supplementary Table S1), including Indels (RASA1, PTPN11, MAPK3, CACNA1, CDH2) and SNVs (HGF, PTPN11, FLT1, MAP2K1, NF1). Additionally, 70 variants were identified in the PI3K/mTOR pathway (Supplementary Table S2), involving Indels (COL9, FGFR4, HGF, JAK3, SGK2) and SNVs (COL9, FOXO3, MYB, PIK3R6, JAK3). Other notable findings included epigenetic dysregulation (EZH2 and ATRX SNVs), TP53 mutations (Indel and SNV), and HLA-related SNVs (HLA-G, HLA-E, HLA-DRA, HLA-DQA, HLA-DPB1). Key negative results included absence of KRAS mutations, CDKN2A copy number loss, MDM2/CDK4 amplifications, and lymphoma-associated mutations (MYD88, CD79B, BCL6, L265P).
CNV/LOH analysis
To detect the B Allele Frequency (BAF) at Somatic CNV and SNV loci, Control-FREEC (Boeva V et al., 2011) software is utilized. The primary tumor exhibited recurrent amplifications in 16 chromosomal regions, including 7q21.12 (encompassing CDK6), 22q13.33, 2q37.3, 6p25.3, 17p13.3 (containing TP53), 21p11.2, 16p13.3, 10q23.31, 9q34.3 (spanning NOTCH1), 4p16.3, 13q13.3, 5q35.3, 17q22, 15q13.1, 11q24.2, and 16q22.1 (G-score >5.1, q-value <0.25), with no significant deletions detected (Figures 2A-C). In contrast, the brain metastasis demonstrated deletions in 6p11.2 (HLA region), 1p34.3 (harboring MYCL), and 7q11.21 (including ELN), but lacked prominent amplifications compared to the primary pulmonary lesion (Figures 2D-F).
Figure 2. Analysis of CNV/LOH and fusion genes. (A) comparison of CNV and LOH between primary lung lesion and adjacent normal tissue. The horizontal axis represents distinct chromosomes. In the upper panel, red denotes copy number gain, blue signifies copy number loss, and green indicates no detectable change. (B) Copy Number Variations in Primary Lung Lesion Compared to Adjacent Normal Tissue. The left vertical axis denotes chromosome numbers, and the right vertical axis indicates chromosomal positions of CNV. The lower horizontal axis represents significance levels (-log10[q-value]), while the upper horizontal axis displays G-scores of variations (incorporating magnitude and inter-sample frequency). The green line marks the significance threshold (q-value = 0.25). (C) Copy Number Loss in Primary Lung Lesion Compared to Adjacent Normal Tissue. (D-F) Comparison of CNV and LOH between Metastatic Lesions and Primary Lung Lesion. (G) Fusion Genes in Primary Lung Lesion Compared to Adjacent Normal Tissue. Red lines represent intrachromosomal fusion events (occurring within the same chromosome), while green lines denote interchromosomal fusion events (occurring between distinct chromosomes). (H) Fusion Genes in Metastatic Lesion Compared to Primary Lung Lesion.
Driver genes and predisposition
The detection of germline mutations (SNV, InDel) in a patient’s normal tissue using the Haplotype Caller tool of the GATK software is followed by a comparison of the detected mutated genes with the CGC (Cancer Gene Census) database. OncodriveCLUST analysis identified NBPF10 as a driver gene in the primary tumor (36), characterized by six non-synonymous mutations clustered within three functional domains (P < 0.05, Q < 0.05), meeting the criteria for driver gene classification (Supplementary Table S3). In contrast, no significant driver genes were detected in the metastasis compared to the primary lesion. Additionally, five potential Pan-cancer cancer predisposition genes were identified in the primary tumor: MUC6 (12 pathogenic loci), FAT1 (2 loci), KDR (2 loci), BARD1 (1 locus), and MPL (1 locus) (Supplementary Table S4).
Fusion genes
The detection of fusion genes in tumor exomes is primarily conducted using FusionMap software. Gene fusion identification is performed separately for tumor samples and normal samples, with fusion genes that also appear in the paired normal samples from tumor samples being excluded. The primary tumor demonstrated high-frequency LOC285045 fusions (122 events), with partners including PRKCE, WNT6, and HOXD family genes. Other notable fusions included HBB-HBD and FTH1-RSF1 (Figure 2G). Metastatic lesions exhibited persistent LOC285045 fusions (168 events) alongside novel events such as USP6-TBC1D3, CT45/CT47, and GOLGA8 family fusions (Figure 2H, Supplementary Tables S5, S6).
Drug sensitivity
IMPACT (Integrate Molecular Profiles with Actionable Therapeutics) is used to predict treatment outcomes in clinical studies. By mining the National Cancer Institute (NCI)-Match, MD Anderson Personalized Cancer Therapy (PCT), and DSigDB databases, it matches mutated genes with FDA (Food and Drug Administration) approved targeted drugs. Comprehensively compare multiple databases, among which in the group of “DSigDB FDA Approved Kinase Inhibitors” identified four FDA-approved targeted therapies: Sunitinib (FLT1 inhibitor), Pazopanib, Vandetanib, and Axitinib, supported by FLT1 SNVs in the primary tumor. Subsequently, the database was expanded to search for more potential therapeutic targets, and combined with National Cancer Institute (NCI)-Match and MD Anderson Personalized Cancer Therapy (PCT), the potential target prediction analysis was conducted, Analysis of the overall genetic variation profile suggested potential efficacy for conventional chemotherapeutic agents. Dactinomycin(p = 0) and methotrexate(p = 0.004) showed the strongest in-silico signals, linked to 24 and 31 potential targets, respectively. Doxorubicin Hydrochloride was also significantly associated (p = 0.014) and has 104 potential targets. The activation of the RAS/MAPK pathway additionally indicated that Sorafenib tosylate might have potential therapeutic effects (p = 0.005, 42 potential targets) (Table 2). No biomarkers predictive of immune checkpoint inhibitor response were detected.
Discussion
Histiocytic Sarcoma (HS) is an extremely rare and aggressive malignancy, as underscored by this case of a 53-year-old female with rapid central nervous system metastasis and a fatal outcome. Our case of primary pulmonary HS, along with the review of nine previously reported cases, reveals a critical contradiction: despite its classification within the typically more indolent primary HS subgroup (18, 37),. HS originating in the lungs exhibits exceptionally aggressive behavior and poor prognosis.
Owing to the scarcity of cases, no specific or universal molecular alterations have been definitively established for histiocytic sarcoma (15). Common alterations include BRAF V600E mutations, RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway activation, TP53 mutations, MYC amplification, and CDKN2A deletion (15, 16). Monoclonal IgH rearrangements are frequent in secondary HS, while primary HS predominantly involves RAS/MAPK pathway mutations, notably NF1 and MAP2K1 alterations (15). Atypical molecular features have also been documented. For instance, Montalvo et al. reported a case with microsatellite stability and a low tumor mutational burden (2 mut/Mb) harboring mutations in FLT3, NOTCH2, and KMT2A (38). Other sporadic alterations include ATM, LRRK2, MYO18A, SETBP1, NOD1, TSC1, NTRK1, CBL, NOTCH1, and KMT2 mutations of uncertain significance (38). In the present case, genomic profiling revealed co-activation of the RAS/MAPK pathway (48 variants) and the PI3K/mTOR pathway (70 variants). Notably, RASA1, MAP2K1, and NF1 mutations partially overlapped with prior HS reports (15). We review previous studies, molecular profiling of 16 secondary HS cases associated with lymphoid malignancies revealed RAS/MAPK pathway gene mutations in 14/16 cases, including KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, MAP2K1, and NF1, indicating that FL-associated secondary HS frequently share a similar mutational profile (39). Furthermore, a comprehensive genomic study of 21 primary HS cases utilizing whole-exome and RNA sequencing identified alterations in RAS/RAF/MAPK pathway genes in all cases (100%), including NF1, MAP2K1, PTPN11, BRAF, KRAS, NRAS, and LZTR1 (40). This study further classified cases into two molecular subgroups based on gene expression: one associated with NF1/PTPN11 abnormalities, and the other linked to B-cell lymphoma-associated gene mutations and clonal immunoglobulin gene rearrangements. This conclusion and the classification basis were further confirmed in this case of primary lung HS. In our case, biallelic inactivation of TP53 (via indel/SNV) and single nucleotide variants in HLA loci (HLA-G, HLA-E, HLA-DRA) were identified, which may contribute to genomic instability and immune evasion. Given the rarity of this case, we have made detailed records of it. Although its significance is still at an initial stage, this detailed record is intended to provide a potential clue for future collaborative research.
Copy number amplifications at 17p13.3 (TP53) and 7q21.12 (CDK6) in the primary lesion correlated with a high Ki-67 index (60%), reflecting uncontrolled proliferation. The recurrent LOC285045 fusion in both primary (122 reads) and metastatic lesions (168 reads) suggests a core oncogenic role. While its precise mechanistic role requires functional validation, its consistent presence underscores its potential importance in both tumorigenesis and metastatic progression. Notably, the brain metastasis exhibited focal deletions absent in the primary tumor. HLA-I is frequently lost in various types of cancer, including colorectal cancer (CRC), leading to tumor immune escape by cytotoxic T lymphocytes during the natural history of cancer development (41). Although there is insufficient evidence to show that the MYCL genotype is associated with tumor progression or poorer prognosis, LOH at MYCL is significantly correlated with regional lymph node metastasis and advanced TNM stage (42). ELN is a core component of elastic fibers, and it is beneficial for extracellular matrix integrity. Its absence may have facilitated the infiltration of the central nervous system (43). Although these specificities were previously not reported in HS, their simultaneous occurrence during metastasis may suggest that they are crucial for successful metastatic colonization. The USP6-TBC1D3 fusion may promote invasion via RAS signaling or cytoskeletal remodeling. TBC1D3, as a tumor-specific oncogene, can enhance the activation of RAS (44). Furthermore, USP6 evolved through the fusion of the TBC1D3 and USP32 genes. Therefore, the USP6 protein retains the homologous domain of TBC1D3 (45). Therefore, we hypothesize that the novel USP6-TBC1D3 fusion identified in the metastatic lesion may have contributed to the aggressive phenotype, potentially facilitating central nervous system metastasis through mechanisms such as enhanced RAS signaling or cytoskeletal remodeling. Functional studies are warranted to validate this potential role.
Pharmacogenomic analysis identified actionable targets (e.g., FLT1 SNVs supporting sunitinib; Activation of the RAS/MAPK pathway indicates sorafenib sulfonate), though the absence of immune checkpoint markers limits immunotherapy options (27). Recent advances in molecular subtyping of HS have opened new avenues for targeted therapeutic strategies. HS cases harboring activating mutations in genes such as MAP2K1 or PTPN11 have demonstrated sensitivity to MEK inhibitors (e.g., trametinib) (46), in secondary HS, the combination of dabrafenib targeting the BRAF V600E mutation with trametinib has successfully induced sustained remission (47). Additionally, therapies targeting other molecules are increasingly mature. For instance, in patients harboring PTEN mutations, the mTOR inhibitor sirolimus serves as an effective treatment option (48). The functional significance of the LOC285045 variant identified here remains uncertain, highlighting the need for functional validation and investigation in larger cohorts.
Given the rarity of HS, no standardized treatment protocol has been established. Complete surgical resection remains the cornerstone of management for localized disease. Regarding targeted therapies, agents such as sunitinib (an FLT1 inhibitor), pazopanib, vandetanib, and axitinib may hold therapeutic potential. Analysis using DSigDB linked potential platinum sensitivity to mutations in APEX1, CHD2, and TP53. The presence of activating alterations in MAP2K1 and NTRK1 suggests potential efficacy of MEK inhibitors (e.g., trametinib) or TRK inhibitors (e.g., larotrectinib), respectively. For advanced disease, the CHOP regimen (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) is commonly employed (49), although a definitive survival benefit has not been conclusively demonstrated (50). PD-L1 overexpression was reported in 3 of 12 cases by Facchetti et al., suggesting a potential role for immunotherapy in a subset of patients (27), however, supporting evidence remains limited. Postoperative adjuvant therapy and chemotherapy remain controversial due to HS’s high-grade malignancy and cellular maturity. Current therapeutic insights, which are largely derived from case reports and small series, necessitate validation through larger, collaborative studies.
Data availability statement
The human genomic sequencing data generated during this study are not publicly available due to patient privacy and ethical restrictions. De-identified, derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request for the purpose of validating the results. Any data sharing will be subject to the approval of the relevant ethics committee and the execution of a formal data use agreement.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by The Medical Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi University School of Medicine, Shihezi University. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article. Written informed consent was obtained from the participant/patient(s) for the publication of this case report.
Author contributions
KC: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. RW: Methodology, Data curation, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Investigation. JW: Methodology, Supervision, Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Formal Analysis. KY: Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Project administration. CL: Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Formal Analysis, Data curation, Project administration. HZ: Writing – review & editing. LT: Writing – review & editing. LY: Writing – review & editing. LM: Writing – review & editing. JH: Project administration, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Data curation, Supervision, Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Software, Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition, Validation, Resources, Visualization, Investigation. LZ: Data curation, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. WN: Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by grants from Key Basic Research Projects in Xinjiang (No. 2025DA017),Key scientific and technological research projects in Xinjiang (Grant No.2023AB058),National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.82460597), Basic Research Project of Shihezi University (No.MSPY202407).
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2026.1636634/full#supplementary-material
References
1. Vardiman JW. The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors of the hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues: an overview with emphasis on the myeloid neoplasms. Chem Biol Interact. (2010) 184:16–20. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2009.10.009
2. Tocut M, Vaknine H, Potachenko P, Elias S, and Zandman-Goddard G. Histiocytic sarcoma. Isr Med Assoc J. (2020) 22:645–7. Available online at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33070490
3. Hung YP and Qian X. Histiocytic sarcoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med. (2020) 144:650–4. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0349-RS
4. Takahashi E and Nakamura S. Histiocytic sarcoma: an updated literature review based on the 2008 WHO classification. J Clin Exp Hematop. (2013) 53:1–8. doi: 10.3960/jslrt.53.1
5. Kommalapati A, Tella SH, Durkin M, Go RS, and Goyal G. Histiocytic sarcoma: a population-based analysis of incidence, demographic disparities, and long-term outcomes. Blood. (2018) 131:265–8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-10-812495
6. Hornick JL, Jaffe ES, and Fletcher CD. Extranodal histiocytic sarcoma: clinicopathologic analysis of 14 cases of a rare epithelioid Malignancy. Am J Surg Pathol. (2004) 28:1133–44. doi: 10.1097/01.pas.0000131541.95394.23
7. Buonocore S, Valente AL, Nightingale D, Bogart J, and Souid AK. Histiocytic sarcoma in a 3-year-old male: a case report. Pediatrics. (2005) 116:e322–5. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0026
8. Stacher E, Beham-Schmid C, Terpe HJ, Simiantonaki N, and Popper HH. Pulmonary histiocytic sarcoma mimicking pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis in a young adult presenting with spontaneous pneumothorax: a potential diagnostic pitfall. Virchows Arch. (2009) 455:187–90. doi: 10.1007/s00428-009-0801-3
9. Tomita S., Ogura G., Inomoto C., Kajiwara H., Masuda R., Iwazaki M., et al. Histiocytic sarcoma originating in the lung in a 16-year-old male. J Clin Exp Hematop. (2015) 55:45–9. doi: 10.3960/jslrt.55.45
10. Mehrotra S and Pan Z. Fine needle aspiration cytology of histiocytic sarcoma with dendritic cell differentiation: a case of transdifferentiation from low-grade follicular lymphoma. Diagn Cytopathol. (2015) 43:659–63. doi: 10.1002/dc.23285
11. Pan Y and Zhang Y. Simultaneous brain and lung histiocytic sarcoma revealed on 18F-FDG PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med. (2018) 43:65–7. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000001908
12. Jhuang JY, Chen WY, and Chuang SS. Primary mediastinal histiocytic sarcoma presenting as pleural effusion. Diagn Cytopathol. (2018) 46:790–3. doi: 10.1002/dc.23963
13. Bellalah A, Korbi I, Ben Hammouda S, Achour A, Ben Abdeljelil N, Njima M, et al. Small bowel and lung histiocytic sarcoma revealed by acute peritonitis: A case report with review of literature. Ann Med Surg (Lond). (2021) 68:102638. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102638
14. Lin Y, Cao Q, Hong A, and Liang X. Primary pulmonary histiocytic sarcoma with high PD-L1 expression benefited from immunotherapy: A case report and bioinformatic analysis. Clin Respir J. (2024) 18:e13741. doi: 10.1111/crj.13741
15. Egan C, Nicolae A, Lack J, Chung H. J., Skarshaug S, Pham T. A., et al. Genomic profiling of primary histiocytic sarcoma reveals two molecular subgroups. Haematologica. (2020) 105:951–60. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2019.230375
16. Wang E., Hutchinson C. B., Huang Q., Sebastian S., Rehder C., Kanaly A., et al. Histiocytic sarcoma arising in indolent small B-cell lymphoma: report of two cases with molecular/genetic evidence suggestive of a ‘transdifferentiation’ during the clonal evolution. Leuk Lymphoma. (2010) 51:802–12. doi: 10.3109/10428191003699845
17. Shao H., Xi L., Raffeld M., Feldman A. L., Ketterling R. P., Knudson R., et al. Clonally related histiocytic/dendritic cell sarcoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma: a study of seven cases. Mod Pathol. (2011) 24:1421–32. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2011.102
18. Broadwater D. R., Conant J. L., Czuchlewski D. R., Hall J. M., Wei S., Siegal G. P., et al. Clinicopathologic features and clinical outcome differences in de novo versus secondary histiocytic sarcomas: A multi-institutional experience and review of the literature. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. (2018) 18:e427–35. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2018.07.286
19. Michonneau D., Kaltenbach S., Derrieux C., Trinquand A., Brouzes C., Gibault L., et al. BRAF(V600E) mutation in a histiocytic sarcoma arising from hairy cell leukemia. J Clin Oncol. (2014) 32:e117–21. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.49.0078
20. Trevisan F, Xavier CA, Pinto CA, Cattete FG, Stock FS, and Martins ML. Case report of cutaneous histiocytic sarcoma: diagnostic and therapeutic dilemmas. Bras Dermatol. (2013) 88:807–10. doi: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20132070
21. Vos JA, Abbondanzo SL, Barekman CL, Andriko JW, Miettinen M, and Aguilera NS. Histiocytic sarcoma: a study of five cases including the histiocyte marker CD163. Mod Pathol. (2005) 18:693–704. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3800346
22. Skala SL, Lucas DR, and Dewar R. Histiocytic sarcoma: review, discussion of transformation from B-cell lymphoma, and differential diagnosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med. (2018) 142:1322–9. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0220-RA
23. Pileri S. A., Ascani S., Cox M. C., Campidelli C., Bacci F., Piccioli M., et al. Myeloid sarcoma: clinico-pathologic, phenotypic and cytogenetic analysis of 92 adult patients. Leukemia. (2007) 21:340–50. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404491
24. Feldman A. L., Arber D. A., Pittaluga S., Martinez A., Burke J. S., Raffeld M., et al. Clonally related follicular lymphomas and histiocytic/dendritic cell sarcomas: evidence for transdifferentiation of the follicular lymphoma clone. Blood. (2008) 111:5433–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-11-124792
25. Cabrera R and Recule F. Unusual clinical presentations of Malignant melanoma: A review of clinical and histologic features with special emphasis on dermatoscopic findings. Am J Clin Dermatol. (2018) 19:15–23. doi: 10.1007/s40257-018-0373-6
26. Sanchez JA and Robinson WA. Malignant melanoma. Annu Rev Med. (1993) 44:335–42. doi: 10.1146/annurev.me.44.020193.002003
27. Facchetti F., Pileri S. A., Lorenzi L., Tabanelli V., Rimsza L., Pittaluga S., et al. Histiocytic and dendritic cell neoplasms: what have we learnt by studying 67 cases. Virchows Arch. (2017) 471:467–89. doi: 10.1007/s00428-017-2176-1
28. Parikh S. A., Rabe K. G., Call T. G., Zent C. S., Habermann T. M., Ding W., et al. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (Richter syndrome) in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL): a cohort study of newly diagnosed patients. Br J Haematol. (2013) 162:774–82. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12458
29. Hollmann TJ and Hornick JL. INI1-deficient tumors: diagnostic features and molecular genetics. Am J Surg Pathol. (2011) 35:e47–63. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31822b325b
30. Furlong MA, Mentzel T, and Fanburg-Smith JC. Pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma in adults: a clinicopathologic study of 38 cases with emphasis on morphologic variants and recent skeletal muscle-specific markers. Mod Pathol. (2001) 14:595–603. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3880357
31. Zhang M. Y., Xiao F., Fang J. C., Liu Z. B., Shen Y. Y., Zhu D., et al. Long-term remission with novel combined immune-targeted treatment for histiocytic sarcoma accompanied by follicular lymphoma: case report and literature review. Int J Mol Sci. (2024) 25:8. doi: 10.3390/ijms25137293
32. Ruan G. J., Zanwar S., Ravindran A., Schram S., Abeykoon J. P., Hazim A., et al. Clinical characteristics, molecular aberrations, treatments, and outcomes of Malignant histiocytosis. Am J Hematol. (2024) 99:871–9. doi: 10.1002/ajh.27263
33. Kubota A., Ishida Y., Hashiguchi J., Sato R., Wada T., Bandoh N., et al. A case of primary histiocytic sarcoma arising from a neck lymph node. Article. ENT-Ear Nose Throat J. (2025) 104:NP54–8. doi: 10.1177/01455613221097200
34. Sharma S, Das P, Dinda AK, and Gupta DK. Disseminated histiocytic sarcoma in a child: a clinicopathological dichotomy with 8 years survival. BMJ Case Rep. (2016) 2016. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2015-213871
35. Hanaoka T, Jingu K, Tochigi T, Hoshino I, Uematu T, and Matsubara H. A case of G-CSF-producing histiocytic sarcoma of the stomach. Article. Int Surg. (2015) 100:568–73. doi: 10.9738/intsurg-d-14-00023.1
36. Tamborero D, Gonzalez-Perez A, and Lopez-Bigas N. OncodriveCLUST: exploiting the positional clustering of somatic mutations to identify cancer genes. Bioinf. (2013) 29:2238–44. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt395
37. Shimono J., Miyoshi H., Arakawa F., Sato K., Furuta T., Muto R., et al. Prognostic factors for histiocytic and dendritic cell neoplasms. Oncotarget. (2017) 8:98723–32. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.21920
38. Montalvo N, Lara-Endara J, Redroban L, Leiva M, Armijos C, and Russo L. Primary splenic histiocytic sarcoma associated with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: A case report and review of literature of next-generation sequencing involving FLT3, NOTCH2, and KMT2A mutations. Cancer Rep (Hoboken). (2022) 5:e1496. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1496
39. Egan C., Lack J., Skarshaug S., Pham T. A., Abdullaev Z., Xi L. Q., et al. The mutational landscape of histiocytic sarcoma associated with lymphoid Malignancy. Article. Mod Pathol. (2021) 34:336–47. doi: 10.1038/s41379-020-00673-x
40. Egan C., Nicolae A., Lack J., Chung H. J., Skarshaug S., Pham T. A., et al. Genomic profiling of primary histiocytic sarcoma reveals two molecular subgroups. Article. Haematologica. (2020) 105:951–60. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2019.230375
41. Anderson P, Aptsiauri N, Ruiz-Cabello F, and Garrido F. HLA class I loss in colorectal cancer: implications for immune escape and immunotherapy. Review. Cell Mol Immunol. (2021) 18:556–65. doi: 10.1038/s41423-021-00634-7
42. Fong KM, Kida Y, Zimmerman PV, and Smith PJ. MYCL genotypes and loss of heterozygosity in non-small-cell lung cancer. Article. Br J Cancer. (1996) 74:1975–8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1996.662
43. Fang T., Zhang L., Yin X., Wang Y., Zhang X., Bian X., et al. The prognostic marker elastin correlates with epithelial-mesenchymal transition and vimentin-positive fibroblasts in gastric cancer. J Pathol Clin Res. (2023) 9:56–72. doi: 10.1002/cjp2.298
44. Wainszelbaum M. J., Charron A. J., Kong C., Kirkpatrick D. S., Srikanth P., Barbieri M. A., et al. The hominoid-specific oncogene TBC1D3 activates ras and modulates epidermal growth factor receptor signaling and trafficking. Article. J Biol Chem. (2008) 283:13233–42. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M800234200
45. Paulding CA, Ruvolo M, and Haber DA. The Tre2 (USP6) oncogene is a hominoid-specific gene. Article. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2003) 100:2507–11. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0437015100
46. Gounder MM, Solit DB, and Tap WD. Trametinib in histiocytic sarcoma with an activating MAP2K1 (MEK1) mutation. N Engl J Med. (2018) 378:1945–7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1511490
47. Tan SL, Ho BLS, Yew TT, and Yunus D. An 8-year-old girl with secondary histiocytic sarcoma with BRAF(V600) mutation following T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia demonstrating stable disease for 3 years on dabrafenib and trametinib - a case report and literature review. BMC Pediatr. (2025) 25:178. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05539-2
48. Chohan K. L., Abeykoon J. P., Young J. R., Tobin W. O., Koster M. J., Shah M. V., et al. Sirolimus as frontline therapy for PTEN-mutated histiocytic sarcoma. Haematologica. (2023) 108:1702–6. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2022.282207
49. Ansari J., Naqash A. R., Munker R., El-Osta H., Master S., Cotelingam J. D., et al. Histiocytic sarcoma as a secondary Malignancy: pathobiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Eur J Haematol. (2016) 97:9–16. doi: 10.1111/ejh.12755
Keywords: case report, fusion genes, histiocytic sarcoma, molecular profiling, pulmonary neoplasms
Citation: Chen K, Zhang L, Wu R, Wei J, Yang K, Luo C, Zhang H, Tao L, Yang L, Meng L, Nong W and Hu J (2026) Primary pulmonary histiocytic sarcoma with CNS metastasis: a case report and molecular profiling insights. Front. Oncol. 16:1636634. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2026.1636634
Received: 07 July 2025; Accepted: 23 January 2026; Revised: 05 December 2025;
Published: 06 February 2026.
Edited by:
Lizza E.L. Hendriks, Maastricht University Medical Centre, NetherlandsReviewed by:
Thomas Simon, University of Southern California, United StatesStefano Testa, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Cancer Center, United States
Copyright © 2026 Chen, Zhang, Wu, Wei, Yang, Luo, Zhang, Tao, Yang, Meng, Nong and Hu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jianming Hu, amlhbm1pbmcuMTIwQDE2My5jb20=; Lian Meng, NDExMjExODg0QHFxLmNvbQ==; Weixia Nong, bnd4X2dvb2RAMTI2LmNvbQ==
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
Lei Zhang2†