ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Gynecological Oncology
Phase I Study of Niraparib with Radiotherapy for Treatment of Metastatic and Locally Advanced Invasive Carcinoma of the Cervix (NIVIX)
Piyush Pathak 1
Eunji Jo 2
Susan Hilsenbeck 2
Matthew Anderson 3
Alfredo Echeverria 1
Shelly Sharma 1
Jan Sunde 4
Tracilyn Hall 4
Anthony Costales 4
Claire Hoppenot 4
Michelle Ludwig 1
1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
2. Department of Biostatistics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, United States
4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Introduction: This Phase I study evaluated the safety and tolerability of concurrent niraparib, an oral poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) 1/2 inhibitor, with definitive radiotherapy in women with locally advanced or platinum-sensitive metastatic cervical cancer. Dose escalation followed a Bayesian Optimal Interval (BOIN) design with a target dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate of 30%. Methods: Women ≥18 years with FIGO stage IIIC2 (bulky nodes >1 cm) or stage IV cervical cancer demonstrating response to platinum-based induction chemotherapy were eligible. Niraparib 100 mg was administered daily concurrent with pelvic radiotherapy (45–57.5 Gy via IMRT with nodal boosts) and brachytherapy, continuing 28 days post-radiation. Per the BOIN design, dose escalation occurred if the observed DLT rate fell below the pre-specified boundary of 0.2365; de-escalation occurred if it exceeded 0.3585. DLTs were defined per protocol as grade ≥4 non-hematologic toxicity, grade 4 thrombocytopenia ≥14 days, grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia with bleeding, or toxicity causing >28-day niraparib delay or >2-day radiation delay. Results: Four patients were enrolled at the 100 mg dose level before study closure due to slow accrual and anticipated changes in standard of care. Two patients (NVX-1, NVX-4) completed concurrent niraparib without protocol-defined DLT. Two patients (NVX-2, NVX-3) discontinued niraparib due to treatment-limiting grade 2 thrombocytopenia (CTCAE v4.0; nadirs 71,000/μL and 53,000/μL); these events did not meet protocol DLT criteria, and no bleeding occurred. The observed DLT rate of 0/4 (0%) fell below the escalation boundary; however, the study closed before dose escalation. Both patients who discontinued had baseline platelet counts <150,000/μL and significant comorbidities (HIV/cirrhosis; suspected chemotherapy-related marrow injury), whereas the two who completed therapy had counts >250,000/μL. All patients completed radiotherapy and achieved local disease control at minimum 12-month follow-up. Conclusion: Concurrent niraparib 100 mg with pelvic radiotherapy was feasible without protocol-defined DLTs. Treatment-limiting grade 2 thrombocytopenia occurred in patients with identifiable risk factors including low baseline platelet counts, hepatic dysfunction, and low body weight. These hypothesis-generating findings support further investigation with attention to patient selection criteria in future trials combining PARP inhibitors with radiotherapy.
Summary
Keywords
Brachytherapy, Cervix cancer, niraparib, PARP inhibitior, Radiotherapy
Received
31 July 2025
Accepted
17 February 2026
Copyright
© 2026 Pathak, Jo, Hilsenbeck, Anderson, Echeverria, Sharma, Sunde, Hall, Costales, Hoppenot and Ludwig. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Piyush Pathak
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.