Zhigang Fu1†
Gengda Huang
Yuan Wang
Jiexia Zhang- 1The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Foshan, China
- 2Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Department of Respiration, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- 3Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital,Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- 4Department of Pulmonary and Critial Care Medicine of Jiangbei Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- 5Department of Pulmonary and Critial Care Medicine of Jiangbei Campus,The First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
SMARCA4-deficient non-small cell lung cancer (SMARCA4-dNSCLC) is an aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis, rarely harboring EGFR, ALK, or ROS1 alterations. We report an advanced SMARCA4-dNSCLC case with brain metastasis exhibiting a novel CTNND2-ALK/EML4-ALK double-fusion. Following platinum-based chemotherapy and brain radiotherapy, next-generation sequencing identified the dual fusions (abundances: 2.6% and 5.2%), confirmed by ALK protein expression. The patient subsequently received ceritinib (750 mg/day). After 3 months, targeted lesions regressed significantly, and progression-free survival exceeded 24 months with ongoing response. This demonstrates efficacy of the ALK inhibitor ceritinib in ALK-rearranged SMARCA4-dNSCLC and underscores the clinical value of genomic-guided therapy.
Introduction
The switch/sucrose non-fermenting (SWI/SNF) complex acts as a tumor suppressor across diverse biological processes (1), with subunit aberrations occurring in ∼20% of human cancers (2). SMARCA4, located at 19q13, encodes BRG1-an essential ATPase subunit of this complex. Thoracic SMARCA4-deficient tumors are classified as either SMARCA4-deficient non-small cell lung cancers (SMARCA4-dNSCLCs) or SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated thoracic tumors (SMARCA4-UTs). The 2021 WHO classification designates SMARCA4-UT as a distinct entity due to its unique histologic, immunohistochemical, and clinical features (3).
BRG1 protein loss, with or without SMARCA4 mutations, affects 5-10% of NSCLCs, predominantly in male heavy smokers (4). Unlike conventional NSCLC, SMARCA4-dNSCLCs and SMARCA4-UT rarely harbor actionable drivers (e.g., EGFR, ALK, or ROS1) (5, 6), lack standard therapies, and confer poorer prognoses (5). While single EML4-ALK fusions occur in ~5% of NSCLCs, double ALK fusions involving EML4-ALK plus another partner (e.g., CTNND2) are exceptionally rare and may exhibit distinct drug sensitivity profiles (7).
Here, we report the first documented case of advanced SMARCA4-dNSCLC with a novel CTNND2-ALK/EML4-ALK double-fusion, demonstrating sustained response to first-line ceritinib.
Case presentation
A 51-year-old male with a 30-pack-year smoking history presented with chest pain, productive cough, and hemoptysis persisting for one month. Family history included laryngeal cancer (mother) and colorectal cancer (elder sister). The patient’s initial ECOG performance status was 1, with no comorbidities or concomitant medications. Aside from long-term smoking, he reported no alcohol consumption or occupational exposures related to lung cancer. Contrast-enhanced chest computed tomography (CT) revealed a 4.8 × 3.5 cm mass in the right lower lobe with associated hilar/mediastinal lymphadenopathy, obstructive pneumonia, and emphysema (Figures 1A-C). Brain MRI demonstrated a 1.2 cm metastatic lesion in the right frontal lobe (Figure 1D). These baseline CT and MRI scans were obtained prior to any treatment, including chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Bronchoscopic biopsy of the lung mass showed poorly differentiated carcinoma arranged in solid sheets and nest-like structures, with tumor cells displaying round-to-oval nuclei, occasional nucleoli, abundant cytoplasm, focal discohesion, and areas of necrosis. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) exhibited: Weak positivity (1+, <10% of tumor cells) for P63, cytokeratin (CK), and focal weak TTF-1; Positive Ki67 (proliferation index 30%); Negative staining for P40, Napsin A, ERG, CD31, SOX-2, SMARCA4, and SMARCA2 (Figures 2A-H). Both SMARCA4 and SMARCA2 exhibited complete nuclear loss in all tumor cells, with preserved nuclear expression in internal non-neoplastic elements, confirming adequate staining quality and true loss of BRG1/BRM expression. Ventana ALK IHC (D5F3) confirmed strong ALK protein expression (Figure 2I). PD-L1 IHC showed a tumor proportion score <1%. The epithelial morphology together with the epithelial marker profile supported the diagnosis of SMARCA4-deficient NSCLC, and SMARCA4-deficient thoracic sarcoma was excluded due to retained epithelial differentiation and absence of sarcomatoid features. The patient was staged as IV (cT2bN2M1) with synchronous brain metastasis.
Figure 1. Treatment response on imaging. (A-C): Baseline chest computed tomography (CT) scans at diagnosis showing (A) a 4.8 cm (longest diameter) ×3.5 cm mass in the right lower lobe (white arrow), (B) obstructive pneumonia, and (C) enlarged hilar/mediastinal lymph nodes (arrowheads). (D): Baseline brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealing a metastatic lesion in the right frontal lobe (red arrow). Lower panels: Follow-up imaging at 3, 9, and 24 months after initiation of ceritinib (note: one cycle of platinum-based chemotherapy and whole-brain radiotherapy were administered between baseline imaging and the start of ceritinib) demonstrating (A–C) significant regression of the primary mass (2.4 cm × 1.2 cm at 3 months, yellow arrow), resolution of obstructive pneumonia, and reduced lymphadenopathy; and (D) complete resolution of the brain metastasis. RECIST assessment: The primary target lesion’s longest diameter decreased by 50% (from 4.8 cm to 2.4 cm), meeting partial response (PR) by RECIST 1.1 criteria (≥30% decrease in the sum of longest diameters of target lesions). The intracranial lesion met criteria for complete response on MRI.
Figure 2. Histopathological and immunophenotypic features. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining (A) revealed poorly differentiated tumor morphology, while immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated weak positivity for P63 (G), cytokeratin [CK, (D)], and TTF-1 (E); and negative immunoreactivity for P40 (F), SOX-2 (H), SMARCA4 (B), and SMARCA2 (C), with Ventana IHC confirming positive ALK protein expression [(I), D5F3 antibody] - consistent with SMARCA4-deficient NSCLC harboring ALK rearrangement. Scale bar: 100 μm; original image field = 750 μm × 750 μm; original magnification ×200.
Following diagnosis, the patient underwent one cycle of platinum-based chemotherapy (carboplatin AUC5 + pemetrexed 500mg/m²) and whole-brain radiotherapy (30 Gy/10 fractions). Capture-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) using a 1021-gene panel (Geneplus Technology) on FFPE tumor tissue revealed dual ALK fusions: CTNND2-ALK (exon 2:20) at 2.6% allele frequency, EML4-ALK (exon 13:20) at 5.2% allele frequency (Table 1; Figures 3A, B) and identified a coexisting TP53 p.R273L mutation. No other actionable alterations were detected. This was corroborated by strong ALK positivity on Ventana IHC (D5F3 clone, Figure 2I).
Table 1. Somatic mutations detected by next-generation sequencing, HGVS, Human Genome Variation Society.
Figure 3. Molecular characterization of CTNND2-ALK fusion. (A) Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) visualization of next-generation sequencing reads demonstrating the CTNND2-ALK fusion junction. Arrows indicate the breakpoint between CTNND2 exon 2 and ALK exon 20. (B) Schematic representation of the novel CTNND2-ALK (exon 2:20) fusion protein structure: the N-terminal domain of CTNND2 is fused to the intact intracellular kinase domain of ALK.
Given the presence of dual ALK rearrangements with synchronous brain metastasis and the proven systemic and intracranial efficacy of ceritinib demonstrated in the ASCEND-4 trial (8), first-line ceritinib (750 mg daily, as used in ASCEND-4) was initiated. At 3-month assessment, chest CT showed 75% reduction in the primary lesion (2.4×1.2 cm vs. baseline 4.8×3.5 cm), resolved obstructive pneumonia, and regressed lymphadenopathy (Figures 1A-C, lower panels). Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) confirmed complete remission of the metastatic lesion (Figure 1D). RECIST 1.1 criteria defined partial response (PR: target lesion sum diameter decrease >30%). Continued ceritinib treatment resulted in further regression of the primary mass to 1.1 cm at 9 months. During follow-up, the patient’s symptoms gradually improved, and his ECOG performance status returned to 0. At last follow-up (24+months), the patient maintains progression-free survival with ongoing treatment response and no grade ≥2 adverse events (CTCAE v5.0 criteria).
Discussion
We report the first documented case of SMARCA4-deficient lung adenocarcinoma harboring dual ALK fusions (CTNND2-ALK/EML4-ALK) with sustained response to ceritinib, providing critical evidence for ALK-targeted therapy in this aggressive subtype.
SMARCA4-dNSCLC diagnosis relies on BRG1 protein loss by IHC or SMARCA4 mutations by NGS, though truncating mutations drive BRG1 deficiency more consistently than missense variants (81% vs. 0% loss rates) (5, 9). Our case showed BRG1 loss without detectable SMARCA4 mutations, potentially due to non-mutational mechanisms or NGS panel limitations (10). Genomically, SMARCA4-dNSCLC typically harbors TP53/KRAS/STK11/KEAP1 alterations but rarely actionable fusions (9). Prior ALK-rearranged SDTT reports involved only SMARCA4-UT (not NSCLC) responding to alectinib (9), while our TP53-mutated case represents true SMARCA4-dNSCLC. The co-occurrence of SMARCA4 deficiency with two distinct ALK rearrangements is biologically uncommon, potentially reflecting the heightened genomic instability associated with SWI/SNF complex dysfunction (11). Despite the aggressive phenotype typically attributed to SMARCA4 loss, the patient exhibited a profound and durable response to ceritinib, indicating that ALK signaling remained the dominant oncogenic driver in this tumor (12).
Notably, CTNND2-ALK (exon2:20) is a novel fusion retaining ALK’s kinase domain. CTNND2 (5p15) encodes an adhesion protein overexpressed in cancers (13), potentially enhancing oncogenicity when fused to ALK. Although current NCCN guidelines preferentially recommend alectinib or brigatinib for first-line therapy in ALK-positive NSCLC, ceritinib remains an evidence-based and guideline-supported option with demonstrated systemic and intracranial activity. In this case, treatment selection was made based on the robust efficacy signals from ASCEND-4, the patient’s clinical status with symptomatic brain metastasis, and institutional therapeutic considerations at the time of decision-making. Therefore, ceritinib was chosen as a clinically appropriate and guideline-supported first-line therapy (8).
Although complex ALK rearrangements may confer resistance (9, 13), our patient achieved 24-month PFS with ceritinib. We hypothesize that: (i) the preserved ALK kinase domain in both fusions maintains ceritinib binding affinity; (ii) concurrent radiotherapy may have eliminated resistant subclones; and (iii) the EML4-ALK (E13:A20) variant has high intrinsic TKI sensitivity (14, 15).
Although the patient received one cycle of platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy and whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) before the NGS results became available, we acknowledge that these induction treatments may introduce some confounding effects when interpreting the early radiologic response. Nevertheless, several considerations suggest that their overall influence on long-term outcomes was limited. First, a single cycle of platinum-based chemotherapy typically produces modest and short-lived responses in ALK-positive NSCLC and would not be expected to account for the profound and durable tumor shrinkage observed over more than 24 months. Second, WBRT can explain the remission of the intracranial lesion but cannot account for the marked and continued regression of the thoracic disease. Third, the depth, speed, and persistence of response-including further tumor shrinkage beyond the initial three months-are highly characteristic of ALK-TKI-driven therapeutic benefit rather than cytotoxic chemotherapy. Nonetheless, the absence of intermediate imaging between induction therapy and ceritinib initiation remains a limitation.
The observed discordance between the low DNA VAF and strong ALK protein expression likely reflects sampling heterogeneity and the greater biological relevance of RNA or protein-level expression for ALK-driven oncogenesis. Although RNA-based NGS or FISH would provide ideal orthogonal validation, these assays were not performed due to patient-related constraints, and this has been acknowledged as a limitation.
This case establishes ceritinib’s efficacy in ALK-rearranged SMARCA4-dNSCLC and underscores NGS’s vital role in identifying targetable drivers in molecularly complex tumors.
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.Written informed consent was obtained from the participant/patient(s) for the publication of this case report.
Author contributions
ZF: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. GH: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JX: Data curation, Writing – original draft. LL: Data curation, Writing – original draft. QR: Data curation, Writing – original draft. HH: Data curation, Writing – original draft. YW: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. JZ: Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by the Beijing Medical and Health Foundation and the Wu Jieping Medical Foundation (Grant No. 320.6750.2020-10-51). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation of results, or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Abbreviations
SMARCA4-dNSCLC, SMARCA4-deficient non-small cell lung cancer; CT, computed tomography; IHC, Immunohistochemistry; NGS, next-generation sequencing; MRI, Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
References
1. Roberts CWM and Orkin SH. The SWI/SNF complex--chromatin and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. (2004) 4:133–42. doi: 10.1038/nrc1273
2. Mittal P and Roberts CWM. The SWI/SNF complex in cancer - biology, biomarkers and therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. (2020) 17:435–48. doi: 10.1038/s41571-020-0357-3
3. Nicholson AG, Tsao MS, Beasley MB, Borczuk AC, Brambilla E, Cooper WA, et al. The 2021 WHO classification of lung tumors: impact of advances since 2015. J Thorac Oncol. (2022) 17:362–87. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.11.003
4. Velut Y, Decroix E, Blons H, Alifano M, Leroy K, Petitprez F, et al. SMARCA4-deficient lung carcinoma is an aggressive tumor highly infiltrated by FOXP3+ cells and neutrophils. Lung Cancer. (2022) 169:13–21. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.05.001
5. Schoenfeld AJ, Bandlamudi C, Lavery JA, Montecalvo J, Namakydoust A, Rizvi H, et al. The genomic landscape of SMARCA4 alterations and associations with outcomes in patients with lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. (2020) 26:5701–8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-1825
6. Shi M, Pang L, Zhou H, Mo S, Sheng J, Zhang Y, et al. Rare SMARCA4-deficient thoracic tumor: Insights into molecular characterization and optimal therapeutics methods. Lung Cancer. (2024) 192:107818. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107818
7. Luo J, Gu D, Lu H, Liu S, and Kong J. Coexistence of a novel PRKCB-ALK, EML4-ALK double-fusion in a lung adenocarcinoma patient and response to crizotinib. J Thorac Oncol. (2019) 14:e266–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.07.021
8. Soria JC, Tan DSW, Chiari R, Wu YL, Paz-Ares L, Wolf J, et al. First-line ceritinib versus platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (ASCEND-4): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet (London England). (2017) 389:917–29. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30123-X
9. Dagogo-Jack I, Schrock AB, Kem M, Jessop N, Lee J, Ali SM, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics of BRG1-deficient NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol. (2020) 15:766–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.01.002
10. Agaimy A, Fuchs F, Moskalev EA, Sirbu H, Hartmann A, and Haller F. SMARCA4-deficient pulmonary adenocarcinoma: clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular characteristics of a novel aggressive neoplasm with a consistent TTF1neg/CK7pos/HepPar-1pos immunophenotype. Virchows Arch. (2017) 471:599–609. doi: 10.1007/s00428-017-2148-5
11. Ribeiro-Silva C, Vermeulen W, and Lans H. SWI/SNF: Complex complexes in genome stability and cancer. DNA Repair (Amst). (2019) 77:87–95. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2019.03.007
12. Pan Y, Yan L, Wang S, Li H, and Chen Q. Case Report: Ensartinib as a first-line treatment for SMARCA4-deficient and EML4-ALK non-small cell lung cancer. Front Oncol. (2025) 15. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1530142
13. Nopparat J, Zhang J, Lu JP, Chen YH, Zheng D, Neufer PD, et al. δ-Catenin, a Wnt/β-catenin modulator, reveals inducible mutagenesis promoting cancer cell survival adaptation and metabolic reprogramming. Oncogene. (2015) 34:1542–52. doi: 10.1038/onc.2014.89
14. Song L, Yan H, Xu Q, Zhou C, Liang J, Lin S, et al. Analysis of baseline molecular factors associated with the risk of central nervous system progression among alectinib-treated patients with ALK-positive NSCLC. JTO Clin Res Rep. (2024) 5:100729. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100729
Keywords: ALK double-fusion, ceritinib, CTNND2-ALK, NSCLC, SMARCA4-dNSCLC
Citation: Fu Z, Huang G, Xie J, Luo L, Ren Q, He H, Wang Y and Zhang J (2026) Ceritinib efficacy in SMARCA4-deficient NSCLC harboring novel CTNND2 ALK/EML4-ALK fusion: case report. Front. Oncol. 16:1680523. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2026.1680523
Received: 06 August 2025; Accepted: 14 January 2026; Revised: 07 December 2025;
Published: 28 January 2026.
Edited by:
Matiullah Khan, AIMST University, MalaysiaReviewed by:
Valentina Masciale, University Hospital of Modena, ItalyZhe Tang, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China
Mina Maksimos Maksimos, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, United States
Copyright © 2026 Fu, Huang, Xie, Luo, Ren, He, Wang and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yuan Wang, WXVhbldhbmd4ejE5OTJAMTI2LmNvbQ==; Jiexia Zhang, ZHJ6anhjbkAxMjYuY29t
†These authors have contributed equally to this work