Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Gynecological Oncology

Transvaginal Ultrasound-Detected Endometrial echogenicity heterogeneity in Diagnosing Endometrial Carcinoma: Risk Factors and Nomogram-Based Prediction Model

Provisionally accepted
Ling  YanLing Yan1Jianxia  SunJianxia Sun1Shengping  YangShengping Yang2Dingyi  WangDingyi Wang1Xiaowen  ZuoXiaowen Zuo1Mingming  ZhangMingming Zhang1Can  ZhangCan Zhang1Ting  ZhangTing Zhang1Huaping  JiaHuaping Jia1*
  • 1Department of Ultrasound Diagnosis, The Ninth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, 739621, Beijing, China
  • 2Obstetrics Department, Heze Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Heze, 274000 China, Heze, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: This study aimed to develop a nomogram prediction model based on risk factors associated with endometrial cancer (EC) diagnosed via transvaginal ultrasound (TVS)-detected non-uniform echogenicity. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 564 female patients (control group: normal/benign lesions, n = 475; observation group: EC, n = 89) was conducted. TVS findings were compared with pathological diagnoses, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to assess diagnostic performance. Patients were split 7:3 into training and internal validation sets. Multivariate logistic regression identified predictors for nomogram construction, which was validated for performance and utility. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis was applied for model interpretability, and clinical cases were used for demonstration. Results: The area under the curve (AUC) of TVS detection of endometrial echogenicity heterogeneity for EC diagnosis was 0.726. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that body mass index (BMI), hypertension, diabetes, age at menopause > 50 years, and non-uniform echogenicity were risk factors for EC. The prediction model constructed demonstrated good calibration performance in the training set and excellent discrimination ability and stable predictive consistency in the internal validation set. Decision curve analysis further confirmed its clinical utility. SHAP analysis of the established nomogram revealed that age at menopause and heterogeneous endometrial echogenicity were the most influential predictors in the model, with echogenicity heterogeneity consistently associated with an increased risk of EC. When the nomogram predicted an EC probability of ≥0.5, the number of predicted positive cases was 93 (17.03%), showing no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) from the 89 actually confirmed EC cases (16.30%). This indicates a high agreement between model predictions and actual outcomes. Conclusion: TVS detection of heterogeneous endometrial echogenicity holds supplementary diagnostic value for EC. The nomogram model constructed in this study integrates key clinical and sonographic features, demonstrating favorable predictive performance and clinical applicability. SHAP analysis confirmed that echogenicity heterogeneity and age at menopause are important predictors, enhancing the model's interpretability. This tool aids in early identification of high-risk patients and provides a reference for clinical decision-making.

Keywords: diagnosis, endometrial cancer, Endometrial echogenicity, Risk factors, transvaginal ultrasound

Received: 08 Aug 2025; Accepted: 26 Jan 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Yan, Sun, Yang, Wang, Zuo, Zhang, Zhang, Zhang and Jia. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Huaping Jia

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.