ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention
This article is part of the Research TopicStrategies to Improve Awareness and Management of Cancer Risk Factors and ScreeningsView all 15 articles
Patients' Knowledge, Attitudes, Preferences Regarding Kidney Cancer Screening, and Factors Influencing Participation Intentions: A Qualitative Study
Provisionally accepted
- Chengdu Third People's Hospital, Chengdu, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Screening is a crucial method for improving the early detection rate of Kidney Cancer (KC). Numerous challenges currently exist in the promotion and implementation of KC screening. As direct participants in the screening and diagnostic process, KC patients possess a deeper understanding of the screening procedures. Clarifying patients' attitudes and preferences toward KC screening is particularly important for optimizing screening policies. Methods: This study employed purposive sampling to select KC patients as research subjects. Using the phenomenological research method within qualitative research, semi-structured interviews were conducted to gather participants' attitudes and preferences regarding KC screening. Data analysis was performed using Colaizzi's seven-step method to extract themes related to KC screening. Results: This study identified 7 themes and 29 subthemes centered on three core dimensions: "Attitudes and Preferences Toward KC Screening," "Factors Influencing Participation in KC Screening," and "Access to Screening Information." Recognition of screening value (including 3 sub-themes: intervention in disease progression, screening necessity for asymptomatic individuals, screening demand among high-risk populations); screening method focus dimensions and selection preferences (including 5 sub-themes: accuracy, convenience, safety, affordability, scientific validity). Facilitating factors (including 5 sub-themes: health consciousness, positive social support, risk awareness motivation, authoritative advice, and convenient screening opportunities); Barriers (including 6 sub-themes: complacency, time constraints, information resource limitations, financial burden, psychological avoidance, accuracy concerns). Information Acquisition Channels (including 4 sub-themes: healthcare provider communication, online media, interpersonal exchange, physical promotional materials); Healthcare Provider Assistance (including 3 sub-themes: process guidance, accessible information delivery, psychological counseling); Preferred Screening Promotion Channels (including 3 sub-themes: offline promotional events, online science communication, public welfare activities).Conclusions: This study clarifies renal cancer patients' attitudes and preferences regarding renal cancer screening, as well as the factors influencing their participation in screening, providing a reference for optimizing screening strategies. The study recommends that future efforts should integrate public needs by implementing risk stratification, optimizing screening technologies, improving healthcare coverage mechanisms, simplifying service procedures, strengthening public risk education, and emphasizing psychological counseling. These measures will enhance participation rates and implementation effectiveness of renal cancer screening.
Keywords: attitudes, Influencing factors, perceptions, Preferences, Renal cell carcinoma, screening
Received: 04 Sep 2025; Accepted: 09 Feb 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Ma, Liu, Zhuo and Xi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Xiang Xi
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.