ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Breast Cancer
A real-world comparison study of the efficacy of dual-target first-line rescue treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive advanced breast cancer: Trastuzumab combined with pertuzumab versus trastuzumab combined with pyrotinib
Liang Zhang
Chao Li
Shubin Song
Wang Fukai
Tingting Ding
Zhengrui Liu
Yuqin Jin
Zhiyong Yu
Shandong First Medical University Cancer Hospital, Jinan, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Abstract. Trastuzumab combined with pertuzumab (HP) is a first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer (ABC). However, trastuzumab combined with pyrotinib (HPyr) could also exert complementary and synergistic effects. Currently, clinical trials directly comparing the effectiveness of the above two treatment approaches are lacking. Herein, a registered single-center, retrospective study (NCT04609540) was caried out. In the present study, patients diagnosed with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive ABC and treated with dual-target first-line rescue treatment at the Shandong Cancer Hospital between January 2018 and February 2023 were included. Patients were assigned to the HP or HPyr treatment groups by the physician-in-charge. The clinical, pathological and prognostic data of all patients were collected and recorded. Among the 89 patients included, 47 received HP, while the remaining 42 HPyr. The therapeutic effect of each treatment approach was determined via evaluating progression-free survival (PFS). The results showed that patients who were treated with HPyr displayed a higher progression rate (71.4% vs. 63.8%) compared with those treated with HP. However, statistical significance was not reached (mean PFS, 21.0±1.9 vs. 24.1±2.8 months; P=0.653). In addition, patients of >60 years old, who received HPyr and younger patients (≤40 years old) who received HP had longer PFS (22.8±4.9 vs. 16.8±4.2 months; P=0.332; and 27.4±5.5 vs. 15.8±5.6 months; P=0.098, respectively). PFS without significant differences was also obtained in the other subgroups. Furthermore, HP showed better clinical efficacy in young patients compared with older ones, while HPyr benefitted older patients. In the other subgroups, the two dual-target regimens also displayed curative effects, without significant differences. Overall, the results of the current study suggested that HPyr could be equivalently used as HP, as a first-line treatment strategy for patients with HER2-positive ABC. Currently, more prospective large-sample studies are needed to further validate our conclusions.
Summary
Keywords
Advanced breast cancer, first-line therapy, Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, Monoclonal antibody, tyrosine kinase inhibitor
Received
08 October 2025
Accepted
20 February 2026
Copyright
© 2026 Zhang, Li, Song, Fukai, Ding, Liu, Jin and Yu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Zhiyong Yu
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.