Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention

Screening children and adolescents for cutaneous malignant melanoma: the impossible trade-off between life-years saved and unnecessary biopsies

Provisionally accepted
Lauro  BucchiLauro Bucchi1Silvia  ManciniSilvia Mancini1Pietro  CerettiPietro Ceretti2Federica  ZamagniFederica Zamagni1Emanuele  CrocettiEmanuele Crocetti1LUIGINO  DAL MASOLUIGINO DAL MASO3Stefano  FerrettiStefano Ferretti4Flavia  BaldacchiniFlavia Baldacchini1Orietta  GiulianiOrietta Giuliani1Alessandra  RavaioliAlessandra Ravaioli1Rosa  VattiatoRosa Vattiato1Giuliano  CarrozziGiuliano Carrozzi5Maria  MichiaraMaria Michiara6Antonino  MusolinoAntonino Musolino1Fabio  FalciniFabio Falcini1Ignazio  StanganelliIgnazio Stanganelli1*
  • 1IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy
  • 2Universita degli Studi di Parma, Parma, Italy
  • 3Centro di Riferimento Oncologico IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
  • 4Universita degli Studi di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
  • 5Azienda Unita Sanitaria Locale di Modena, Modena, Italy
  • 6Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction In Europe, insufficient data exist to assess the magnitude and results of screening practice for cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) among children and adolescents. In this population-based study covering part of the Emilia-Romagna Region (northern Italy), multiple indicators of screening for CMM by patient age were evaluated. Methods The current population of the study area is over 2,600,000. The records of patients with CMM (2003-2017) were extracted from the Emilia-Romagna Cancer Registry. The records of dermatologic office visits and skin biopsies were downloaded from the outpatient healthcare database of the Regional Administration. Patient age was grouped as 0-19 (children and adolescents), 20-39, 40-59, 60-79, and ≥80 years. The study endpoint were in situ/invasive CMM incidence rate, Breslow tumour thickness distribution, mortality rate, dermatologic office visit rate, skin biopsy rate, number (of patients) needed to visit (NNV) and biopsy (NNB) to detect a case of disease, and the potential number of life-years saved, equivalent to the number of years of life expectancy left at diagnosis. Results Data for 11,679 patients, 4,593,988 dermatologic office visits and 849,343 skin biopsies were obtained. Patients aged 0-19 years (n=51) accounted for 0.4% of total incident CMM cases, 0.3% of total deaths from CMM, and 1.4% of total potential number of life-years saved. The annual dermatologic office visit rate at age 0-19 years was 9.2%. The NNV was 11,362.2 at age 0-19 years versus 305.6 in the middle-aged group of 40-59 years (ratio, 37.2). The NNB was 681.5 and 66.4, respectively (ratio, 10.3). The total potential number of life-years saved was 2939.9 versus 98,382.2, respectively (ratio, 0.03). Conclusion When screening children and adolescents for CMM, a trade-off between life-years saved and unnecessary biopsies is impossible to make because of the minimal prevalence and the ill-defined clinical/dermoscopic features of the disease.

Keywords: adolescents, Biopsy, Children, Cutaneous malignant melanoma, Mass Screening, Overtreatment

Received: 16 Oct 2025; Accepted: 02 Feb 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Bucchi, Mancini, Ceretti, Zamagni, Crocetti, DAL MASO, Ferretti, Baldacchini, Giuliani, Ravaioli, Vattiato, Carrozzi, Michiara, Musolino, Falcini and Stanganelli. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Ignazio Stanganelli

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.