Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

REVIEW article

Front. Oncol., 30 January 2026

Sec. Cancer Molecular Targets and Therapeutics

Volume 16 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1744928

The methyltransferase METTL16 in digestive system cancers: functions and mechanisms

Jia Li,&#x;Jia Li1,2†Yueyuan Bao,&#x;Yueyuan Bao1,2†Fei Yao*Fei Yao3*Qingming Wu,*Qingming Wu1,4*
  • 1Institute of Infection Immunology and Tumor Microenvironment, School of Medicine, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
  • 2Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Occupational Hazard Identification and Control, School of Medicine, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
  • 3Scientific Research Office, Wuchang Hospital, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
  • 4Department of Gastroenterology, Tianyou Hospital, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

N6-methyladenosine (m6A) methylation, the most prevalent mRNA modification, affects RNA transcription, splicing, and stability. Methyltransferase-like 16 (METTL16), a novel m6A methyltransferase, regulates the expression of target mRNAs via m6A-mediated modifications. The methyltransferase domain of METTL16 is essential for its catalytic activity. In addition to acting as a methyltransferase, METTL16 can also facilitate mRNA translation in an m6A-independent manner, thus regulating cancer development and progression. Accumulating evidence has indicated that METTL16 plays a pivotal role in the progression of various cancers by regulating cell proliferation, apoptosis, metastasis, and resistance to chemotherapy. In this review, we provide a narrative review of the functions of METTL16 and summarize its oncogenic and tumor-suppressive functions as well as its underlying mechanisms in human digestive system cancers. However, further in-depth studies are required to validate these findings. By comprehensively summarizing the current literature on METTL16, we provide a theoretical basis for its application as a diagnostic and prognostic marker as well as a potential therapeutic target for digestive system cancers.

1 Introduction

Digestive system cancers rank among the most common malignant tumors, mainly include esophageal cancer, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, liver cancer, pancreatic cancer, gallbladder cancer (1). Malignant tumors of the digestive system characterized by high incidence, high mortality and poor prognosis, the 5-year survival rate of patients is generally lower than that of other common cancers (2). Digestive system cancers are mainly treated with surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, which early-stage symptoms are insidious, and often diagnosed at the middle or advanced stage, resulting in unsatisfactory treatment outcomes (3). Therefore, investigating the specific mechanisms of the occurrence and progression of digestive system cancers and identifying new therapeutic targets are crucial for improving the patients survival rate.

The occurrence and development mechanism of digestive system cancers involves changes in genetics, epigenetics and transcriptomics, among which epigenetic modifications have received extensive attention in recent years (4). Relevant studies have indicated the chemical modification of nucleotides plays important roles in regulating cancer-related biological processes (5). Over 170 chemical modifications in various RNAs have been identified (6), among which the N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification is one of the most prevalent (7, 8). The m6A modification, first discovered in1974 (9), has been observed in yeast, plants, flies, bacteria, humans, and other mammals (10, 11). The m6A modification is a dynamic and reversible process catalyzed by m6A methyltransferases (writers), recognized by RNA-binding proteins (readers), and eliminated by demethylases (erasers) (1214). Accumulating evidence indicates that the m6A modification regulates target gene expression by altering mRNA splicing, stability, translation, and export (1517). Dysregulation of m6A participates in the malignant progression of digestive system cancers by regulating oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes (1820).

Several studies have focused on human m6A writers, with the methyltransferase-like 3 (METTL3)/methyltransferase-like 14 (METTL14) complex being the earliest identified methyltransferase (18). This complex is formed in the cytoplasm and localized in the nucleus (19), where it is recruited to target sites with the aid of accessory proteins, such as WTAP, RBM15, VIRMA, and ZC3H13, to regulate cellular m6A levels (20, 21). Methyltransferase-like 16 (METTL16), a newly discovered RNA methyltransferase, has attracted considerable attention. METTL16 is a highly conserved protein that is distributed in the nucleus and cytoplasm (22, 23). It was initially believed to be a ribosomal RNA methyltransferase (24) and has been confirmed to catalyze m6A formation on many substrate RNAs, including methionine adenosyltransferase 2A (MAT2A) (25), U6 small nuclear RNA (U6 snRNA) (26), and other RNAs. Compared with the METTL3/METTL14 complex, METTL16 is a monomer with unique structures that can methylate double-stranded RNA and interact with multiple RNAs (27).

Regarding its function, numerous studies have demonstrated that METTL16 plays a key role in proliferation, invasion, metastasis, and drug resistance in digestive system cancers in an m6A-dependent or -independent manner (28, 29). In this review, we explored recent studies on METTL16 and digestive system cancers, and summarized the roles and underlying mechanisms of METTL16 in the occurrence and development of digestive system tumors, providing a theoretical basis for its application in cancer treatment.

2 METTL16 substrates

METTL16 has been reported to interact with mRNA and noncoding RNA (30), among which MAT2A, U6 snRNA, and MALAT1 have been the most extensively studied.

S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) is a primary cell methylation donor, and MAT2A encodes SAM synthetase in most human cells (31, 32). METTL16 binds to the hairpin structure of the 3′ UTR of MAT2A and modulates the splicing and expression of MAT2A mRNA, thereby regulating intracellular SAM levels (26, 31, 33). At elevated SAM concentrations, METTL16 briefly binds to the hairpin structure of hp1 for catalytic methylation and then rapidly dissociates, thereby preserving the intronic isoform of MAT2A mRNA. Conversely, low levels of SAM extend the residence time of METTL16 on hp1, stimulating the splicing of MAT2A, producing more mature MAT2A mRNA, and supplementing SAM levels (26).

METTL16 is a methyltransferase of U6 snRNA (34, 35). Pendleton et al. demonstrated that METTL16 methylates U6 snRNA at A43 by incubating purified recombinant METTL16 methyltransferase domain with radiolabeled U6 snRNA at position A43 (26). Aoyama et al. found that the C-terminal VCR increased the affinity and interaction of METTL16 with U6 snRNA. Specifically, the interaction between the VCR and the internal stem-loop within the U6 snRNA can induce a conformational rearrangement of U6 snRNA A43, altering the RNA structure to effectively facilitate the methylation of U6 snRNA by the methyltransferase domain (36). Taken together, these studies indicates that METTL16 is a pivotal RNA methyltransferase responsible for U6 snRNA methylation.

Metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (MALAT1) is an oncogenic long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) involved in the development of various cancers (3739). Brown et al. first demonstrated that METTL16 can specifically recognize and bind the 3′-terminal triple helix structure of MALAT1. However, the VCR domain of METTL16 was critical for this binding to occur (40). In addition, m6A-modified adenosine was found at position 8290 in MALAT1 near the METTL16-MALAT1 interaction site, although it appeared to have been deposited by METTL3/14 (41). Breger et al. found that the MALAT1 triple helix lacks the UACAGAGAA nonamer motif present in the U6 snRNA and MAT2A hairpins; therefore, the MALAT1 triple helix cannot be methylated by METTL16 (35). The purpose and function of METTL16 binding to the MALAT1 triple-helix complex are currently unknown, METTL16 may play a role in independent methylation.

3 The role and mechanism of METTL16 in human digestive system cancers

METTL16 can regulate gene expressions through m6A-dependent and m6A-independent approach. On the one hand, it catalyzes the m6A modification of specific RNA substrates, and regulates the biological functions of tumor cells by altering mRNA splicing, stability, translation, and export. On the other hand, METTL16 directly interacts with eIF3a/b, significantly enhancing translation efficiency. The gain or loss of function mutations in METTL16 does not affect its interaction with eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 a/b (eIF3a/b), indicating that the promotion of translation by METTL16 is independent. Many studies have shown that METTL16 plays an important role in the development and progression of human cancers (Figure 1)and could serve as a diagnostic and prognostic marker as well as a therapeutic target for cancers (4244). We reviewed the roles and mechanisms (such as signalling pathways) of METTL16 in digestive system cancers (Table 1) to provide a theoretical basis for further research and clinical treatment.

Figure 1
Illustration of different types of cancer associated with METTL16 and N^6-methyladenosine (m^6A). It includes colorectal cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, bladder cancer, thyroid carcinoma, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, lung cancer, gastric cancer, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Organs are depicted with marked tumor regions, surrounding the central text about METTL16 and m^6A.

Figure 1. Schematic overview of METTL16 in human cancers, including cholangiocarcinoma, bladder cancer, thyroid carcinoma, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, lung cancer, gastric cancer, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and colorectal cancer.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Role of METTL16 in digestive system cancers.

3.1 Hepatocellular carcinoma

Liver cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide (2), among which hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type. METTL16 levels are elevated in HCC tissues and are correlated with poor patient prognosis. The overexpression of METTL16 promotes HCC cell migration, invasion, and proliferation and inhibits cell apoptosis, indicating its carcinogenic effects. Mechanistically, METTL16 directly binds to the tumor suppressor lncRNA RAB11B-AS1 and catalyzes m6A methylation, reducing its stability and expression. The overexpression of RAB11B-AS1 reverses the carcinogenic effects of METTL16 in HCC (29). METTL16 has also been reported to bind lnc-CSMD1-7, destabilizing it and inhibiting its binding to the splicing factor RNA binding fox-1 homolog 2 (RBFOX2), thereby promoting HCC cell migration (45). In addition, Wang et al. found that METTL16 downregulated lncRNA TIALD by catalyzing its m6A modification and reduced its RNA stability, thereby inhibiting the degradation of the oncogene aurora kinase A (AURKA) and ultimately promoting HCC migration and the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process (46). Moreover, METTL16 is highly expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma stem cells (CSCs), where it promotes ribosomal RNA maturation and regulates mRNA translation by interacting with eIF3a, thereby accelerating the self-renewal of CSCs and promoting HCC progression (47). In summary, METTL16 plays an important role in the progression of HCC (Figure 2).

Figure 2
Diagram illustrating the role of METTL16 in cellular processes. METTL16 binds to RAB11B-AS1 and Lnc-CSMD1-7, affecting their stability through m6A methylation. This interaction regulates RAB11B-AS1 stability, leading to HCC progression, and Lnc-CSMD1-7 affects RBFOX2 and EMT processes. METTL16 also influences TIALD stability and Aurora A degradation.

Figure 2. Schematic summary of the oncogenic roles of METTL16 in HCC. METTL16 promotes the progression of HCC by regulating the expression of RAB11B-AS1, Lnc-CSMD1–7 and TIALD in a m6A-dependent manner.

3.2 Colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common malignancy of the digestive system that has the third-highest incidence rate and the second-highest mortality rate (48). METTL16 is highly expressed in CRC tissues compared to adjacent tissues and is significantly correlated with tumor size, lymph node metastasis, and tumor clinical grade (45). Mechanistically, Li et al. demonstrated that increased METTL16 promotes the m6A modification of autophagy associated 1 (SOGA1) mRNA, enhancing its mRNA stability in an insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 1 (IGF2BP1)-dependent manner, triggering mitotic progression, and promoting CRC progression (49). In addition, Wei et al. also found that METTL16 could facilitate the m6A modification of SOGA1 mRNA. Subsequently, SOGA1 inhibits AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activity and upregulates the expression of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 4 (PDK4), a key enzyme in glucose metabolism, thus promoting CRC metabolic reprogramming and progression (42). And the latest research supports that the highly expressed METTL16 promotes CRC progression and is related to the poor prognosis of patients (50), these studies indicate that METTL16, as a pro-carcinogenic factor, promotes the development and progression of CRC.

3.3 Pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) accounts for 85% to 90% of pancreatic cancers, with the most malignant and the poorest prognosis (51). It was reported that METTL16 is downregulated in PDAC, and its overexpression enhances the expression and stability of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (CDKN1A) (p21) through m6A modification, delaying the G1 phase transition and exerting a strong inhibitory effect on PDAC (52). Another study revealed a longer overall survival in patients with PDAC with higher METTL16 expression. METTL16 mediates the m6A modification of dishevelled segment polarity protein 2 (DVL2) mRNA, a key protein in the Wnt signaling pathway, suppressing the migration and invasion of PDAC cells by inhibiting the activation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway (53). Furthermore, Lu et al. demonstrated that METTL16 expression is markedly reduced in PDAC tissues and plays a crucial role in regulating the tumor microenvironment. Gain-of-function experiments indicated an abundance of native B and CD8+ T cells, a decrease in M0 macrophages, and reduced expression of the immune checkpoint PD-L1 in the high METTL16 expression group (54). Zeng et al. showed that METTL16 represses the exonuclease activity of meiotic recombination 11 (MRE11) in a methyltransferase-independent manner, inhibiting DNA terminal resection. METTL16 is phosphorylated following DNA damage, which leads to conformational changes in RNA binding and reduces the interaction between METTL16 and MRE11, thereby promoting damaged DNA cleavage and accelerating the cellular homologous recombination (HR) repair process of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (55). However, the specific mechanism through which METTL16 regulates the PDAC tumor microenvironment remains unclear. Collectively, these findings indicate that METTL16 plays a tumor-suppressive role in PDAC and may be a therapeutic and prognostic biomarker (Figure 3).

Figure 3
Diagram illustrating the role of METTL16 in cell cycle regulation and cancer progression. METTL16 affects m6A methylation on P21 and DVL2 mRNAs, leading to G1 phase arrest and DNA repair involvement. Downstream, DVL2 interacts with β-catenin, influencing cell proliferation, metastasis, and survival, contributing to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDCA) progression.

Figure 3. Schematic summary of the tumor-suppressive roles of METTL16 in PDAC. METTL16 represses the progression of PDAC by regulating the expression of p21 and DVL2 in a m6A-dependent manner and DNA damage repair in a m6A-independent manner.

3.4 Gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) ranks among the top five malignancies worldwide in both incidence and mortality (56). METTL16 is highly expressed in GC tissues compared to adjacent normal tissues, and its knockdown inhibits cell proliferation and induces cell-cycle arrest at the G1/S phase. Mechanistically, METTL16 enhances cyclin D1 mRNA stability through its m6A methyltransferase activity, increasing cyclin D1 expression and accelerating GC cell proliferation (57). Additionally, Sun et al. found that the lactylation of METTL16-K229 increases ferredoxin 1 (FDX1) expression, promoting the reduction of Cu2+ to the more toxic Cu1+ and thereby inducing cuproptosis in GC (58) (Figure 4). Collectively, current evidence suggests that METTL16 promotes GC progression through distinct mechanisms.

Figure 4
Diagram illustrating the role of METTL16 in various cancers, including lung, gastric, breast, papillary thyroid carcinoma, epithelial ovarian, acute myeloid leukemia, bladder, and cholangiocarcinoma. Each segment shows METTL16's effects on mRNA stability, cell proliferation, curoptosis, ferroptosis, and metabolism. Key pathways and molecules like GPX4, PLOD2, cyclin D1, and mRNA types are highlighted, indicating cell processes influenced by METTL16. The central theme focuses on METTL16's increasing or decreasing roles in cancer progression.

Figure 4. Schematic overview summarizing dysregulated METTL16 and representative m6A-related targets/pathways across multiple cancers (lung, breast, gastric, epithelial ovarian, acute myeloid leukemia, cholangiocarcinoma, bladder, and papillary thyroid carcinoma).

3.5 Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a highly malignant bile duct tumor with an overall 5-year survival rate that remains below 20% (59). Liu et al. showed that METTL16 is upregulated in CCA and that its knockdown significantly inhibits CCA growth. Mechanistically, METTL16 increases PR domain containing 15 (PRDM15) translation in an m6A-dependent manner, which is recognized by the m6A reader protein YTH N6-methyladenosine RNA-binding protein 1 (YTHDF1), increasing fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 (FGFR4) expression and promoting extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) and protein kinase B (AKT) phosphorylation at Ser473, thereby promoting tumorigenesis (60) (Figure 4).

Taken together, METTL16 has been found to play different roles in the pathogenesis and progression of digestive system cancers. Functional studies on METTL16 could help us better understand its biological behavior and provide new perspectives and strategies for its applications in cancer diagnosis and treatment.

4 The possible determinants of the role of METTL16

According to the studies in the previous section, METTL16 is reported to act as an oncogene in some cancers and as a tumor suppressor in others. Here we summarized the possible determinants of the role of METTL16.

METTL16 possess tissue-specific effects, and its RNA targets vary among different types of cancer or tissues. The modification of m6A in CRC, HCC and GC can enhance the expression of tumor-related genes and promote tumorigenesis, while in PDAC it can repress tumor-related genes expression, thereby suppressing tumor progression. In addition, METTL16 may cooperate with various m6A reader proteins to bind and modify different RNAs, the downstream target genes and pathways directly determine its regulatory functions. For example, METTL16 promoting tumor development by up-regulating the expression of SOGA1, which is crucial for maintaining mitosis and chromosomal stability in cancer cells (49). And it inhibits tumor cell proliferation by regulating the expression of p21, which is a key cell cycle inhibitor protein (52). And the tumor microenvironment is also an important factor influencing the function of METTL16. Specifically, a high-lactate environment can induce lactation modification of METTL16 and promote cuproptosis in gastric cancer cells (58), and phosphorylation modifications of METTL16 triggered by DNA damage can also alter its RNA binding ability (52). Additionally, the metabolic state of tumor cells (such as oxygen levels and SAM availability) may alter the functions of METTL16 (32, 45).

In summary, the roles of METTL16 in digestive system cancers are not fixed, which are determined by multiple factors, such as the availability of SAM, tissue-specific RNA targets, and the tumor microenvironment.

5 Conclusion and prospects

With the improvement in living standards and changes in dietary patterns, the incidence and mortality rates of common digestive system tumors have been increasing and have become the main components of cancer-related deaths. An increasing number of studies demonstrated that m6A modifications play important biological roles in the development and progression of digestive system cancers (6163). In this review, we focused on METTL16, an important m6A modulator that affects various mRNA processes (28, 47, 64), and discussed that METTL16 plays a key role in the occurrence and progression of digestive system cancers through m6A-dependent and -independent manners.

METTL16 is closely associated with the proliferation, invasion, and migration of digestive system cancers, which might serve as a potential diagnostic and therapeutic biomarker (60, 65). However, the role of METTL16 in human digestive system cancers have not been widely studied, which mainly relies on cell models, bioinformatics analyses and immunodeficient mice (66), the existing studies on METTL16 have overlooked the existence of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment, the variability among datasets, and the lack of large-scale clinical validation studies. Targeting RNA methyltransferases has shown potential especially in cancer treatment, but it still faces multiple challenges. The specificity is the primary challenge, the recognition and modification of RNA sequences require high precision. If the targeting is inaccurate, it may affect normal gene functions and lead to off-target effects (67, 68). Additionally, METTL16 can directly promote mRNA translation in an m6A-independent manner, thus merely designing inhibitors targeting its catalytic pocket may not be able to completely block its cancer-promoting function, leading to treatment failure (28, 69, 70). Moreover, RNA methylation is involved in regulating gene expression and immune response processes. Therefore, inhibiting RNA methyltransferases enzymes may trigger cytotoxicity or immune responses (7173). In addition, drugs targeting RNA methyltransferases (such as small molecule inhibitors) need to maintain sufficient concentrations in the body to target cancer tissues, but the intracellular delivery and bioavailability of RNA targets remain technical bottlenecks. Moreover, the complexity of the tumor microenvironment, hypoxia and metabolic reprogramming may weaken the efficacy of drugs (7476). At present, except for a few METTL3 inhibitors that have entered preclinical research (77), most methyltransferases do not have effective targeted drugs and further in-depth research is needed.

In conclusion, METTL16 is abnormally expressed in digestive system cancers and acts as an oncogene or tumor suppressor that regulates cancer progression (Table 1). Although certain progress has been made in the research of METTL16, but most studies are based on cellular experiments and immunodeficient mice. Therefore, large-scale, multi-center clinical tumor sample studies are needed to verify the expression of METTL16 and explore its detailed mechanism and prognostic value. Taken together, a deeper understanding of the role and molecular mechanisms of METTL16 in human digestive system cancers will be of great significance for the early diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of cancers.

Author contributions

JL: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YB: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. FY: Formal Analysis, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Writing – review & editing. QW: Formal Analysis, Project administration, Visualization, Writing – original draft.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This research was supported by the following research grants from Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (2025AFB355), the Open Fund of Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Occupational Hazard Identification and Control (OHIC2024Y02) and the Joint Fund of Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Occupational Hazard Identification and Control (JF2024-Y11).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank who played critical roles in the support, and BioRender (https://www.biorender.com/) for helping us with our drawing.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Yao L, Man C-F, He R, He L, Huang J-B, Xiang S-Y, et al. The interaction between N6-methyladenosine modification and non-coding RNAs in gastrointestinal tract cancers. Front Oncol. (2022) 11:784127. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.784127

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer J Clin. (2024) 74:229–63. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Yin X, Li J, Zhao J, Zheng W, Zhang A, and Ma J. Epigenetic modifications involving ncRNAs in digestive system cancers: focus on histone modification. Clin Epigenet. (2024) 16. doi: 10.1186/s13148-024-01773-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Zhou W-m, Liu B, Shavandi A, Li L, Song H, and Zhang J-y. Methylation landscape: targeting writer or eraser to discover anti-cancer drug. Front Pharmacol. (2021) 12:690057. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.690057

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Zhao LY, Song J, Liu Y, Song CX, and Yi C. Mapping the epigenetic modifications of DNA and RNA. Protein Cell. (2020) 11:792–808. doi: 10.1007/s13238-020-00733-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Mo J, Weng X, and Zhou X. Detection, clinical application, and manipulation of RNA modifications. Acc Chem Res. (2023) 56:2788–800. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.3c00395

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Jiang X, Liu B, Nie Z, Duan L, Xiong Q, Jin Z, et al. The role of m6A modification in the biological functions and diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther. (2021) 6:74. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-00450-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Wiener D and Schwartz S. The epitranscriptome beyond m(6)A. Nat Rev Genet. (2021) 22:119–31. doi: 10.1038/s41576-020-00295-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Desrosiers R, Friderici K, and Rottman F. Identification of methylated nucleosides in messenger RNA from Novikoff hepatoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (1974) 71:3971–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.10.3971

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Deng X, Chen K, Luo GZ, Weng X, Ji Q, Zhou T, et al. Widespread occurrence of N6-methyladenosine in bacterial mRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. (2015) 43:6557–67. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv596

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Yue H, Nie X, Yan Z, and Weining S. N6-methyladenosine regulatory machinery in plants: composition, function and evolution. Plant Biotechnol J. (2019) 17:1194–208. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13149

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Wu R, Jiang D, Wang Y, and Wang XN. (6)-methyladenosine (m(6)A) methylation in mRNA with A dynamic and reversible epigenetic modification. Mol Biotechnol. (2016) 58:450–9. doi: 10.1007/s12033-016-9947-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Yang Y, Hsu PJ, Chen YS, and Yang YG. Dynamic transcriptomic m(6)A decoration: writers, erasers, readers and functions in RNA metabolism. Cell Res. (2018) 28:616–24. doi: 10.1038/s41422-018-0040-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Zaccara S, Ries RJ, and Jaffrey SR. Reading, writing and erasing mRNA methylation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. (2019) 20:608–24. doi: 10.1038/s41580-019-0168-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Huang H, Weng H, Sun W, Qin X, Shi H, Wu H, et al. Recognition of RNA N(6)-methyladenosine by IGF2BP proteins enhances mRNA stability and translation. Nat Cell Biol. (2018) 20:285–95. doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0045-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Liu Y, Yang D, Liu T, Chen J, Yu J, and Yi P. N6-methyladenosine-mediated gene regulation and therapeutic implications. Trends Mol Med. (2023) 29:454–67. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2023.03.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Oerum S, Meynier V, Catala M, and Tisné C. A comprehensive review of m6A/m6Am RNA methyltransferase structures. Nucleic Acids Res. (2021) 49:7239–55. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab378

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Liu J, Yue Y, Han D, Wang X, Fu Y, Zhang L, et al. A METTL3-METTL14 complex mediates mammalian nuclear RNA N6-adenosine methylation. Nat Chem Biol. (2014) 10:93–5. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1432

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Schöller E, Weichmann F, Treiber T, Ringle S, Treiber N, Flatley A, et al. Interactions, localization, and phosphorylation of the m(6)A generating METTL3-METTL14-WTAP complex. Rna. (2018) 24:499–512. doi: 10.1261/rna.064063.117

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Knuckles P, Lence T, Haussmann IU, Jacob D, Kreim N, Carl SH, et al. Zc3h13/Flacc is required for adenosine methylation by bridging the mRNA-binding factor Rbm15/Spenito to the m(6)A machinery component Wtap/Fl(2)d. Genes Dev. (2018) 32:415–29. doi: 10.1101/gad.309146.117

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Ping XL, Sun BF, Wang L, Xiao W, Yang X, Wang WJ, et al. Mammalian WTAP is a regulatory subunit of the RNA N6-methyladenosine methyltransferase. Cell Res. (2014) 24:177–89. doi: 10.1038/cr.2014.3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Nance DJ, Satterwhite ER, Bhaskar B, Misra S, Carraway KR, and Mansfield KD. Characterization of METTL16 as a cytoplasmic RNA binding protein. PloS One. (2020) 15:e0227647. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227647

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Sendinc E and Shi Y. RNA m6A methylation across the transcriptome. Mol Cell. (2023) 83:428–41. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.01.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Satterwhite ER and Mansfield KD. RNA methyltransferase METTL16: Targets and function. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. (2022) 13:e1681. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1681

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Zhang R, Zhang Y, Guo F, Huang G, Zhao Y, Chen B, et al. Knockdown of METTL16 disrupts learning and memory by reducing the stability of MAT2A mRNA. Cell Death Discov. (2022) 8:432. doi: 10.1038/s41420-022-01220-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Pendleton KE, Chen B, Liu K, Hunter OV, Xie Y, Tu BP, et al. The U6 snRNA m(6)A Methyltransferase METTL16 Regulates SAM Synthetase Intron Retention. Cell. (2017) 169:824–35.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Ruszkowska A. METTL16, methyltransferase-like protein 16: current insights into structure and function. Int J Mol Sci. (2021) 22. doi: 10.3390/ijms22042176

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Su R, Dong L, Li Y, Gao M, He PC, Liu W, et al. METTL16 exerts an m(6)A-independent function to facilitate translation and tumorigenesis. Nat Cell Biol. (2022) 24:205–16. doi: 10.1038/s41556-021-00835-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Dai YZ, Liu YD, Li J, Chen MT, Huang M, Wang F, et al. METTL16 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression through downregulating RAB11B-AS1 in an m(6)A-dependent manner. Cell Mol Biol Lett. (2022) 27:41. doi: 10.1186/s11658-022-00342-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Warda AS, Kretschmer J, Hackert P, Lenz C, Urlaub H, Höbartner C, et al. Human METTL16 is a N(6)-methyladenosine (m(6)A) methyltransferase that targets pre-mRNAs and various non-coding RNAs. EMBO Rep. (2017) 18:2004–14. doi: 10.15252/embr.201744940

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Shima H, Matsumoto M, Ishigami Y, Ebina M, Muto A, Sato Y, et al. S-adenosylmethionine synthesis is regulated by selective N(6)-adenosine methylation and mRNA degradation involving METTL16 and YTHDC1. Cell Rep. (2017) 21:3354–63. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.11.092

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Hunter OV, Ruiz JC, Flaherty JN, and Conrad NK. Functional analysis of 3’-UTR hairpins supports a two-tiered model for posttranscriptional regulation of MAT2A by METTL16. Rna. (2023) 29:1725–37. doi: 10.1261/rna.079695.123

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Mermoud JE. The role of the m(6)A RNA methyltransferase METTL16 in gene expression and SAM homeostasis. Genes (Basel). (2022) 13. doi: 10.3390/genes13122312

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Ishigami Y, Ohira T, Isokawa Y, Suzuki Y, and Suzuki T. A single m(6)A modification in U6 snRNA diversifies exon sequence at the 5’ splice site. Nat Commun. (2021) 12:3244. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23457-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Breger K and Brown JA. Elucidating the kinetic mechanism of human METTL16. Biochemistry. (2023) 62:494–506. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.2c00601

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Aoyama T, Yamashita S, and Tomita K. Mechanistic insights into m6A modification of U6 snRNA by human METTL16. Nucleic Acids Res. (2020) 48:5157–68. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa227

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Wang Y, Zhang J, Shi H, Wang M, Yu D, Fu M, et al. M2 tumor-associated macrophages-derived exosomal MALAT1 promotes glycolysis and gastric cancer progression. Adv Sci (Weinh). (2024) 11:e2309298. doi: 10.1002/advs.202309298

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Hao L, Wu W, Xu Y, Chen Y, Meng C, Yun J, et al. LncRNA-MALAT1: A key participant in the occurrence and development of cancer. Molecules. (2023) 28. doi: 10.3390/molecules28052126

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Kim J, Piao HL, Kim BJ, Yao F, Han Z, Wang Y, et al. Long noncoding RNA MALAT1 suppresses breast cancer metastasis. Nat Genet. (2018) 50:1705–15. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0252-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Brown JA, Kinzig CG, DeGregorio SJ, and Steitz JA. Methyltransferase-like protein 16 binds the 3’-terminal triple helix of MALAT1 long noncoding RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2016) 113:14013–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1614759113

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Jin D, Guo J, Wu Y, Du J, Yang L, Wang X, et al. m(6)A mRNA methylation initiated by METTL3 directly promotes YAP translation and increases YAP activity by regulating the MALAT1-miR-1914-3p-YAP axis to induce NSCLC drug resistance and metastasis. J Hematol Oncol. (2021) 14:32. doi: 10.1186/s13045-021-01048-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Wei W, Zhang ZY, Shi B, Cai Y, Zhang HS, Sun CL, et al. METTL16 promotes glycolytic metabolism reprogramming and colorectal cancer progression. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. (2023) 42:151. doi: 10.1186/s13046-023-02732-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Shi Z, Cao X, Ma Y, Li K, Wang X, Lin J, et al. RNA methyltransferase METTL16: From molecular mechanisms to therapeutic prospects in cancers. Cancer Lett. (2025) 624:217698. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2025.217698

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Wang Q, Jiang X, Yuan Y, and Li C. METTL16 emerges as a pivotal epitranscriptomic regulator, linking RNA modification, tumor progression, and immune modulation. Front Immunol. (2025) 16:1706971. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1706971

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Wang Y, Yang Y, Yang Y, Dang Y, Guo Z, Zhuang Q, et al. Hypoxia induces hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis via the HIF-1α/METTL16/lnc-CSMD1-7/RBFOX2 axis. iScience. (2023) 26:108495. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108495

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Wang Y, Zhong Y, Zheng X, Cheng N, Yang Y, Yang Y, et al. LncRNA TIALD contributes to hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis via inducing AURKA lysosomal degradation. Cell Death Discov. (2023) 9:316. doi: 10.1038/s41420-023-01620-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Xue M, Dong L, Zhang H, Li Y, Qiu K, Zhao Z, et al. METTL16 promotes liver cancer stem cell self-renewal via controlling ribosome biogenesis and mRNA translation. J Hematol Oncol. (2024) 17:7. doi: 10.1186/s13045-024-01526-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Yang R, Wu T, Yu J, Cai X, Li G, Li X, et al. Locally advanced rectal cancer with dMMR/MSI-H may be excused from surgery after neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 monotherapy: a multiple-center, cohort study. Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1182299. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1182299

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Li J, Yang F, Wang Z, Zheng S, Zhang S, Wang C, et al. METTL16-mediated N6-methyladenosine modification of Soga1 enables proper chromosome segregation and chromosomal stability in colorectal cancer. Cell Prolif. (2024) 57:e13590. doi: 10.1111/cpr.13590

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Li J, Luo Q, Lu M, Lu C, Xu C, Ding J, et al. METTL16 promotes lipid metabolic reprogramming and colorectal cancer progression. Int J Biol Sci. (2025) 21:4782–97. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.105391

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Grossberg AJ, Chu LC, Deig CR, Fishman EK, Hwang WL, Maitra A, et al. Multidisciplinary standards of care and recent progress in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin. (2020) 70:375–403. doi: 10.3322/caac.21626

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Xie F, Zheng Y, Fu W, Chi B, Wang X, Zhang J, et al. The m6A methyltransferase METTL16 inhibits the proliferation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma cancer cells via the p21 signaling pathway. Front Oncol. (2023) 13:1138238. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1138238

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Yu L, Lu J, Xie N, Fang L, Chen S, Wu Y, et al. Suppression of wnt/β-catenin signaling in PDAC via METTL16-mediated N6-methyladenosine modification of DVL2. J Cancer. (2023) 14:2964–77. doi: 10.7150/jca.85860

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Lu L, Zheng D, Qu J, Zhuang Y, Peng J, Lan S, et al. METTL16 predicts a favorable outcome and primes antitumor immunity in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Front Cell Dev Biol. (2022) 10:759020. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.759020

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Zeng X, Zhao F, Cui G, Zhang Y, Deshpande RA, Chen Y, et al. METTL16 antagonizes MRE11-mediated DNA end resection and confers synthetic lethality to PARP inhibition in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Nat Cancer. (2022) 3:1088–104. doi: 10.1038/s43018-022-00429-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Smyth EC, Nilsson M, Grabsch HI, van Grieken NC, and Lordick F. Gastric cancer. Lancet. (2020) 396:635–48. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31288-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Wang XK, Zhang YW, Wang CM, Li B, Zhang TZ, Zhou WJ, et al. METTL16 promotes cell proliferation by up-regulating cyclin D1 expression in gastric cancer. J Cell Mol Med. (2021) 25:6602–17. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.16664

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Sun L, Zhang Y, Yang B, Sun S, Zhang P, Luo Z, et al. Lactylation of METTL16 promotes cuproptosis via m(6)A-modification on FDX1 mRNA in gastric cancer. Nat Commun. (2023) 14:6523. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42025-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Cambridge WA, Fairfield C, Powell JJ, Harrison EM, Søreide K, Wigmore SJ, et al. Meta-analysis and meta-regression of survival after liver transplantation for unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg. (2021) 273:240–50. doi: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003801

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Liu N, Zhang J, Chen W, Ma W, and Wu T. The RNA methyltransferase METTL16 enhances cholangiocarcinoma growth through PRDM15-mediated FGFR4 expression. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. (2023) 42:263. doi: 10.1186/s13046-023-02844-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Yu L, Gao Y, Bao Q, Xu M, Lu J, and Du W. Effects of N6-methyladenosine modification on metabolic reprogramming in digestive tract tumors. Heliyon. (2024) 10:e24414. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24414

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Xu Z, Sun B, Wang W, Fan Y, Su J, Sun J, et al. Research progress on m6A and drug resistance in gastrointestinal tumors. Front Pharmacol. (2025) 16:1565738. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1565738

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Li J, Wang F, Liu Y, Wang H, and Ni B. N(6)-methyladenosine (m(6)A) in pancreatic cancer: Regulatory mechanisms and future direction. Int J Biol Sci. (2021) 17:2323–35. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.60115

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Barone S, Cerchia C, Summa V, and Brindisi M. Methyl-transferase-like protein 16 (METTL16): the intriguing journey of a key epitranscriptomic player becoming an emerging biological target. J Med Chem. (2024) 67:14786–806. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c01247

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Yi T, Wang C, Ye X, Lin J, Lin C, Qin F, et al. METTL16 inhibits pancreatic cancer proliferation and metastasis by promoting MROH8 RNA stability and inhibiting CAPN2 expression - experimental studies. Int J Surg. (2024) 110:7701–19. doi: 10.1097/js9.0000000000002116

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Zhang H, Yin M, Huang H, Zhao G, and Lu M. METTL16 in human diseases: What should we do next? Open Med (Wars). (2023) 18:20230856. doi: 10.1515/med-2023-0856

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Ruan H, Dou D, Lu J, Xiao X, Gong X, and Zhang X. Off-target effects of oligonucleotides and approaches of preclinical assessments. SLAS Discov. (2025) 35:100254. doi: 10.1016/j.slasd.2025.100254

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Rainaldi J, Mali P, and Nourreddine S. Emerging clinical applications of ADAR based RNA editing. Stem Cells Transl Med. (2025) 14. doi: 10.1093/stcltm/szaf016

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Liu Y, Goebel GL, Kanis L, Hastürk O, Kemker C, and Wu P. Aminothiazolone inhibitors disrupt the protein-RNA interaction of METTL16 and modulate the m(6)A RNA modification. JACS Au. (2024) 4:1436–49. doi: 10.1021/jacsau.3c00832

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Wang F, Zhang J, Lin X, Yang L, Zhou Q, Mi X, et al. METTL16 promotes translation and lung tumorigenesis by sequestering cytoplasmic eIF4E2. Cell Rep. (2023) 42:112150. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112150

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Chen X, Liu X, Xu J, Zhu X, Liu B, Yang X, et al. The inspiration of methyltransferase in RNA methylation modification for targeted therapy of Malignant tumors. Front Immunol. (2025) 16:1663423. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1663423

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Brichkina A, Suezov R, and Huber M. Methyltransferase-like 3 (METTL3) inhibition potentiates anti-tumor immunity: a novel strategy for improving anti-PD1 therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther. (2023) 8:448. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01696-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Artika IM, Arianti R, Demény M, and Kristóf E. RNA modifications and their role in gene expression. Front Mol Biosci. (2025) 12:1537861. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2025.1537861

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Zhang TQ, Lv QY, and Jin WL. The cellular-centered view of hypoxia tumor microenvironment: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic interventions. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. (2024) 1879:189137. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2024.189137

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Chen Z, Han F, Du Y, Shi H, and Zhou W. Hypoxic microenvironment in cancer: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic interventions. Signal Transduct Target Ther. (2023) 8:70. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01332-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Chen F, Fu Y, Bai G, Qiu J, and Hua K. Multi-omics dissection of tumor microenvironment-mediated drug resistance: mechanisms and therapeutic reprogramming. Front Pharmacol. (2025) 16:1634413. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1634413

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Liu X and Kan X. Small-molecule and peptide inhibitors of m6A regulators. Front Oncol. (2025) 15:1629864. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1629864

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: digestive system cancers, M6A, methyltransferase, METTL16, RNA modification

Citation: Li J, Bao Y, Yao F and Wu Q (2026) The methyltransferase METTL16 in digestive system cancers: functions and mechanisms. Front. Oncol. 16:1744928. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2026.1744928

Received: 12 November 2025; Accepted: 14 January 2026; Revised: 07 January 2026;
Published: 30 January 2026.

Edited by:

Rohit Upadhyay, Tulane University, United States

Reviewed by:

Ulrich Membe Femoe, University of Pennsylvania, United States
Abhishek Mishra, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, United States
Kandasamy Neelamegam, Tulane University, United States

Copyright © 2026 Li, Bao, Yao and Wu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Fei Yao, ZmVpeWFvMDgyM0AxNjMuY29t; Qingming Wu, d3VoZTkyMjRAc2luYS5jb20=

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.