Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention

A Decade of Esophageal Cancer in Kazakhstan: What the National Cancer Registry Reveals (2014–2023)

Provisionally accepted
Altynay  BeyembetovaAltynay Beyembetova1*Ruslan  AkhmedullinRuslan Akhmedullin1Diyora  AbdukhakimovaDiyora Abdukhakimova1Ayana  AblayevaAyana Ablayeva1Aigerim  BiniyazovaAigerim Biniyazova1Oxana  ShatkovskayaOxana Shatkovskaya2Zhandos  BurkitbayevZhandos Burkitbayev2Altay  KerimkulovAltay Kerimkulov2Galiya  OrazovaGaliya Orazova3Abduzhappar  GaipovAbduzhappar Gaipov1*
  • 1School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Nur-sultan, Kazakhstan
  • 2National Scientific Oncology Center, Astana, Kazakhstan
  • 3Astana Medical University, Astana, Kazakhstan

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Esophageal cancer (EC) is a major yet understudied public health burden in Central Asia. Kazakhstan has one of the highest EC rates in the region, but national epidemiological trends and survival outcomes remain poorly reported. Epidemiological trends among younger adults are largely unexplored, despite growing concern about early-onset gastrointestinal cancers. This study assessed recent patterns in EC incidence, mortality, disease burden, and survival across Kazakhstan from 2014 to 2023. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, population-based cohort study including all EC patients registered in the National Cancer Registry between Jan 1, 2014, and Dec 31, 2023. Demographic, clinical, and survival data were extracted from registry-linked records. Early-onset EC was defined as diagnosis before age 45. Age-standardized incidence, mortality, and prevalence rates per 100,000 were calculated using the WHO World Standard Population. DALYs were estimated following GBD 2023 methodology. Survival was assessed using Kaplan–Meier methods; predictors were analyzed with Cox regression. Results: The cohort included 24,778 patients. The age-standardized incidence rate was 13.9 per 100,000 (95% CI 12.6–15.1). Mortality rose from 4.4 per 100,000 in 2014 to 10.6 per 100,000 in 2023, peaking at 12.3 per 100,000 in 2018. DALYs increased from 3,383 (95% UI 2,970–3,800) to 8,300 (95% UI 6,691–9,269) per 100,000, 95% attributable to YLL. In early-onset cases, DALYs per 100,000 tripled over ten years. Three-year survival declined from 62.9% (95% CI 59.2–66.6) at Stage I to 12.9% (95% CI 10.8–15.0) at Stage IV. Male sex (aHR 1.11), advanced stage (aHR 7.10), and alcohol disorders (aHR 1.15) were associated with poorer survival. Kyzylorda and Karaganda regions had the highest burden. Interpretation: Despite stable incidence, EC mortality in Kazakhstan has tripled over the past decade, reflecting late-stage diagnosis, limited treatment access, and persistent modifiable risk factors such as alcohol and tobacco use. These findings highlight a critical public health gap and underscore the need for early detection programs and strengthened oncology infrastructure to reduce premature mortality in Kazakhstan and neighboring countries.

Keywords: Central Asia, DALY (disability-adjusted life years), Epidemiology, esophageal cancer, Kazakhstan, Population based registry, survival analysis

Received: 08 Dec 2025; Accepted: 16 Feb 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Beyembetova, Akhmedullin, Abdukhakimova, Ablayeva, Biniyazova, Shatkovskaya, Burkitbayev, Kerimkulov, Orazova and Gaipov. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Altynay Beyembetova
Abduzhappar Gaipov

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.