Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Oncol.

Sec. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention

This article is part of the Research TopicThe Role of Gut Microbiota in Preventing OncogenesisView all 5 articles

Impact of Biliary Fungal Contamination on Outcomes after Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Cancer

Provisionally accepted
Jeremy  ChangJeremy Chang1Sophia  XiaoSophia Xiao1Yutao  SuYutao Su1Scott  K. ShermanScott K. Sherman1,2James  Howe VJames Howe V1,2James  P. De AndradeJames P. De Andrade1,2Hisakazu  HoshiHisakazu Hoshi1Carlos  H. F. ChanCarlos H. F. Chan1,2*
  • 1Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, United States
  • 2The University of Iowa Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, Iowa City, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: Many patients with cancer of the pancreatic head will have biliary stenting to relieve malignant obstruction. Biliary stenting is associated with increased rates of bacterial and fungal biliary contamination. Little is known regarding the impact of fungal biliary contamination on postoperative and oncologic outcomes of pancreatic cancer. This study aims to evaluate the effects of fungal biliary contamination on postoperative and oncologic outcomes in patients receiving pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Methods: A retrospective study of a prospectively maintained single tertiary institutional database was performed identifying patients with the diagnosis of PDAC from 2015 to 2022 who underwent curative-intent resection and had intraoperative biliary fungal cultures. Primary outcome measures assessed included overall survival (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS). Secondary outcome measure was postoperative complication rate. Kaplan method estimated OS and RFS and survival curves were compared with log rank test. Clinicopathologic variables were assessed for association with multivariable Cox hazard ratio. Results: Among 82 patients included, 87.8% had preoperative stenting. In stented patients, bacterial and fungal contamination had an incidence of 98.7% and 48.6%, respectively. Patients with positive fungal cultures had higher rates of neoadjuvant chemotherapy utilization than those with negative intraoperative fungal bile cultures (p=0.05). Positive biliary fungal cultures were not independently associated with risk for postoperative complications nor RFS but were associated with worse OS (HR = 2.11 [1.04 – 4.26], p=0.04). In the subgroup of patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, positive fungal bile culture was associated with worse OS (HR = 2.70 [1.11 – 6.60], p=0.03), but without more pronounced hematological evidence of systemic immunosuppression before and after chemotherapy. Conclusion: Biliary fungal contamination was not associated with increased risk of postoperative complications in pancreatic cancer patients but was associated with worse OS, particularly in patients who received neoadjuvant therapy. Investigations regarding the causal relationship between biliary fungus and treatment response and outcome in PDAC patients are warranted.

Keywords: Biliary stenting, Candida, fungus, microbiome, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Pancreatic Cancer, Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Received: 28 Dec 2025; Accepted: 05 Feb 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Chang, Xiao, Su, Sherman, Howe V, De Andrade, Hoshi and Chan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Carlos H. F. Chan

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.