ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Oncol.
Sec. Head and Neck Cancer
Clinicopathological and Sonographic Characterization of NTRK-Fusion Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Based on Preoperative Molecular Testing: A Comparative Study with BRAFV600E PTC
Yuzhi Zhang
Daoyuan Zou
Xin Wu
Min Han
Junfang Gai
Wenbo Ding
Shuhang Xu
Chao Liu
Xinping Wu
Yuguo Wang
Affliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Background: NTRK fusions are relatively rare in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), and their clinicopathological characteristics, particularly in unselected populations and in comparison with BRAFV600E PTC, have not been systematically elucidated. Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed PTC patients who underwent surgery between October 2022 and May 2025. All patients underwent preoperative fine-needle aspiration biopsy and multigene molecular testing. Ultimately, 38 patients with NTRK-fusion PTC and 1196 patients with BRAFV600E PTC were included. A comprehensive analysis of the clinical, ultrasonographic, and pathological features of NTRK-fusion PTC was conducted, with comparison to BRAFV600E PTC. Results: Among the 38 identified NTRK-fusion PTC patients, NTRK3 (81.6%) was the predominant fusion type. Histologically, classical PTC and mixed growth patterns with follicular architecture (34.2% each) were most frequent, followed by the follicular variant (18.4%). NTRK-fusion PTC demonstrated a high rate of lymph node metastasis (LNM) (78.9%). Among preoperative parameters, a tumor diameter >12 mm on ultrasound was associated with increased risk of lateral LNM (OR=5.00, 95% CI: 1.10-22.82; P=0.038). Besides, NTRK1-fusion PTCs demonstrated a significantly higher frequency of bilateral lobe involvement compared to NTRK3-fusion PTCs (57.1% vs. 12.9%, P=0.025). Compared to patients with BRAFV600E PTC, those with isolated NTRK-fusion (n=34) were significantly younger (median age: 35.0 vs 43.0 years), had larger tumors (median diameter: 10.5 vs 7.0 mm), higher rates of LNM (76.5% vs 50.7%), and greater prevalence of co-existing Hashimoto's thyroiditis (61.8% vs 28.3%) and follicular nodular disease (26.5% vs 10.6%) (all P<0.01). Cytopathologically, NTRK-fusion PTC demonstrates a higher proportion of atypia of undetermined significance/ follicular neoplasm compared to BRAFV600E PTC (41.2% vs. 16.1%). Sonographically, isoechogenicity (20.6% vs. 7.9%), microcalcifications (79.4% vs. 58.0%), and a wider-than-tall shape (91.2% vs. 52.5%) were more frequently observed in the NTRK-fusion group (all P<0.05). Conclusions: NTRK-fusion defines a distinct PTC molecular subtype characterized by a high burden of LNM and a spectrum of features linked to follicular growth patterns. These findings facilitate the preoperative identification of this tumor subtype and provide a foundation for individualized risk stratification and tailored management strategies.
Summary
Keywords
BRAFV600E mutation, lymph node metastasis, NTRK fusion, Papillary thyroid carcinoma, Ultrasonography
Received
03 January 2026
Accepted
20 February 2026
Copyright
© 2026 Zhang, Zou, Wu, Han, Gai, Ding, Xu, Liu, Wu and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xinping Wu; Yuguo Wang
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.