SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Pediatr.
Sec. Obstetric and Pediatric Pharmacology
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1604572
Efficacy of Glyburide versus Metformin in Preventing Neonatal Birth Obesity in Pregnancies Complicated by Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Provisionally accepted- Chengdu Shuangliu District Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) has significant implications for both maternal and fetal health, increasing the risk of macrosomia, neonatal hypoglycemia, and long-term metabolic complications in offspring. Given these concerns, a comprehensive evaluation of treatment options, including glyburide and metformin, compared to insulin, is essential to guide clinical practice. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, utilizing PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science without restrictions on date or language. The focus was on studies comparing oral medications (glyburide or metformin) with insulin for GDM, assessing outcomes, e.g., birth weight and the risk of macrosomia. Studies with non-relevant study designs were excluded. Data extraction and management were conducted with bias assessment using SYRCLE's tool. Statistical analyses were performed using R, incorporating both fixed and random effects models, subgroup analyses, and tests for publication bias. Results: This meta-analysis reviewed 22 studies (19 randomized controlled trials and 3 retrospective cohort studies) that evaluated treatments for GDM. The overall risk of macrosomia did not differ statistically between oral medications and insulin (odds ratio [OR] = 0.8534, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.6271; 1.1614], p = 0.3134). However, subgroup analysis revealed that glyburide increased the risk (OR = 1.3806, p < 0.05), whereas metformin reduced it (OR = 0.6728, p < 0.0001). No statistical difference was found in infant birth weights between oral medications and insulin (mean difference [MD] = 14.3838, 95% CI [-40.7746; 69.5421], p = 0.6093), but subgroup analysis indicating that glyburide increased birth weight (MD = -83.32, 95% CI [-160.74 to -5.91]), and metformin decreased it (MD = 72.80, 95% CI [26.24–119.36]). Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that oral medications for GDM do not statistically alter the overall risk of macrosomia or infant birth weight compared with insulin administration. However, glyburide is associated with an increased risk of macrosomia, whereas metformin appears to reduce this risk. Consistent with these findings, glyburide was associated with an increase in infant birth weight, while metformin was associated with a decrease. These findings emphasize the importance of personalized treatment strategies for GDM management.
Keywords: gestational diabetes mellitus, Glyburide, Metformin, Macrosomia, Birth Weight
Received: 02 Apr 2025; Accepted: 12 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Jiang, Zhang, Liu, Xie and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Jian Liu, Chengdu Shuangliu District Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.