Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pediatr.

Sec. Pediatric Cardiology

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1605899

This article is part of the Research TopicEpigenetic and Genetic Mechanisms Underlying Cardiovascular Diseases and Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Volume IIView all 4 articles

Variants of Unknown Significance in Fetal Heart Malformations: Distribution and Impact on Prenatal Decision-Making

Provisionally accepted
Qingsong  WangQingsong Wang1*Jun  YinJun Yin1Xiaomeng  ZhangXiaomeng Zhang2Huimin  OuHuimin Ou2Fuyan  LiFuyan Li2Yundong  ZhangYundong Zhang2Caiyu  GuoCaiyu Guo2Weiyi  WanWeiyi Wan2Yongyu  CaoYongyu Cao2Tongyong  LUOTongyong LUO2Xianmin  WangXianmin Wang2
  • 1The First People's Hospital of Jintang County/ Jintang Hospital, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
  • 2Sichuan Provincial Women's and Children's Hospital / The Affiliated Women's and Children's Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective To investigate the distribution patterns of variants of unknown significance (VUS) in fetuses with heart malformations (CHD) combined with extracardiac abnormalities and their impact on prenatal decision-making. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) data of 697 cases of fetal heart malformations (including simple, complex, and combined with extracardiac abnormalities) and 2689 controls from Sichuan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital between January 2020 and August 2022. Copy number variants (CNVs) were classified according to the 2 ACMG guidelines (pathogenic, VUS, benign), and the differences in VUS detection rates and their impact on pregnancy outcomes were compared among groups. Results Among 697 fetuses with prenatally diagnosed cardiac malformations, 602 (86.37%) had simple, 69 (9.90%) complex, 18 (2.58%) combined with structural extracardiac anomalies, and 8 (1.15%) with soft markers. Karyotype abnormalities occurred in 4.74% (26/549), 16.36% (9/55), 27.78% (5/18), and 12.50% (1/8) of these groups, respectively, all exceeding controls (4.71%, P < 0.05). Pathogenic CNVs were detected in 4.88% (27/553), 7.69% (5/65), 8.33% (2/24), and 0% (0/2), respectively; the first three rates were significantly higher than controls (1.38%, P < 0.05, P = 0.002, P = 0.033). VUS rates rose progressively: 0.54% (3/553), 1.54% (1/65), 12.50% (3/24), and 100% (2/2). Among nine VUS-positive pregnancies, six resulted in live-born infants without abnormalities; three were terminated due to additional malformations or parental anxiety. Conclusion Fetuses with cardiac malformations accompanied by structural extracardiac anomalies carry the highest genetic risk; karyotyping combined with CMA should therefore be performed routinely. Complex cardiac malformations also warrant concurrent testing, whereas simple malformations and those with soft markers can be evaluated individually.

Keywords: Fetal heart malformations, Variants of unknown significance (VUS), Prenatal Diagnosis, Genetic Counseling, Chromosomal microarray analysis(CMA)

Received: 04 Apr 2025; Accepted: 08 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Yin, Zhang, Ou, Li, Zhang, Guo, Wan, Cao, LUO and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Qingsong Wang, The First People's Hospital of Jintang County/ Jintang Hospital, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.