Abstract
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) exhibits high incidence, surgical intervention rates, and mortality among preterm infants, profoundly impacting survivor's long-term quality of life. Consequently, the etiology and pathogenesis of this disease remain incompletely elucidated. Emerging evidence underscores the intricate connection between epigenetics and NEC. DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs regulate disease development through targeted modification of transcriptional regulation and translational control in NEC-associated genes, thereby driving pathological progression. Notably, N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification, the most prevalent form of RNA epigenetic regulation, exerts critical functions in intestinal inflammation, microbial homeostasis, and injury repair, suggesting its potential involvement in NEC development. In this review, we will summarize the current mechanistic understanding of NEC, emphasizing its interplay with epigenetics (DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs). we also explore the emerging role of m6A RNA modification in gut pathophysiology, proposing its potential role in NEC.
1 Introduction
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), a life-threatening gastrointestinal emergency in neonates, demonstrates an incidence rate of 2%–13% among preterm infants, with the global average reaching 7% in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants (). The overall mortality rate stands at 29.3% in preterm neonates, escalating to 32.5% in VLBW infants with NEC (). Approximately 41.7% of NEC cases require surgical intervention, accompanied by a striking 34.9% mortality rate in surgically managed patients (). Survivors frequently develop long-term sequelae, including growth retardation, neurodevelopmental delays, short bowel syndrome, intestinal strictures/adhesions, and cholestasis (). Therefore, elucidating the pathogenesis of NEC and identifying its risk factors are critical for developing effective prevention and treatment strategies. However, the precise etiology and pathogenesis of NEC remain incompletely understood, though current evidence confirms its multifactorial nature involving intestinal immaturity, formula feeding, microbial dysbiosis, and infections ().
Epigenetics bridges environmental exposures with genomic regulation, wherein external factors (nutrition, infection, pharmacological agents, and physiological stress) induce nucleotide base modifications or protein alterations without altering DNA sequences, thereby regulating gene expression through heritable and reversible mechanisms (, ). Studies have found that NEC involves multiple epigenetic mechanisms. DNA methylation, histone modification, and non-coding RNAs are involved in the occurrence and development of NEC (Figure 1), affecting the disease phenotype (). This review delineates the current research landscape of epigenetic mechanisms in NEC, discuss the potential mechanisms of m6A modification in NEC, providing a basis for clarifying the etiology and pathogenesis of NEC, ultimately providing mechanistic insights to inform targeted therapeutic development.
Figure 1
2 Overview of the pathogenesis of NEC
TLR4 (Toll-like receptor 4) serves as the primary pattern recognition receptor for bacterial endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide, LPS) and functions as a central mediator in the pathogenesis of NEC (). LPS from gram-negative bacteria in the intestinal lumen subsequently binds to TLR4 expressed on intestinal epithelial cells (IECs), initiating a cascade of downstream signaling events, ultimately driving the excessive production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) (). The ensuing cytokine storm exacerbates disruption of the mucosal barrier and causes local tissue damage. Subsequent translocation of gut-derived bacteria and their pathogenic metabolites across the compromised intestinal epithelium into systemic circulation leads to TLR4 activation on vascular endothelial cells. This receptor engagement suppresses endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) expression, thereby triggering mesenteric vasoconstriction through impaired NO-mediated vasodilation (). These pathophysiological cascades culminate in intestinal hypoperfusion, transmural necrosis, and ultimately bowel perforation ().
During the initial phase of NEC, clinical presentations frequently include gastrointestinal dysfunction characterized by emesis, abdominal distension, and enteral feeding intolerance, representing manifestations of impaired gastrointestinal motility (). Gastrointestinal motility is mainly regulated by enteric nervous system (ENS) composed of neurons and enteric glial cells (EGCs). There are abundant EGCs surrounding enteric neurons in the intestinal mucosa. Structural or functional impairment of EGCs disrupts ENS, thereby contributing to dysregulated intestinal motility (). Kovler et al. () conducted a multispecies histopathological analysis of ileal specimens from NEC mice, porcine models, and human neonates, demonstrating a marked depletion of EGCs across all study cohorts. Mice with EGCs deficiency exhibited significantly higher susceptibility to severe NEC phenotypes compared to wild-type controls. Mechanistically, conditional knockout of TLR4 specifically in EGCs attenuated the EGCs depletion observed in experimental NEC, suggesting TLR4 signaling directly mediates EGCs loss during disease progression. EGCs exert protective effects against NEC through brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) mediated suppression of TLR4 activation, thereby mitigating NEC initiation and progression ().
TLR9, a structural homolog of TLR4, is significantly downregulated in intestinal tissues from NEC (). Mechanistic studies reveal that TLR9 activation enhances expression of interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase-M (IRAK-M), a negative feedback regulator of TLR4 signaling, attenuates TLR4-driven inflammatory cascades, ultimately ameliorating NEC severity (). Thus, the dynamic interplay between TLR4 and TLR9 signaling pathways in the neonatal gut contributes critically to the pathogenesis and progression of NEC (). Furthermore, accumulating evidence has established a causal link between gut microbiota dysbiosis and NEC. A recent meta-analysis investigating gut microbial dysbiosis in preterm infants prior to NEC onset revealed a significant enrichment of Proteobacteria coupled with reduced relative abundances of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes during the pre-NEC phase ().
3 DNA methylation and NEC
3.1 DNA methylation patterns in clinical NEC
DNA methylation is an enzymatic process catalysed by DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs), involving the covalent addition of a methyl group (–CH₃) from S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) to the C5 position of cytosine residues within CpG dinucleotide sequences (). A meta-analysis including 3,648 neonatal samples from 17 distinct cohorts revealed that methylation at 8,899 CpG sites within 4,966 genes in umbilical cord blood was significantly associated with neonatal gestational age. Significant correlations have been observed between DNA methylation patterns in umbilical cord blood, brain, and lung tissues of fetuses at comparable gestational ages (). The study by Good et al. () demonstrated that ileal and colonic tissues from infants with surgical NEC exhibited widespread DNA hypermethylation. A total of 7,087 differentially methylated sites were associated with genes showing significant transcriptional differences. Among promoter regions of downregulated genes in NEC, 92% of differentially methylated sites displayed hypermethylation, while this proportion decreased to 66% in upregulated genes (). Tian et al. () performed multi-omics analyses integrating methylation profiling, RNA transcriptome, and single-cell sequencing data from NEC intestinal tissues. Their investigation revealed differentially expressed genes exhibiting an inverse correlation between promoter region methylation levels and transcriptional activity. These genes demonstrated predominant enrichment within the intestinal epithelial compartment, and were functionally associated with the modulation of T cell differentiation processes and suppression of intestinal inflammatory responses ().
Moreover, studies have revealed distinct DNA methylation patterns in fecal samples from infants with NEC, with a marked correlation observed between the methylation profiles of fecal specimens and colonic tissues (, ). Klerk et al. () conducted a comparative analysis of fecal DNA specimens from 24 NEC and 45 non-NEC preterm infants, systematically comparing methylation levels of multiple genes across pre-onset, acute, and post-onset phases. Their findings demonstrated significantly elevated methylation at the TLR4 CpG2 site in infants with NEC compared to non-NEC controls. Within the NEC cohort, the methylation of the vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) CpG2 site was 0.8% for a long time before NEC, increased to 1.8% shortly before NEC, and increased to 2.0% after NEC. An analogous pattern was observed at the DEFA5 CpG1 site, where methylation rates progressed from 75.4% to 81.4% (). Moreover, investigations have identified that during the pre-NEC phase, fecal DNA from infants with NEC exhibited C-terminal domain small phosphatase-like 2 (CTDSPL2) methylation levels of 51%, demonstrating a statistically significant elevation compared with non-NEC controls (17%) (). These findings collectively suggest that fecal DNA methylation profiling holds promise as a predictive biomarker for NEC progression. Furthermore, the targeted analysis of specific methylation sites may provide novel therapeutic targets for both preventive interventions and clinical management of NEC.
3.2 Mechanistic involvement of DNA methylation in NEC
In mammals, the DNA methylation process is mainly regulated by DNA methyltransferases DNMT1 and DNMT3, which serve distinct functions: DNMT1 primarily maintains existing methylation patterns during DNA replication (maintenance methylation), while DNMT3 establishes new methylation marks (de novo methylation) (). Within the intestinal epithelium, DNMT1 demonstrates spatial specificity, exhibiting predominant localization to the crypt base proliferative zone. Targeted deletion of DNMT1 in intervillus progenitor cells triggers a cascade of pathobiological consequences: genomic hypomethylation, DNA damage premature differentiation and apoptosis of progenitor cells, and ultimately the loss of nascent villi (). Profound disruptions in intestinal crypt homeostasis caused by apoptosis () and abnormal differentiation of stem cells (), along with necrosis and loss of villi (), all of which are also observed in NEC. Research has found that the methylation degree of the TLR4 in differentiated IECs is significantly higher than that in undifferentiated IECs, suggesting that the methylation of TLR4 is involved in the differentiation process of IECs, and this process is mainly regulated by DNMT3 (). DNA methylation mediates downregulation of TLR4 through promoter hypermethylation, leading to attenuated LPS responsiveness in IECs (). Animal studies have demonstrated that prenatal intrauterine infection induces alterations in DNA methylation patterns within the promoter regions of multiple genes participating in TLR4 signaling pathway in the small intestine of offspring (). Cortese et al. () demonstrated that exposure of immature IECs to probiotic or pathogenic bacteria results in the identification of over 200 differentially modified DNA regions, indicating that early microbial colonization may induce alterations in intestinal epigenetic signatures. Routine postnatal oral antibiotic administration in preterm piglets delays microbial colonization and alters genomic DNA methylation, potentially influencing intestinal health by modulating the expression of genes linked to intestinal immunity, vascular integrity, and metabolism, thereby contributing to NEC prevention (). CTDSPL2 hypermethylation precedes NEC onset, suppressing its transcription via DNA methylation, thereby impairing cell cycle progression and exacerbating inflammation through NF-κB signaling (). Therefore, prenatal and postnatal environmental factors may exert their influence on intestinal development and homeostasis through modulation of genomic DNA methylation in the gut, potentially representing one of the key mechanisms underlying the predisposition to NEC in preterm infants ().
4 Histone modifications and NEC
4.1 Histone modifications patterns in NEC
The nucleosome, composed of DNA and histones, is the basic structural unit of chromatin. When the N-terminus of the histone tail is modified, the state of chromatin is affected, and thus the expression of genes is changed. Such histone modifications include acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, and ubiquitination (). Differential expression of histone methylation regulating genes has been demonstrated in intestinal tissues of infants with NEC, with the most pronounced alteration observed in KDM6B. Both upregulated JMJD3 (encoded by KDM6B) and reduced H3K27 trimethylation (H3K27me3) were more evident in NEC patients and animal models compared to controls (). In addition, histone deacetylase 8 (HDAC8) is highly expressed in NEC ().
4.2 Mechanistic involvement of histone modifications in NEC
Studies have demonstrated that histone modifications are integral to maintaining intestinal homeostasis, with the associations between histone acetylation/methylation and NEC having been conclusively established (). In dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) induced murine colitis models, H3K27ac levels are significantly downregulated, whereas histone HDAC inhibitors restore H3K27ac levels and suppress pro-inflammatory cytokine production (). In NEC, upregulated HDAC8 suppresses transcriptional activity by reducing H3K9ac levels at the promoter regions of key arginine metabolic pathway genes (PRODH/PRODH2), thereby diminishing arginine biosynthesis (). Arginine serves as the precursor for endogenous NO synthesis, with NO playing a critical role in NEC pathogenesis by modulating intestinal vasodilation and blood flow (). Selective inhibition of HDAC8 ameliorates arginine metabolism disorders, alleviates intestinal injury in NEC mouse model, and attenuates the production of pro-inflammatory factors IL6, IL-1β, and TNF-α (). Histone hyperacetylation maintains chromatin in an open state at the TLR4 gene promoter region, facilitating transcription. The use of HDAC inhibitors can enhance TLR4 expression in IECs (). The administration of GSK-J4, a specific inhibitor of JMJD3, effectively mitigated the overexpression of JMJD3 and reversed the hypoexpression of H3K27me3 in NEC mice. Subsequently, it exerted its anti-inflammatory effects by suppressing inflammatory responses via the NF-κB and JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathways. Moreover, GSK-J4 ameliorated intestinal injury through the inhibition of necroptosis, ultimately contributing to the alleviation of NEC (). These findings suggest that targeting histone-modifying enzymes involved in histone acetylation and methylation, could be a potential strategy for the prevention and treatment of NEC.
5 Non-coding RNAs and NEC
5.1 Non-coding RNAs patterns in NEC
Non-coding RNAs function as multifunctional regulators by interacting with DNA, RNA, and protein complexes to modulate gene expression at multiple regulatory levels, spanning transcriptional regulation to post-transcriptional modifications (, ). Comparative analyses of plasma and intestinal tissue samples between NEC and non-NEC infants have systematically identified differentially expressed ncRNAs, particularly microRNAs (miRNAs), long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), and circular RNAs (circRNAs) (–). Han et al. () performed whole-transcriptome sequencing of miRNAs, lncRNAs, and circRNAs in intestinal tissues from neonates with NEC. Compared to controls, they identified 281 differentially expressed mRNAs, 21 miRNAs, 253 lncRNAs, and 207 circRNAs in infants with NEC. Through RNA regulatory network construction, the pathogenic gene hexokinase 2 (HK2) was pinpointed. This hypoxia-associated gene may mediate carbohydrate metabolism dysregulation in NEC pathogenesis (). Compared to non-NEC infants, neonates with NEC exhibit distinct plasma miRNA profiles. Specifically, miR-1290, miR-1246, and miR-375 serve as specific biomarkers of NEC, with miR-1290 demonstrating the highest diagnostic value for discriminating between medical and surgical NEC (). In intestinal tissues of NEC, significant downregulation of miR-429/200a/b and miR-141/200c clusters was observed (). These miRNA clusters demonstrated binding capacity to multiple target genes with concomitant gene expression modulation, exerting negative regulatory effects on VEGF, E-selectin (SELE), kinase insert domain receptor (KDR), fms-related tyrosine kinase 1 (FLT1), and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) (). Functional studies confirmed their involvement in three critical NEC associated pathways: inflammatory response (), angiogenesis (), and epithelial barrier dysfunction ().
5.2 Mechanistic involvement of non-coding RNAs in NEC
Non-coding RNAs play regulatory roles in intestinal inflammation, apoptosis, damage, and repair processes. Among these, miRNAs have garnered the most research attention in NEC. miR-141-3p targets motor neuron and pancreas homeobox 1 (MNX1), alleviating intestinal inflammation and oxidative stress in NEC murine models (). Mechanistically, it protects IECs from LPS-induced injury by suppressing RIPK1-mediated inflammatory responses and necroptosis (). miR-124 promotes IECs apoptosis and inflammatory cell infiltration by targeting ROCK1 to inhibit the expression of TLR9 (). Human milk contains diverse non-coding RNAs, and the protective role of breast milk-derived non-coding RNAs against NEC has been demonstrated. Studies reveal that exosomal miRNAs from breast milk suppress the TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway, mitigating intestinal inflammation and oxidative stress to reduce NEC risk (). Notably, preterm breast milk exosomes exhibit superior capacity to enhance intestinal epithelial repair compared to term breast milk exosomes. This functional advantage coincides with the enrichment of lncRNAs in in preterm milk exosomes (). Bioinformatic analyses suggest that these enriched lncRNAs may modulate proliferative signaling pathways, including JAK-STAT and AMPK (). Collectively, these findings suggest that miRNAs may serve as key mechanistic regulators of NEC pathogenesis, while also discovering the therapeutic potential of milk-derived non-coding RNAs.
6 Crosstalk of epigenetic mechanisms in NEC
In vitro studies reveal that LPS-hyporesponsive intestinal epithelial cell lines exhibit significantly higher histone deacetylation and DNA methylation at the TLR4 locus compared to monocytic cell lines or LPS-hyperresponsive epithelial cells, suggesting that TLR4 responsiveness to LPS is modulated by DNA methylation and histone acetylation (). LPS stimulation induces dynamic epigenetic remodeling at the COX-2 promoter in intestinal epithelial cells, characterized by sequential DNA hypermethylation, histone acetylation, and histone methylation. Specifically, LPS promotes COX-2 DNA methylation, followed by JMJD3 recruitment to the promoter region, which mediates H3K27 demethylation and ultimately upregulates COX-2 expression (). Both TLR4 and COX-2 are overexpressed in NEC and contribute to its pathogenesis (). Furthermore, VEGF dysregulation in NEC involves dual epigenetic mechanisms: aberrant DNA methylation at its promoter and and post-transcriptional repression by specific miRNAs (e.g., miR-429/200a/b and miR-141/200c) (, ). This combined regulation leads to VEGF downregulation in NEC (), while exogenous VEGF supplementation attenuates NEC progression (). Breast milk-derived exosomal miR-148a-3p exerts protective effects in NEC by binding the 3'UTR of the tumor suppressor TP53, suppressing p53 expression and upregulating the deacetylase SIRT1 via the p53/SIRT1 axis (). Additionally, Gao et al. () identified the lncRNA LINC01512 as a novel regulator of SIRT1, which enhances Treg immunosuppressive function while inhibiting Th17 pro-inflammatory activity. NEC tissues exhibit significant LINC01512 downregulation, inversely correlating with Treg/Th17 imbalance (). SIRT1 further mitigates inflammation by inhibiting NF-κB acetylation and nuclear translocation (). Therefore, the miR-148a-3p/p53/SIRT1 and LINC01512/SIRT1 axes represent promising anti-inflammatory targets for NEC.
7 RNA modification
In addition to the above classic epigenetic mechanisms, N6-methyladenosine (m6A), the most abundant RNA modification in mammals, has emerged as a key regulator in gut (patho) physiology (). The modifications predominantly occur near the stop codon region and the 3′-untranslated region (3′-UTR) of RNA, regulated by three classes of enzymes: methyltransferases (e.g., METTL3, METTL14, WTAP, and METTL16), demethylases (e.g., FTO, ALKBH5, and ALKBH3), and RNA-binding proteins that regulate RNA translation, degradation, and stability (e.g., YTHDF1-3, YTHDC1-2, IGF2BP1-3, HuR, and EIF3) () (Figure 2). The m6A modification regulates mRNA abundance, spatiotemporal dynamics, and alternative splicing processes, thereby orchestrating protein expression profiles and biological phenotypes. m6A modification exerts essential regulatory functions in fundamental cellular processes including development, tissue regeneration, immune homeostasis, and damage response mechanisms ().
Figure 2
7.1 Characteristics of m6A modification in clinical intestinal diseases
Clinical studies have demonstrated disease-specific m6A epitranscriptomic signatures across intestinal pathologies, where dynamic dysregulation of m6A regulators reflects disease progression stages. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) exhibits paradoxical m6A regulatory dynamics: METTL3 and FTO demonstrate elevated expression concomitant with METTL14 and HuR downregulation (). Notably, conflicting evidence delineates activity-dependent fluctuations of these regulators, characterized by the upregulation of METTL3 and FTO during the active phases, in contrast to their downregulation during the remission (). This coordinated dysregulation of methyltransferases and demethylases underscores the intricate crosstalk within m6A regulatory networks (). As principal IBD subtypes, ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) demonstrate clinical heterogeneity in m6A regulator expression. UC patients exhibit serum METTL3 and WTAP levels correlating with disease extent, subtype and IL-6, whereas CD patients show METTL3 associations with lesion location and Crohn's Disease activity index, but no significant WTAP variation vs. controls (). The partial mechanism of m6A modification in intestinal injury is summarized in Figure 3.
Figure 3
7.2 m6Amodification and intestinal inflammation
The pivotal role of m6A modification in intestinal inflammation has been corroborated across in vivo and in vitro experimental models. Mechanistically, methyltransferases METTL3 and METTL14 exhibit upregulated expression in LPS induecd IECs (). Notably, METTL3 exacerbates LPS-induced inflammatory cascades by potentiating epithelial apoptosis, elevating oxidative stress burden, and impairing antioxidant defenses (). In vitro, METTL3 promotes TLR4 signaling by enhancing m6A modification of IRAKM mRNA, a negative regulator of TLR4, thereby accelerating its degradation (). METTL3-deficient macrophages exhibit reduced TNF-α production upon LPS stimulation in vitro, indicating that METTL3-mediated m6A modifications activate macrophage responses (). In LPS induced endotoxemia, METTL3 directly modulates m6A on TLR4 mRNA, promoting its translation and stabilizing the transcript, which elevates TLR4 protein expression and activates the neutrophil TLR4 signaling pathway. Ultimately, CXCR2 activation and internalization, dependent on the TLR4 signaling pathway, drive neutrophil mobilization from the bone marrow into systemic circulation (). Mice with intestinal epithelial METTL3 deficiency resist rotavirus infection via m6A-dependent stabilization of Irf7 mRNA, which enhances type I and III interferon production (). Olazagoitia-Garmendia et al. () identified elevated m6A levels in the 5′-UTR of XPO1 mRNA in celiac disease patients, where hypermethylation increases XPO1 protein expression in vitro and in vivo, driving NF-κB activation and inflammation. Cumulatively, these findings elucidate the pivotal role of METTL3 in exacerbating inflammatory responses through m6A-mediated epitranscriptomic regulation, particularly via modulation of the TLR4/NF-κB signaling axis (). Li et al. () confirmed that increased m6A methylation correlates with colitis development in vivo. Whereas in vitro, melatonin attenuates LPS-induced colonic inflammation by suppressing METTL3 and reducing m6A levels via melatonin receptor 1B (MTNR1B) in vitro. Despite growing evidence linking m6A regulators to inflammation, conflicting studies underscore the complexity of m6A regulation. Cai et al. () reported reduced global m6A levels and METTL3 expression in LPS-treated macrophages. METTL3 downregulation significantly upregulated pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF-α, IL-6, NO), potentially by stabilizing NOD1 and RIPK2 mRNAs, amplifying NOD1 signaling, and exacerbating inflammation.
7.3 m6A modification and intestinal cell survival
m6A modification plays a critical role in balancing intestinal cell renewal, differentiation (), death, and survival (, ). Huang et al. (69) observed apoptotic and necrotic markers, including cleaved caspase-3 (c-caspase 3) and phosphorylated MLKL (p-MLKL), in METTL3 knockout IECs. Both necroptotic and apoptotic cells were enriched in the crypt region, potentially linked to METTL3 enrichment in crypts (70). In vivo, the abundant necroptotic and apoptotic cells in stem and transient amplifying cells but not in Paneth cells (69). Treg cells lacking METTL3 in intestinal epithelium exhibited loss of m6A modification on SOCS mRNA, leading to increased SOCS mRNA stability and expression, which suppressed the IL-2-STAT5 signaling pathway and impaired Treg-mediated anti-inflammatory capacity. Consequently, METTL3-deficient Treg mice developed severe autoimmune diseases (71). METTL14-mediated m6A modification of GsdmC mRNA is essential for the viability of Lgr5+ colonic stem cells, ensuring proper mucosal development (72). METTL14 deletion induced colonic stem cell apoptosis, causing mucosal barrier dysfunction and severe colitis, partly by regulating Nfkbia mRNA stability and the NF-κB pathway (). Ito-Kureha et al. (73) reported that WTAP-deficient T cells in mice developed colitis at 7 weeks of age, accompanied by upregulated RIPK1 expression and apoptosis. Conversely, WTAP knockdown suppressed M1 macrophage polarization and CD4+ T cell infiltration, alleviating UC progression in mice (74). These findings highlight cell type-specific roles of m6A modification, sometimes exerting opposing effects.
7.4 m6A modification and intestinal barrier
Emerging evidence indicates that m6A regulates intestinal barrier integrity, encompassing mechanical, chemical, and immune barriers. Li et al. (75) demonstrated that METTL3 knockdown reduced ZO-1, occludin, and claudin-3 expression in IECs, compromising barrier function. METTL3 also modulates β-defensin production after E. coli infection by enhancing GPR161 transcription via m6A modification, thereby promoting defensin expression to counteract bacterial invasion (76). m6A readers IGF2BP1 and HuR directly bind to tight junction protein mRNAs (e.g., occludin, JAM-1, claudin-1, claudin-3, E-cadherin), enhancing their stability and translation to reinforce barrier integrity. IGF2BP1 deficiency exacerbated DSS-induced colitis by impairing epithelial barrier function (77). Intestinal HuR knockout mice exhibited reduced Paneth cell numbers and lysozyme granules, with HuR regulating Paneth cell function via TLR2 membrane localization (78). METTL14 deficiency diminished goblet cell-derived mucins (MUC2, TFF3), exacerbating tight junction dysfunction (72). Li et al. (75) demonstrated that mesenchymal stem cells improve intestinal barrier function in ischemia-reperfusion injury via exosomal miR-34a-5p secretion. Mechanistically, METTL3/IGF2BP3 stabilizes pre-miR-34a through m6A modification, thereby enhancing mature miR-34a-5p expression (75). NEC is characterized by compromised intestinal barrier integrity, impaired mucosal repair (), Paneth cell depletion, and dysfunctional Paneth cell activity (79), suggesting that m6A-mediated regulation of intestinal barrier homeostasis may contribute to NEC pathogenesis.
7.5 m6A modification and gut microbiota
m6A modification exhibit bidirectional crosstalk with gut microbiota. Microbial communities modulate host mRNA m6A patterns, as evidenced by germ-free mice showing elevated m6A levels in intestinal, hepatic, and cerebral tissues compared to conventional counterparts (80). Microbial metabolites including folate, betaine, choline, vitamin B12, fumarate, succinate, and butyrate remodel one-carbon metabolism, methionine cycling, and the tricarboxylic acid cycle to regulate SAM and α-ketoglutarate production, critical substrates for methylation and demethylation processes, thereby dynamically shaping m6A landscape (81). During early postnatal development, gut microbiota maturation (e.g., folate-producing Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium) enhances intestinal DNA methylation and RNA m6A modifications, ensuring proper gut maturation (80, 82). During the critical postnatal developmental window, the gastrointestinal microbiota undergoes dynamic maturation characterized by expanding taxonomic diversity and functional abundance, establishing spatiotemporal microbiota-host crosstalk (83). Conversely, host m6A modification can modulate microbial homeostasis. METTL14 knockout mice maintain baseline microbiota composition at 4 weeks but develop significant dysbiosis by 24 weeks, characterized by depletion of S24-7 and Lachnospiraceae with concurrent expansion of Bacteroidaceae, Spirochaetaceae, Deferribacteraceae, and Enterobacteriaceae (84). In vivo, FTO deficiency restructures gut microbiota composition by enhancing Lactobacillus abundance and suppressing Porphyromonadaceae and Helicobacter, thereby attenuating intestinal inflammation (85). FTO critically governs protein-energy homeostasis, with essential amino acids (EAAs) serving as potent stimulators of its expression. Notably, formula milk contains threefold higher branched-chain EAAs (BCAAs) compared to breast milk, potentially hyperactivating FTO signaling (86). Therefore, the overexpression of FTO may be one of the mechanisms by which formula feeding increases the risk of NEC.
8 Conclusion
In conclusion, accumulating evidence validates the involvement of multiple epigenetic mechanisms in NEC pathogenesis. Notably, the pivotal role of m6A modification in intestinal homeostasis underscores its potential to drive NEC development. Epigenetic modifications orchestrate gene expression across transcriptional and post-transcriptional tiers, modulating NEC susceptibility and progression. These findings highlight promising therapeutic targets for NEC intervention.
Statements
Author contributions
YiC: Writing – original draft. YuC: Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Correction note
A correction has been made to this article. Details can be found at: 10.3389/fped.2025.1704225.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1.
AlsaiedAIslamNThalibL. Global incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pediatr. (2020) 20:344. 10.1186/s12887-020-02231-5
2.
YangHBMinJYByunJKoDKimHYMinKBet alIncidence of necrotizing enterocolitis in South Korea from 2007 to 2017. J Perinatol. (2021) 41:1092–9. 10.1038/s41372-021-01053-2
3.
HanSMHongCRKnellJEdwardsEMMorrowKASollRFet alTrends in incidence and outcomes of necrotizing enterocolitis over the last 12 years: a multicenter cohort analysis. J Pediatr Surg. (2020) 55:998–1001. 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.02.046
4.
VaidyaRYiJXO’SheaTMJensenETJosephRMShenbergerJet alLong-term outcome of necrotizing enterocolitis and spontaneous intestinal perforation. Pediatrics. (2022) 150:e2022056445. 10.1542/peds.2022-056445
5.
XiongTMaheshwariANeuJEi-SaieAPammiM. An overview of systematic reviews of randomized-controlled trials for preventing necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants. Neonatology. (2020) 117:46–56. 10.1159/000504371
6.
MooreLDLeTFanG. DNA methylation and its basic function. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2013) 38:23–38. 10.1038/npp.2012.112
7.
FrazerLCYamaguchiYSinghDKAkopyantsNSGoodM. DNA methylation in necrotizing enterocolitis. Expert Rev Mol Med. (2024) 26:e16. 10.1017/erm.2024.16
8.
NairJMaheshwariA. Epigenetics in necrotizing enterocolitis. Curr Pediatr Rev. (2021) 17:172–84. 10.2174/1573396317666210421110608
9.
MeisterALDohenyKKTravagliRA. Necrotizing enterocolitis: it’s not all in the gut. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). (2020) 245:85–95. 10.1177/1535370219891971
10.
HackamDJSodhiCP. Bench to bedside—new insights into the pathogenesis of necrotizing enterocolitis. Recent advances in understanding necrotizing enterocolitis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2022) 19:468–79. 10.1038/s41575-022-00594-x
11.
LinLXiaXLiuWWangYHuaZ. Clinical characteristics of neonatal fulminant necrotizing enterocolitis in a tertiary children’s hospital in the last 10 years. PLoS One. (2019) 14:e0224880. 10.1371/journal.pone.0224880
12.
KovlerMLGonzalez SalazarAJFultonWBLuPYamaguchiYZhouQ. Toll-like receptor 4-mediated enteric glia loss is critical for the development of necrotizing enterocolitis. Sci Transl Med. (2021) 13:eabg3459. 10.1126/scitranslmed.abg3459
13.
YinYLiuFLiYTangRWangJ. mRNA expression of TLR4, TLR9 and NF-κB in a neonatal murine model of necrotizing enterocolitis. Mol Med Rep. (2016) 14:1953–6. 10.3892/mmr.2016.5455
14.
GribarSCSodhiCPRichardsonWMAnandRJGittesGKBrancaMF. Reciprocal expression and signaling of TLR4 and TLR9 in the pathogenesis and treatment of necrotizing enterocolitis. J Immunol. (2009) 182:636–46. 10.4049/jimmunol.182.1.636
15.
PammiMCopeJTarrPIWarnerBBMorrowALMaiVet alIntestinal dysbiosis in preterm infants preceding necrotizing enterocolitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Microbiome. (2017) 5:31. 10.1186/s40168-017-0248-8
16.
MeridSKNovoloacaASharpGCKüpersLKKhoATRoyRet alEpigenome-wide meta-analysis of blood DNA methylation in newborns and children identifies numerous loci related to gestational age. Genome Med. (2020) 12:25. 10.1186/s13073-020-0716-9
17.
GoodMChuTShawPMcClainLChamberlainACastroCet alGlobal hypermethylation of intestinal epithelial cells is a hallmark feature of neonatal surgical necrotizing enterocolitis. Clin Epigenetics. (2020) 12:190. 10.1186/s13148-020-00983-6
18.
TianBXuXLiLTianYLiuYMuYet alEpigenetic insights into necrotizing enterocolitis: unraveling methylation-regulated biomarkers. Inflammation. (2024) 48:236–53. 10.1007/s10753-024-02054-x
19.
KlerkDHPlöschTVerkaik-SchakelRNHulscherJBFKooiEMWBosAFet alDNA methylation of TLR4, VEGFA, and DEFA5 is associated with necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants. Front Pediatr. (2021) 9:630817. 10.3389/fped.2021.630817
20.
GoodMChuTShawPNolanLSWrobleskiJCastroCet alSelective hypermethylation is evident in small intestine samples from infants with necrotizing enterocolitis. Clin Epigenetics. (2022) 14:49. 10.1186/s13148-022-01266-y
21.
KlerkDHKooiEMBosAFHulscherJBVerkaik-SchakelRNPlöschT. Hypermethylation of CTDSPL2 prior to necrotizing enterocolitis onset. Epigenomics. (2023) 15:479–86. 10.2217/epi-2023-0119
22.
ChenZZhangY. Role of mammalian DNA methyltransferases in development. Annu Rev Biochem. (2020) 89:135–58. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-103019-102815
23.
ElliottENSheafferKLSchugJStappenbeckTSKaestnerKH. Dnmt1 is essential to maintain progenitors in the perinatal intestinal epithelium. Development. (2015) 142:2163–72. 10.1242/dev.117341
24.
SubramanianSBuH-FChouPMWangXGengHAkhtarSet alScattered crypt intestinal epithelial cell apoptosis induces necrotizing enterocolitis via intricate mechanisms. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2024) 18:101364. 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2024.05.012
25.
VenkatramanAYuWNitkinCSampathV. Intestinal stem cell development in the neonatal gut: pathways regulating development and relevance to necrotizing enterocolitis. Cells. (2021) 10:312. 10.3390/cells10020312
26.
NarabayashiHKomaCNakataKIkegamiMNakanishiY. Gut microbiota-dependent adaptor molecule recruits DNA methyltransferase to the TLR4 gene in colonic epithelial cells to suppress inflammatory reactions. Front Mol Biosci. (2022) 9:1005136. 10.3389/fmolb.2022.1005136
27.
TakahashiKSugiYHosonoAKaminogawaS. Epigenetic regulation of TLR4 gene expression in intestinal epithelial cells for the maintenance of intestinal homeostasis. J Immunol. (2009) 183:6522–9. 10.4049/jimmunol.0901271
28.
CorteseRLuLYuYRudenDClaudEC. Epigenome-microbiome crosstalk: a potential new paradigm influencing neonatal susceptibility to disease. Epigenetics. (2016) 11:205–15. 10.1080/15592294.2016.1155011
29.
PanXGongDNguyenDNZhangXHuQLuHet alEarly microbial colonization affects DNA methylation of genes related to intestinal immunity and metabolism in preterm pigs. DNA Res. (2018) 25:287–96. 10.1093/dnares/dsy001
30.
GaoFZhangJJiangPGongDWangJWXiaY. Marked methylation changes in intestinal genes during the perinatal period of preterm neonates. BMC Genomics. (2014) 15:716. 10.1186/1471-2164-15-716
31.
MaSXuLChenLSunXHuFGongYet alNovel pharmacological inhibition of JMJD3 improves necrotizing enterocolitis by attenuating the inflammatory response and ameliorating intestinal injury. Biochem Pharmacol. (2022) 203:115165. 10.1016/j.bcp.2022.115165
32.
GuoTHuSXuWZhouJChenFGaoTet alElevated expression of histone deacetylase HDAC8 suppresses arginine-proline metabolism in necrotizing enterocolitis. iScience. (2023) 26:106882. 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106882
33.
FeliceCLewisAIqbalSGordonHRigoniAColomboMPet alIntestinal inflammation is linked to hypoacetylation of histone 3 lysine 27 and can be reversed by valproic acid treatment in inflammatory bowel disease patients. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2021) 11:889–91. 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2020.11.009
34.
YazjiISodhiCPLeeEKGoodMEganCEAfraziAet alEndothelial TLR4 activation impairs intestinal microcirculatory perfusion in necrotizing enterocolitis via eNOS-NO-nitrite signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2013) 110:9451–6. 10.1073/pnas.1219997110
35.
WillemsRKrychLRybickiVJiangPSangildPTShenRLet alIntroducing enteral feeding induces intestinal subclinical inflammation and respective chromatin changes in preterm pigs. Epigenomics. (2015) 7:553–65. 10.2217/epi.15.13
36.
Ortega MorenoLChaparroMGisbertJP. Long non-coding RNAs and their potential role as biomarkers in inflammatory bowel disease. Int J Mol Sci. (2024) 25:8808. 10.3390/ijms25168808
37.
LiWZengYZhongJHuYXiongXZhouYet alProbiotics exert gut immunomodulatory effects by regulating the expression of host miRNAs. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. (2025) 17:557–68. 10.1007/s12602-024-10443-9
38.
HanYLiuXKangLChenDLiYZhangHet alA potential pathogenic hypoxia-related gene HK2 in necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) of newborns. BMC Pediatr. (2022) 22:617. 10.1186/s12887-022-03664-w
39.
NgPCChanKYYYuenTPSitTLamHSLeungKTet alPlasma miR-1290 is a novel and specific biomarker for early diagnosis of necrotizing enterocolitis-biomarker discovery with prospective cohort evaluation. J Pediatr. (2019) 205:83–90.e10. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.09.031
40.
LiuHWangY-B. Systematic large-scale meta-analysis identifies miRNA-429/200a/b and miRNA-141/200c clusters as biomarkers for necrotizing enterocolitis in newborn. Biosci Rep. (2019) 39(9):BSR20191503. 10.1042/BSR20191503
41.
MaSTianXYZhangYMuCShenHBismuthJet alE-selectin-targeting delivery of microRNAs by microparticles ameliorates endothelial inflammation and atherosclerosis. Sci Rep. (2016) 6:22910. 10.1038/srep22910
42.
YanXManagliaELiuSXTanXDWangXMarekCet alLack of VEGFR2 signaling causes maldevelopment of the intestinal microvasculature and facilitates necrotizing enterocolitis in neonatal mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. (2016) 310:716–25. 10.1152/ajpgi.00273.2015
43.
KatoT. Biological roles of hepatocyte growth factor-met signaling from genetically modified animals. Biomed Rep. (2017) 7:495–503. 10.3892/br.2017.1001
44.
ChenHZengLZhengWLiXLinB. Increased expression of microRNA-141-3p improves necrotizing enterocolitis of neonates through targeting MNX1. Front Pediatr. (2020) 8:385. 10.3389/fped.2020.00385
45.
LiXWangYWangYHeX. MiR-141-3p ameliorates RIPK1-mediated necroptosis of intestinal epithelial cells in necrotizing enterocolitis. Aging (Albany NY). (2020) 12:18073–83. 10.18632/aging.103608
46.
DondaKTorresBAMaheshwariA. Non-coding RNAs in neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. Newborn. (2022) 1:120–30. 10.5005/jp-journals-11002-0012
47.
DiSJCuiXWLiuTJShiYY. Therapeutic potential of human breast milk-derived exosomes in necrotizing enterocolitis. Mol Med. (2024) 30:243. 10.1186/s10020-024-01010-7
48.
YanXLiuLYaoSChenYYuQJiangCet alLncRNA and mRNA profiles of human milk-derived exosomes and their possible roles in protecting against necrotizing enterocolitis. Food Funct. (2022) 13:12953–65. 10.1039/D2FO01866G
49.
AngrisanoTPeroRBrancaccioMCorettiLFlorioEPezoneAet alCyclical DNA methylation and histone changes are induced by LPS to activate COX-2 in human intestinal epithelial cells. PLoS One. (2016) 11:e0156671. 10.1371/journal.pone.0156671
50.
SabnisACarrascoRLiuSXYanXManagliaEChouPMet alIntestinal vascular endothelial growth factor is decreased in necrotizing enterocolitis. Neonatology. (2015) 107:191–8. 10.1159/000368879
51.
YangHBKimHYKimSHKimSY. Suppressive role of vascular endothelial growth factor on intestinal apoptosis in induced necrotizing enterocolitis in rats. Ann Surg Treat Res. (2023) 105:157–64. 10.4174/astr.2023.105.3.157
52.
GuoMMZhangKZhangJH. Human breast milk-derived exosomal miR-148a-3p protects against necrotizing enterocolitis by regulating p53 and sirtuin 1. Inflammation. (2022) 45:1254–68. 10.1007/s10753-021-01618-5
53.
GaoXLiuWGaoPLiSChenZMaF. Melatonin-induced lncRNA LINC01512 prevents treg/Th17 imbalance by promoting SIRT1 expression in necrotizing enterocolitis. Int Immunopharmacol. (2021) 96:107787. 10.1016/j.intimp.2021.107787
54.
DengZJinJWangZWangYGaoQZhaoJ. The metal nanoparticle-induced inflammatory response is regulated by SIRT1 through NF-κB deacetylation in aseptic loosening. Int J Nanomedicine. (2017) 12:3617–36. 10.2147/IJN.S124661
55.
TangFChenLGaoHXiaoDLiX. M6a: an emerging role in programmed cell death. Front Cell Dev Biol. (2022) 10:817112. 10.3389/fcell.2022.817112
56.
ZhangJSongBZengYXuCGaoLGuoYet alM6a modification in inflammatory bowel disease provides new insights into clinical applications. Biomed Pharmacother. (2023) 159:114298. 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.114298
57.
LiuMXuKSaaoudFShaoYZhangRLuYet al29 m6A-RNA methylation (epitranscriptomic) regulators are regulated in 41 diseases including atherosclerosis and tumors potentially via ROS regulation-102 transcriptomic dataset analyses. J Immunol Res. (2022) 2022:1433323. 10.1155/2022/1433323
58.
MotawiTKShakerOGAmrGSenousyMA. RNA methylation machinery and m6A target genes as circulating biomarkers of ulcerative colitis and crohn’s disease: correlation with disease activity, location, and inflammatory cytokines. Clin Chim Acta. (2024) 561:119831. 10.1016/j.cca.2024.119831
59.
DingRLiRLiuJZhangJHanJ. Lipopolysaccharide induces inflammation and up-regulates the expression of methyltransferase-like 3 (METTL3) and METTL14 in human and mouse intestinal epithelial cells. Xi Bao Yu Fen Zi Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi. (2022) 38:308–15.
60.
DuanYLvXCaoXSunW. Effect of METTL3 gene on lipopolysaccharide induced damage to primary small intestinal epithelial cells in sheep. Int J Mol Sci. (2024) 25:9316. 10.3390/ijms25179316
61.
TongJWangXLiuYRenXWangAChenZet alPooled CRISPR screening identifies m6A as a positive regulator of macrophage activation. Sci Adv. (2021) 7:eabd4742. 10.1126/sciadv.abd4742
62.
LuoSLiaoCZhangLLingCZhangXXiePet alMETTL3-mediated M6a mRNA methylation regulates neutrophil activation through targeting TLR4 signaling. Cell Rep. (2024) 43:113666. 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113666
63.
WangATaoWTongJGaoJWangJHouGet alM6a modifications regulate intestinal immunity and rotavirus infection. Elife. (2022) 11:e73628. 10.7554/eLife.73628
64.
Olazagoitia-GarmendiaAZhangLMeraPGodboutJKSebastian-DelaCruzMGarcia-SantistebanIet alGluten-induced RNA methylation changes regulate intestinal inflammation via allele-specific XPO1 translation in epithelial cells. Gut. (2022) 71:68–76. 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322566
65.
LiYMaBWangZChenYDongY. The effect mechanism of N6-adenosine methylation (m6A) in melatonin regulated LPS-induced colon inflammation. Int J Biol Sci. (2024) 20:2491–506. 10.7150/ijbs.95316
66.
CaiYYuRKongYFengZXuQ. METTL3 regulates LPS-induced inflammatory response via the NOD1 signaling pathway. Cell Signal. (2022) 93:110283. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2022.110283
67.
DingCYangXLiuHRoulisMChenHChenYet alMETTL3 modulates colonic epithelium integrity via maintaining the self-renewal and differentiation of Lgr5+ stem cell. J Mol Cell Biol. (2025) 6:mjae060. 10.1093/jmcb/mjae060
68.
ZhangTDingCChenHZhaoJChenZChenBet alM6a mRNA modification maintains colonic epithelial cell homeostasis via NF-κB-mediated antiapoptotic pathway. Sci Adv. (2022) 8:eabl5723. 10.1126/sciadv.abl5723
69.
HuangMWangXZhangMLiuYChenYG. METTL3 restricts RIPK1-dependent cell death via the ATF3-cFLIP axis in the intestinal epithelium. Cell Regen. (2024) 13:14. 10.1186/s13619-024-00197-8
70.
LiuYHuangMWangXLiuZLiSChenY-G. Segregation of the stemness program from the proliferation program in intestinal stem cells. Stem Cell Rep. (2023) 18:1196–210. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2023.03.007
71.
TongJCaoGZhangTSefikEAmezcua VeselyMCBroughtonJPet alM6a mRNA methylation sustains treg suppressive functions. Cell Res. (2018) 28:253–6. 10.1038/cr.2018.7
72.
DuJSarkarRLiYHeLKangWLiaoWet alN6-adenomethylation of GsdmC is essential for Lgr5+ stem cell survival to maintain normal colonic epithelial morphogenesis. Dev Cell. (2022) 57:1976–94.e8. 10.1016/j.devcel.2022.07.006
73.
Ito-KurehaTLeoniCBorlandKCantiniGBataclanMMetzgerRNet alThe function of WTAP in N6-adenosine methylation of mRNAs controls T cell receptor signaling and survival of T cells. Nat Immunol. (2022) 23:1208–21. 10.1038/s41590-022-01268-1
74.
XieXChengSChenXWangX. WTAP Promotes the progression of ulcerative colitis by silencing the expression of CES2 through m6A modification. J Autoimmun. (2024) 148:103295. 10.1016/j.jaut.2024.103295
75.
LiYJXuQWXuCHLiWM. MSC promotes the secretion of exosomal miR-34a-5p and improve intestinal barrier function through METTL3-mediated Pre-miR-34A m6A modification. Mol Neurobiol. (2022) 59:5222–35. 10.1007/s12035-022-02833-3
76.
LiYJXuQWXuCHLiWM. Enterotoxigenic escherichia coli infection promotes enteric defensin expression via FOXO6-METTL3-m6A-GPR161 signalling axis. RNA Biol. (2021) 18:576–86. 10.1080/15476286.2020.1820193
77.
SinghVGowdaCPSinghVGanapathyASKaramchandaniDMEshelmanMAet alThe mRNA-binding protein IGF2BP1 maintains intestinal barrier function by up-regulating occludin expression. J Biol Chem. (2020) 295:8602–12. 10.1074/jbc.AC120.013646
78.
XiaoLLiXXChungHKKalakondaSCaiJZCaoSet alRNA-binding protein HuR regulates paneth cell function by altering membrane localization of TLR2 via post-transcriptional control of CNPY3. Gastroenterology. (2019) 157:731–43. 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.05.010
79.
YangJShiY. Paneth cell development in the neonatal gut: pathway regulation, development, and relevance to necrotizing enterocolitis. Front Cell Dev Biol. (2023) 11:1184159. 10.3389/fcell.2023.1184159
80.
WangXLiYChenWShiHErenAMMorozovAet alTranscriptome-wide reprogramming of N6-methyladenosine modification by the mouse microbiome. Cell Res. (2019) 29:167–70. 10.1038/s41422-018-0127-2
81.
ZhuoRXuMWangXZhouBWuXLeoneVet alThe regulatory role of N6 -methyladenosine modification in the interaction between host and microbes. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. (2022) 13:e1725. 10.1002/wrna.1725
82.
LiuMChenQSunYZengLWuHGuQet alProbiotic potential of a folate-producing strain latilactobacillus sakei LZ217 and its modulation effects on human gut Microbiota. Foods. (2022) 11:234. 10.3390/foods11020234
83.
WangHHanJZhangX-A. Interplay of m6A RNA methylation and gut microbiota in modulating gut injury. Gut Microbes. (2025) 17:2467213. 10.1080/19490976.2025.2467213
84.
LuTXZhengZZhangLSunHLBissonnetteMHuangHet alA new model of spontaneous colitis in mice induced by deletion of an RNA m6A methyltransferase component METTL14 in T cells. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2020) 10:747–61. 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2020.07.001
85.
SunLMaLZhangHCaoYWangCHouNet alFTO deficiency reduces anxiety- and depression-like behaviors in mice via alterations in gut microbiota. Theranostics. (2019) 9:721–33. 10.7150/thno.31562
86.
MelnikBC. Milk: an epigenetic amplifier of FTO-mediated transcription? Implications for western diseases. J Transl Med. (2015) 13:385. 10.1186/s12967-015-0746-z
Summary
Keywords
necrotizing enterocolitis, epigenetics, N6-methyladenosine, neonates, DNA methylation
Citation
Chen Y and Chen Y (2025) Epigenetics in neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis: current understanding and the potential involvement of m6A modification. Front. Pediatr. 13:1617042. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1617042
Received
23 April 2025
Accepted
14 August 2025
Published
02 September 2025
Corrected
08 October 2025
Volume
13 - 2025
Edited by
Elisabeth M. W. Kooi, University Medical Center Groningen, Netherlands
Reviewed by
Torsten Plösch, University Medical Center Groningen, Netherlands
Lauren Frazer, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Chen and Chen.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yujun Chen chenyujun1006@163.com
ORCID Yixian Chen orcid.org/0009-0007-3103-9759
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.