Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CASE REPORT article

Front. Pediatr., 03 October 2025

Sec. Pediatric Urology

Volume 13 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2025.1629410

Congenital duplicated ureter-vagina anomalous anastomosis causing female urinary incontinence: a case report and literature review


Shuxin LiShuxin Li1Hongliang CaoHongliang Cao1Yueqiu ZhangYueqiu Zhang1Jinghan SuJinghan Su2Tong YangTong Yang1Wei Wei
Wei Wei1*Xin Lian

Xin Lian1*
  • 1Department of Surgical Urology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
  • 2Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery II, General Surgery Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China

Ectopic ureter is a rare congenital anomaly, often challenging to diagnose due to atypical anatomical positioning and variable clinical presentations. Consideration should be given to the possibility of an ectopic ureteral orifice in young women presenting with persistent, unexplained urinary incontinence. This report details a 22-year-old nulliparous female presenting with persistent urinary incontinence. Imaging revealed left ureteral dilatation, with CT suggesting a possible connection between the distal ureter and vagina. Magnetic resonance imaging of the urinary system confirmed bilateral renal abnormalities with double ureteral malformations, hydronephrosis on the left side, and ectopic opening of the left ureter into the anterior vaginal wall, accompanied by a bicornuate uterus. Cystoscopy confirmed a double ureteric orifice on the right side and an ectopic left ureteral opening into the vagina. The patient underwent intraoperative cystoscopy, ureter cystostomy, and double-J stent placement. At the two-month post-operative follow-up, the patient's urinary incontinence symptoms and left-sided hydronephrosis with ureteral dilatation had completely resolved. Normal urinary function was restored, and the double-J stents were successfully removed via cystoscopy. This case underscores the need for heightened vigilance regarding congenital ectopic ureteral orifices in young women with no history of childbirth or surgery presenting with urinary incontinence. The combination of cystoscopy and imaging aids in definitive diagnosis, with surgical reimplantation yielding favorable outcomes. Early identification and intervention are crucial for improving prognosis.

Introduction

Ectopic ureter is a rare congenital urological anomaly characterized by the abnormal positioning of the ureteral drainage opening, which is located outside the usual anatomical location. The prevalence of this condition is extremely low, typically ranging from 0.025% to 0.05% (1). Most ectopic ureters are associated with a dual collecting system in the urinary tract, featuring an abnormal number of ureters. These abnormal ureters may drain urine into the bladder or connect abnormally with other peripheral organs. Ectopic ureters are often detected in childhood, as they may be present from birth. Ectopic ureters may also be diagnosed at a later stage due to urinary tract infections, urinary incontinence, or other related symptoms (2, 3). The prevalence of ectopic ureters is significantly higher in women than in men (4). The cause of an ectopic ureter may involve abnormal embryonic development or a medical injury, both of which can result in an abnormal ureter position (5, 6). Additionally, ectopic ureters are frequently accompanied by other urinary tract malformations, such as duplicate kidneys or ureters. Clinical manifestations include urinary incontinence, urinary tract infections, and hydronephrosis (7, 8). Chronic hydronephrosis may impair renal function and, in severe cases, lead to renal insufficiency (9). Ectopic ureteral anomalies usually require surgical intervention. Surgical approaches to treating ectopic ureters include ectopic ureterostomy and possibly combined nephrectomy if the ipsilateral kidney is nonfunctioning. Suppose the patient's ureter and kidneys are functioning well. In that case, the less invasive option of ureteral bladder reimplantation, which restores the normal urinary flow pathway by dissecting and anastomosing the ureter to the bladder, can provide a better prognosis for the patient.

Case presentation

A 22-year-old female patient presented with persistent urinary incontinence since infancy, spanning over two decades. The patient's perineal area remains persistently moist, requiring 3–4 diaper changes daily. The patient had no significant past medical history and no familial history of similar conditions. No history of surgery or childbirth at the time of consultation. The patient grew up in an orphanage after being abandoned as an infant. Due to this socially vulnerable background and lack of longstanding familial support, her condition was neither brought to medical attention nor formally evaluated in childhood or adolescence. Clinical examination revealed thickening of the external urethral orifice, with a suspected vaginal opening measuring approximately 0.7 centimeters in diameter. To determine the cause of the patient's long-standing urinary incontinence, we conducted a series of systematic imaging and endoscopic investigations. Initial multi-slice CT imaging revealed compensatory enlargement of the left kidney with hydronephrosis affecting the entire renal pelvis and ureter. A cystic, low-density lesion connecting the distal ureter to the anterior vaginal wall was identified, suggesting a possible ectopic ureteral opening into the vagina (Figure 1). Magnetic resonance imaging of the urinary system confirmed bilateral renal abnormalities with double ureteral malformations, hydronephrosis on the left side, and ectopic opening of the left ureter into the anterior vaginal wall, accompanied by a bicornuate uterus. Intravenous urography (IVU) further confirmed bilateral ureteral anomalies on the right side, whilst the dilated left ureter exhibited a bifurcated pattern in its middle and upper segments, ultimately converging near the bladder, thus ruling out complete duplication (Figure 2). Cystoscopy revealed two openings in the right ureter consistent with a duplicated ureteral anomaly. An ectopic opening of the left ureter was identified near the external urethral orifice on the anterior vaginal wall. In contrast, the ureteral opening on the ipsilateral side of the bladder trigone was absent (Figure 3). It should be noted that a limitation in this case was the absence of renal scintigraphy to assess left renal segmental function. This examination is crucial for identifying such congenital anomalies, serving as a key basis for guiding clinical decision-making and selecting the surgical approach. The patient underwent transurethral cystoscopy and left ureter cystostomy under general anesthesia. Intraoperatively, the left ureteral orifice was found to be ectopically located on the anterior vaginal wall near the external urethral orifice. Additionally, approximately 2 cm above the external iliac artery, the ureter exhibited thickened adhesions spanning about 8 cm in length (Figure 4). The definitively identified ectopic opening location precisely matched the preoperative cystoscopy localization, confirming the diagnosis of congenital ureterovaginal fistula. Ureter cystostomy was performed by creating a subcutaneous tunnel, excising the redundant ureter segment, and anastomosing it to the bladder mucosa, with a double-J stent placed. Postoperative urinary incontinence symptoms were completely resolved, and the patient was discharged successfully on the fourth postoperative day. During the two-month follow-up period, the patient reported having completely discontinued the use of urinary pads. Ultrasound follow-up revealed complete resolution of left hydronephrosis with no significant ureteral dilatation observed. After two months postoperatively, the double-J stent was removed via cystoscopy, and the patient's urinary function returned to normal.

Figure 1
CT scan images showing axial, sagittal, and coronal views of the abdomen and pelvis. Red arrows indicate specific areas of interest in each section. Panel A displays the axial view, panel B the sagittal view, panel C the coronal view, and panel D another sagittal view.

Figure 1. CT scan of the ureter shows hydronephrosis of the left renal pelvic ureter (A,C,D), with a suspected terminal ureter connected to a cystic hypodense shadow of the vagina (B).

Figure 2
X-ray images labeled A and B show an abdomen with red arrows pointing at specific areas. Image A, timed at fifteen minutes, highlights a region near the spine. Image B, timed at twenty-five minutes, indicates another area nearby.

Figure 2. Intravenous urography revealed a double ureter on the right side (A) and a double ureter on the left side, which converged into a single ureter (B).

Figure 3
Four endoscopic images labeled A to D show varying views of the internal surface of what appears to be a human organ. Image A shows a pale surface with visible blood vessels, B displays a slightly darker shade with possible inflammation, C reveals a pinkish surface with more pronounced structures, and D exhibits a smoother, lighter pink texture.

Figure 3. Illustrates various ureteral openings and related abnormalities. (A) Right sided orthotopic ureteral opening. (B) Right superior renal ureteral opening. (C) Abnormal mucosa in the urethra. (D) Left ectopic ureteral opening.

Figure 4
Surgical procedure showing a gloved hand holding tissue in an open wound, with a green arrow indicating a specific area. Metal retractors and surgical drapes are visible.

Figure 4. Two ureters converge to form a single ureter at the upper-middle end of the left side, and the lower end of the ureteral confluence joins the vagina.

Discussion

An ectopic ureter is an anatomical abnormality of the urinary system characterized primarily by the end of the ureter not opening into the triangular region of the bladder, but draining into the non-triangular region of the bladder or an adjacent peripheral organ, such as the vagina, urethral vestibule, or rectum (4, 10). The vagina and urethra are common sites for ectopic ureteral openings (11). The prevalence of ectopic ureters in the overall population is approximately 0.025%–0.05% (2). Regarding gender distribution, the prevalence is significantly higher in females than in males, with a ratio of roughly 2–6 to 1 (2). The leading causes of the disease include congenital developmental anomalies and medically induced injuries, the latter of which are relatively rare, with most cases caused by congenital anomalies (4, 5). Individuals with a family history of ectopic ureters, exposure to abnormal environmental factors during pregnancy, and deletions and mutations in genes that inhibit the formation of anomalous ureters, such as the fetal BMP-4 gene, are risk factors that may increase the risk of developing ectopic ureters (1214). The underlying cause of ectopic ureters is the failure of the ureteric bud to migrate normally to the bladder triangle during the embryonic period, resulting in its termination in an alternative location (4, 15). This anomaly usually occurs in the 4th–7th week of gestation and is associated with misalignment of the ureteric bud as it separates from Wolfe's canal (4, 15).

The most common clinical symptoms of ectopic ureter in women are persistent or intermittent urine leakage and recurrent urinary tract infections (16, 17). This is because the ectopic ureter bypasses the external urethral sphincter, interfering with its ability to control urine flow effectively and leading to abnormal urine distribution and an increased risk of urinary tract infections (18, 19). The clinical symptoms of male ectopic ureter are more insidious, mainly because male ectopic ureters are less likely to bypass the external urethral sphincter. Therefore, male urinary incontinence is less common (15, 20, 21). However, male patients may present with recurrent urinary tract infections or epididymitis, and the opening of the male ectopic ureter is most often located near the urethra or seminal vesicles in the prostate (15, 20). In women, the ectopic ureter may open in the vagina, which may be manifested as increased vaginal discharge or misdiagnosed as a gynecological disease (1, 22). If the ectopic ureter is combined with ureteral obstruction or hydronephrosis, low back pain may occur (22). Patients with ectopic ureters often have a combination of renal malformations, with 80% of female patients having ectopic ureters with double collecting systems, as well as other types of malformations, including dysplastic kidneys, ectopic kidneys, or atrophic kidneys (10, 16, 23). Infantile patients tend to present with symptoms of urinary incontinence or urinary tract infection or are diagnosed early due to prenatal ultrasound findings of hydronephrosis (24, 25). Some patients may exhibit no typical clinical symptoms and may be detected only incidentally in imaging studies (15, 23).

Although our case presented with typical clinical manifestations, the symptoms and diagnostic approaches for ectopic ureters vary significantly among individuals. To contextualize this case within a broader clinical framework, we reviewed recently published representative case reports (Table 1). Regarding diagnosis, imaging studies are crucial for confirmation, with ultrasound serving as an initial screening tool. However, literature consistently emphasizes the central role of magnetic resonance urography (MRU). For young patients with suspected complex congenital urological anomalies, MRU should be considered the initial imaging modality of choice due to its superior soft-tissue characterization, lack of ionizing radiation, and ability to provide detailed anatomical and functional information in a single examination (11, 28, 3133). CT provides detailed three-dimensional imaging, and endoscopy allows for direct visualization of the opening location or surrounding urine accumulation (1, 11, 28, 34). Moreover, for patients with ectopic ureters, preoperative voiding cystourethrography is crucial for locating the ectopic ureteral orifice or assessing the presence of vesicoureteral reflux and bladder outlet obstruction (10, 35). Additionally, renal scintigraphy is indispensable for functional assessment, as it is crucial in determining whether to perform nephron-sparing or radical surgery (4, 36).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Comparison of clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment methods in published case reports of ectopic ureter.

Treatment options for ectopic ureters require comprehensive consideration of multiple factors, primarily including the degree of renal impairment, anatomical abnormalities, and the severity of clinical symptoms. For asymptomatic patients, no specific intervention is typically required, and regular follow-up observation is sufficient. In this case, despite the presence of a redundant right ureter with an opening not located in the bladder trigone, surgical resection is unnecessary since it has not caused any clinical symptoms. Standard surgical approaches for ectopic ureters include ectopic ureterostomy, ureter cystoplasty, ectopic urethrectomy, and ipsilateral nephrectomy (15, 30, 37, 38). A preoperative comprehensive evaluation is essential to determine the precise location of the ectopic ureter, renal morphology, and functional status, thereby enabling the development of an individualized surgical plan (16). In the comprehensive assessment of ectopic ureters, the integration of functional renal imaging techniques, such as dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) or mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG-3) scintigraphy, is paramount (36, 39). Such imaging studies quantitatively assess the functional contribution of compromised nephrons and aid in distinguishing salvageable parenchymal tissue from segments with complete loss of function (36, 39). A significant limitation of our preoperative assessment was the absence of functional renal imaging studies. Such imaging techniques are crucial for quantifying functional disparities among affected renal segments, particularly in complex renal anomalies with underlying developmental abnormalities. Although CT supported the decision for ureteral reimplantation in this case and intravenous pyelography demonstrated preserved contrast excretion and intraoperative renal morphology, the lack of objective quantitative data remains a weakness in the evaluation. When imaging demonstrates minimal function in the relevant renal segment, the surgical strategy should shift toward pyeloureterectomy rather than reconstruction to eliminate nonfunctional tissue and sources of incontinence. For functional nephrons, ureter cystoplasty is the preferred approach, aiming to restore normal anatomy and maximize renal function preservation (37, 40). For cases of duplicated collecting systems with severe functional impairment in the upper renal segment, upper nephrectomy combined with urethrectomy is a common and effective treatment approach (15, 38, 41). Compared to urethrectomy or partial nephrectomy, ureter cystostomy offers advantages such as reduced trauma, greater preservation of nephrons, and lower risk of postoperative renal insufficiency. Additionally, uretero-ureteral anastomosis serves as a viable alternative, particularly for duplicated collecting systems, where the ectopic ureter can be reimplanted onto a normally positioned ureter (38, 42).

The surgical management of ectopic ureters has evolved with the adoption of minimally invasive techniques. Laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgery offer patients additional benefits, including reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, and improved cosmetic outcomes (43, 44). Furthermore, minimally invasive procedures are increasingly recognized as the standard treatment for many cases of ectopic ureter, particularly in pediatric patients (45, 46). These approaches are highly effective for nephrectomy, heminephrectomy, and even complex ureteral reimplantation in selected patients (43, 47, 48). In the present case, however, an open surgical approach was elected due to the intraoperative finding of significant peritureteral fibrosis and adhesions, which increased the complexity of dissection and the risk of inadvertent injury. The primary objective remained the successful resolution of incontinence and the preservation of renal function, which was achieved through ureteroneocystostomy.

Conclusion

This case highlights the need for heightened vigilance regarding congenital ectopic ureteral orifices in young female patients presenting with persistent urinary incontinence, particularly in those without a history of childbirth or surgery. The condition can be definitively diagnosed through a combination of imaging studies and endoscopic examination. Surgical reconstruction to restore normal anatomical pathways significantly improves patients' quality of life and enhances the prognosis of renal function.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Ethics Committee of the First Hospital of Jilin University. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

SL: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. HC: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YZ: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JS: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. TY: Conceptualization, Investigation, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. WW: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. XL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. WU JIEPING Medical Foundation (No. 3D4240299428).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Abbreviations

CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MRU, magnetic resonance urography; IVU, intravenous urography; DTPA, diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid; DMSA, dimercaptosuccinic acid; MAG-3, mercaptoacetyltriglycine.

References

1. Wang Q, Wu Z, Zhang F, Akbar R, Lou Y, Zhou J, et al. Gynecological diagnosis and treatment of ectopic ureter insertion into vagina: analysis of five cases and a literature review. J Clin Med. (2022) 11(21):6267. doi: 10.3390/jcm11216267

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Patel M, Parikh U, Shrotriya R, Kadam S, Shah J, Chandna S. Bilateral single system ectopic ureters with vaginal insertion in a female child, a rare variant. Urology. (2021) 149:e37–9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.10.025

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Liu F, Liu F, Xu Y, Zhang C, Li Q, Guo L. Congenital ureterovaginal fistula: a rare case of single-system ectopic ureter opening into the vagina with ipsilateral ectopic kidney diagnosed via ultrasound. Quant Imaging Med Surg. (2024) 14(8):6161–5. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-213

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Dhale A, Pendkar R, Hatwar G, Dharamshi JD, Trivedi Y. Ectopic ureter opening in vagina: a rare cause of nonfunctional kidney and urinary incontinence in a pediatric patient. Cureus. (2024) 16(5):e60052. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60052

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Ratajczak JM, Hladun T, Orchel G. Iatrogenic ureterovaginal fistula after laparoscopic hysterectomy: a case report. Prz Menopauzalny. (2021) 20(1):48–51. doi: 10.5114/pm.2021.104337

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Pyra K, Szmygin M, Szmygin H, Jargiello T, Rechberger T, Wozniak S. Uretero-vaginal fistulas—clinical presentation, treatment and literature overview. Ginekol Pol. (2022) 93(6):501–5. doi: 10.5603/GP.a2021.0240

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Mahmood H, Hadjipavlou M, Das R, Anderson C. Robotic partial nephrectomy for duplex kidney with ectopic ureter draining in the vagina in an adult patient with urinary incontinence. BMJ Case Rep. (2017) 2017:bcr2016218576. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2016-218576

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Duicu C, Kiss E, Simu I, Aldea C. A rare case of double-system with ectopic ureteral openings into vagina. Front Pediatr. (2018) 6:176. doi: 10.3389/fped.2018.00176

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. M Alahmad Y, Elmajdoub A, Barah A. An unusual presentation of a rare combination of double moiety and vaginal ureter insertion. Cureus. (2023) 15(11):e49574. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49574

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Hussen NB, Kumsa ID, Gebreamlak AL. Detection and management of a case of single system ectopic ureteral insertion to vagina with atrophic ectopic kidney. Int J Surg Case Rep. (2023) 106:108234. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2023.108234

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Rani K, Surolia P, Jaipal U, Mannan N. Ectopic ureter: spectrum of magnetic resonance imaging findings. Cureus. (2024) 16(4):e58977. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58977

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Mohamed F, Jehangir S. Coexistent duplication of urethra and a refluxing ectopic ureter presenting as recurrent epididymo-orchitis in a child. BMJ Case Rep. (2017) 2017:bcr2017220278. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2017-220278

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Meuser M, Deuper L, Rudat C, Aydoğdu N, Thiesler H, Zarnovican P, et al. FGFR2 signaling enhances the SHH-BMP4 signaling axis in early ureter development. Development. (2022) 149(1):dev200021. doi: 10.1242/dev.200021

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Lopes FM, Roberts NA, Zeef LA, Gardiner NJ, Woolf AS. Overactivity or blockade of transforming growth factor-β each generate a specific ureter malformation. J Pathol. (2019) 249(4):472–84. doi: 10.1002/path.5335

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Al-Smair A, Saadeh A, Azizieh O, Al-Ali A. Duplex collecting system with ectopic ureter into the posterior urethra: a case report. Cureus. (2022) 14(3):e23609. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23609

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Bu L, Nie F, Li Y, Wang T, Yang X, Yang D. Ectopic ureter-A retrospective analysis, symptom and treatment. Arch Esp Urol. (2022) 75(10):807–12. doi: 10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20227510.118

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Fonseca RR, Covita A, Mota RL. Ureteral duplication with an heterotopic ureteric implantation: a less common cause of adult urinary incontinence. BMJ Case Rep. (2021) 14(2):e239572. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-239572

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Chionardes MA, Liemarto AK, Gunardi SL. Unilateral duplicated collecting system and ureter with severe hydroureteronephrosis and ectopic ureter insertion of upper pole moiety: a case report. Ann Med Surg (Lond). (2022) 74:103255. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103255

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Pinto DS, George T, Saxena D, Joseph T, Hoisala VR. Ureteral reflux into an ectopic upper moeity of a duplex kidney from the bladder neck with distal ureteral pseudodiverticulum formation. J Clin Diagn Res. (2016) 10(9):Td07–9. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/21739.8455

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Kaplish D, Vagha JD, Meshram RJ, Lohiya S, Hampe P. A case of ectopic ureter with right atrophied kidney in a pediatric patient. Cureus. (2024) 16(2):e53360. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53360

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Heijkoop B, Lahoud J, Wong ELH. Endoscopic stone management in an ectopic ureter inserting into the prostatic urethra. BMJ Case Rep. (2023) 16(9):e254927. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2023-254927

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Eubanks AA, Gonzalez HM. Congenital megaureter presenting in an adult as a vaginal wall cyst. Obstet Gynecol. (2016) 127(5):859–61. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001357

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Amenu D, Asmare A, Siraj A. Congenital ureterovaginal fistula: a rare case of single-system ectopic ureter with ipsilateral ectopic kidney managed by vaginal approach: a case report. J Med Case Rep. (2021) 15(1):617. doi: 10.1186/s13256-021-03157-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Ortiz R, Parente A, Burgos L, Angulo JM. Endoscopic urinary diversion as initial management of symptomatic obstructive ectopic ureter in infants. Front Pediatr. (2017) 5:208. doi: 10.3389/fped.2017.00208

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Li Z, Psooy K, Morris M, Dharamsi N, Retrosi G. Laparoscopic ligation of ectopic ureter in pediatric patients: a safe surgical option for the management of urinary incontinence due to ectopic ureters. Pediatr Surg Int. (2021) 37(5):667–71. doi: 10.1007/s00383-020-04852-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Reinig BA, Silva BM, Fernandes M, Onofre AL, Veruska Paiva Ortolan E. A single-system ectopic ureter in a child: a challenge for early diagnosis. Cureus. (2024) 16(1):e51834. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51834

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Abyaksa R, Pramod SV, Siregar S. Uterus as one of the ectopic ureter openings: case report. Urol Case Rep. (2021) 39:101830. doi: 10.1016/j.eucr.2021.101830

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Toia B, Pakzad M, Hamid R, Wood D, Greenwell T, Ockrim J. Diagnosis and surgical outcomes of ectopic ureters in adults: a case series and literature review. Neurourol Urodyn. (2019) 38(6):1745–50. doi: 10.1002/nau.24054

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Jain P, Sarkar D, Maiti K, Gupta S, Pal DK. Rare cases of ectopic ureter: analysis from a single centre with review of the literature. Turk J Urol. (2019) 45(Supp. 1):S92–7. doi: 10.5152/tud.2018.37085

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Chang ES, Hidalgo RJ, Wiegand LR, Wyman A. Concomitant laparoscopic and vaginal excision of duplicated collecting system. Int Urogynecol J. (2021) 32(10):2871–2. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04745-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Chua ME, Ming JM, Farhat WA. Magnetic resonance urography in the pediatric population: a clinical perspective. Pediatr Radiol. (2016) 46(6):791–5. doi: 10.1007/s00247-016-3577-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Świȩtoń D, Grzywińska M, Czarniak P, Gołȩbiewski A, Durawa A, Teodorczyk J, et al. The emerging role of MR urography in imaging megaureters in children. Front Pediatr. (2022) 10:839128. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.839128

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Thimmappa ND, Kazi I, Nasrullah A, Elbanan M, Siddiqui A, Raj D, et al. Magnetic resonance urography (MRU): technique mastery and illustrative case reviews. Abdom Radiol (NY). (2025). doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-05109-1 [Epub ahead of print].

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Deng J, Lu X, Liu Y. Ectopic insertion of a duplicated ureter into prostatic urethra: demonstration by 3D multi-detector computed tomography urography. J Xray Sci Technol. (2016) 24(5):661–4. doi: 10.3233/XST-160592

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Eroglu Y, Yildirim K, Çinar A, Yildirim M. Diagnosis and grading of vesicoureteral reflux on voiding cystourethrography images in children using a deep hybrid model. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. (2021) 210:106369. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106369

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Smakal O, Sarapatka J, Hartmann I, Vencalek O, Flogelova H, Koranda P, et al. Can renal ultrasonography and DMSA scintigraphy be used for the prediction of irreversible histological lesions of the upper pole in duplex system with ureteroceles or ectopic ureters? Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. (2016) 160(3):429–34. doi: 10.5507/bp.2016.028

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Nishio H, Mizuno K, Matsumoto D, Kato T, Kamisawa H, Kurokawa S, et al. A novel transvesicoscopic ureteral reimplantation technique to treat an infantile ectopic ureter in a single system. Urology. (2022) 164:244–7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.12.028

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Panach-Navarrete J, Valls-González L, Negueroles-García M, Castelló-Porcar A, Martínez-Jabaloyas JM. Ectopia ureteral en paciente pediátrico: diferentes soluciones para diferentes problemas [Pediatric ureteral ectopia: solutions for several issues.]. Arch Esp Urol. (2021) 74(6):627–32. (Spanish).34219067

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

39. Viteri B, Calle-Toro JS, Ballester L, Darge K, Furth S, Khrichenko D, et al. Potential benefits of functional magnetic resonance urography (fMRU) over MAG3 renal scan in children with obstructive uropathy. J Pediatr Urol. (2021) 17(5):659.e1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.07.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Agrawal V, Babu R. Isolated laparoscopic extra-vesical ureteric reimplantation (I-LEVUR) for upper moiety ectopic ureter without lower moiety vesicoureteric reflux. Pediatr Surg Int. (2024) 40(1):284. doi: 10.1007/s00383-024-05876-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Li B, Zhu T, Ma F, Zhao Y. Ectopic kidney with an ectopic ureter masquerading adnexal mass: a case report and literature review. Int J Womens Health. (2024) 16:971–8. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S457828

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Monti M, Rotondi G, Carlucci M, Fiorenza V, Mattioli G. Robot-assisted uretero-ureterostomy. J Pediatr Urol. (2025) 21(3):779–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2025.02.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Michaud JE, Akhavan A. Upper pole heminephrectomy versus lower pole ureteroureterostomy for ectopic upper pole ureters. Curr Urol Rep. (2017) 18(3):21. doi: 10.1007/s11934-017-0664-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Mittal S, Srinivasan A. Robotics in pediatric urology: evolution and the future. Urol Clin North Am. (2021) 48(1):113–25. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2020.09.008

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Bilgutay AN, Kirsch AJ. Robotic ureteral reconstruction in the pediatric population. Front Pediatr. (2019) 7:85. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00085

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Mizuno K, Kojima Y, Nishio H, Hoshi S, Sato Y, Hayashi Y. Robotic surgery in pediatric urology: current status. Asian J Endosc Surg. (2018) 11(4):308–17. doi: 10.1111/ases.12653

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Waterloos M, Ploumidis A, Pappas A, De Bleser E, De Groote R, Weyers S, et al. Robot-assisted resection of ectopic kidney in children: an anatomical illustration. J Pediatr Urol. (2019) 15(1):87–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.10.018

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Smith JS, Springhart WP. Ejaculatory duct obstruction in the setting of an ectopic ureter. Sex Med. (2020) 8(3):574–6. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2020.03.004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: heterotopic ureter, urinary incontinence, congenital ureterovaginal fistula, cystoscopy, ureteral bladder reimplantation

Citation: Li S, Cao H, Zhang Y, Su J, Yang T, Wei W and Lian X (2025) Congenital duplicated ureter-vagina anomalous anastomosis causing female urinary incontinence: a case report and literature review. Front. Pediatr. 13:1629410. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1629410

Received: 15 May 2025; Accepted: 19 September 2025;
Published: 3 October 2025.

Edited by:

Maria Marcela Bailez, Garrahan Hospital, Argentina

Reviewed by:

Wilmer Silva Caso, Peruvian University of Applied Sciences, Peru
Han Chu, Anhui Provincial Children's Hospital, China

Copyright: © 2025 Li, Cao, Zhang, Su, Yang, Wei and Lian. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Xin Lian, bGlhbnhpbjYyMTYxNjNAMTYzLmNvbQ==; Wei Wei, d2Vpd0BqbHUuZWR1LmNu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.