ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pediatr.
Sec. Neonatology
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1639573
A Phase 1b Randomized, Multicenter, Dose Determination Trial Of Zelpultide Alfa (recombinant human surfactant protein D, rhSP-D) In Preterm Neonates At High Risk Of Developing Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia
Provisionally accepted- 1Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain
- 2Instituto de Investigacion e Innovacion Biomedica de Cadiz, Cádiz, Spain
- 3Emory University and Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, United States
- 4Duke University Medical Center, Durham, United States
- 5Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, United States
- 6Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
- 7Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
- 8Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
- 9Institut de Recerca Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
- 10Hospital Regional Universitario de Malaga, Málaga, Spain
- 11Airway Therapeutics Inc., Madrid, Spain
- 12La Fe Hospital, Valencia, Spain
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) ranks among the most severe long-term complications of prematurity . Surfactant Protein D, not present in commercial surfactant, regulates the innate immune response of the lungs by clearing infectious pathogens and limiting pulmonary inflammation and inflammatory injury. We aimed to assess the safety and tolerability of zelpultide alfa (rhSP-D) versus air-sham added to the standard of care in preterm neonates at risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Efficacy was a secondary outcome.Methods: Phase 1b, randomized, double-blind, dose-determination study that enrolled intubated, mechanically-ventilated preterm neonates who required ≥ 1 surfactant treatment within 96 hours of birth. Initially, eight subjects (25-28 6 /7 weeks gestational age, GA) were randomized 3:1 to receive up to two doses of intratracheal zelpultide alfa at each dosing level (2, 4, or 6 mg/kg) or air-sham, 24 hours apart. Twelve additional subjects (23-28 6 /7 weeks GA) were randomized 3:1 to receive the highest-tolerated dose of zelpultide alfa, or air-sham, once daily for up to 7 days.Results: Thirty-seven subjects were randomized and treated. Zelpultide alfa, at its highest dose, 6 mg/kg had a favorable safety profile. 92.9% of zelpultide alfa subjects versus 100.0% air-sham experienced ≥ 1 adverse event. Mortality was 21% in the zelputide alfa group and 0% in the air-sham group, although no deaths were related to the study drug. The incidence of BPD was 32.1% vs 66.7%, BPD or death was 54% and 67%, and time on mechanical ventilation was 17.7 vs 25.8 days in the zelpultide alfa compared to the air-sham group.Conclusions: This study endorses the safety and tolerability of zelpultide alfa up to 6 mg/kg (≤ 7 days) and reinforces the need for further clinical development of zelpultide alfa as a therapy for preventing BPD.
Keywords: SP-D, Premature neonates, Respiratory distress, Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, zelpultide alfa
Received: 02 Jun 2025; Accepted: 25 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Alonso-Ojembarrena, Poindexter, Aleem, Healy, Aguar-Carrascosa, Moliner, Serrano Martin, Arroyo and VENTO. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: MAXIMO VENTO, La Fe Hospital, Valencia, Spain
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.