Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CASE REPORT article

Front. Pediatr., 27 October 2025

Sec. Pediatric Cardiology

Volume 13 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2025.1662114

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvancing Our Understanding of the Cardiac Conduction System to Prevent ArrhythmiasView all 8 articles

Case Report: Adenosine-induced atrioventricular dissociation: unmasking monomorphic tachycardia as a diagnostic challenge in a neonate


Feifei Wang,&#x;Feifei Wang1,†Bin Wu,&#x;Bin Wu2,†Jiaqi Huang,&#x;Jiaqi Huang3,†Ba YaletaiBa Yaletai4Peng Liu

Peng Liu3*
  • 1Department of Electrocardiogram Laboratory, Ordos Central Hospital, Ordos School of Clinical Medicine, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Inner Mongolia, China
  • 2Department of Endocrinology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, China
  • 3Department of Cardiology, Ordos Central Hospital, Ordos School of Clinical Medicine, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Inner Mongolia, China
  • 4Department of Neonatology, Ordos Central Hospital, Ordos School of Clinical Medicine, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Inner Mongolia, China

Background: Neonatal monomorphic tachycardia poses a diagnostic challenge. This report demonstrates how adenosine-induced AV dissociation confirmed ventricular tachycardia.

Case: A 3-day-old preterm neonate (34 + 2 weeks) presented with refractory monomorphic tachycardia (217 bpm; QRS 92 ms) initially diagnosed as SVT based on 1:1 retrograde P-waves. Adenosine administration induced atrioventricular dissociation without termination—a finding inconsistent with SVT. Retrospective ECG analysis revealed prolonged QRS duration during tachycardia (92 ms vs. 60 ms post-cardioversion) and delta wave-like slurring, confirming VT diagnosis. Synchronized cardioversion (0.5 J/kg) restored sinus rhythm, followed by metoprolol prophylaxis.

Conclusion: This case highlights that monomorphic tachycardia in neonates may represent VT. Adenosine's role in inducing AV dissociation is pivotal for diagnosis, and low-energy cardioversion with β-blocker maintenance offers an effective rescue strategy. Clinicians must reassess ECG features dynamically to avoid misclassification.

Introduction

Neonatal arrhythmias, though relatively uncommon with an estimated incidence of 1% in general populations and up to 5% in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), represent critical clinical challenges due to their potential for hemodynamic compromise and long-term sequelae (1). While most cases are transient and benign, non-benign arrhythmias such as supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) or ventricular tachycardia (VT) require urgent intervention to prevent cardiac failure or sudden death (2). This case report describes a 3-day-old preterm neonate with life-threatening relatively narrow QRS complex tachycardia tachycardia unresponsive to adenosine, successfully managed with electrical cardioversion and sustained by metoprolol.

Case presentation

A male neonate was electively delivered via lower segment cesarean section at 34 + 2 weeks gestation to a 30-year-old primigravida with an unremarkable antenatal history. Serial fetal surveillance ultrasonography demonstrated normal anatomical development, complemented by negative maternal TORCH serological profiling. The procedure was performed under spinal anesthesia for persistent breech presentation, achieving Apgar scores of 9 and 10 at 1 and 5 min respectively. Neonatal biometric parameters included a birth weight of 2,180 g (30th percentile for gestational age).

At 30 min postnatally, the infant developed acute respiratory decompensation manifesting as tachypnea (40 breaths/min), intercostal and subxiphoid retractions, with concurrent cyanosis. Radiographic evaluation identified decreased permeability of both lungs on chest x-ray. Echocardiographic evaluation confirmed transitional circulation patterns (patent foramen ovale with left-to-right shunting, patent ductus arteriosus) without structural anomalies. Laboratory analysis demonstrated marked elevation of cardiac biomarkers: White blood cell (WBC) 6.99 × 109/L, Hemoglobin (HGB) 178 g/L. High-sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT) 0.0605 µg/L (reference <0.014 µg/L) and NT-proBNP 3,596 pg/mL (reference <125 pg/mL). Hepatic derangement was evidenced by alanine aminotransferase (ALT) 15 U/L (13–35) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 37 U/L (7–40). Electrolyte profiling showed venous potassium 4.37 mmol/L (3.5–5.3) and magnesium 0.86 mmol/L (0.75–1.02), excluding significant ionic disturbances. Pulse oximetry demonstrated profound desaturation (SpO2 84% in room air), prompting immediate escalation to non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV mode: FiO2 30%, PIP 16 cmH2O, Ti 0.35 s, RR 40 breaths/min). This intervention achieved partial oxygenation improvement (SpO2 93%, pH 7.48, pO2 82 mmHg, pCO2 24 mmHg, Base Excess −5.6 mmol/L, and Lactate 2.2 mmol/L), while telemetry detected sustained wide-complex tachycardia (ventricular rate 217 bpm; QRS 92 ms) with a delta wave-like slurring at its onset and 1:1 conduction retrograde P-wave morphology, consistent with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (Figure 1). Blood pressure (BP) was 68/35 mmHg. Intravenous adenosine administration (0.1 mg/kg) can reduce the heart rate to 175 beats per minute and show the phenomenon of atrioventricular dissociation and fusion beats with qrs-wave morphology unchanged (Figure 2). Ultimately, we diagnosed this tachycardia as ventricular tachycardia. Electrical cardioversion (0.5 J/kg) subsequently achieved successful sinus rhythm restoration (Figure 3) and BP was 70/34 mmHg. The infant's acute respiratory decompensation and profound desaturation were initially attributed to respiratory distress syndrome; however, their temporal coincidence with the onset of sustained tachycardia and the marked, immediate clinical improvement post-cardioversion strongly implicated the arrhythmia-induced hemodynamic compromise as the primary etiology. Initiation of metoprolol tartrate (0.1 mg/kg q12h) maintained arrhythmia-free status throughout 48 h monitoring and the patient maintained clinical stability with preserved cardiac function at 8-week reassessment.

Figure 1
Electrocardiogram (ECG) showing multiple leads with consistent, rapid, and regular QRS complexes, suggesting a ventricular tachycardia pattern. An enlarged section of lead II highlights the distinctive waveform with a marked peak and an emphasized sharp deflection.

Figure 1. Electrocardiogram before adenosine. Monomorphic tachycardia (heart rate: 217 beats per minute, QRS duration: 92 ms) with retrograde P-wave (1:1). Solid arrows indicate P-waves.

Figure 2
Electrocardiogram (ECG) showing six leads with regular heart rate pattern. Right side enlarges a segment from lead II with prominent QRS complexes highlighted by arrows, indicating possible ventricular activity.

Figure 2. Electrocardiogram after adenosine. Monomorphic complex tachycardia (heart rate: 175 beats per minute, QRS duration: 92 ms) with atrioventricular dissociation and fusion beats. Solid arrows indicate P-waves, and hollow arrows indicate fusion beats.

Figure 3
Electrocardiogram (ECG) showing multiple leads, including I, II, III, aVR, aVL, aVF, V1 to V6. Each lead displays a series of heartbeats with distinct P, QRS, and T waves against a grid background.

Figure 3. Electrocardiogram after electrical cardioversion. Sinus rhythm (heart rate: 123 beats per minute, QRS duration: 60 ms).

Discussion

Neonatal arrhythmias, particularly in preterm infants with structurally normal hearts, often pose diagnostic challenges (3). The neonate presented with refractory relatively narrow QRS complex tachycardia. Initially, the tachycardia was presumed to be supraventricular in origin based on the relatively narrow QRS duration (92 ms) and 1:1 retrograde P-wave morphology, prompting adenosine administration for attempted termination. Although adenosine failed to terminate the tachycardia, it played a crucial role in clarifying the diagnosis by inducing atrioventricular dissociation—a phenomenon inconsistent with SVT. Ultimately, the arrhythmia was successfully terminated via synchronized cardioversion. Additionally, retrospective comparison of the ECGs before and after cardioversion revealed two key features supporting ventricular tachycardia: (1) prolonged QRS complex duration during tachycardia (92 ms vs. 60 ms in sinus rhythm), and (2) delta wave-like slurring at the QRS onset. This diagnostic evolution underscores the importance of dynamic ECG reassessment and targeted therapeutic interventions in neonatal arrhythmia management.

The absence of structural heart defects or familial arrhythmia history in this case underscores the multifactorial nature of neonatal tachycardia (2). While congenital heart disease and electrolyte imbalances are common triggers, this neonate exhibited unremarkable echocardiographic and metabolic profiles. Elevated cardiac biomarkers (hs-TnT and NT-proBNP) further reflect myocardial strain, a phenomenon documented in arrhythmia-associated injury. We focus on supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) with aberrant conduction vs. ventricular tachycardia (VT). In this context, the administration of adenosine was instrumental. The induction of atrioventricular dissociation and fusion complex without termination of the tachycardia provided incontrovertible evidence for a diagnosis of VT, thereby excluding SVT with aberrancy as the underlying mechanism.

We wish to underscore that the administration of adenosine (or the use of vagal maneuvers) during continuous 12-lead ECG monitoring is a critical diagnostic step in the evaluation of every monomorphic, relatively narrow-complex tachycardia. This approach is essential not only for potential termination of SVT but, as demonstrated in this case, for its ability to induce atrioventricular dissociation—a pathognomonic sign of VT. Furthermore, a meticulous analysis of QRS morphology, including the presence of slurring or patterns suggestive of underlying cardiomyopathy, should be routinely performed alongside response to adenosine. Based on the diagnostic challenge encountered in this case, we propose a systematic diagnostic algorithm for clinicians facing regular tachycardia in neonates (Figure 4).

Figure 4
Flowchart for managing monomorphic tachycardia starts with assessing hemodynamic status, checking for hypotension, altered consciousness, respiratory distress, or shock. If unstable, synchronized electrical cardioversion is performed. If stable, ECG monitoring, vagal maneuver, and adenosine are used. Outcomes include termination, AV dissociation, AV block, or no response, leading to diagnoses like SVT, VT, AT, or further QRS analysis. Long-term management involves echocardiograms, Holter monitoring, genetic testing, and pediatric cardiology follow-up.

Figure 4. Proposed diagnostic algorithm for monomorphic tachycardia in neonates and infants. SVT, Supraventricular Tachycardia; VT, Ventricular Tachycardia; AT, Atrial Tachycardia.

Electrical cardioversion—a strategy supported by recent guidelines for hemodynamically unstable arrhythmias. The successful restoration of sinus rhythm at 0.5 J/kg aligns with recommended energy doses (5–15 J), minimizing myocardial injury risk. Post-conversion metoprolol maintenance prevented recurrence. In this case, a comprehensive echocardiogram ruled out structural anomalies such as cardiac tumors or cardiomyopathy. In the context of idiopathic VT with a structurally normal heart, as was present here, empirical beta-blocker therapy is a standard and often effective prophylactic strategy to suppress adrenergically-mediated triggers. The patient's sustained positive response to metoprolol supports this approach, though long-term follow-up and consideration of advanced genetic testing remain important.

The patient's sustained stability at 8 weeks supports the efficacy of combined electrical and pharmacological intervention. However, neonatal arrhythmias even when transient may signal latent conduction abnormalities, warranting extended follow-up. Studies indicate that 13.4%–25% of neonates with SVT/VT exhibit recurrence within the first year, often associated with accessory pathways or channelopathies (4, 5). Genetic testing was not performed here but should be considered in idiopathic cases to exclude inherited arrhythmogenic disorders.

Conclusion

This case report underscores that life-threatening neonatal arrhythmias, including monomorphic tachycardias, may manifest in the absence of structural cardiac anomalies or familial predispositions, thereby presenting formidable diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. The diagnostic intricacy is accentuated by the pivotal role of pharmacologic agents that induce atrioventricular block, which can facilitate the differentiation of the underlying arrhythmogenic mechanisms. Expedient intervention, encompassing synchronized cardioversion when indicated, in conjunction with β-blocker prophylaxis, constitutes a salutary and efficacious management paradigm, particularly in preterm neonates undergoing transitional circulatory adaptations.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Ethics Committee of Ordos Central Hospital. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation was not required from the participants or the participants' legal guardians/next of kin in accordance with the national legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s), and minor(s)' legal guardian/next of kin, for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

FW: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. BW: Writing – review & editing. JH: Writing – review & editing. BY: Writing – review & editing. PL: Data curation, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. AI-assisted language optimization was applied under author supervision. Final content responsibility remains with authors.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Ban J-E. Neonatal arrhythmias: diagnosis, treatment, and clinical outcome. Korean J Pediatr. (2017) 60:344–52. doi: 10.3345/kjp.2017.60.11.344

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Jaeggi E, Öhman A. Fetal and neonatal arrhythmias. Clin Perinatol. (2016) 43:99–112. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2015.11.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Ciriello GD, Sorice D, Orlando A, Papaccioli G, Colonna D, Correra A, et al. Antiarrhythmic therapy for narrow QRS supraventricular tachyarrhythmias in newborns and infants in the first year of life: potent tools to be handled with care. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. (2024) 24:271–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2024.07.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Chiu S-N, Wu W-L, Lu C-W, Tseng W-C, Wu K-L, Wang J-K, et al. Primary ventricular tachycardia in paediatric population in a tertiary centre. Arch Dis Child. (2017) 102:1137–42. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-312418

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Wei N, Lamba A, Franciosi S, Law IH, Ochoa LA, Johnsrude CL, et al. Medical management of infants with supraventricular tachycardia: results from a registry and review of the literature. CJC Pediatr Congenital Heart Dis. (2022) 1:11–22. doi: 10.1016/j.cjcpc.2021.09.001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: monomorphic, tachycardia, neonate, electrocardiography, adenosine

Citation: Wang F, Wu B, Huang J, Yaletai B and Liu P (2025) Case Report: Adenosine-induced atrioventricular dissociation: unmasking monomorphic tachycardia as a diagnostic challenge in a neonate. Front. Pediatr. 13:1662114. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1662114

Received: 8 July 2025; Accepted: 14 October 2025;
Published: 27 October 2025.

Edited by:

Edward Joseph Vigmond, Université de Bordeaux, France

Reviewed by:

Giovanni Malanchini, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Italy
Muhammad Mohsin, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Pakistan

Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Wu, Huang, Yaletai and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Peng Liu, d2FuZ3V5aXN1QDE2My5jb20=

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.