Angioembolization as a life-saving maneuver for unstable pelvic fractures in skeletally immature children: a multicenter case series

Abstract

Background:

Hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures (HUPF) in skeletally immature children and adolescents carry significant mortality. While internal iliac artery embolization (IIAE) is a cornerstone of management for HUPF in adults, data on its application and outcomes in this truly pediatric population, particularly in China, are scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of IIAE for HUPF in this specific, vulnerable group.

Methods:

This multicenter, retrospective case series included patients aged 15 years or younger who presented with HUPF and underwent IIAE at three major Chinese trauma centers between 2019 and 2023. Key outcomes included immediate hemorrhage control, in-hospital mortality, and long-term complications.

Results:

A total of seven patients underwent IIAE. The cohort demonstrated severe trauma, with a median Pelvic Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) of 5 and a median Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 36. Of the six patients who underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), active arterial extravasation was identified in four. However, subsequent angiography confirmed life-threatening arterial injuries in all seven patients, including the two with negative CECT scans. Immediate and sustained hemodynamic stability was achieved in six patients (85.7%). The single mortality occurred in a patient with refractory hemorrhagic shock who required a massive transfusion of 28.5 units of red blood cells, whereas the median for the six survivors was 4 units. At a median follow-up of 22 months, all survivors were ambulatory and no major procedure-related ischemic complications were observed.

Conclusion:

IIAE is a feasible and effective life-saving intervention for HUPF in skeletally immature patients. A negative CECT scan does not rule out significant arterial injury, underscoring the vital role of prompt angiography. We recommend a low threshold for early intervention, with consideration of non-selective embolization as a primary damage control tactic in these critically injured children.

Introduction

Hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures (HUPF) represent a life-threatening manifestation of severe trauma, posing a unique challenge in skeletally immature children and adolescents. While overall pelvic fractures in this demographic are relatively uncommon, with reported incidences ranging from 0.2% to 7.5% (1), HUPF cases are associated with disproportionately high mortality rates of up to 14% (2, 3). It is in this younger, skeletally immature population that the differences from adult patients are most profound, due to distinct pelvic anatomy, biomechanics, and physiological responses to shock (4). In adult trauma care, internal iliac artery embolization (IIAE) is a cornerstone of hemorrhage control (5). However, robust evidence guiding its use in the truly pediatric population remains scarce, particularly from Chinese trauma centers.

Figure 1

The management of pediatric HUPF is a race against time where rapid hemorrhage control is the paramount objective. These challenges are particularly acute in skeletally immature patients, whose unique physiology can be deceptive. Their remarkable ability to compensate for significant blood loss often masks the true severity of injury, leading to a state of compensated shock that can rapidly deteriorate without warning (6). This, coupled with concerns about radiation exposure and the long-term effects of intervention on a growing pelvis, contributes to a lack of standardized, proactive treatment protocols for this specific age group (7).

Therefore, this study was designed to address this critical evidence gap. We retrospectively analyzed our multicenter experience with IIAE for HUPF specifically in children and early adolescents (aged 15 years and under). By focusing on this distinct demographic, we aimed to provide targeted clinical evidence to support the development of more robust emergency treatment protocols for this vulnerable and often-overlooked patient group.

Methods

Study design and patient population

We performed a retrospective multicenter review of medical records from three major trauma centers in China, spanning from January 2019 to December 2023. This study received approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at each participating center, with patient consent requirements waived.

The study population comprised all patients aged 15 years or younger who underwent IIAE for hemorrhage control in the setting of an acute, traumatic pelvic fracture.

Hemodynamic instability was defined according to pediatric Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) guidelines by the presence of one or more of the following criteria. First, evidence of compensated shock, defined as persistent age-specific tachycardia in conjunction with signs of poor organ perfusion (e.g., prolonged capillary refill time, weak peripheral pulses, or cool, mottled extremities). Second, the presence of age-specific hypotension, defined as a systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 90 mmHg for patients >10 years, or < (70 mmHg + [2 × age in years]) for patients aged 1–10 years. This definition prioritizes the early signs of compensated shock, as the development of hypotension in children indicates a state of severe decompensated shock, often signifying a blood loss of greater than 45%.

Data collection

A standardized data collection form was used to extract information from each patient's electronic medical record. Key data points included:

Patient and Injury Characteristics: Age, sex, mechanism of injury, Pelvic Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), and Injury Severity Score (ISS).

Hemodynamic Status on Admission: This included initial vital signs (systolic blood pressure, heart rate) and the patient's response to initial fluid and blood product resuscitation.

Diagnostic and Procedural Information: Key findings from contrast-enhanced CT (CECT), details of the angiographic procedure and embolization technique (e.g., embolic agents, vessels targeted), and any adjunctive hemostatic measures used (e.g., REBOA, pelvic packing).

Clinical Outcomes: Data on the achievement of hemodynamic stability post-procedure, in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay, and any procedure-related complications were collected.

Follow-up Data: Available information from outpatient records regarding functional recovery (e.g., ambulatory status) and fracture healing was reviewed.

All collected data were anonymized and analyzed descriptively.

Results

Patient characteristics and injury severity

During the study period, a total of seven patients meeting the inclusion criteria were identified from four trauma centers. The cohort comprised three males and four females, with a median age of 14 years (Table 1). The primary mechanism of injury was a high-fall injury in four cases. Three of the seven patients were transferred from local hospitals for higher-level care, which was associated with prolonged pre-hospital times ranging from 420 to 480 min. In contrast, the pre-hospital time was markedly shorter for the four non-transferred patients; except for one case, all were admitted within 30 min of injury. The patients presented with severe polytrauma, evidenced by a median Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 36 (range: 22–50). The pelvic injuries were particularly severe, with a median pelvic Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) of 5, and mechanically unstable AO Foundation and Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO-OTA) Type C fractures were present in five of the seven cases (Table 1).

Initial presentation and diagnostic findings

Upon admission, all patients exhibited clinical signs of hemodynamic instability, accompanied by other manifestations of mild to moderate hemorrhagic shock. The admission systolic blood pressure ranged from 75 to 110 mmHg. The time from admission to intervention varied widely, ranging from 30 to 390 min, with only three patients undergoing embolization within one hour. One critically ill patient (Patient C) required REBOA as a bridge to definitive hemorrhage control. The median 24-h packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion for the six survivors was 4 units, while the single non-survivor (Patient D), who died from refractory shock, received a massive 28.5 units.

Six patients underwent CECT scans, and one patient underwent a non-contrast CT scan at the local hospital. This initial imaging identified active contrast extravasation in four patients (66.7%). Notably, in the remaining two patients (B and G), the CECT scan was negative for active bleeding. Despite these negative findings, the clinical team proceeded to angiography due to persistent hemodynamic instability and high-risk fracture patterns. Subsequent diagnostic angiography proved to be the definitive diagnostic tool, confirming active arterial hemorrhage in all seven patients (100%) (Table 2).

Interventions and immediate outcomes

All seven patients underwent IIAE. The embolization techniques were tailored to the angiographic findings; a non-selective approach was used in five cases and a selective approach in two. Gel foam was the most common embolic agent, used either alone or in combination with coils in six patients. The embolization was performed bilaterally in six cases (Table 2).

The primary clinical outcome was highly successful, with six of the seven patients (85.7%) achieving immediate and sustained hemodynamic stability post-procedure. The one mortality (Patient D) occurred in a patient with an exceptionally high admission heart rate (178 bpm) and a prolonged embolization duration (130 min), who required a massive transfusion of 28.5 units of PRBCs and ultimately died to refractory hemorrhagic shock (Tables 1, 2). For the six survivors, pelvic external fixation was applied to four patients for initial stabilization, followed by staged internal fixation.

Complications and follow-up

The in-hospital morbidity for survivors was low, with one patient developing pneumonia and another a deep vein thrombosis (DVT), both of which were managed successfully (Table 3). For the surviving patients, the median length of stay in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) was 4 days, and the median total hospital stay was 30 days.

All six survivors were followed for a median of 22 months. At the final follow-up, the functional outcomes were excellent. All survivors had achieved solid fracture healing and were able to walk independently. Crucially, no long-term complications directly attributable to embolization, such as gluteal muscle necrosis or limb ischemia, were reported in any of the survivors (Table 3).

Discussion

This multicenter case series, one of the few from China to focus on this topic, provides critical insights into the management of HUPF in children and adolescents. Our primary findings underscore that IIAE is a highly effective, life-saving intervention with an excellent safety profile in this vulnerable population. It is important to interpret these findings, however, through the lens of a retrospective study design that inherently does not capture eligible patients who did not survive to undergo the procedure. Three noteworthy observations from our study warrant detailed discussion: (1) the diagnostic discrepancy between CECT and angiography (33.3% CECT miss rate), (2) the paramount importance of a proactive treatment strategy tailored to pediatric physiology, and (3) the ongoing debate regarding selective vs. non-selective embolization as a damage control tactic.

Before delving into our findings, it is crucial to clarify the rationale for focusing on patients aged 15 and under. This study was intentionally designed to address two critical issues. First, this skeletally immature population is fundamentally different from adults; the period prior to the closure of the triradiate cartilage involves unique pelvic anatomy, biomechanics, and physiological responses to trauma (2). Therefore, the efficacy and safety of IIAE in this specific demographic cannot be simply extrapolated from adult data. Second, this pediatric and early adolescent group often represents an overlooked patient population, sometimes falling into a treatment gap between pediatric-focused institutions and adult trauma systems (8, 9). Our study aimed to provide targeted evidence for this distinct and clinically challenging group, justifying the focused cohort to ensure the clarity and specificity of our conclusions.

A pivotal finding of our study was the limited sensitivity of CECT in this clinical scenario. While CECT is an essential tool in initial trauma evaluation, it failed to detect active arterial bleeding in two of our six patients who underwent CECT, both of whom were later confirmed to have significant hemorrhage on angiography (Box 1). This observation aligns with research in adult populations, such as Nakajima's study, which documented a cohort of 47 patients where angiography detected bleeding missed by CECT, consistent with our findings (10). These results strongly suggest that for a pediatric patient with a high-risk pelvic fracture and persistent hemodynamic instability, a negative CECT should not preclude or delay angiography. The decision to proceed to interventional radiology should be driven by the patient's physiological state, not solely by initial imaging results (Figure 1). This principle is further supported by Katayama et al. (11), who demonstrated the value of proactive angiography in their study of 1,351 patients with pelvic fracture aged 19 and under. Among these patients, 221 (16.4%) underwent pelvic angiography, and propensity score matching revealed significantly lower in-hospital mortality rates in the angiography group compared to those who did not receive the procedure.

Successful hemorrhage control was achieved in six of seven patients (83.3%) in our cohort, reinforcing the efficacy of IIAE. This outcome is comparable to or better than those reported in other pediatric series, such as the 95% effective bleeding control rate in Vo's study (12) and the successful hemostasis in three of four patients reported by Gonzalez et al. (13). We attribute this success to a proactive treatment philosophy. While some literature expresses caution regarding early intervention in children (13), our findings advocate for a different approach. As ATLS guidelines emphasize, children possess remarkable compensatory mechanisms but can decompensate with catastrophic speed once these reserves are exhausted (6). Relying on blood pressure as the sole indicator of shock is unreliable and dangerous in this population. Therefore, the presence of compensated shock (e.g., persistent tachycardia despite resuscitation) in the setting of a severe pelvic fracture should be a clear indication for immediate, life-saving intervention.

A critical observation from our data is the significant variability in treatment timelines, which warrants further discussion. The prolonged pre-hospital times for transferred patients, ranging from 420 to 480 min, highlight a systemic challenge. In the context of a growing trend toward centralizing severe pediatric trauma care in China, our findings underscore the importance of proactive, timely transfer rather than delayed transfer compelled by clinical deterioration. These extended pre-hospital periods represent critical windows of ongoing hemorrhage and deepening shock that can adversely affect outcomes.

Furthermore, the wide variation in admission-to-intervention times, from 30 to 390 min, suggests a lack of standardized protocols for activating early angioembolization across different trauma centers. While some institutions demonstrated high efficiency, with three patients undergoing embolization in ≤1 h, significant delays in others may indicate that the vital role of early embolization is not yet universally prioritized. This is particularly concerning, as existing research has demonstrated that delayed embolization is associated with increased mortality in patients with pelvic fractures. Therefore, reducing these pre-hospital and in-hospital time intervals represents a crucial target for future quality improvement initiatives in the management of pediatric HUPF.

Our findings also contribute to the long-standing debate on the primary source of bleeding in HUPF. The historical belief, often misattributed to Huittinen and Slätis's cadaveric study (14), that venous bleeding predominates (85%) (15, 16) is challenged by our results. As has been correctly pointed out in the literature, that study could not confirm venous bleeding and actually showed widespread arterial extravasation (17). Our finding that 100% of our patients had arterial bleeding confirmed on angiography aligns with modern clinical research indicating a high prevalence (47%–97%) of arterial injury in HUPF (18–20). This reinforces the message that arterial hemorrhage is a primary driver of instability, and clinicians must maintain a high index of suspicion for internal iliac artery system injuries.

The debate between selective and non-selective embolization techniques is particularly relevant in damage control surgery. In our series, the sole mortality occurred in a patient who underwent a prolonged (130-min) selective embolization. While our sample size prevents a direct comparison, this observation aligns with concerns that attempting to selectively embolize multiple, scattered bleeding sites can significantly prolong procedure time, thereby extending the duration of shock and exacerbating coagulopathy (21–23). In contrast, non-selective embolization of the main internal iliac artery trunks is technically simpler, faster, and may be a more appropriate damage control strategy, a concept supported by others in the literature (21, 24). While Hymel et al.'s study in adults found no difference in procedure time (25), the unique context of pediatric trauma resuscitation may place a higher premium on speed.

Finally, the safety of IIAE is a critical consideration. Although the literature documents potential ischemic complications such as gluteal necrosis (26, 27), bladder necrosis (28), and fracture non-union (29) are well-documented. It is therefore highly reassuring that in our cohort, with a median follow-up of 22 months, no such long-term, procedure-related complications were observed. Of particular concern in children and adolescents is the preservation of future reproductive and sexual function. Reassuringly, the two male survivors in our cohort had documented normal erectile function during their hospitalization. This observation aligns with existing literature, which suggests that male sexual dysfunction is more often attributable to the severe pelvic fracture itself, including associated nerve damage, than to the embolization procedure (30, 31). Similarly, there is currently no evidence to suggest that bilateral internal iliac artery occlusion adversely affects female fertility, though continued long-term follow-up for the female adolescents in our study is warranted (32). Furthermore, all survivors achieved fracture healing and returned to normal daily activities, demonstrating that the robust collateral circulation in children may offer protection against the ischemic risks seen in adults.

Limitations

This study has several limitations. The primary limitation is the small sample size, which is a direct consequence of our intentional focus on the rare clinical entity of HUPF within a specific, skeletally immature age group. While this approach provides targeted insights, it precludes formal statistical analysis and limits the generalizability of our conclusions. Second, the retrospective design introduces potential biases. An inherent selection bias exists because our cohort was identified based on patients who had already received IIAE. This methodology excludes eligible patients who did not undergo the procedure (e.g., due to early mortality), which may lead to an overestimation of its effectiveness. Furthermore, the data is subject to information bias related to the quality and completeness of medical records. Finally, the multicenter nature may introduce minor variations in treatment protocols.

Conclusion

Our case series provides important evidence from China supporting the prompt and proactive use of IIAE in skeletally immature children and early adolescents with HUPF. IIAE is a safe and effective method for achieving rapid hemorrhage control with excellent long-term functional outcomes and no major observed ischemic complications. We strongly recommend that clinical teams maintain a low threshold for proceeding to angiography, even in the face of a negative CECT scan, and consider non-selective embolization as a primary damage control technique in these critically injured children. Future large-scale, prospective studies are warranted to establish definitive management protocols by validating the clinical decision pathway for angiography despite negative CT findings, focusing on minimizing time-to-intervention, and incorporating systematic long-term functional follow-up.

References

• 1.

  BanerjeeSBarryMJPatersonJMH. Paediatric pelvic fractures: 10 years experience in a trauma centre. Injury. (2009) 40:410–3. 10.1016/j.injury.2008.10.019

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2.

  SilberJSFlynnJM. Changing patterns of pediatric pelvic fractures with skeletal maturation: implications for classification and management. J Pediatr Surg. (2002) 22:22–6. 10.1097/01241398-200201000-00006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3.

  TosounidisTHSheikhHGiannoudisPV. Pelvic fractures in paediatric polytrauma patients: classification, concomitant injuries and early mortality. Open Orthop J. (2015) 9:303–12. 10.2174/1874325001509010303

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4.

  de la CalvaCJoverNAlonsoJSalomM. Pediatric pelvic fractures and differences compared with the adult population. Pediatr Emerg Care. (2020) 36:519–22. 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001411

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5.

  AnandTEl-QawaqzehKNelsonAHosseinpourHDitilloMGriesLet alAssociation between hemorrhage control interventions and mortality in US trauma patients with hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures. JAMA Surg. (2023) 158:63–71. 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.5772

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6.

  American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. ATLS®: Advanced Trauma Life Support Student Course Manual. 10th ed.Chicago: American College of Surgeons (2018).

  • Google Scholar

• 7.

  PloussiABrountzosERammosSApostolopoulouSEfstathopoulosEP. Radiation exposure in pediatric interventional procedures. CardioVasc Intervent Radiol. (2021) 44:857–65. 10.1007/s00270-020-02752-7

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8.

  WaltherAEFalconeRAPrittsTAHansemanDJRobinsonBRH. Pediatric and adult trauma centers differ in evaluation, treatment, and outcomes for severely injured adolescents. J Pediatr Surg. (2016) 51:1346–50. 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.03.016

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9.

  GreeneACShpigelMSandiferSPSaffordSD. Pediatric trauma—not just little adults—part 1: differences in physiology and injury patterns. Curr Surg Rep. (2024) 12:186–95. 10.1007/s40137-024-00406-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10.

  NakajimaKYamaguchiKAbeTTaniguchiHMizukamiSSekikawaZet alExtravasation and outcomes in computed tomography and angiography in patients with pelvic fractures requiring transcatheter arterial embolization: a single-center observational study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. (2022) 92:873–9. 10.1097/TA.0000000000003446

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11.

  KatayamaYKitamuraTHiroseTKiguchiTMatsuyamaTTakahashiHet alPelvic angiography is effective for emergency pediatric patients with pelvic fractures: a propensity-score-matching study with a nationwide trauma registry in Japan. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. (2021) 47:515–21. 10.1007/s00068-019-01154-w

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12.

  VoN-JAlthoenMHippeDSPrabhuSJValjiKPadiaSA. Pediatric abdominal and pelvic trauma: safety and efficacy of arterial embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol. (2014) 25:215–20. 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.09.014

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13.

  GonzalezKDaltonBKeriseyMAguayoPJuangD. Pelvic angiography for trauma in children: a rare but useful adjunct. Eur J Pediatr Surg. (2016) 27:196–9. 10.1055/s-0036-1584532

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14.

  HuittinenVMSlätisP. Postmortem angiography and dissection of the hypogastric artery in pelvic fractures. Surgery. (1973) 73:454–62. 10.5555/uri:pii:0039606073903164

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15.

  CoccoliniFStahelPFMontoriGBifflWHorerTMCatenaFet alPelvic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines. World J Emerg Surg. (2017) 12(1):5. 10.1186/s13017-017-0117-6

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16.

  WernerNLBurlewCC. Pelvic fractures and indications for pelvic packing: an update. Curr Surg Rep. (2019) 7(4):8. 10.1007/s40137-019-0228-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17.

  LiHHuangGDuD. Issues related to application of internal iliac artery devascularization in the emergency management of hemodynamically unstable pelvic fracture. Chin J Traumatol. (2024) 40:577–84. 10.3760/cma.j.cn501098-20240313-00210

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18.

  GourlayDHofferERouttMBulgerE. Pelvic angiography for recurrent traumatic pelvic arterial hemorrhage. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. (2005) 59:1168–73. 10.1097/01.ta.0000189043.29179.e4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19.

  BlackmoreCCJurkovichGJLinnauKFCummingsPHofferEKRivaraFP. Assessment of volume of hemorrhage and outcome from pelvic fracture. Arch Surg. (2003) 138:504–9. 10.1001/archsurg.138.5.504

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20.

  TanizakiSMaedaSIshidaHYamamotoTYoshikawaJ. Clinical characteristics of external iliac artery branch injury in pelvic trauma. Am J Emerg Med. (2017) 35:1636–8. 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.05.006

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21.

  WijffelsDJVerbeekDOPonsenKJGoslingsJCvan DeldenOM. Imaging and endovascular treatment of bleeding pelvic fractures: review article. CardioVasc Intervent Radiol. (2019) 42:10–8. 10.1007/s00270-018-2071-4

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22.

  ShapiroMMcDonaldAAKnightDJohannigmanJACuschieriJ. The role of repeat angiography in the management of pelvic fractures. J Trauma. (2005) 58:227–31. 10.1097/01.ta.0000152080.97337.1f

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23.

  FangJ-FShihL-YWongY-CLinB-CHsuY-P. Repeat transcatheter arterial embolization for the management of pelvic arterial hemorrhage. J Trauma. (2009) 66:429–35. 10.1097/TA.0b013e31817c969b

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24.

  FelicianoDVMattoxKLMooreEE. Trauma. 9th ed.New York, NY: McGraw Hill Professional (2020). p. 1440.

  • Google Scholar

• 25.

  HymelAAsturiasSZhaoFBlissRMoranTMarshallRHet alSelective versus nonselective embolization versus no embolization in pelvic trauma: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. (2017) 83:361–7. 10.1097/TA.0000000000001554

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26.

  LaiC-YTsengI-CSuC-YHsuY-HChouY-CChenH-Wet alHigh incidence of surgical site infection may be related to suboptimal case selection for non-selective arterial embolization during resuscitation of patients with pelvic fractures: a retrospective study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. (2020) 21:335. 10.1186/s12891-020-03372-5

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27.

  YasumuraKIkegamiKKamoharaTNoharaY. High incidence of ischemic necrosis of the gluteal muscle after transcatheter angiographic embolization for severe pelvic fracture. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. (2005) 58:985–90. 10.1097/01.TA.0000162625.63241.12

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28.

  TarkhanovABartalGDruzhinSShakhbazyanRGrebenevEKartashovM. Bladder wall and surrounding tissue necrosis following bilateral superselective embolization of internal iliac artery branches due to uncontrollable haematuria related to bladder tumor: case report. CVIR Endovasc. (2018) 1:34. 10.1186/s42155-018-0043-z

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29.

  LindvallEDavisJMartirosianAGarciaGHusakL. Bilateral internal iliac artery embolization results in an unacceptably high rate of complications in patients requiring pelvic/acetabular surgery. J Orthop Trauma. (2018) 32:445–51. 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001240

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30.

  RamirezJIVelmahosGCBestCRChanLSDemetriadesD. Male sexual function after bilateral internal iliac artery embolization for pelvic fracture. J Trauma. (2004) 56:734–41. 10.1097/01.ta.0000120287.04574.78

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31.

  GoussousNSawyerMDWuersmerL-AHuebnerMOsbornMLZielinskiMD. Comparison of sexual function and quality of life after pelvic trauma with and without angioembolization. Burns Trauma. (2015) 3:21. 10.1186/s41038-015-0022-8

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32.

  GulcanOMehmetSENurullahPSenemYTMehmetSI. Subsequent pregnancy outcomes and fertility rates in the case series that underwent bilateral hypogastric artery ligation (BHGAL) due to severe postpartum hemorrhage. Asian Pac J Reprod. (2024) 13:28–33. 10.4103/apjr.apjr_84_23

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar