Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pediatr.

Sec. Neonatology

Platelet-to-C-reactive Protein Ratio Stratifies Surgical Risk and Mortality in Necrotizing Enterocolitis Neonates with Portal Venous Gas

Provisionally accepted
Xinyin  ZhangXinyin Zhang1Huan  WeiHuan Wei1Qi  TanQi Tan1Zheng-Li  WangZheng-Li Wang1Zhenhua  GuoZhenhua Guo2Wei  LiuWei Liu2Jian  CaoJian Cao2*
  • 1Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Department of Neonatology, Chongqing, China
  • 2Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Department of General and Neonatal Surgery, Chongqing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Portal venous gas (PVG) represents a severe complication of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), typically signaling disease progression and poor prognosis. While traditionally regarded as an indication for surgical intervention in NEC, accumulating clinical evidence indicates that not all cases of PVG require operative management. Currently, surgical decision-making for NEC neonates with PVG primarily relies on physicians' subjective clinical assessments, resulting in substantial management uncertainty. The platelet-to-C-reactive protein ratio (PCR), an objective and convenient biomarker integrating information on disseminated intravascular coagulation and systemic inflammation, has demonstrated predictive value in neonatal sepsis and other conditions. However, its utility has not yet been explored in NEC-PVG patients. This study retrospectively evaluates the predictive value of PCR for surgical intervention and prognosis in this high-risk population, aiming to facilitate early identification and improve clinical outcomes. Methods: This retrospective single-center cohort study analyzed 186 neonates with NEC (Bell stage ≥IIa) and ultrasonographically confirmed PVG (2021 - 2024). We evaluated the PCR, calculated at PVG diagnosis, for predicting surgical intervention and 30-day mortality by employing multivariate logistic regression (with collinearity assessment and bootstrap validation) to identify independent factors and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to assess predictive performance and optimal cut-offs, supplemented by sensitivity analyses. Results: The cohort demonstrated a surgical intervention rate of 37.10% (69/186) and 30-day mortality of 13.98% (26/186). Multivariate analysis identified PCR as an independent predictor for both surgical intervention (aOR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.69 - 0.86) and mortality (aOR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.69 - 0.92). ROC curve analysis established PCR thresholds of ≤4.84×109/mg for surgical intervention (AUC 0.84; sensitivity 80%, specificity 85%) and ≤2.57×109/mg for mortality prediction (AUC 0.80; sensitivity 69%, specificity 91%). Conclusions: This study suggests that the PCR is a promising predictor of surgical intervention and mortality risk in NEC-PVG patients, with superior predictive performance compared to individual parameters. Based on these findings, we propose the incorporation of PCR testing into standard clinical monitoring protocols, using 4.84 × 109/mg as a potential cutoff value to inform therapeutic decision-making, which may improve clinical management and outcomes in this high-risk population.

Keywords: necrotizing enterocolitis, Portal venous gas, platelet-to-C-reactive protein ratio, Surgical intervention, Mortality

Received: 14 Aug 2025; Accepted: 28 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Wei, Tan, Wang, Guo, Liu and Cao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Jian Cao

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.