Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pediatr.

Sec. Pediatric Neurology

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvancements and Challenges in Speech, Language, Swallowing, Orofacial and Hearing Disorders ResearchView all 4 articles

Hospital-Family Collaborative DTT Intervention to Reduce the Parenting Stress through Improving Core Symptoms and Family Functioning in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Provisionally accepted
Mengqin  DaiMengqin Dai*Juan  LiJuan LiXiaohong  ChenXiaohong ChenLian  ChenLian ChenXiaocui  TangXiaocui TangHaixia  YuHaixia YuYun  QiuYun QiuYuwei  YangYuwei Yang
  • Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background and Objectives: Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) have emerged as a globally recognized public health concern. Currently, discrete trial teaching (DTT) is an effective intervention approach for ASD rehabilitation in hospitals. However, family-based interventions often yield limited outcomes. This study aims to develop a hospital-family collaborative DTT program guided by King's goal attainment theory, to support parents in delivering continuous and effective intervention within home environments. Method: This single-blind randomized controlled study included 84 children with ASD aged 1 to 6 years. Participants were stratified by gender and age and randomly assigned to either the experimental group (n=42) or the control group (n=42) using a random number table. The experimental group received a hospital-family collaborative DTT program, consisting of one month of hospital intervention followed by three months of family-based intervention, while the control group received standard DTT rehabilitation. Outcomes were assessed using the Gesell Developmental Schedules (GESELL), Parenting Stress Index-Short Form (PSI-SF), Family Assessment Device (FAD), along with DTT theoretical and skill evaluations. Results: Except that the PSI scores were unaffected by the intervention method, the GESELL, PSI, FAD, theoretical, and skill scores were significantly influenced by both intervention time (F=37.70–896.12, all P<0.001), intervention method (F=37.70–896.12, all P<0.001), and their interaction (F=5.83–75.27, all P<0.01). Partial correlation analysis revealed that improvements in parenting stress were initially linked to changes in "adaptive" items on the GESELL and FAD scales during the hospital intervention phase (Δ FAD. affective reaction: rpartial=0.225, P=0.043; Δ GESELL. adaptation behavior: rpartial=-0.290, P=0.009; Δ parental knowledge: rpartial=-0.432, P<0.001), followed by improvements in "behavioral" items during the family-based intervention phase (ΔFAD. problem-solving: rpartial=0.433, P<0.001; ΔGESELL. gross motor behavior: rpartial=-0.292, P=0.010; ΔGESELL. fine motor behavior: rpartial=-0.309, P=0.012; ΔGESELL. personal-social behavior: rpartial=-0.327, P=0.001). For all participants, extremely high levels of parenting stress were independently associated with FAD disorders (particularly in problem-solving, affective responsiveness, and affective involvement), child factors (including male, language disorder, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder),

Keywords: Autism Spectrum Disorders, Child, caregiver, Gesell Developmental Schedules, Parenting Stress Index, Family assessment device (FAD)

Received: 18 Sep 2025; Accepted: 21 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Dai, Li, Chen, Chen, Tang, Yu, Qiu and Yang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Mengqin Dai, daimengqin@sc-mch.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.