Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pediatr.

Sec. General Pediatrics and Pediatric Emergency Care

The CHANSE Score: A Novel Clinical Tool Incorporating the Heel Drop Test for the Diagnosis of Pediatric Appendicitis

Provisionally accepted
Min Kyo  ChunMin Kyo Chun1,2Jun Sung  ParkJun Sung Park1,2Dahyun  KimDahyun Kim1,2Jeeho  HanJeeho Han1,2Jeong-Yong  LeeJeong-Yong Lee1,2Jong Seung  LeeJong Seung Lee1,3Seung Jun  ChoiSeung Jun Choi1,2*
  • 1University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Songpa-gu, Republic of Korea
  • 2Department of Pediatrics, Asan Medical Center, Songpa-gu, Republic of Korea
  • 3Department of Emergency Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Songpa-gu, Republic of Korea

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Acute appendicitis is one of the most common abdominal surgical emergencies in children presenting to the emergency department. Although clinical guidelines emphasize combining symptom characteristics, physical examination findings, and inflammatory markers for accurate diagnosis, pediatric presentations are often atypical and overlap with other conditions. Classic physical signs such as the obturator, psoas, and Rovsing's signs have limited predictive value. The heel drop test has been reported to outperform rebound tenderness in detecting intraperitoneal inflammation, as it is more objective and less susceptible to misinterpretation. However, evidence regarding its diagnostic utility in appendicitis is limited, and its clinical application in pediatric patients has not been specifically examined. Objective: To evaluate the clinical utility of the heel drop test for diagnosing appendicitis in children and to develop a novel clinical scoring system that incorporates this test. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study at a tertiary pediatric emergency center between August 2021 and August 2023. Children with suspected appendicitis underwent standardized clinical and laboratory evaluation, including the heel drop test. Variables significantly associated with appendicitis were identified and used to create a new scoring system (CHANSE: CRP elevation, Heel drop test positivity, Anorexia, Nausea or vomiting, Shift to the left, Elevated WBC). Diagnostic performance was assessed and compared with the Pediatric Appendicitis Score (PAS) using ROC analysis. Results: Among 142 enrolled children, 84 were diagnosed with appendicitis. A positive heel drop test was significantly more common in the appendicitis group and showed diagnostic performance comparable to cough/percussion/hopping tenderness. The CHANSE score demonstrated superior diagnostic accuracy compared with PAS (AUC 0.794 vs. 0.763, p < 0.001). A CHANSE score ≥3 showed predictive characteristics similar to a PAS cutoff ≥7. Higher CHANSE scores were also associated with complicated appendicitis. Conclusion: The heel drop test is a useful and objective physical examination method for diagnosing pediatric appendicitis. The CHANSE score, which incorporates this test, is a simple and reliable tool with diagnostic performance comparable to or better than PAS. It may also assist in identifying complicated appendicitis and support timely clinical decision-making.

Keywords: Appendicitis, clinical scoring system, Heel Drop Test, pediatric, Emergency Department (ED)

Received: 14 Oct 2025; Accepted: 26 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Chun, Park, Kim, Han, Lee, Lee and Choi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Seung Jun Choi

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.